National Science Foundation Human Resources Outcome Indicators: Approaches and Prospects Colloquium on Measuring the Impacts of Science June 17-18, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2006 POPULATION REFERENCE BUREAU Marlene A. Lee Senior Policy Analyst Domestic Programs 300 MILLION AND COUNTING Education and Workforce: The Critical.
Advertisements

House Committee on Workforce and Technical Skills February 20, 2001.
STEM ACTION CENTER HB 150 Applied Science 7 th and 8 th Grade STEM Pathways and Certification.
Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.
Rochester STEM High School Kathleen Denaro, Principal Molly Schleigh, NAF Coordinator.
Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) Interrelated surveys conducted annually by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
Broader Impacts: Meaningful Links between Research and Societal Benefits October 23, 2014 Martin Storksdieck I Center for Research on Lifelong STEM Learning.
Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) in Engineering Program Engineering Education NSF Awardees Conference-Sept , 2007 Mary Poats, Program Manager-RET.
The Educonomy: A Framework for Creating Complete Workforce Solutions July 10, 2009 Dr. Teresa Chasteen, President & CEO Worldwide Interactive Network (WIN)
Cross-Cutting and Special Interest Programs NSF Regional Grants Conference October 4 - 5, 2004 St. Louis, MO Hosted by: Washington University.
NSF Research Proposal Review Guidelines. Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity.
Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney Division of Environmental Biology
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Careers Conference 2009 January 26, LONG-TERM EMPLOYMENT OUTLOOK Presenter: Victoria Udalova, Economist Office of Economic Advisors WI Department.
U.S. Science Policy Cheryl L. Eavey, Program Director
Survey of Earned Doctorates National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics Mark Fiegener, Ph.D. Presentation to Clemson University.
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
Jobs and Unemployment. When you have completed your study of this chapter, you will be able to C H A P T E R C H E C K L I S T Define the unemployment.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
How to improve the appeal of research career to university graduates? Eero Vuorio University of Turku Finland.
NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program November 2007 Major Research Instrumentation EPSCoR PI Meeting November 6-9,
Working Toward a Statewide Information System to Track the Effectiveness of Student Aid Financial Programs in Maryland Michael J. Keller Director of Policy.
Marketing BY: CHEREESE LANGLEY. Nature of work Formulate, direct and coordinate marketing activities and policies to promote products and services, working.
Top Myths about Future Employment in IT. Society for Information Management 2 Why We are Here The understanding of simple economic principles has sent.
1 Sustaining Technical Programs The NSF’s Advanced Technological Education Program and American Competitiveness Mike Lesiecki, MATEC A Member of the Academic.
Growth Firms Project Chris Parsley, Manager Small Business Policy Branch Industry Canada From Data to Research for Policy OECD Growth Firms Meeting.
The Canadian Occupational Projection System Gilles Bérubé Labour Market Research and Forecasting Division Human Resources and Skills Development Canada.
Plus 50 and Completion: Returns and Strategies AACC 91 st Annual Convention April 11, 2011, New Orleans.
Data Sources on the STEM Workforce Dixie Sommers Assistant Commissioner August 1, 2011.
Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage
BIRDS Jeannette M. Wing Assistant Director for Computer and Information Science and Engineering National Science Foundation June 22, 2010.
WE ARE A COMPLEX LAND. MASLOW’S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS DESIRE TO HELP OTHERS MEANING TO LIFE ESTEEM NEEDS RECOGNITION & APPRECIATION BELONGINGNESS AND LOVE.
Company LOGO Broader Impacts Sherita Moses-Whitlow 07/09/09.
1 Division of Science Resources Statistics The Complex National Effects of High- Skilled Migration Council for Foreign Relations New York, NY February.
9/7/2015Division of Undergraduate Education Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) Program Bert Holmes
Chapter 1 The Customer Service Profession
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Education & Training Requirements of Jobs in the U.S. Linda Morris-Henry Foundations of Career and Workforce Education EVT 7066 October 20, 2008.
DIGEST OF KEY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING INDICATORS 2008 Presentation Slides National Science Board.
Social Sciences and the Humanities Data in the United States National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics Dr. Lynda T. Carlson.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Sandra H. Harpole February 6,2012.  Dr. George Hazzelrigg ◦ Competitive Proposal Writing ◦
Superintendent’s Panel on Excellence in Adult Education.
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
The University System of Ohio: A Partner in Ohio’s Economic Development Stephanie Davidson, PhD Interim Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs and System.
Higher Education and the Workforce  What’s the need?  What’s our response? 2002 Annual Meeting Roderick G. W. Chu Ohio Board of Regents.
1 The international mobility of researchers: recent trends and policy initiatives Ester Basri Science and Technology Policy Division Contact:
Promoting Diversity at the Graduate Level in Mathematics: A National Forum MSRI October 16, 2008 Deborah Lockhart Executive Officer, Division of Mathematical.
ANZAM WORKSHOP 2009 Peter Noonan. Framework for Review Terms of Reference Excluded innovation and research which was to be dealt with in Cutler Review.
Identification of national S&T priority areas with respect to the promotion of innovation and economic growth: the case of Russia Alexander Sokolov State.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
The national system of qualifications and interests of the stakeholders in the development of higher education Rimma Seidakhmetova Bologna Process and.
Mapping New Strategies: National Science Foundation J. HicksNew York Academy of Sciences4 April 2006 Examples from our daily life at NSF Vision Opportunities.
Funding Caroline Wardle Senior Science Advisor, CISE Directorate National Science Foundation
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
National Science Foundation Division of Science Resources Statistics An Overview of the Science and Engineering Labor Force (With some emphasis on IT)
State Higher Education Executive Officers Multi-State Longitudinal Data Exchange WICHE’s 4-State Pilot 2011 National Forum – PPI Committee.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin© 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1-1.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
“CareerGuide for Schools”
David W. Mogk Dept. of Earth Sciences Montana State University
Career Outcomes for Higher Education Graduates
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
Gulf States Math Alliance 2019 Conference
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

National Science Foundation Human Resources Outcome Indicators: Approaches and Prospects Colloquium on Measuring the Impacts of Science June 17-18, 2004 Montreal, Canada Rolf Lehming Division of Science Resources Statistics, National Science Foundation NOTE: The views expressed are those of the author and do not represent the position of the National Science Foundation. No endorsement by the National Science Foundation should be inferred.

National Science Foundation Two types of research output  New knowledge in the form of research results, methodological advances, conceptual breakthroughs  People who have gained substantive, conceptual, methodological and tacit knowledge along with a perspective on science and research  Both can theoretically be traced and analyzed  Bibliometrics as knowledge output proxy  Graduate enrollment, advanced degrees, and postdocs as proxies Human Resources Outcome Indicators

National Science Foundation Longer-term research outcomes  Individuals’ research experiences and encounters with science may yield outcomes like  An appreciation of the scientific perspective  An openness to empirical inquiry  The acquisition of specific skills  The sum of these individual outcomes may yield  A technically sophisticated population and workforce  An educated citizenry able to deal with the science and technology components of public policy issues Human Resources Outcome Indicators

National Science Foundation NSF Strategic Goals  “People” as one of NSF’s four Strategic Performance Goals  (along with “Ideas,” “Tools” and “Administration and Management”)  The strategic “People” outcome goal is to develop a workforce of scientists and engineers that is  Diverse, internationally competitive, and globally engaged  And to develop well-prepared [scientifically literate?] citizens  The plan includes annual performance goals and prospective and retrospective reporting foci Human Resources Outcome Indicators

National Science Foundation NSF Administrative Data Number of people involved in NSF’s activities FY2002 FY2003 FY2004 _____________________ Actual Estimated Estimated Senior researchers 28,960 29,820 30,590 Other professionals 12,060 12,180 12,640 Postdoctoral associates 5,740 6,060 6,170 Graduate students 26,170 27,440 28,690 Undergraduate students 34,250 32,710 36,350 K-12 students 11,460 13,640 14,640 K-12 teachers 84,710 85,460 86,830 Total number of people 203, , ,910 Human Resources Outcome Indicators

National Science Foundation NSF Administrative Data  These figures are compiled from proposal budgets estimating number and types of people involved  Limited personal information is captured about the principal investigator(s) only  NSF asks principal investigators to fill in, as part of project closeout, a matrix of project participants by type of position and demographic characteristics  Submission is voluntary and compliance variable  Figures do not include the almost 200,000 reviewers of the 30,000-plus proposals NSF receives annually Human Resources Outcome Indicators

National Science Foundation NSF Administrative Data  The data provide approximate estimates of the number of people “reached,” in some fashion, by NSF funds or, in the case of peer reviewers, by NSF programs  These initial project estimates  are not exact  cannot be aggregated over time (the same persons may be counted in 2, 3, or more adjacent years)  in their current form invite no further analytical use Human Resources Outcome Indicators

National Science Foundation NSF’s Strategic People Goal  NSF discussion about requiring investigators to supply demographic and contact information for project participants to allow use for  Tracking of careers  Studies of (scientific) productivity  Program assessments Human Resources Outcome Indicators

National Science Foundation NSF’s Strategic People Goal  NSF declined for reasons including.(???)  Concern about PI response burden  Feasibility and legality (informed consent, university role)  Rules for establishing and maintaining Federal Systems of Records  Confidentiality and privacy concerns Human Resources Outcome Indicators

National Science Foundation NSF’s Strategic People Goal  NSF emphasizes HR output and outcomes in proposal guidelines  “Proposals must describe … the broader impacts resulting from the proposed activities …”  Integration of research and education  Participation of underrepresented groups  Infrastructure enhancement such as facilities, instrumentation, networks, partnerships  Enhancement of scientific and technological understanding  Potential benefits of the activity to society at large Human Resources Outcome Indicators

National Science Foundation NSF’s Strategic People Goal  NSF also emphasizes the importance of HR output and outcomes in reviewer instructions  Reviewers are instructed to address both merit review criteria  Intellectual merit of the proposed activity  Broader impacts [i.e., as described before]  Response to the broader-impacts criterion by proposal submitters and reviewers has been uneven  NSF has begun returning some proposals  NSF has repeatedly urged reviewers to address the second criterion Human Resources Outcome Indicators

National Science Foundation NSF Surveys  Three biennial surveys of individuals who have at least a bachelor’s degree in science, engineering, or math or work in an S&E occupation  National Survey of College Graduates samples people with a bachelor’s or higher degree drawn from decennial U.S. Census, then followed up  National Survey of Recent College Graduates samples those with newly awarded S&E degrees  Survey of Doctorate Recipients draws a sample from a census of recipients of U.S. S&E doctorates  Integrated into the Scientists and Engineers Statistical Data System (SESTAT) Human Resources Outcome Indicators

National Science Foundation NSF Surveys  Extensive demographic, educational, work-related, and personal information  Permits some outcome-related analyses including  Expansion of S&E occupations in the labor force (4 times faster growth than total LF over 2 decades)  Tracking of S&E degree holders into occupations not classified as science or engineering  High degree of relatedness of job, training  May indicate growing technical requirements of the economy  For individuals, education and career histories Human Resources Outcome Indicators

National Science Foundation NSF Surveys  Outcome type variables but only inferred link to input, output items  Other limitations include  Expanded NAICS coding but aggregating up in analyses and barring of firm-level reporting  Limited ability to do productivity studies because of the paucity of output indicators  Matching with data from external sources faces serious difficulties  No ability to address citizenship competency issues  Separate survey on public attitudes Human Resources Outcome Indicators

National Science Foundation Other NSF Survey  Survey of Industrial Research and Development  25,000 firms, 2 personnel items  total payroll employment  Estimated FTE number of scientists and engineers working on R&D  Excludes social sciences and psychology  Analyses of the distribution of FTE researchers by firm sector and characteristics including R&D volume  In principle, trends in use of researchers across industries  No human resources detail available Human Resources Outcome Indicators

National Science Foundation Non-NSF Surveys  The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Occupational Employment Survey  Tracking of trends in S&E occupations at industry level in the framework of total employment  Potential to develop comparable state-level estimates (technical issues to be resolved)  Potential outcome indicators on changing size, composition, location of high-technology segments of the economy  BLS defines high-tech industries by S&E jobs percentage at least twice that of the average for all industries. Human Resources Outcome Indicators

National Science Foundation Bottom Line and a Note  These surveys provide some means of estimating the size and some composition of the S&E workforce  All surveys but Industrial R&D Survey have only implied link of outcomes to inputs and outputs (except education inputs)  Limited ability to conduct in-depth panel analyses of career patterns in the context of the total labor market  Limited ability to conduct productivity studies  A note on intergenerational social mobility  Valued mark of an open society  Education traditionally a strong factor  Role of science? Human Resources Outcome Indicators