GEOG 268: Cartography Map Projections
Distortions resulting from map transformations Transformation of: angles (shapes) areas distances direction
Transformation of angles On globe: compass rose the same at each point (directions 90 o apart) correct angles maintained ? Conformal (correct form) map projection cannot be equal-area
Transformation of areas Retain area representation: all regions shown in correct relative size equal area or equivalent projection no map projection can be conformal and equivalent conformal? Similar earth regions with unequal sizes, equivalent? Equal area but deform angles
Transformation of distances Maintain consistency of scale: scale same along line connecting points Two options: maintain scale along one or more parallel lines standard parallels, maintain scale along one or two points equidistant map projections standard points
Transformation of directions True direction along a sphere is actually along a Great Circle & not a rhumb line Correct direction on map? Great Circle shown as a straight line several possible representations: great circles as straight lines in limited area standard parallels, great circles w/ correct azimuths shown as straight lines from one point azimuthal map projections
Visual analysis: “just look” way graticule appears on reference globe vs. projection parallels are parallel parallels are spaced equally on meridians meridians and great circles appear as straight lines when looking orthogonally meridians converge towards poles spacing of meridians decrease towards poles meridians & parallels equally spaced at equator at 60 o latitude, meridians are half as far apart as parallels parallels & meridians always intersect at right angles surface area between parallels and meridians same along same latitude interval
Choosing a map projection Visualizing distortion helps you to: select a suitable map projection evaluate information already in map format Cartographers need to be familiar with map projections example: never measure area on Mercator cartographers frequently transfer data from one map projection to another fit characteristics of data to be mapped
Choosing a map projection Factors influencing choice?: geographers, historians, ecologists interested in mapping areas - relative sizes of regions navigators, meteorologists, engineers concerned with angles and distances atlas map maker often wants compromise map projections have many advantages over globes: convey concepts of distributions undesirable to be shown on a globe no good or bad projection, just poor choices
Guidelines in choosing a map projection Projection’s major property? conformality equivalency azimuthality reasonable appearance, etc. example : small scale map of temperatures across globe? More effective if... Parallels are parallel parallels straight lines: compare temps
Guidelines in choosing a map projection Amount and arrangement of distortion? Good match between shape of area being mapped & shape of area of low distortion on the projection general classes of map projections specific arrangements of their distortion Series of maps / atlases? Large and small scale maps need to show same pattern of distortion use projections showing meridians & parallels at right angles to each other
Guidelines in choosing a map projection Overall shape of an area important? Shape and size of the page on which the map will be shown is a constraint find a good projection fit - better detail can create your own projection to fit need request a transformation to minimize error within a particular region. Many classed as “miscellaneous” devised for special purposes easy to create new types; become “fads” Peter’s cylindrical