Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?. FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76*

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Radio Maria World. 2 Postazioni Transmitter locations.
Advertisements

Números.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
SKELETAL QUIZ 3.
PDAs Accept Context-Free Languages
/ /17 32/ / /
Reflection nurulquran.com.
EuroCondens SGB E.
Worksheets.
Slide 1Fig 26-CO, p.795. Slide 2Fig 26-1, p.796 Slide 3Fig 26-2, p.797.
Democracy Deferred: W.E.B. Du Bois I sit with Shakespeare and he flinches not (Political Science 565)
STATISTICS Linear Statistical Models
Addition and Subtraction Equations
Disability status in Ethiopia in 1984, 1994 & 2007 population and housing sensus Ehete Bekele Seyoum ESA/STAT/AC.219/25.
By John E. Hopcroft, Rajeev Motwani and Jeffrey D. Ullman
September 10, Overview The purpose of the presentation is to provide an update on the status of the opening of school. The purpose of the presentation.
Western Public Lands Grazing: The Real Costs Explore, enjoy and protect the planet Forest Guardians Jonathan Proctor.
EQUS Conference - Brussels, June 16, 2011 Ambros Uchtenhagen, Michael Schaub Minimum Quality Standards in the field of Drug Demand Reduction Parallel Session.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
Ninth Grade Distribution All Students = 301 (100%) (less level 1 & 2 students) (less level 3 students in full transition) (less students in full.
FY2007 FCAT SSS. Grade 3 FCAT SSS Reading Percent Level 1 All Students Tested.
2007 ITBS/ ITED Results Cedar Rapids Community Schools.
CHAPTER 18 The Ankle and Lower Leg
Summative Math Test Algebra (28%) Geometry (29%)
ASCII stands for American Standard Code for Information Interchange
The 5S numbers game..
突破信息检索壁垒 -SciFinder Scholar 介绍
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Numerical Analysis 1 EE, NCKU Tien-Hao Chang (Darby Chang)
The basics for simulations
© 2010 Concept Systems, Inc.1 Concept Mapping Methodology: An Example.
Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2013 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.
Algebra & Fcts. Trace Items Algebra & Fcts. Trace Items Fall 2007 ISTEP+ Grades Bob Trammel Math Consultant (260)
Figure 3–1 Standard logic symbols for the inverter (ANSI/IEEE Std
1 Prediction of electrical energy by photovoltaic devices in urban situations By. R.C. Ott July 2011.
Dynamic Access Control the file server, reimagined Presented by Mark on twitter 1 contents copyright 2013 Mark Minasi.
What if you knew exactly what kids need to succeed? What if you knew exactly what kids need to succeed?
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
CSE 6007 Mobile Ad Hoc Wireless Networks
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
LN-251 SimINERTIAL Performance
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
2.10% more children born Die 0.2 years sooner Spend 95.53% less money on health care No class divide 60.84% less electricity 84.40% less oil.
Foundation Stage Results CLL (6 or above) 79% 73.5%79.4%86.5% M (6 or above) 91%99%97%99% PSE (6 or above) 96%84%100%91.2%97.3% CLL.
Subtraction: Adding UP
OPSB & RSD LEAP/GEE Scores in Context Cowen Institute for Public Education Initiatives Tulane University May 2008.
Numeracy Resources for KS2
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
The Effect of Peloid Application in Out-patient Setting on Knee Osteoarthritis Results of a Pilot Study E Odabaşı, R Tekin, H Erdem, İ.Şimşek, M Turan.
2.4 Bases de Dados Estudo de Caso. Caso: Caixa Eletrônico Caixa Eletrônico com acesso à Base de Dados; Cada cliente possui:  Um número de cliente  Uma.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
ANALYTICAL GEOMETRY ONE MARK QUESTIONS PREPARED BY:
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Lial/Hungerford/Holcomb/Mullins: Mathematics with Applications 11e Finite Mathematics with Applications 11e Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Take any two digit number between 11 to Add the numbers (Example: Number 54 : 5+4=9). 2. Now subtract the answer from original number (i.e. 54-9=45,
UNDERSTANDING THE ISSUES. 22 HILLSBOROUGH IS A REALLY BIG COUNTY.
A Data Warehouse Mining Tool Stephen Turner Chris Frala
Chart Deception Main Source: How to Lie with Charts, by Gerald E. Jones Dr. Michael R. Hyman, NMSU.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
2007 COOPERATIVE INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAM (CIRP) First-Year Student Survey Profile Administered August 2007 West Chester University of Pennsylvania.
Introduction Embedded Universal Tools and Online Features 2.
úkol = A 77 B 72 C 67 D = A 77 B 72 C 67 D 79.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Presentation transcript:

Is Floridas School Grading System Biased?

FY2007 Relationship (r) between SAR Results and % Federal Lunch HS R HS M HS W HS S RGMGLR G LM G PT S ES -0.85*-0.79*-0.32*-0.80*-0.60*-0.34*-0.36*-0.07*-0.76* MS -0.89*-0.87*-0.51*-0.88*-0.69*-0.75*-0.17*-0.39*-0.87* HS -0.80*-0.82*-0.54*-0.74*-0.66*-0.61* * * Indicates statistical significance.

FY2007 High Standards Reading by % Federal Lunch Elementary Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 High Standards Reading by % Federal Lunch Middle Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 High Standards Reading by % Federal Lunch High Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 High Standards Math by % Federal Lunch Elementary Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 High Standards Math by % Federal Lunch Middle Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 High Standards Math by % Federal Lunch High Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 High Standard Writing by % Federal Lunch Elementary Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 High Standard Writing by % Federal Lunch Middle Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 High Standard Writing by % Federal Lunch High Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 High Standards Science by % Federal Lunch Elementary Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 High Standards Science by % Federal Lunch Middle Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 High Standards Science by % Federal Lunch High Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 Reading Gains by % Federal Lunch Elementary Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 Reading Gains by % Federal Lunch Middle Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 Reading Gains by % Federal Lunch High Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 Math Gains by % Federal Lunch Elementary Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 Math Gains by % Federal Lunch Middle Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 Math Gains by % Federal Lunch High Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 Low 25% Reading Gains by % Federal Lunch Elementary Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 Low 25% Reading Gains by % Federal Lunch Middle Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 Low 25% Reading Gains by % Federal Lunch High Schools r = 0.03 Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT

FY2007 Low 25% Math Gains by % Federal Lunch Elementary Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 Low 25% Math Gains by % Federal Lunch Middle Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 Low 25% Math Gains by % Federal Lunch High Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT

FY2007 Points by % Federal Lunch Elementary Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 Points by % Federal Lunch Middle Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

FY2007 Points by % Federal Lunch High Schools r = Percent Federal Lunch PERCENTPERCENT Significant

2007 Elementary School Grades by Federal Lunch

2007 Middle School Grades by Federal Lunch

2007 High School Grades by Federal Lunch