East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action A Six Year Head-to-Head Comparison of Osteopathic and Allopathic Applicants to a University-Based, Allopathic General Surgery Residency Lisa L Schlitzkus MD, Christopher J Clark MD, Steven C Agle MPH, MD, P.J. Schenarts MD
East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action Background 250% increase in DO graduates, 1980 – 2005 1/5 of medical school graduates DO 18,000 MD graduates annually, stable since 1980
East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action Background 419% increase in DOs in allopathic residencies, DOs entering allopathic general surgery residency 3%, up from 1.2% mid 1990s Bias against DO applicants
East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action Hypothesis Applicant characteristics of osteopathic graduates to a university-based, allopathic general surgery residency are no different than those of allopathic graduates
East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action Methods IRB approval Retrospective US Graduates only Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS)
East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action Methods Database of self-reported data Demographics Years and Jobs after graduation Couples match Letters of Recommendation Volunteer experiences Scholarly works Advanced degree USMLE and COMLEX scores Statistical Analysis Student t-test and chi-square Significance set at p<0.05
East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action Results 1,155
East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action AllopathicOsteopathicp-value Age in Years28.9 ± ± Male Gender65.1%63.0%0.621 Caucasian65.5%78.5%0.002 US Citizenship 96.5%98.5%0.220 Demographics
East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action AllopathicOsteopathicp-value Years after Graduation 0.3 ± ± Jobs after Graduation 0.2 ± ± Couples Match 3.6%5.9%0.192 Other Demographics
East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action AllopathicOsteopathicp-value Letters of Recommendation 3.5 ± ± Volunteer Activities5.8 ± ± Scholarly Works1.6 ± ± Advanced Degrees15.1%21.5%0.057 Common Selection Variables
East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action AllopathicOsteopathicp-value Reported99.0%54.8% Score207.7 ± ± Attempts at Passing 1.1 ± ± USMLE Step 1
East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action AllopathicOsteopathicp-value Score217.4 ± ± Attempts at Passing 1.1 ± ± Reported77.1%43.0% USMLE Step 2
East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action COMLEX 1COMLEX 2 Score512.5 ± ± 91.8 Attempts at Passing 1.1 ± ± 0.2 Reported88.9%77.8% Reported USMLE equivalent 54.8%43.0% COMLEX Performance
East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action Limitations Retrospective Self Reported Data Unable to compare clerkship grades Single Institution Few osteopathic applicants
East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action Discussion Increased osteopathic graduates of which 9% enter general surgery residencies Osteopathic residencies cannot accommodate thus more will enter allopathic Screening variables not applicable to DOs Example: AOA membership Unfamiliarity with specific medical schools Race may reflect rural focus Failure to report USMLE scores may be considered red flag
East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action Conclusion Essentially no difference exists between allopathic and osteopathic applicants, except for USMLE Step 1 scores, which may be due to self-reporting of favorable data.
East Carolina University Division of Surgical Education Turning Knowledge into Action