Quantitative Measures: Measuring Student Learning September 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
Advertisements

 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Module 1: Introduction to Student Growth Measures and SLOs.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
A Grand Bargain for Education Reform A Grand Bargain for Education Reform The Giffin Model 2011 Regional Conference on Strategic Compensation Awareness.
David Guyette, Laura Six, Rose Drake and Paige Kinnaird
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION1. 2 When teachers succeed, students succeed. Research has proven that no school-level factor matters more to.
TEAM Evaluation Model OverviewTEAM Evaluation Model Overview Zachary Rossley, Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Data and Research Division, Tennessee Department.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) as approved by the Board of Regents, May 2011 NOTE: Reflects guidance through September 13, 2011 UPDATED.
ITEC 7445: EMERGING TECHNOLOGY EMILY TOMS NOVEMBER 12, 2012
JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing the Accountability of Teachers to Reach all Students and their Needs Raymon J. Smith References.
NEW TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS CONNECTING TEACHER PERFORMANCE to ACADEMIC PROGRESS.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
State Assessment Results CCR = ACTE T E A E C A C T A.
Awareness Session June 2010
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
STRATEGIC PLAN Tennessee Department of Education School Team Training Series Opening Session – Literacy June 2014.
Scheduling Information Night February 17, Scheduling Night Agenda 7:00 – 7:15, Scheduling Overview 7:15 – 7:45, Guidance Presentations  Current.
January, 2012 Governing Board Retreat. PUSD Strategic Plan Student Learning Data-Driven Decision Making Capacity Development Community Connectedness.
Master Teacher Program Presenters:Ginny Elliott Winifred Nweke.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Building School Capacity Through Teacher Evaluation Susan Moore Johnson Harvard Graduate School of Education Project on the Next Generation of Teachers.
GATE/SAS Gifted and Talented Education and School for Advanced Studies Cowan Avenue Elementary.
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
Scheduling Information Night March 3, Scheduling Night Agenda 7:00 – 7:15, Scheduling Overview 7:15 – 7:45, Guidance Presentations  Current freshmen.
1 Superintendents’ Quarterly Meeting A Next Generation Accountability Model March 25, 2010.
Scheduling for GRADES Scheduling Timeline February 12 th Teacher recommendations – core courses Today-Feb. 27 th : Select courses online.
Copyright © 2009 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness: Some Models to Consider Laura.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS INITIATIVE VALUE-ADDED TRAINING Value-Added Research Center (VARC)
Educational Benefit Review (EBR)
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
SCHOOL WIDE VOCABULARY DEVELOPMENT CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN I Heidi Nolan EDUC 6331, KKL.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Texas Educator Evaluation & Support System Systems US Department of Education NCLB Waiver-Fall 2013 Condition of Waiver to develop new Texas evaluation.
DVAS Training Find out how Battelle for Kids can help Presentation Outcomes Learn rationale for value-added progress measures Receive conceptual.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Assessment Report October 26, Types of Assessments Given Formative Summative Aptitude/Achievement Curriculum Based Assessments.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Stetson University welcomes: NCATE Board of Examiners.
Scheduling Information Night February 10, Scheduling Night Agenda 7:00 – 7:15, Scheduling Overview 7:15 – 7:45, Guidance Presentations  Current.
Forum on Evaluating Educator Effectiveness: Critical Considerations for Including Students with Disabilities Lynn Holdheide Vanderbilt University, National.
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research and Cleveland Metropolitan School District. All rights reserved. March 2014 Interpreting Vendor Assessment.
35% Non-FCAT Teachers – Teacher Level Student Growth Component – 40% Bay District has adopted teacher-level student growth measures for those teachers.
In the spring of 2007, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce released an education report card for all states. Tennessee received an “F” in the category of Truth.
Recertification TEAM Teacher Evaluation Process.
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
100+ years of teacher education
Teacher SLTs
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
OCTEO Conference ODE Update ∙ October 28, 2016.
Teacher SLTs
Tiger Academy Curriculum Committee
Annual WBWF Student Achievement Report 2017
TEM Growth and Achievement Measure Selection Process
Teacher SLTs
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Teacher SLTs
Quantitative Measures: Measuring Student Learning
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
Teacher SLTs
Presentation transcript:

Quantitative Measures: Measuring Student Learning September 2011

Core Values of TEAM  Providing educators with a system of frequent and constructive feedback will support continuous improvement among our educators and students.  Supporting teachers’ individual strengths and development needs will result in improved instruction and student learning.  Recognizing and learning from our most effective educators will improve instruction, recruitment, retention and training across the state.  Combining observation data with student data generates a complete view of a teacher’s effectiveness in the classroom. 2

The Overall Effectiveness Rating 3

50% Quantitative: Student Growth and Achievement 4  35% - Student Growth –Growth measure students’ progress between two points in time.  15% - Student Achievement –Achievement measures students’ performance at a single point in time and compares to a standard.

35% - Student Growth Measure 5 How do you measure growth?  The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) measures how much a student grows during the year compared to their projected growth. How do you project growth?  Value-added data uses multiple years of student achievement data to develop a “growth pattern.”  With this pattern, we can project where he/she should be at the end of the school year.

35% - Student Growth Measure 6  This student’s past performance provides enough data to “project” how much the student should grow this year.  The “value-added” measure is a comparison of the student’s projected growth to the actual growth.

35% - Student Growth Measure 7 What data will be used to measure student growth for me?  Teachers with individual TVAAS scores: TVAAS *  Teachers without TVAAS scores: –For the school year, a school-wide value-added measure will be used; in some cases this will be a composite based on the content area (i.e. literacy or math). –This year, TDOE is piloting other growth options to ensure that many teachers have an approved alternate option for the school year. –TDOE is committed to working with educators and experts across the state to develop alternate measures that are fair and high- quality. * Data from all tested grades and subjects taught by an individual teacher are combined into the individual TVAAS score.

35% - Student Growth Measure Growth Measure for teachers without individual TVAAS scores SubjectMeasure used in Evaluation Academic InterventionistsSchool-wide Overall, Literacy, or Math Value-added Composite Computer Technology* School-wide Value-added CTE**School-level Literacy or Math Value-added Composite ELLSchool-level Literacy Value-added Composite Fine ArtsSchool-wide Value-added Health-Wellness and PE**School-wide Value-added HS Core Non-Tested**School-wide Overall, Literacy or Math Value-added Composite Library Media Specialists*School-level Value-added Literacy Composite Special Education**School-wide Value-added School Services PersonnelSchool-wide Value-added World Languages**School-level Literacy Value-added Composite Early Grades**School-level Literacy and Math Value-added Composite For Pre-K to 2 nd Grade campuses, the school-wide value-added composite will come from feeder campuses *The development teams for these subject areas recommended the use of school-wide value-added as the growth measure. **Alternate measures are being piloted this year or are under development, for more information visit

How do you measure achievement?  The State Board of Education has approved several measures that can be used * : 9 15% - Student Achievement Measure ACT/SAT Assessments School-wide or Individual TVAAS National/State Used Available Assessments AP/IB/NIC Assessments Postsecondary Matriculation Graduation Rate/CTE Concentrator Graduation Rate Completion/Success in Advanced Coursework 9 th Grade Retention/Promotion Other Measures Approved by State Board * List of approved measures will be reviewed and revised each year.

 Each educator will meet with an evaluator by November 1 to select and scale the achievement measure.  During this conference, the educator and evaluator will: –Select an achievement measure.* –Choose ranges of outcomes that correspond to each effectiveness category (1-5) using student performance data that will be available by the end-of-the-year.* –Complete the Achievement Measures Worksheet % - Student Achievement Measure *For more information about approved measures and scaling achievement measures visit the TEAM web pages at

Student data in the effectiveness rating  Each evaluator and educator will have an end-of-year conference to discuss the observation scores as well as the outcomes of the selected Achievement Measure.  The growth data will be incorporated into the final rating when the data becomes available in June.  Teachers will be notified of the final rating over the summer.  The range of potential effectiveness ratings will be discussed at the end of year conference. 11