Richard MarcianoChien-Yi Hou Caryn Wojcik University of University of State of Michigan North Carolina North Carolina Records Management ServicesSALT DCAPE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OGF-23 iRODS Metadata Grid File System Reagan Moore San Diego Supercomputer Center.
Advertisements

Digital Preservation A Matter of Trust. Context * As of March 5, 2011.
An Introduction to Repositories Thornton Staples Director of Community Strategy and Alliances Director of the Fedora Project.
Presentation by Priyanka Sawarkar
Fedora Users’ Conference Rutgers University May 14, 2005 Researching Fedora's Ability to Serve as a Preservation System for Electronic University Records.
Institutional Repositories It’s not Just the Technology New England Archivists Boston College March 11, 2006 Eliot Wilczek University Records Manager Tufts.
Transformations at GPO: An Update on the Government Printing Office's Future Digital System George Barnum Coalition for Networked Information December.
PREMIS in Thought: Data Center for LC Digital Holdings Ardys Kozbial, Arwen Hutt, David Minor February 11, 2008.
Sustainable Preservation Services for Archivists through Distributed Custody Caryn Wojcik State of Michigan Records Management Services.
KEEP Project Overview House Government Efficiency Committee March 14, 2012 Matt Veatch State Archivist & KEEP Project Manager
Towards a Federated Infrastructure for the Preservation and Analysis Archival Data Chien-Yi HOU Richard MARCIANO {chienyi, School.
DCAPE Project Update Richard MarcianoChien-Yi Hou Caryn Wojcik University of University of State of Michigan North Carolina North Carolina Records Management.
Chronopolis: Preserving Our Digital Heritage David Minor UC San Diego San Diego Supercomputer Center.
Richard MARCIANO Chien-Yi HOU School of Information and Library Science (SILS) Sustainable Archives & Leveraging Technologies Group (SALT) University of.
DCAPE Distributed Custodial Archival Preservation Environments ( Chien-Yi HOU Richard MARCIANO UNC Chapel Hill, SILS /
PAWN: A Novel Ingestion Workflow Technology for Digital Preservation
THE RUTGERS WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Mary Beth Weber Cataloging and Metadata Services Rutgers University Libraries August 3, 2007.
Working Together Revisited: Diverse Skills for Sustainability Robert P. Spindler Arizona State University December 5 th, 2006.
PAWN: Producer-Archive Workflow Network University of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies Joseph JaJa, Mike Smorul, Mike McGann.
Richard MARCIANO Chien-Yi HOU School of Information and Library Science (SILS) Sustainable Archives & Leveraging Technologies Group (SALT) University of.
Persistent Digital Archives and Library System (PeDALS) South Carolina Department of Archives and History.
1 From Filing Cabinet to Desktop and Network: Records Management in N.C. State Government Ed Southern Government Records Branch N.C. Office of Archives.
Persistent Digital Archives and Library System (PeDALS) A Guide for Wisconsin State Agencies.
DCC Conference, Glasgow November, Digital Archive Policies and Trusted Digital Repositories MacKenzie Smith, MIT Libraries Reagan Moore, San Diego.
Preserving Electronic Mailing Lists: The H-Net Archive H-Net Mapped to the OAIS Model Preservation AssessmentPreservation improvementsOverview How H-Net.
San Diego Supercomputer CenterUniversity of California, San Diego Preservation Research Roadmap Reagan W. Moore San Diego Supercomputer Center
USING METADATA TO FACILITATE UNDERSTANDING AND CERTIFICATION ABOUT THE PRESERVATION PROPERTIES OF A PRESERVATION SYSTEM Jewel H. Ward, Hao Xu, Mike C.
Persistent Digital Archives and Library System (PeDALS) SC Department of Archives and History.
Rule-Based Data Management Systems Reagan W. Moore Wayne Schroeder Mike Wan Arcot Rajasekar {moore, schroede, mwan, {moore, schroede, mwan,
OAIS in the Library Environment Managing and Preserving Electronic Resources FLICC/CENDI Washington DC, December 11,2001 Anne Van Camp RLG, Member Initiatives.
Production Data Grids SRB - iRODS Storage Resource Broker Reagan W. Moore
Dermot Frost Digital Repository of Ireland Trinity College Dublin.
1 Schema Registries Steven Hughes, Lou Reich, Dan Crichton NASA 21 October 2015.
Libraries, Archives, and Digital Preservation: The Reality of What We Must Do Leslie Johnston Acting Director, National Digital Information Infrastructure.
GeoMAPP: Using Metadata to Help Preserve Geospatial Content Matt Peters, Utah’s Automated Geographic Reference Center Glen McAninch, Kentucky Department.
Rule-Based Preservation Systems Reagan W. Moore Wayne Schroeder Mike Wan Arcot Rajasekar Richard Marciano {moore, schroede, mwan, sekar,
Archival Workshop on Ingest, Identification, and Certification Standards Certification (Best Practices) Checklist Does the archive have a written plan.
Persistent Digital Archives and Library System (PeDALS)
Selene Dalecky March 20, 2007 FDsys: GPO’s Digital Content System.
OAIS Rathachai Chawuthai Information Management CSIM / AIT Issued document 1.0.
How to Implement an Institutional Repository: Part II A NASIG 2006 Pre-Conference May 4, 2006 Technical Issues.
NDSR Boston webinar: Digital Preservation Introduction Presenter: Nancy Y McGovern October 2015.
The Project Three-year grant from the National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC), April 2010-March 2013 Develop electronic records.
Fedora and the Preservation of University Electronic Records Project NHPRC Electronic Records Research Grant Kevin L. Glick Manuscripts and Archives, Yale.
Preserving Electronic Mailing Lists as Scholarly Resources: The H-Net Archives Lisa M. Schmidt
©MIT LKTR Workshop, Digital Archive Policies and Trusted Digital Repositories MacKenzie Smith, MIT Libraries Reagan Moore, San Diego Supercomputer.
Aligning Digital Preservation Policies with Community Standards Nancy McGovern Digital Preservation Officer.
Managing Access at the University of Oregon : a Case Study of Scholars’ Bank by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
Institutional Repositories July 2007 DIGITAL CURATION creating, managing and preserving digital objects Dr D Peters DISA Digital Innovation South.
National Archives and Records Administration1 Integrated Rules Ordered Data System (“IRODS”) Technology Research: Digital Preservation Technology in a.
Collection Management Systems
Infrastructure Breakout What capacities should we build now to manage data and migrate it over the future generations of technologies, standards, formats,
1 Documentation Progression Send To Standard Document Library Document Center – Drop Off Library – Rules Based on Content Type and Metadata routes files.
The OAIS model SEEDS meeting May 5 th, 2015, Lausanne Bojana Tasic.
Strategic Repurposing for Sustainable Access. Mission Statement The North Carolina State Archives, Archives and Records Section is part of the North Carolina.
Building Preservation Environments with Data Grid Technology Reagan W. Moore Presenter: Praveen Namburi.
Use of Policies to Enforce Collection Properties Richard Marciano Reagan Moore University of North Chapel Hill Data Intensive Cyber Environments.
Developing a Dark Archive for OJS Journals Yu-Hung Lin, Metadata Librarian for Continuing Resources, Scholarship and Data Rutgers University 1 10/7/2015.
Digital Preservation Initiatives in the United States A Summary Deanna B. Marcum.
Discover ScholarSphere A repository service collaboration between the University Libraries and ITS.
Current as of April/May 2013
Building A Repository for Digital Objects
An Introduction to Tessella and The Safety Deposit Box Platform
Policy-Based Data Management integrated Rule Oriented Data System
DCAPE Interface Demonstration
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part II
Research data preservation in Canada
Institutional Repositories
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part II
How to Implement an Institutional Repository: Part II
Presentation transcript:

Richard MarcianoChien-Yi Hou Caryn Wojcik University of University of State of Michigan North Carolina North Carolina Records Management ServicesSALT DCAPE PROJECT

NHPRC ISSUED A CALL… Design a digital preservation service with a business model for the archival community Fill the needs of archival repositories that cannot build and sustain their own electronic records archive

DCAPE PROJECT Distributed Custodial Archival Preservation Environments Project funded by NHPRC in 2008 (RE ) Officially started in December 2008 Project ended March

WHAT IS DISTRIBUTED CUSTODIAL PRESERVATION? Physical custody of archival collections is distributed outside of the archival repository (owner) to a trusted preservation service Owner retains legal custody Owner remains responsible for archival functions, including preservation and access Access to collections is controlled by owner

DCAPE PARTNERS 28 people across 9 institutions and 2 staff at UNC, for a total of 32 participants Cultural Entity: Getty Research Institute Cyberinfrastructure: West Virginia University, Carleton University (Canada) State Archives: California, Kansas, Michigan, Kentucky, North Carolina, New York State Library: North Carolina University Archives: Tufts UNC: School of Information and Library Science (SILS), Sustainable Archives and Leveraging Technologies (SALT)

DCAPE GOALS Build a preservation environment that meets the needs of archival repositories for trusted archival preservation services. Services are based on policies (rules) that are defined by the archivist Over 250 rules have been developed for the iRODS library that can be leveraged for DCAPE A series of rules might “look” like this: When files are ingested, replicate them in three different locations and run a checksum on each file. Bit-check files every month. Send an alert about any changes to the files.

DCAPE GOALS The trusted digital repository infrastructure will be assembled from state-of-the-art rule-based data management systems, commodity storage systems, and sustainable preservation services The software infrastructure will automate many of the administrative tasks associated with the management of archival repositories Tasks will include: authentication, replication, migration, obsolete file management, preservation metadata management, etc.

PROJECT TASKS Execute service agreements between UNC and partners to govern use of the test collections Define rules and services (organized according to the OAIS framework) for iRODS to perform on test collections Ingest test collections into iRODS and validate the rules and services Develop business model (including costs) for sustaining a repository service based on iRODS Develop model service agreements that define the standard and optional services of the repository

ROLE OF IRODS Preservation environment provides rule-based automation of archival functions (repeatable services) Standard and optional services will be available Shared service should reduce costs for each archival repository, compared to the cost of building in-house preservation capabilities

DCAPE BUSINESS MODEL Non-profit Fees for services Fees for storage Storage and disaster prevention services Software maintenance Access and connectivity

DCAPE INTERFACE PlatformNavigationLoginAudit TrailAppearanceReporting Batch Operations Screen Views

DCAPE METADATA MODEL Employ modified Dublin Core model Follow OAIS model Allow customization Encourage standardization Define Source: creator, system, archivist Level: collection, accretion, item Accessibility: internal vs. public Field Status: Required vs. optional

AUDIT TRAIL Tracks activities and actions by users System generated metadata in the metadata model Supports authenticity of collections and records Documents preservation activities by archivists Essential function of a “trusted digital repository” iRODS can log the information at the system and user level Interface will allow views of the relevant audit trail data from various screens Data can be exported to PREMIS format, if necessary

DCAPE WORKFLOW Define functionality at each stage Virtual Loading Dock Pre-accessioning Ingestion Preservation Area Archival storage Data management Administration Preservation planning Reference Room Access Common services Management Each activity is mapped to the metadata model

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Identify user roles Define duties of users assigned to that role Roles Governance Team Director System Administrator Account Administrator Archival Administrator Accessioning Archivist Processing Archivist Reference Archivist Archival Researcher

SECURITY AND PERMISSIONS Define the actions that a user can perform Based upon their role Based upon the collections they have access to Linked to the user’s login Permissions Add/Create/Upload/Modify/View/Delete/Open/Close/Export/ Replicate Security Groups/Users Collections/Records

MORE INFORMATION