Palomar College General Education/Institutional Learning Outcomes Overview Fall, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aligning VALUE Rubrics to Institutional Purposes: Sharing Practical Approaches that Promote Consistent Scoring and Program Improvement Linda Siefert
Advertisements

GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE- BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
1 Your Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Associate Professor Sarah Thomason & Karen Brunner, Asst. VP for Institutional Effectiveness & Research August 29,
Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Learning without Borders: Internationalizing the Gator Nation M. David Miller Director, Quality Enhancement Plan Timothy S. Brophy Director, Institutional.
Working with Rubrics: Using the Oral Communication, Writing, and Critical Thinking Rubrics VALUE Rubrics Ashley Finley, Ph.D Senior Director of Assessment.
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Assessment Consultant to THECB’s Undergraduate Education Advisory Committee (UEAC): Danita McAnally, Chief of Planning and Advancement.
February  Founded  Located in Crystal Lake, IL.  offers six associate's degrees and 17 Associate of Applied Science degrees.  About 400.
University of Minnesota Duluth Design and Implementation of a Comprehensive Campus Assessment System Jackie.
Faculty Learning Communities’ Impacts: Results of a National Survey Faculty Learning Communities’ Impacts: Results of a National Survey Andrea L. Beach,
Ivy Tech Adjunct Faculty Conference April 4, 2009.
Lindsey Wilson College October, In 2010, the LWC faculty adopted new institutional student learning outcomes including: Lindsey Wilson students.
May 18, Two Goals 1. Become knowledgeable about the QEP. 2. Consider your role in making the QEP a success.
Cumberland County: May 28 Oak Ridge: June 2 Roane County: June 4 Scott: June 4 Campbell: June 9 Knox: June 10 Loudon: June 11.
Frequently asked questions about development, interpretation and use of rubrics on campuses 1.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Supporting Learning With Digital Literacy. Goals of Meeting Information tools to share with your staff; launching survey on instruction using technology.
Summary of Emerging Trends in Higher Education Spring 2011.
SLOAC Committee Flex Day Working Session Date: Time: 12:45 – 2:15.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement.
LEARNING OUTCOMES & SNAAP ATHE Leadership Institute Montreal, July 2015 Sally Gaskill, Director Strategic National Arts Alumni Project Indiana University.
Humanities Blogs Rock! Integrating information technology into the School of Liberal Arts and Academic Partnerships Shereen Hassanein.
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.
COM 101 Training 2013 Roberta Rea. Teaching and learning practices have been widely tested and have been shown to be beneficial for college students from.
Senior Literacy Assessment: AY Senior Literacy Assessment English assessment was an interest of USDE and MSCHE ▫Undertaken in various forms.
Assessment of Student Learning North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture Cia Verschelden June 17, 2009.
Evidence of Student Learning Fall Faculty Seminar Office of Institutional Research and Assessment August 15, 2012.
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE- BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
+ General Education Assessment Spring 2014 Quantitative Literacy.
Department of Secondary Education Program Assessment Report What We Assessed: Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and CA State Teaching Performance.
Competency Assessment Advisory Team (CAAT) QUANTITATIVE REASONING DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS REP – ROB NICHOLS 1.
VALUE/Multi-State Collaborative (MSC) to Advance Learning Outcomes Assessment Pilot Year Study Findings and Summary These slides summarize results from.
Getting the Most Out of Learning Outcomes ILO Assessments – Closing the Loops & Upcoming ILO Assessments SLO Summit, November 6 th, 2015.
What does Internationalization mean for Western? Faculty workshop 1 (27 and 28 October 2014)
Knowing Our Students, and Helping Them Succeed. 54.8% Latino Students (38.8% college-wide) 67.6% Female v. 32.4% Male (61.4% v. 38.6% college-wide) Average.
Standardized Testing EDUC 307. Standardized test a test in which all the questions, format, instructions, scoring, and reporting of scores are the same.
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
AAC&U VALUE Project: Minnesota Collaborative Demonstration Year 2 ( ) Demonstration Year 3 ( ) 1.
W R I T I N G M A T T E R S A workshop of the Hoosier Writing Project a site of the National Writing Project at IUPUI Herb Budden, Co-director.
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Dr. Christopher L. Markwood Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi January 23, 2014.
Using AAC&U’s Learning Tools to Address Core Revision Terrel L. Rhodes Vice President Association of American Colleges and Universities Texas Coordinating.
A Proven Model for Faculty-driven General Education Assessment Dr. Rose Mince, Dean of Instruction for Curriculum and Assessment Ms. Nancy Bogage, Director,
FSM NSTT Teaching Competency Test Evaluation. The NSTT Teaching Competency differs from the three other NSTT tests. It is accompanied by a Preparation.
FALL 2015 MIRAMAR COLLEGE LAURA MURPHY COLLEGE- WIDE OUTCOMES AND ASSESSMENT FACILITATOR ISLO Assessment Summary.
Systems Wide Learning at a Community College Developments in the last five years –SACS-COC (Course Outcomes to Program Outcomes) –The Texas Higher Education.
Assessment Instruments and Rubrics Workshop Series Part 1: What is a rubric? What are the required elements? What are VALUE rubrics? February 24, 2016.
Mary Ann Roe e-Colorado Portal Coordinator Colorado Department of Labor and Employment Jennifer Jirous Computer Information Systems Faculty Pikes Peak.
Quantitative Literacy Across the Curriculum. Members of the QLAC Committee Beimnet Teclezghi – co-chair Laura Pannaman – co-chair Marilyn Ettinger John.
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! S. Berlin.
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
General Education Assessment
THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING
Assessment Workshop Design Program Portfolio & Presentation / ART- 230
Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment
Refinement Year Results ( ) – 1/19/2018
Rasmussen’s Transferrable Skills
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment
Jillian Kinzie, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research
SAT DATA OVERVIEW DARLINGTON SCHOOL - UPPER SCHOOL DIVISION MEETING
Creating an Interdisciplinary assessment activity Flex day 1/12/2017
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
Welcome to the AP® School Year
Presentation transcript:

Palomar College General Education/Institutional Learning Outcomes Overview Fall, 2015

Assessments Information Literacy, Spring 2012 Critical and Creative Thinking, Spring 2012 Critical Thinking, Spring 2013 Oral Communication, Spring 2013 Quantitative Literacy, Spring 2014 Written Communication, Fall 2014 Intercultural Competency, Spring 2015

Information Literacy 48% of students who have completed 45 units at Palomar College are proficient in information literacy. Over 50% of all students assessed scored either proficient or exemplary on each of the first four competencies (define, access, evaluate and use information). Less than half (42.5%) of the students assessed at proficiency on using information ethically (citing sources).

Information Literacy

Critical & Creative Thinking 56% of those students earned an overall score of proficient or exemplary. Older students performed better than younger students Students scores improved with number of units completed up to 30 units. Then there was a slight decline.

Critical & Creative Thinking Put together workgroup to rethink rubric Assessed just critical thinking again – the following year. Professional development workshops each semester

Oral Communication 70% of those students scored at proficient or above. Younger students scored better than older students. Asian students scored lower than white and Hispanics students.

Oral Communication Professional development workshop on teaching oral communication & presentation skills in the non-speech classroom We would like to offer a series in the TLC on how to overcome communication apprehension

Quantitative Literacy No difference in performance by gender White, Non-Hispanic student group performed better on average than Hispanic student group Youngest students did not perform as well on average as older students

Quantitative Literacy Created workgroup to develop quantitative literacy resources for students and faculty. Group met in June and discussed some of the challenges facing students and faculty. John Harland presented an extensive list of resources that faculty could use in their classes. John is working with some of the faculty members to develop some tailored resources for their courses.

Written Communication 81.2% Competent / More than Competent Results varied by subgroup Women received more “Superior” ratings 30+ students received more “Superior” ratings White, Non Hispanic and multi-ethnic tended to receive higher ratings Students with more units had slightly higher ratings Strengths -Context and purpose, critical thinking, overall structure Weaknesses - Grammar and punctuation

Written Communication Ideas for Action: Need to form a workgroup to develop ideas below Every class should have a writing assignment Encourage revisions Sentence level problems - gather resources – web sites Remind faculty to send students to writing center Workshops on specific areas - weaknesses Faculty forum – discussing areas of concern Offer PD Workshops for faculty -- how to improve writing in your classroom & writing a rubric

Intercultural Competency Assessments varied across the six factors. 53.7%-60.5% of students rated “Proficient” / “Exemplary” Results varied across demographic categories Gender – Overall women rated higher on “Empathy” Age students received proportionately more “Exemplary” ratings Units – All over the board, small trend for students with higher units. Again use caution when interpreting results.

Intercultural Competency Ideas for Action: Rubric was difficult to use. Consider using e-portfolios in the future. Norming needs further refinement. Expand a cultural awareness to an institutional awareness – faculty, staff, administrators PD training for faculty and staff, to model and teach intercultural competence. Investigate a resource center for undocumented students. Align and promote the courses that meet the multi- cultural requirement

GE/ILO tasks for Follow-up with Quantitative literacy resources, reconsider modules Put workgroup together for written communication to tackle suggestions for action Put workgroup together for intercultural competency to tackle suggestions for action Work with PD and Student Equity on Spring Equity Event

GE/ILO tasks for continued Develop workshop for Communication Apprehension for TLC Evaluate the Dashboard Assess Digital Literacy Spring 2016 Research Integrative Learning and consider if there is a way to develop an assessment or approach to an assessment that would evaluate the entire category of Integrative Learning and Personal and Social Responsibility