School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Getting Started Follow-up George Sugai &Vincent Samoulis OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut April 10,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RQS Board of education presentation, October 28, 2013
Advertisements

Responsiveness to Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
SWPBS: Year 2 Follow Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 18, 2007
Overview of SW-PBIS Cohort 10 ( ) Metro RIP (Regional Implementation Project) November 6, 2013 Shoreview Community Center T. J. Larson, MAT Barack.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Follow-up #2 (Cohort 2)
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports CCSD
George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS University of CT & OR
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Training/Coaching Meeting & Team Training Debriefing George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
SWPBS: Implementing with Accuracy & Durability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut May.
PBIS (Positive Behavior Intervention System) “Husky Pride”
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Overview George Sugai & Brandi Simonsen OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut May 15,
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Year One RI PBIS Team & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
SWPBS Overview: Establishing Continuum of Support for All George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports Center on Behavioral Education.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut March 10,
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
PBIS Universal Level Reinvigorating Tier One Implementation VTPBiS Leadership Forum October 7, 2014.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support for All Students: Coaching Implementation George Sugai University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
SWPBS: Sustainability & Scaling Logic George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education & Research OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut August 31,
E. Expectations & Rules Developed. Core Feature PBIS Implementation Goal E. Expectations and Rules Developed school-wide behavior expectations.
SWPBS: Leadership Team Guidelines George Sugai University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports October 31,
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Administrator’s Role Donna Morelli Cynthia Zingler Education Specialists Positive Behavioral.
SWPBS: Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut March.
Bridging Primary & Secondary/Tertiary Tier Practices & Systems: Responding to Unresponsive Behavior Brandi Simonsen & George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral.
Neag School of Education Response to Intervention III SW Behavioral Assessment George Sugai Director CBER Co-Director Center on PBIS
Is PBIS Evidence-based? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August.
Understanding & Planning for Non- Responsive Behavior (Secondary/Tertiary Tier) George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
Systems Logic for Sustained Large Scale Implementation George Sugai National Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports UConn Center for Behavioral.
Responsiveness to Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
SWPBS: Sustainability, Classroom Management, Interventions for Individual Students Celeste Dickey & George Sugai University of Oregon & Connecticut Center.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Discipline & Beyond George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of.
SWPBS: Leadership Team Follow-up Jon Dyson, Lavonne Nkomo, George Sugai Center on Disabilities University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support for All Lou DeLoreto E.O. Smith High School George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Tier 1/Universal Training The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 12/5/20151 If you modify this powerpoint, update the version information below. This.
Data-based Decision Making: Basics OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports February 2006
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
SWPBS: Where Did the Triangle Come From? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut May 17, 2006
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Overview for Leadership George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut Oct 12,
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: District Coaches’ Meeting Donna Morelli Cynthia Zingler Education Specialists Positive Behavioral.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Plants, Camps, Special Education, & Prevention Science George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut.
Systems, Data, & Practices to Move PBIS Forward in Ravenswood City School District Sheldon Loman, Ph.D.
Review & Re-establish School-Wide PBIS: Tier 1 Cohort 10 August 2015 *
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Evolution of RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut January 23,
SWPBS & RtI for All George Sugai University of Connecticut OSEP Center on PBIS September 24, 2008
SWPBS: Readiness & Commitment George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut June 6,
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Rationale, Readiness, Features George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Lessons Learned in SWPBS Implementation: Sustainability & Scaling Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Connecticut January 15,
W. M. Anderson Primary: School- Wide Positive Behavior Support Plan James Carraway, Chairperson Macie Davis Debra Fulmore Pam Lee Lerlisa McKnight Gail.
Think thrice – measure success! What is happening in CCS to help children learn and succeed.
RTI: Linking Academic and Behavior Support Wesley Temple Dawn Davis.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Getting Started George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut April 6,
SWPBS: Sustainability
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Presentation transcript:

School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Getting Started Follow-up George Sugai &Vincent Samoulis OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut April 10,

New England PBS Conference November 15 th Somewhere near Boston Information:

April 10 Agenda Welcome, Advance Organizer Brief Team Reports SWPBS Review & Moving Forward Non-Classroom Setings Understanding Escalating Behavior Evaluation & Data Management Action Planning

MAIN TRAINING OBJECTIVES Establish leadership team Establish staff agreements Build working knowledge of SW-PBS practices & systems Develop individualized action plan for SW- PBS –Data: Discipline Data, EBS Self-Assessment Survey, Team Implementation Checklist –Presentation for school Organize for upcoming school year

“1 Min. Team Reports Name of School Data Report 1-2 Accomplishments/Activities Since January 1 Challenge/”Speed Bump”

Messages Repeated! 1.Successful Individual student behavior support is linked to host environments or schools that are effective, efficient, relevant, & durable 2.Learning & teaching environments must be redesigned to increase the likelihood of behavioral & academic success

2 Worries & Ineffective Responses to Problem Behavior Get Tough (practices) Train-&-Hope (systems)

Development “Map” 2+ years of team training Annual “booster” events Coaching/facilitator school & district levels Regular self-assessment & evaluation data Develoment of local/district leadership teams State/region & Center on PBIS for coordination & TA

Role of “Coaching” Liaison between school teams & PBS leadership team Local facilitation of process Local resource for data-based decision making

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Student Behavior OUTCOMES Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement Supporting Decision Making 4 PBS Elements

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT

Academic SystemsBehavioral Systems 1-5% 5-10% 80-90% Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success

Main Messages Good TeachingBehavior Management STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Increasing District & State Competency and Capacity Investing in Outcomes, Data, Practices, and Systems

Agreements Team Data-based Action Plan ImplementationEvaluation GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: “Getting Started” CO PBS FCPS

Behavioral Capacity Priority & Status Data-based Decision Making Communications Administrator Team Administrator Specialized Support Student Community Non-Teaching Teaching Family Representation Start with Team that “Works.” Team-led Process Meetings

3-4 Year Commitment Top 3 School- Wide Initiatives Coaching & Facilitation Dedicated Resources & Time Administrative Participation 3-Tiered Prevention Logic Agreements & Supports

Self-Assessment Efficient Systems of Data Management Team-based Decision Making Evidence- Based Practices Multiple Systems Existing Discipline Data Data-based Action Plan SWIS

Nonclassroom Setting Systems Classroom Setting Systems Individual Student Systems School-wide Systems School-wide Positive Behavior Support Systems

1.Common purpose & approach to discipline 2.Clear set of positive expectations & behaviors 3. Procedures for teaching expected behavior 4.Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior 5. Continuum of procedures for discouraging inappropriate behavior 6. Procedures for on-going monitoring & evaluation School-wide Systems

Classroom-wide positive expectations taught & encouraged Teaching classroom routines & cues taught & encouraged Ratio of 6-8 positive to 1 negative adult- student interaction Active supervision Redirections for minor, infrequent behavior errors Frequent precorrections for chronic errors Effective academic instruction & curriculum Classroom Setting Systems

Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged Active supervision by all staff –Scan, move, interact Precorrections & reminders Positive reinforcement Nonclassroom Setting Systems

Behavioral competence at school & district levels Function-based behavior support planning Team- & data-based decision making Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes Targeted social skills & self-management instruction Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations Individual Student Systems

School Rules NO Food NO Weapons NO Backpacks NO Drugs/Smoking NO Bullying Redesign Learning & Teaching Environment

Few positive SW expectations defined, taught, & encouraged

Expectations Expectations & behavioral skills are taught & recognized in natural context

Acknowledging SW Expectations: Rationale To learn, humans require regular & frequent feedback on their actions Humans experience frequent feedback from others, self, & environment –Planned/unplanned –Desirable/undesirable W/o formal feedback to encourage desired behavior, other forms of feedback shape undesired behaviors

Acknowledge & Recognize

Agreements Team Data-based Action Plan ImplementationEvaluation GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS

Team Managed Staff Acknowledgements Continuous Monitoring Staff Training & Support Administrator Participation Effective Practices Implementation CO PBSFCPS

“80% Rule” Apply triangle to adult behavior! Regularly acknowledge staff behavior Individualized intervention for nonresponders –Administrative responsibility

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT

“Golden Plunger” Involve custodian Procedure –Custodian selects one classroom/ hallway each week that is clean & orderly –Sticks gold-painted plunger with banner on wall

North Myrtle Beach Primary June 8, 2004 SC

“Staff Dinger” Reminding staff to have positive interaction Procedures –Ring timer on regular, intermittent schedule –Engage in quick positive interaction

“1 Free Period” Contributing to a safe, caring, effective school environment Procedures –Given by Principal –Principal takes over class for one hour –Used at any time

“G.O.O.S.E.” “Get Out Of School Early” –Or “arrive late” Procedures –Kids/staff nominate –Kids/staff reward, then pick

Staff Acknowledgements 9 minutes Review/develop procedures for acknowledging/encouraging staff contributions & accomplishments Report 2-3 “big ideas” from your team discussion (1 min. reports) Attention Please 1 Minute New Spokesperson

Agreements Team Data-based Action Plan ImplementationEvaluation GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS

Relevant & Measurable Indicators Team-based Decision Making & Planning Continuous Monitoring Regular Review Effective Visual Displays Efficient Input, Storage, & Retrieval Evaluation SWISFRMS

Agreements Team Data-based Action Plan ImplementationEvaluation GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS

Academic SystemsBehavioral Systems 1-5% 5-10% 80-90% Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success

What does SWPBS look like? >80% of students can tell you what is expected of them & give behavioral example because they have been taught, actively supervised, practiced, & acknowledged. Positive adult-to-student interactions exceed negative Function based behavior support is foundation for addressing problem behavior. Data- & team-based action planning & implementation are operating. Administrators are active participants. Full continuum of behavior support is available to all students

Pre Post

Office Discipline Referrals Definition –Kid-Teacher-Administrator interaction –Underestimation of actual behavior Improving usefulness & value –Clear, mutually exclusive, exhaustive definitions –Distinction between office v. classroom managed –Continuum of behavior support –Positive school-wide foundations –W/in school comparisons

“Mom, Dad, Auntie, & Jason” In a school where over 45% of 400 elem. students receive free-reduced lunch, >750 family members attended Family Fun Night.

I like workin’ at school After implementing SW-PBS, Principal at Jesse Bobo Elementary reports that teacher absences dropped from 414 ( ) to 263 ( ).

“I like it here.” Over past 3 years, 0 teacher requests for transfers

“She can read!” With minutes reclaimed from improvements in proactive SW discipline, elementary school invests in improving school- wide literacy. Result: >85% of students in 3 rd grade are reading at/above grade level.

ODR Admin. Benefit Springfield MS, MD = % improvement = 14,325 min. = hrs = 40 days Admin. time

ODR Instruc. Benefit Springfield MS, MD = % improvement = 42, min. = hrs = 119 days Instruc. time

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ٭

3% 8% 89% 10% 16% 74% 11% 18% 71% K=6 (N = 1010) 6-9 (N = 312) 9-12 (N = 104) Mean Proportion of Students

K-6 (N = 1010) 6-9 (N = 312) 9-12 (N = 104) 32% 43% 25% 48% 37% 15% 45% 40% 15%

SWIS summary (Majors Only)1675 schools, 839,075 students Grade Range # Schools # Students (mean) Mean ODR/100/ school day (sd) K ,932 (435) 0.37 (50) ,159 (655) 1.02 (1.07) ,325 (983) 1.16 (1.37) K-(8-12)24891,659 (369) 1.53 (4.49)

N = 59 N = schools25 schools

N = schools N = schools

4J School District Eugene, Oregon Change in the percentage of students meeting the state standard in reading at grade 3 from to for schools using PBIS all four years and those that did not.

Schools using SW-PBS report a 25% lower rate of ODRs

N =23N = 8 N = 23 N = 8

“We found some minutes?” After reducing their office discipline referrals from 400 to 100, middle school students requiring individualized, specialized behavior intervention plans decreased from 35 to 6.

84% 58% 11% 22% 05% 20%

88%69% 08% 17% 04% 14%

Team Implementation Checklist (2) Work as team for 9 minutes Complete & submit one copy of TIC Present 2-3 “big ideas” from your group (1 min. reports) Attention Please 1 Minute New Spokesperson

Tools (pbis.org) EBS Self-assessment TIC: Team Implementation Checklist SSS: Safe Schools Survey SET: Systems School-wide Evaluation Tool PBS Implementation & Planning Self- assessment ISSET: Individual Student Systems Evaluation Tool (pilot) SWIS: School-Wide Information System (swis.org)

Action Planning: Guidelines Agree upon decision making procedures Align with school/district goals. Focus on measurable outcomes. Base & adjust decisions on data & local contexts. Give priority to evidence-based programs. Invest in building sustainable implementation supports (>80%) Consider effectiveness, & efficiency, relevance, in decision making (1, 3, 5 rule)

Action Planning (2:55) Attention Please 1 Minute New Spokesperson Review “big ideas” (content from today) –SW PBS –Nonclassroom Settings –Managing Escalating Behaviors –Data Systems Review where we are –Current Action Plan –School Data –New/Next Activities Logistics –Develop report to staff –Schedule next team meeting date

Measurable & justifiable outcomes On-going data-based decision making Evidence-based practices Systems ensuring durable, high fidelity of implementation PBIS Messages

CONTACT INFO SETTING All Settings HallwaysPlaygroundsCafeteria Library/ Comput er Lab AssemblyBus Respect Ourselves Be on task. Give your best effort. Be prepare d. Walk.Have a plan. Eat all your food. Select healthy foods. Study, read, comput e. Sit in one spot. Watch for your stop. Respect Others Be kind. Hands/f eet to self. Help/sha re with others. Use normal voice volume. Walk to right. Play safe. Include others. Share equipment. Practice good table manners Whispe r. Return books. Listen/watc h. Use appropriate applause. Use a quiet voice. Stay in your seat. Respect Property Recycle. Clean up after self. Pick up litter. Maintain physical space. Use equipment properly. Put litter in garbage can. Replace trays & utensils. Clean up eating area. Push in chairs. Treat books carefull y. Pick up. Treat chairs appropriate ly. Wipe your feet. Sit appropriat ely.