First ECENA Plenary Meeting Zagreb, 19-20 January 2006 Agenda Item 5 Guidance for Reporting on IPPC Directive Implementation and RMCEI Implementation Ruslan.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.

Advertisements

Major Accident Prevention Policy (MAPP) and Safety Management System (SMS) in the Context of the Seveso II Directive.

Action Plan Skills Building: Module 2 Defining Action Plan Purpose and Scope January 2013.

INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)

The European IPPC Bureau Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) Seville, Spain Internet E.mail : Don.

Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.

© FSAI Administrative Assistance and Cooperation – a role for FLEP? FLEP Meeting BfR, Berlin 18 th -19 th February 2015 Dorothy Guina Dornan.

BS EN ISO 14001:2004 Madlen King BSc MSc MIEMA EMS Lead Assessor Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance Ltd BS EN ISO 14001:2004.

Annual Report Executive Summaries Food and Veterinary Office Unit F1-Country profiles, Coordination of Follow-up.

1 Inspection of LCPs: System for Inspection. ECENA Training Workshop Bristol, March 2008.

Integrated and Planned Enforcement of Environmental Law Phare Twinning Project CZ03/IB/EN/01 Analysis of minimal criteria for environmental inspection.

Joint European Commission – IMPEL Seminar on Environmental Inspections Wednesday 17 November 2010 Hotel Le Meredien, Brussels.

Senior Regulators Meeting The future of the IRRS Programme: Enhancing the Effectiveness of the Regulatory Body Ramzi Jammal, Executive Vice-President and.

Croatian Report on new Environmental Protection Law Josipa Blažević-Perušić, B.Sc. Arch. State Secretary Anita Pokrovac-Patekar, B.Sc. Pharm. Senior Environmental.

EPER reporting process in Hungary with emphasis on the experiences Edina Gampel Counsellor National Inspectorate for Environment, Nature and Water Budapest,

WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 3 : Regulatory Context Peter Stastny EUROCONTROL.

2nd ECENA Plenary Meeting Brussels, Sept Overview of the recent IMPEL activity Hilda FARKAS IMPEL Secretariat.

Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection, ROMANIA 1 BERCEN 1 st Exchange program – November 2002 Croatia PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN COOPERATION.

MINIMUM CRITERIA Project Manager Marianne Lindström, Bulgaria SYKE, Expert Services, Environmental Management Division.

Third BERCEN Plenary Meeting December 16-17, 2004 Brussels, Belgium Key Achievements in Environmental Enforcement and Compliance in the Republic of Montenegro.

From EPER to E-PRTR EPER/E-PRTR module ECENA training workshop Szentendre,15/16 October 2007 Michel Amand Belgian Head of delegation PRTR Chair of the.

Croatian Report on Key Achievements in Environmental Enforcement and Compliance Josipa Blažević-Perušić, B.Sc. Arch. Assistant Minister Anita Pokrovac.

Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.

Grundtvig Learning Partnership Project TeachingFlex.

Enforcing European Union Environmental Law 29 November 2013 UCC, Cork Session 2: Liam Cashman, Environment Directorate- General, European Commission: "New.

1th ECENA Plenary Meeting Zagreb, Jan 2006 Recent developments in IMPEL Network By Hilda FARKAS IMPEL SECRETARIATE DG-ENV.

European Commission: DG Environment Streamlining and harmonizing climate change and air pollution requirements TFEIP, 23 – 24 May 2007, Dessau Eduard Dame.

Joint European Commission – IMPEL Seminar on Environmental Inspections Wednesday 17 November 2010 Hotel Le Meredien, Brussels 1.

Recommendation 2001/331/EC: Review and relation to sectoral inspection requirements Miroslav Angelov European Commission DG Environment, Unit A 1 Enforcement,

Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.

Republic of Serbia BENCHMARKING AND SETTING ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT INDICATORS Ministry of Science and Environmental Protection Directorate.

Workshop on Benchmarking Szentendre, March 2007 Benchmarking Ruslan Zhechkov ECENA Secretariat.

Permitting and Inspection. 1. When is decentralization effective? Delegate most permit writing and inspection functions to lowest possible level to effectively.

Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 providing for Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections in the Member.

ECENA Workshop on Benchmarking and Progress Monitoring in Environmental Enforcement and Compliance Szentendre, March 29-30, 2007 Assessment Tools and Methods.

Twinning project ENEA – ENforcing Environmental Acquis Skopje, 19 th of November, 2015.

BERCEN plenary meeting Sofia, March 18, 2005 Agenda item 8 Draft Scope and Proposed Location of BERCEN Training 2005 BERCEN Secretariat.

How to start with the implementation of IPPC Directive Czech Republic Czech Environmetal Inspectorate.

ECENA Workshop on Benchmarking and Setting Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Indicators March, 2007 REC Conference Centre Szentendre Ministry.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency LESSONS LEARNED ON THE REGULATION OF NUCLEAR SAFETY Presentation to the Workshop on Lessons Learned from IRRS Missions.

E-PRTR Refit evaluation and Article 17 official data review 1 2 nd Global Round Table on PRTRs 25 November 2015 Andreas Grangler.

Integrated and Planned Enforcement of Environmental Law Phare Twinning Project CZ03/IB/EN/01 Inspection and enforcement approach Pavel Šremer Vedoucí projektu.

Project financed under Phare EUROPEAN UNION QUALITY EXTERNAL MONITORING IN THE SCHOOL YEAR 2007 – 2008 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Material produced.

ECENA Plenary meeting January Implementation of EC Decision No. 479 from 17 July 2000 on EPER (European Pollutant Emission Register) in ROMANIA.

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Czech experience - Use of BREFs and national BAT notes, role of IPPC Agency, Czech TWG Multi-Country Workshop June 8th,

Transfer of Technology Consultative Process Wanna Tanunchaiwatana Manager, Technology Climate Change Secretariat (UNFCCC) Asia and the Pacific Regional.

Ministry of Environment, Forests and Water ManagementAlbania ECENA Exchange Programme First Plenary Meeting January, 2006 Zagreb, Croatia.

Creating the environment for business Assessment of the Implementation by the Member States of the IPPC Directive Advisory Group Meeting Friday 13 th January.

1 | Code of Conduct for School Students Travelling on Buses Australian Bus and Coach Conference 29 September 2014.

BERCEN plenary meeting Budapest, September Agenda item 4 National key achievements in environmental enforcement and compliance, and proposals on.

Inspection and enforcement approach

process and procedures for assessments

Strategy Formulation Process Workshop B

First ECENA Plenary Meeting Zagreb, January 2006 Agenda Item 11

Setting Actuarial Standards

Dan Tofan | Expert in NIS 21st Art. 13a WG| LISBON |

Certification system for prepackages

Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)

Benchmarking and ECE Indicators

USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18

Agenda item 5(b) the Committee’s activities related to the overview of progress in implementing the strategic plan for 2015–2020, including the evaluation.

Beyond Regulatory Compliance

BERCEN Plenary Meeting Budapest, September 9, 2002 Agenda item 4

BERCEN plenary meeting Budapest, September Agenda item 4

IPPC Review Stakeholder Hearing

Title Goes Here Organization SIT Workshop Agenda Item #

Basic information on NROs 7-8 September 2018, Moscow, Russia

Wrap up of agenda item no. 3

Natura 2000 management group Brussels, 19 May 2011

Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training

Presentation transcript:

First ECENA Plenary Meeting Zagreb, January 2006 Agenda Item 5 Guidance for Reporting on IPPC Directive Implementation and RMCEI Implementation Ruslan Zhechkov ECENA Secretariat

Background It responds to the decision at the First BERCEN Plenary Meeting in Budapest, September, 2002 It will highlight and address common difficulties It will streamline the process of transfer of lessons learned and best practices It will be a tool for measuring achieved progress It will help countries get prepared for reporting to the EC in the future Following the reporting countries may receive important recommendations from the Commission

IPPC Reporting/Countries Without National IPPC Laws Based on Commission Decision 2003/241/EC on the IPPC Questionnaire Linked to the process of ECENA Peer Reviews Plans for transposition and implementation should be clarified (current projects, etc.) Follows answer to the questionnaire in terms of planned or suggested actions

IPPC Reporting/Countries With National IPPC Laws Based on Commission Decision 2003/241/EC on the IPPC Questionnaire Linked to the process of ECENA Peer Reviews Answers should be focused and concrete Same numbering as in questionnaire Explanation when information is missing

RMCEI Reporting Based on IMPEL Guidance on Point VIII of Recommendation 2001/331/EC Linked to the process of ECENA Peer Reviews

VIII. Reporting on environmental inspection activities in general (2) Such reports should be available to the public and should include in particular the following information: (a) data about the staffing and other resources of the inspecting authorities; (b) details of the inspecting authority's role and performance in the establishment and implementation of relevant plan(s) for inspections; (c) summary details of the environmental inspections carried out, including the number of site visits made, the proportion of controlled installations inspected (by type) and estimated length of time before all controlled installations of that type have been inspected; (d) brief data on the degree of compliance by controlled installations with EC legal requirements as appears from inspections carried out; (e) a summary, including numbers, of the actions taken as a result of serious complaints, accidents, incidents and occurrences of non- compliance; (f) an evaluation of the success or failure of the plans for inspections as applicable to the inspecting body, with any recommendations for future plans.

Suggestions Start with filling in Annex B of the IMPEL Guidance specifying the national legislation implementing the EC legal requirements listed in Annex A A separate pro-forma for Annex C including the tables has to be filled in for each national legislation implementing the EC legal requirements A separate pro-forma for Annex C should not be filled in for each EC Directive Guidance for filling in Tables 1-5 is included in each table