National Association of Drug Court Practitioners Anaheim, CA June 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Public Safety and Domestic Security Policy Committee Policy Committee October 6, 2009.
Advertisements

What is the term that defines the men and women we supervise? Parolee Probationer Offender Supervised Releasee Restored Citizen Returning Citizen Client.
Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Presentation.
Mentor Courts, Training Curriculum, & Legislation Brian Clubb Project Director National Drug Court Institute.
Veterans Treatment Courts GEORGIA ACCOUNTABILITY COURTS CONFERENCE JACK OCONNOR BUFFALO VETERANS COURT B.
1 Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections  Office of Community Corrections was created pursuant to Public Act 511 of 1988,
El Paso County COMMUNITY CUSTODY PROGRAM AN OVERVIEW Originally Presented to EPC Board of County Commissioners November 14, 2002 CCP.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
James S. Egar Monterey County Public Defender. In representing a client, a lawyer shall exercise independent, professional judgment and render candid.
Core Competencies. OBJECTIVES Recognize key core competencies Identify the relationship between core competencies and best practices.
An Introduction To Grayson County’s Juvenile Problem Solving Court Honorable Brian Gary 397 th District Court.
NATIONAL AMERICAN INDIAN COURT JUDGES ASSOCIATION’S 43RD ANNUAL MEETING > THE JUDGES’ ROLE IN TRIBAL HEALING TO WELLNESS COURTS Presenters: Joseph Thomas.
Family Dependency Treatment Court An Introduction.
Misdemeanor Sanctions
Police chiefs | formerly incarcerated people | pretrial service administrators | probation officials | state legislators | substance abuse treatment providers.
Introduction to Kenosha County Behavioral Health Courts Kenosha County Division of Aging & Disability Jim Truchan (LMFT,LPC,LCSW) Human Services Manager.
REALIGNING RESOURCES TO FUND YOUR DTC CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROFESSIONALS – NATIONAL CONFERENCE BANFF, ALBERTA OCTOBER 24 – 27,
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
EXCELLENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY BUILDING COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
Austin American Statesman August 21, 2007 Texas leads nation in number of drunken driving deaths WASHINGTON BUREAU Tuesday, August 21, 2007 WASHINGTON.
Downtown Community Court Canadian Criminal Justice Association CONGRESS 2009 Halifax, Nova Scotia October 30, 2009 Honourable Judge Tom Gove Provincial.
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change James M. Byrne, Professor March 26,2015.
Elmore County Drug and DUI Court
The 10 Key Components of Veteran’s Treatment Court Presented by: The Honorable Robert Russell.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH ADULT SYSTEMS OF CARE – JAIL MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT Full Service Partnership.
Participant Choice – Access to Recovery as a Voucher Service Delivery Model Presented to National Summit on Prisoner Re-Entry Sponsored by the White House.
Study visit to LA on Youth Mental Health Programmes Professional Roles & Development for Mental Health Practitioners By Yvonne Chak Hong Kong Christian.
North Carolina TASC Clinical Series Training Module One: Understanding TASC.
Criminal Justice Reform in California Challenges and Opportunities Mia Bird Northern California Grantmakers Annual Conference – From Ideas to Action May.
Probation and Parole in the United States Your presenter:
Drunk Driving: A Strategy for Reducing Recidivism 12 th Annual Michigan Traffic Safety Summit Tuesday March 13, 2006 Bradley Finegood, MA, LLPC.
Drug Offender Reform Act Smarter Sentencing + Smarter Treatment = Better Outcomes and Safer Neighborhoods.
Aimed at a reduction in alcohol and drug use and criminal activity.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions: Between Probation and Incarceration 1.
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
PREPARED BY NPC RESEARCH PORTLAND, OR MAY 2013 Florida Adult Felony Drug Courts Evaluation Results.
UCLA’s Statewide Evaluation of Proposition 36 Darren Urada, Ph.D. UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Association for Criminal Justice Research (California)
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF ADDING THE RECLAIMING FUTURES APPROACH TO JUVENILE TREATMENT DRUG COURTS: RECLAIMING FUTURES/JUVENILE DRUG COURT EVALUATION Josephine.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
Polk County Family Drug Court The Honorable Karla Fultz Todd Beveridge, M.S.W., M.S.
4380 SW Macadam Ave., Ste. 530 Portland, OR Informing policy, improving programs Implementation of the Ten Key Components: Variations.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
Coordinator 101 Rose M. Ewing. Drug Court History First Drug Court was implemented in Miami, Florida in Today, there are approximately 2,500 therapeutic.
RISK AND NEED TRACKS SAMHSA 2013 Orleans Parish Drug Court Expansion Grant.
An integrated approach to addressing opiate abuse in Maine Debra L. Brucker, MPA, PhD State of Maine Office of Substance Abuse October 2009.
EL PASO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SERVICES Dr. Henry Sontheimer Department Director & Criminal Justice Planner.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
Aboriginal Financial Officers Association of BC September 24, 2015 Developing a Substance Abuse Management Program in your Workplace Presentation by Peter.
Recovery Support Services and Client Outcomes: Results of Two Interim Evaluations in Texas College on Problems of Drug College on Problems of Drug Dependence.
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Programs for Drug Offenders.
Chapter 14 Prevention and Corrections in the Community 1.
Prevention, Enforcement and Treatment (PET) Program NH Provider’s Association Annual Conference Eric Adams, PET Coordinator Laconia Police Department October.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
Drug Courts Prepared by Sheri Heffelfinger Montana Legislative Services Division For the Law and Justice Interim Committee February 2008.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
Barnstable County Sheriff’s Office’s Educating Inmates on Medication Assisted Recovery _________________ Roger Allen LMHC Director of Inmate Services Jessica.
 First drug court opened in Miami-Dade, FL in 1989  Goal is to reduce recidivism by using graduated sanctions and incentives combined with treatment.
The Kansas City VA Medical Center And Kansas City, Missouri Municipal Court.
Problem Solving Courts Bench Bar Conference Double Tree Hotel April 20, rd Judicial District Court of Common Pleas – Berks County.
Veterans Treatment Court Hon. Mary Hogan Sullivan Presiding Justice Norfolk County Veterans Treatment Court
History and Concepts of Drug Courts
Henu’ Community Wellness Court
Using the National Criminal Justice Treatment Practices (NCJTP) Survey
Drug Treatment Court.
Marie Crosson, Executive Director
BY: Honorable Robert S. Anchondo
Presentation transcript:

National Association of Drug Court Practitioners Anaheim, CA June 2009

 Sheriff Maxwell Hendry  Fife Drug Court Sheriff

 Stuart MacArthur  Team Leader  Drug Court Supervision and Treatment Team  Orange County Drug Court

Some Quotes  Mission: to make Drug Courts as popular as Viagra (father of one of the inventors of Viagra)  Drug Courts represent the light at the end of the tunnel for those stuck in the cycle of addiction (VP Bydon)  Smarter on time is better than being tough on crime

Some facts and figures  2300 Drug Courts in America alone.  Use of Suboxone in one American Drug Court showed 62% success rate. Success rate defined as clients who did not return to Opiate use.  US prison population has increased 700% since  50% of US prison population have drug problems.  2/3 of this population are re-arrested within 3 years and ½ return to prison.  $250 million is what Obama Administration wants to invest in 2010 in Drug Courts.

Orange County Court Visit  80% failure rate over 30 years in dealing with drug misusing offenders.  People of California wanted change.  Prop 36 opened in The Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act, also known as Proposition 36, was passed by 61% of California voters on November 7, This vote permanently changed state law to allow first- and second-time nonviolent, simple drug possession offenders the opportunity to receive substance abuse treatment instead of incarceration.  The University of California at Los Angeles, which was chosen to run the required evaluation of Proposition 36, has issued five annual reports on the implementation and impact of the program since These reports provide data and analysis that will help state legislators determine the future of the program. The report released in April 2007, shows that Proposition 36 treatment is severely under-funded, and that this is affecting treatment quality. According to researchers, the program needs at least $228.6 million to provide adequate treatment. UCLA’s contract with the state has been extended, and researchers will continue to collect and analyze data on the law and its impacts.  Orange County has a 75% success rate in its drug court.  They use Community Colleges (getting people into training) Provide Dental Assistance, Raise money through Golf Days to pay for this. Take successful participants on visits to the Getty in LA.  They require clients to do a civic event e.g. hiking.  CS has been done for people with Brain Injuries.  60% OF DRUG COURT CLIENTS IN O.C ARE Methamphetamine users. 14% use heroin.

10 key components of Drug Court  Key Component #1: Drug courts integrate alcohol and other drug treatment services with justice system case processing  Key Component #2: Using a nonadversarial approach, prosecution and defense counsel promote public safety while protecting participants’ due process rights  Key Component #3: Eligible participants are identified early and promptly placed in the drug court program  Key Component #4: Drug courts provide access to a continuum of alcohol,drug, and other related treatment and rehabilitation services  Key Component #5: Abstinence is monitored by frequent alcohol and otherdrug testing  Key Component #6: A coordinated strategy governs drug court responses to participants’ compliance  Key Component #7: Ongoing judicial interaction with each drug court participant is essential  Key Component #8: Monitoring and evaluation measure the achievement ofprogram goals and gauge effectiveness  Key Component #9: Continuing interdisciplinary education promotes effective drug court planning, implementation, and operations  Key Component #10: Forging partnerships among drug courts, public agencies, and community-based organizations generates local support and enhances drug court program effectiveness

 Lisa Burns  Social Worker  Drug Court Supervision and Treatment Team  Observations from the Conference

American Drug Courts  Alumni Groups / Mentoring  Social Aspect  Intensive programmes  Incentives/ sanctions

Fairfield County, Ohio

5 stages:  Boot Camp (30 days)  Meet with Judge weekly  Meet with Probation Officer Daily  Random Drug Screens  Begin to look for sponsor  No working  Phase 1 (12 weeks)  Meet with Judge weekly  3 x week Probation Officer  3 x week Drug screens  Must have rapport with Sponsor  1 x per week group work  No working  1 month continuous negative drug screens

 Phase 2 (12 weeks)  Bi- weekly meeting with Judge  2 x week Probation Officer  2 x week Drug Screens  Bi- weekly individual counselling  Relapse prevention group  Bergin to look for employment  Look for stable housing  3 months continuous negative drug screens  Phase 3 (12 weeks)  Monthly meeting with Judge  1 x per week with Probation Officer  1 x week drug screens  Maintain rapport with sponsor  Monthly individual counselling sessions  Aftercare group meetings 1 x week  Must have a job or be in school  Maintain stable housing  6 months continuous negative drug screens

 Aftercare (12-20 weeks)  1 x month Probation Officer  2 x month drug screens  Maintain job/ school  Maintain sobriety  In addition to the above social activities are arranged with workers/ clients

Incentives/ Sanctions  INCENTIVES:  Fish bowl  Lunch with the Judge  Baseball caps  Go first in Court  Choosing times and days of appointments  SANCTIONS  Use of essays  Community Service  Court time  Custody for short periods  Use of grading for both sanctions and incentives

Fife Drug Court  Working group  Accelerated assessment period  Focus group