MUTCD Adoption Delays/Status. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) KRS 189.337 requires the Cabinet to adopt a manual of standards and specifications.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Part 7 Traffic Controls For School Areas. Section 7A.01 STANDARD statement changed to GUIDANCE statement TCDs in school areas should be related to: Volume,
Advertisements

Retroreflectivity: Raising the Nighttime Brightness of Traffic Signs and Markings Office of Technology Applications Peter Hatzi.
Approaches to Traffic Control on Private Property.
Change Order Missouri Local Programs How to Complete a Change Order & Get it Approved.
P RACTICES TO M ANAGE T RAFFIC S IGN R ETROREFLECTIVITY NCHRP Project Synthesis Topic Paul Carlson June 21, 2011.
September 2011 Webinar 2009 MUTCD NPAs on Compliance Dates & Standard Definition 2009 MUTCD – NPAs on Compliance Dates & Standard Definition MUTCD Proposed.
The MMUTCD New Compliance Dates Sign Retroreflectivity
CURVE SPEED ADVANCED WARNING SIGNS
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD Revisions to Part 7 – Traffic Control for School Areas.
2008 Mid-States Highway–Rail Grade Crossing Safety Conference May 20, 2008 David Peterson.
FHWA Report on MUTCD Activities Chung Eng, FHWA Office of Transportation Operations NCUTCD Meeting – June 26, 2014.
2009 MUTCD Revisions Part 4 – Traffic Signals Revisions to the 2009 MUTCD.
Overview of 2009 MUTCD. Tom McDonald, PE Safety Circuit Rider Iowa LTAP.
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD Revisions to Chapter 2D – Guide Signs for Conventional Roads.
Part 3 – Markings. Dotted (not broken) lane lines shall be used for non-continuing lanes:  Lane drops  Auxiliary lanes  Deceleration lanes  Acceleration.
Worker Visibility Rule Hari Kalla MUTCD Team Leader Office of Transportation Operations Federal Highway Administration.
RETROREFLECTIVITY - UPDATE CLIFF REUER SD LTAP WESTERN SATELLITE – SDSM&T
Regional GIS User Group Meeting Wednesday, May 11, :00 AM - Noon Amphitheater, C – Level
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
SIGN MANAGEMENT UPDATE Tracy Nowaczyk Pavement Management and Operations Section Engineer Meeting Fall 2013.
General, Regulatory, and Warning Signs
Section Engineers Meeting Lake Cumberland March 2010.
Minimum Retroreflectivity Levels for Traffic Signs New MUTCD Criteria.
What's New In The 2009 MUTCD? Richard C. Moeur, PE 2010 Roads & Streets Conference.
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Aren Cambre
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Chapter 2 Signing Overview Traffic Signs 101 November 20, 2014.
New MUTCD Requirements for Sign Retroreflectivity Matheu J. Carter, P.E. Delaware T 2 Center.
By: Carol Martineau, Acting Assistant Manager, Aircraft Maintenance Division, AFS-301 Date: June 7, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration ASA Conference.
Advanced Lesson 4: Advanced Collaboration To prevent users from inserting, deleting, and renaming worksheets, protect the workbook. When you protect a.
Wisconsin Contractor-Engineer Conference January 22, 2009 Safety Apparel, FHWA Work Zone Safety Subpart K Rule & Permanent Concrete Barriers Bill Bremer,
FHWA10/1/ MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES REWRITE AND OUTREACH EFFORT TARGET DATE: 2001.
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
Mid-States Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety Conference Guan Xu, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Design.
General Revisions to Part 2 – Signs. New chapters and revisions for Part 2 Relocation of gates and barricades to Chapter 2B Relocation of object markers.
Amendments to Orange County Code Chapter 9 (Building & Construction Regulations) Orange County BCC June 16, 2015.
MUTCD Website: Nighttime Visibility Website:
A summary of the new rule and methods to be in compliance Sign Reflectivity Maintenance Standards.
Overview of the AASHTO Highway Safety Manual Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Guide Sign Design June 17-18, 2015 Arden Hills, MN.
Revisions to Chapter 2C – Warning Signs and Object Markers
Minimum Sign Retroreflectivity Requirements Updated August 2012 with compliance date revisions.
2009 MUTCD -- Compliance Dates NPA Notice of Proposed Amendments to MUTCD: Changes in Compliance Dates Table I-2.
MUTCD KEY Concepts for Traffic Control Applications.
General Revisions to Part 2 – Signs
2003 MUTCD Chapter 2A Signs General. 2A.06 Design of Signs  Add to the support statement “General appearance” of sign legends, colors, and sizes shown.
Donald E. Howe, P.E. Division of Traffic Operations California Department of Transportation Minimum Sign Retroreflectivity Requirements New.
Do Now (3x + y) – (2x + y) 4(2x + 3y) – (8x – y)
Safety Concerns on Low Volume Roads Towns & Township Meeting December 2015 By Cliff Reuer Technical Assistance Provider SDLTAP.
REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED SIGNIFICENT REVISIONS TO THE 2011 VIRGINIA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL Fall 2014 Virginia ATSSA Chapter Meeting October 1, 2014.
Jason J. Siwula, PE – Safety Engineer HSIP HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT SIGNING.
IMUTCD–Recent Revision, Panel Sign Standards & OHSSI Lalit Garg, P.E. Traffic Administration, INDOT March 9, 2016.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING PROCEDURES FOR REVISIONS STATEWIDE AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS (STIP & TIP) State of Alabama Department.
Ismael Garza, P.E., PTOE NDOT Traffic Operations Wednesday, September 16, 2015.
Engineering and Aesthetics Session 3. Engineering vs. Aesthetics Source: City of Bellevue, “Speed Hump: Design, Pavement Marking, and Signing”
Department of Environmental Quality Review of 15A NCAC 13A.0101 Hazardous Waste Rules May 12, 2016.
An Overview of Stakeholder Roles and Federal Legislation at Grade Crossings May 18, 2016 presentation to CPWA Saskatchewan Chapter, Saskatoon Railway Safety.
What's in the 2009 MUTCD For Bicyclists?
BIKE WALK CIVICS KING STREET NEIGHBORHOOD GREENWAY PILOT March 9, 2017.
New MUTCD Requirements for Operations
Note to Presenters This presentation was downloaded from Gene Hawkins’ website. Gene Hawkins would like for you to recognize the origin of this material.
MUTCD for Operations/ Maintenance Staff
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
Revisions to Part 7 – Traffic Control for School Areas
Review of Revised SP 150 – Traffic Control Dated February 01, 2017
Complete Management of your Entire Backflow Program
Department of Environmental Quality
Safety Audit Components
SE Regional Signing and Marking Engineer
Minimum Sign Retroreflectivity Requirements Updated August 2012 with compliance date revisions New Retroreflectivity standards were added to the MUTCD.
Presentation transcript:

MUTCD Adoption Delays/Status

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) KRS requires the Cabinet to adopt a manual of standards and specifications for a uniform system of official traffic control devices 603 KAR 5:050 adopts the MUTCD as Kentucky’s standard for traffic control devices

Adoption of 2009 MUTCD in Kentucky? Required Administrative Regulation modification Required Administrative Regulation modification Officially adopted January 25, 2012 Officially adopted January 25, 2012 (ten days late)

Why did it take two years to adopt? Section 1A.13 New language in Standard stating that “standard statements shall not be modified or compromised based on engineering judgment or engineering study.” Deleted language stating that “this Manual should not be considered a substitute for engineering judgment.”

Problems? Reduces the ability of traffic engineers to apply traffic control device principles in a manner that best meets the needs of road users. Reduces the ability of traffic engineers to apply traffic control device principles in a manner that best meets the needs of road users. No opportunity for public comment on the change. No opportunity for public comment on the change. Change was made on the basis of one comment from over 15,000 comments to NPA. Change was made on the basis of one comment from over 15,000 comments to NPA. Change will increase the liability for transportation agencies and organizations. Change will increase the liability for transportation agencies and organizations.

Solution? Waited for FHWA to address Waited for FHWA to address Added similar language to the KAR which now states: Added similar language to the KAR which now states: The MUTCD shall: (a) Provide the standards, guidance, and options for the design and application of traffic control devices; and (b) Not be considered a substitute for engineering judgment.

Revision #1 – Engineering Judgment Effective June 13, 2012 Effective June 13, 2012 Returns original language to MUTCD: Returns original language to MUTCD:  Deleted language about not modifying or compromising standard statements  Added, “Manual should not be considered a substitute for engineering judgment”.

At same time…

Compliance Dates Target dates for compliance of important changes Target dates for compliance of important changes 58 different compliance dates (some from 2000 and 2003 editions) 58 different compliance dates (some from 2000 and 2003 editions) Ranging from January, 2011 to December, 2019 Ranging from January, 2011 to December, 2019

Street Name Signs to the Rescue Letter height requirements: Letter height requirements: – low speed (compliance January 9, 2012) – high speed (compliance December 22, 2018) Minimum retro (compliance January 22, 2018) Minimum retro (compliance January 22, 2018) Lettering shall be composed of a combination of lower-case letters with initial upper-case letters Lettering shall be composed of a combination of lower-case letters with initial upper-case letters Economy tanked Economy tanked Thank you, Good Morning America Thank you, Good Morning America

Revision #2 – Compliance Dates Effective June 13, 2012 Effective June 13, 2012 Eliminates compliance dates for 46 items Eliminates compliance dates for 46 items Extended/revised dates for 4 items Extended/revised dates for 4 items Target dates for 8 items were deemed to be of critical safety importance and remain in effect Target dates for 8 items were deemed to be of critical safety importance and remain in effect New “Option” exempts existing historic street name signs from Standards/Guidance for color, letter size, retroreflectivity, and other design features New “Option” exempts existing historic street name signs from Standards/Guidance for color, letter size, retroreflectivity, and other design features

New Table

Future Action? Initiated efforts to modify KAR to adopt 2009 MUTCD including revisions 1 and 2 Initiated efforts to modify KAR to adopt 2009 MUTCD including revisions 1 and 2 Will delete language that was previously added to KAR Will delete language that was previously added to KAR Work to satisfy compliance dates Work to satisfy compliance dates