Presentation to Teach for America February 27, 2012 MANY THANKS TO DR. LUNINE PIERRE JEROME (BPS) AND DR. ESTA MONTANO (OELAAA*) FOR THE CONTENT CITED.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 When DAP Meets GAP Promoting Peaceful Coexistence between Developmentally Appropriate Practice & the Need to Address the Achievement Gap International.
Advertisements

CURRICULAR MAPPING: ALIGNING ALL INTEGRATED COMPONENTS TO NJCCCS Fred Carrigg Special Assistant to the Commissioner for Urban Literacy.
IDENTIFYING ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Types of ELLs and Classroom Implications.
Academic English for Success in Content and Literacy Let Academic English take center stage in your classroom K-6 ESL/ELD Program.
Claude Goldenberg Stanford University
Why this Research? 1.High School graduates are facing increased need for high degree of literacy, including the capacity to comprehend texts, but comprehension.
CLD extras. English as a Second Language (ESL) teachers must have special preparation to teach English to non-native speakers; being a fluent speaker.
What is the purpose of bilingual education ?
1 When DAP Meets GAP Promoting Peaceful Coexistence between Developmentally Appropriate Practice & the Need to Address the Achievement Gap National Association.
Implementing the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm Implementing the Mutually Adaptive Learning Paradigm Nan Frydland and Judy Zivan Long Island University,
ELL Data Slides Note for PD Network Members: This set of slides includes up to date data regarding English language learners in Massachusetts. This set.
Bridges New ELA: Supporting SIFE with Low Literacy in the Home Language Session 1, March 19, 2015.
Good teaching, good teachers and comparative analysis Fernando Reimers.
Bridges New ELA: Supporting SIFE with Low Home Language Literacy Session 2: March 19, 2015.
EXCEPTIONAL AND CULTURALLY DIFFERENT APPROACH This approach attempts to assist exceptional and culturally different students to acquire the knowledge.
High Schools Literacy: English Language Learners June 2008 Maria Santos Office of English Language Learners.
Characteristics of English Language Learners (ELLs) Language Similarities & differences Culture Childrearing practices & family values Parental role in.
E NGLISH L ANGUAGE L EARNERS Diverse Learners Spotlight Presentation University of New England By: Erin Dilla.
Continuing dominance of “language of instruction” debate.
Instructional Methods and Program Models for Serving English Language Learners.
Integrating Math in the ESOL Curriculum MATH FOR ALL.
Raising student achievement through Literacy Auckland CETA branch, Sue McVeigh
English Language Learners and Standards-based Education in Massachusetts.
Article Summary – EDU 215 Dr. Megan J. Scranton 1.
Teacher Institute Day August 20, 2012 Lincoln Elementary School.
ESL Phases & ESL Scale Curriculum Corporation 1994.
Program Models for English Language Instruction
Bilingual Education and English as a Second Language Program Models
Dr E. Lugo Morales1 6/28/2012. Develop academic vocabulary Read to acquire new information Understand information presented orally Participate in classroom.
Saunders & Marcaletti. Thompson Issues in the Development of AMAOs Understanding second language acquisition should be a prerequisite to setting.
The Common Core State Standards and the English Language Learners Wen Ma, Ph.D. Le Moyne College.
 ESL program is one that “provides instruction in the English language and other courses of study using teaching techniques for acquiring English, and...
English-as-a-Second Language Programs
Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.
Sheltered Instruction Part III of III Presented by Office of English Language Learners
ED5545 Curriculum & Instruction Master Practicum II
by Noverene Taylor EDD 9100-OL8 Leadership Seminar Nova Southeastern University October 19, 2006 Dr. Ron Parlett.
Ideas and Activities to Differentiate Instruction through Comprehensible Input.
Bilingual-Bicultural Education GA Summer Course 2007.
Operational Definitions Dr. Elva Cerda Pérez University of Texas /TSC Brownsville.
Supports K–12 School Effectiveness Framework: A Support for School Improvement and Student Success (2010). The integrated process of assessment and instruction.
How Languages are Learned and Acquired
Developing English Language and Literacy. Demographics.
Comprehensive Evaluations. Overview OBJECTIVES: Review Comprehensive Evaluation Process Provide Information On Selected Topics  Specific Learning Disability.
Reframing English Language Learners in an Enrichment Model SED 407 Beliefs Guide Practice.
New Pathways to Academic Achievement for K-12 English Learners TESOL March 26, 2009 Anna Uhl Chamot The George Washington University.
The World of SIFE : Potential and Possibilities Drs. Elaine Klein and Gita Martohardjono RISLUS/CUNY Graduate Center The SIFE Forum, Nov 12, 2010.
The Ontario Context \. English Language Learners: A Definiton ELLs are students in provincially funded English language schools whose first language is.
Building Bridges for Emergent Bilinguals, Part I : Scaffolding for oral language development Rebecca Curinga, PD Coordinator Rocío Raña, PD Facilitator.
Effective Language and Reading Interventions for English Language Learners.
The CALLA Handbook – Chapter 8 CALLA in Different Contexts Dr. Ellen de Kanter University of St. Thomas Instructional Strategies for the Content Area in.
Long Term English Learners EDSC 410 August 31, 2015.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS Identification E.L.L. Service Models Pull-out Integrated Facilitated Sheltered.
English-Language Arts Content Standards for California By Ashleigh Boni & Christy Pryde By Ashleigh Boni & Christy Pryde.
Using TESOL’s Standards to Guide Instructional Design
English Language Learners. What Is ELL? English Language Learners 1.) Students who are new to the English language. 2.) Students whose native language.
Collaboration & Integrated Content-Based Instruction.
ELL353 Welcome to Week #3 Dr. Holly Wilson. This Week’s Assignments 1. Readings 2. Discussion #1: Teaching Vocabulary 3. Discussion #2: Vocabulary Lesson.
GUIDE THE ISS GUIDE TO THE SIOP MODEL AUGUST 1ST, 2013.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
Most of the students are in elementary schools. About 75% of the students are from Spanish language backgrounds. The students are located mostly in a few.
Angela L. Briggs FLT 860 Michigan State University.
Pre-Referral to Special Education: Considerations
Radford City Schools School Board Presentation
Performance Indicator A
The English Language Learners: How to Serve our Diverse Students
Mainstream or Literacy
Radford City Schools School Board Presentation
English Learner Parent Academy
Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph.D. Rutgers, The State University of NJ
Presentation transcript:

Presentation to Teach for America February 27, 2012 MANY THANKS TO DR. LUNINE PIERRE JEROME (BPS) AND DR. ESTA MONTANO (OELAAA*) FOR THE CONTENT CITED / USED HERE! US with comments/questions!: HEIDI PEREZ LAURIE HARTWICK * OFFICE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION & ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Who Are the Students We Call SIFEs?

Working Focus Group / OELAAA Determine a definition for Massachusetts Determine efficacious procedures for identification, appropriate diagnostics and assessments to inform programming Determine what qualifications a teacher may need to teach SIFE Current working definition: Massachusetts Definition of SIFE (Student with Interrupted Formal Education) SIFE (Student with Interrupted Formal Education) refers to an English language learner, who is typically a newcomer between the ages of 8 and 21 and has experienced an interrupted education or has little to no schooling experience. Interruptions may be due to gaps in academic history, possibly caused by unavailability of schooling, civil unrest, immigration, transience, trauma, or other factors that would limit the student’s ability to perform and achieve in a Massachusetts classroom with students of a comparable age group. Moreover, a Student with Interrupted Formal Education may have experienced limited schooling, characterized by a non-rigorous quality of education in the home country, which is incomparable to schools in Massachusetts. This may include a shorter school day and/or school year, and a weak curriculum. Also, students may have been educated by teachers who were not high school or college graduates. Based on assessments, the student’s academic level is a minimum of two years below grade level in literacy and numeracy and lacks the general knowledge and/or practical life skills required in a typical Massachusetts classroom.

Constructing a common language… Immigrant students Lack of schooling / disrupted or weak educational background Lack literacy in L1 Rural areas / war torn areas 3 years behind academically Literacy / numeracy / academic / content High-risk for drop out

What makes a SIFE different from an ELL? Are over-age for their grade level Have needs beyond the traditional ESL or Bilingual program Are socially and psychologically isolated from mainstream students [and maybe the ESL population as well] And are not SPED!

What profiles of students might be found in a “typical” SIFE program? Diverse educational backgrounds Various skills, interests, backgrounds, life experiences Different learning styles Multiple lives Multiple levels of English proficiency Limited self-concept as a learner Prior educational experience may misalign with MA curriculum expectations Account for about 10% of ELLs

Causes of Limited Formal Schooling Need to work to support family income Need to provide child care for family Live in remote locations away from schools Lack parental supervision Displacement / frequent moves due to economic need or political turmoil

Literacy Levels Pre-literate – no exposure to literacy  May speak a language with no written form Non-literate – no access to literacy  Language may have a written form and strong literary tradition but students do not have access to literacy instruction Semiliterate – not a high level of literacy  Some literacy development but below grade level expectations of U.S. schools

The Challenge: Academic Literacy SIFE “not only need to develop cognitively demanding grade-level academic language proficiency while learning grade-level content knowledge, they must also confront the additional challenges of developing basic literacy and numeracy skills and acquiring basic academic knowledge, all within the relatively short time from of secondary school.” (DeCapua et. al., 2009, p. 3)

The Challenge: Academic Literacy SIFE students are unable to do these because the skills are not used in context: Defining, Categorizing, Classifying, Synthesizing, Critical thinking, Decontextualization SIFE are able to use the skills they have when they are required within context!

What do SIFE need? “…systematic, explicit and targeted at diagnosed need…what gets taught is what is needed by the student. Now how do we find out what is needed? We diagnose in language and we diagnose in reading: looking at both the language and the literacy profiles determines how we instruct…” instruction “has to be quick, it has to be purposeful, it has to be focused on academic English language, and it has to be focused on literacy attainment – word recognition, comprehension, and again, focused on diagnosed needs.” (Schifini, 2002, Natl. Conference on Newcomers Programs, p. 39)

SIFE and US School dichotomies:  U.S. schools stress future purpose – Ss implicitly understand they are learning for the future SIFE are used to immediate application – they observe, practice, get feedback – learning is pragmatic and it parallels life  U.S. schools expect transfer of prior learning to new learning SIFE lack prior knowledge to transfer to new learning  U.S. schools foster independence/individual responsibility Most SIFE come from a collectivistic culture/interconnectedness in primary/shared responsibility  U.S. schools use written language to process learning SIFE may be used to oral language only to process learning …The list goes on and on!

What to do about SIFE? [there is too much to present today – maybe a Part II on methods, practices, strategies?] Consider learning environment: learner-centered? Knowledge-centered? Assessment-centered*? Community- centered? BPS currently uses an assessment-centered learning environment for their two levels of SIFE programming. An assessment-centered learning environment is alternative: Requires in-depth understanding Requires use of skills learning Is holistic and integrative Allows for more flexibility ( especially time) Embeds a stress-free/cooperative environment

What to do about SIFE? Successful SIFE programs use  Thematic units  A pedagogical mode that is interactive and experiential  Engages in constant dialog between students and students and students and teachers  Dialog is both oral and written  Integrated curriculum  Integrated language processes  Uses multiple intelligence theory to plan lessons  Creates individual student plans – themes are the same, goals are the same, activities are differentiated

What to do about SIFE? When designing programming and lessons, a MALP model can provide the framework you need: from: DeCapua, A., Marshall, H. (2011) p. 49

If your interest has been piqued… DeCapua, A. and Marshall, H. (2011) Breaking New Ground: Teaching Students with Limited or Interrupted Formal Education in U.S. Secondary Schools. Ann Arbor: MI. University of Michigan Press. DeCapua, A. and Marshall, H. (2009) Meeting the Needs of Students with Limited or Interrupted Schooling. Ann Arbor: MI. University of Michigan Press.