Master Plan for Services to English Learners Oxnard School District Bilingual Coordinators’ Network March 20, 2009 Sacramento, CA Norm Gold Associates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. LOCAL.
The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
Campus Improvement Plans
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) Implementation Mary Richter MO SW-PBS State Coordinator.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Purpose of the ELA/ELD Framework
VCOE Curriculum Council NGSS Update December 4 th, 2014.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Katherine Kingston EDLD May 15, 2011 This presentation will see just how well Galena Park ISD’s technology plan compares with the National.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
NCES Forum July 2010 Kathy Gosa Kansas State Department of Education Using Forum Products to Establish a Solid SLDS Framework.
Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) The Albany Marriott Albany, New York September 15, 2010.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Stakeholder Forum D300 Strategic Plan Overview Fred Heid, Superintendent.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction Implementation of the California English Language Development Standards Sandra Covarrubias, Education.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
New Diploma Implementation Project Plan Presented to the State Board of Education May 17, 2007.
Principal Professional Development September 26, SUSD Common Core PD 2013.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Resources for School and District Planning August 15, 2014.
ISSRC Update for BISD Staff  Instructional  Support  Services  Review  Committee February 2, 2015 Services covered: Special Education Title I / LAP.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Cambrian School District Board of Education Presentation April 3, 2014 Local Educational Agency Plan (LEAP)
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Session 3 CPDP Formulation Process Project for Capacity Development for Implementing the Organic Law at the Capital and Provincial Level (PILAC 2)
TECHNOLOGY USE PLAN INFORMATIONAL LETTER: 7 POLICY CODE: IJND Technology Planning Guidelines July 26, 2002.
Six Keys to Managing Successful Programs for LEP Students NABE 2006 Phoenix, Arizona Norm Gold Sacramento, California Copyright.
Sacramento Area Council of Governments ITS Partnership Meeting February 2, 2005.
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Administrators Academy November 8, Improved learning Each child Each teacher Each administrator Each parent No exceptions No excuses.
ARTS EDUCATION in GEORGIA. Georgia Council for the Arts MISSION The mission of Georgia Council for the Arts is to cultivate the growth of vibrant, thriving.
Needs Assessment: Conducting, Completing and Aligning with the Budget November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker, ESE Worcester Public Schools: Gregg Barres, Manager.
RUSD’s Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Stakeholders Meeting #1 April 13, 2015 Initial Overview.
CCRESA Rubric Presentation Jeni Corn, Malinda Faber, Friday Institute, NC State University.
Diploma Implementation Advisory Task Force September 26, 2006.
External Review Exit Report Towns County School System October 4-7, 2015.
Achieving More with An Assessment Inventory Neil GuptaWorthington City Schools Cathy HeidelbergEducational Service Center of Central Ohio Devin AndersonBuckeye.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California English Language Development Test (CELDT) Program.
Implementing NVACS The State Role. State Law NRS NRS NRS
The Day in the Life of OFPSI staff By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs & School Improvement (OFPSI) Petersburg City Public Schools.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
California and the Every Student Succeeds Act
California and the Every Student Succeeds Act
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
English Learner Strategic Plan
District Overarching Goals Achievements
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
Family Engagement Coordinator Meeting July 25, 2018
ACTION PLAN Texas Association for Bilingual Education
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
PI-34 (It is 3-4, not 34).
Integrating Human Rights and Gender Equality in Evaluation –Towards UNEG Guidance Update title Presentation by UNEG HR/GE Task Force.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Master Plan for Services to English Learners Oxnard School District Bilingual Coordinators’ Network March 20, 2009 Sacramento, CA Norm Gold Associates

Today we’ll provide: 1)An overview of a collaborative process for development of a district master plan for English learners. 2)Example of the new Oxnard School District Master Plan for Services to English Learners in print and in electronic versions.

Purposes of Master Plan Provide an operational guide for teachers, administrators, counselors, para-educators, clerks and others. Guide the implementation of outstanding programs for English learners, and ensure that these programs achieve the district’s goals for ELs. Ensure operation of programs that are optimally- effective.

A Master Plan Should Include goals for ELs to reach linguistic, academic and cultural proficiency. Be consistent with local board policies, strategic plan and the district’s Local Educational Agency Plan (LEAP). Cover all necessary elements of state and federal law.

For most benefit All personnel engaged in EL programs should use this plan frequently. We want administrators, teachers and others to refer to its pages in print and on the internet for specific guidance on how to deliver the EL programs. To “be on the same page,” we need a page to be on!

Aims of EL Master Plan Development Project 1. Use the master plan project to build district-wide capacity and a sustainable system of EL services. 2. Ensure coherent, cohesive and effective programs for all English learners.

Development Phases (Eight to 20 months) 1.0 Planning 2.0 Drafts and Revision 3.0 Final Draft and Adoption 4.0 Roll-Out and PD 5.0 Evaluate, Revise, Improve

Our Collaborative Process STEP 1: Form Task Force of Stakeholders teachers, administrators, board members parents, community members college and university and local city representatives students in unified and high school districts –Monthly facilitated task force meetings Eight to ten Meetings are conducted in Spanish and English Materials provided in Spanish and English

STEP 2: Build a common foundational knowledge –Identify characteristics of ideal master plan –Set goals for English Learners –Review past practice in the district –Review EL research on systems, structure, instruction –Confirm understanding of state and federal requirements –Conduct small and large working group discussions of specific content and chapters.

STEP 3: The work of the task force –The stakeholders consider several partial and complete drafts. –A complete draft is disseminated throughout district. Feedback from staff, parents and others informs task force final deliberations. –Task force develops consensus on final draft to be submitted to the Superintendent. STEP 4: District staff and superintendent review and forward a final version to local board for adoption. STEP 5: Final plan is prepared for print and electronic versions.

Products Board-approved master plan Design and formatting for print and electronic publication. Design and formatting of forms, form letters and other materials for an electronic forms repository –all available from a web-site designed to be consistent with the printed master plan.

Professional Development The plan is only of value if supported by thorough roll- out and extensive Professional Development. Design activities and materials for multi-faceted PD, aimed to ensure thorough implementation. Include all staff and other stakeholders.

The New Oxnard SD Master Plan for Services to English Learners Oxnard School District, 2008 –

Print and Web Design Professional design of printed version and website greatly enhance usefulness and impact. –“Active” table of contents –Hotlinks to forms, letters, policies, templates and state documents. Online forms repository decreases need to print and maintain binders of forms and letters, and makes distribution to thousands of users possible. –Instant updates are a snap. Web-site design is up-to-date and responsive to those with disabilities.

Other Recent Plans Hayward Unified School District, 2006 – Fontana USD, 2008 – Also: Newport-Mesa USD, Pajaro Valley USD, Ventura USD.

Hayward USD

Other Contacts Chris López-Chatfield & Michael Chatfield – Chatfield and Associates – Gilroy, CA – (408) – Mac Clemmens – Digital Deployment, Inc. – Sacramento, CA – – (916)

Many thanks to: Teachers, parents and administrators in: Desert Sands USD, Fontana USD, Hayward USD Newport-Mesa USD, Oxnard School District Oxnard Un HSD, Pájaro Valley USD Parlier USD, Santa Ana USD, Ventura USD Special thanks to: Karen Kendall, Director, EL Programs, Newport-Mesa USD ____________________________________________________________ Norm Gold (916) rev