ILC Electronics Manufacturing Opportunities ILC Industrial Forum at Fermilab September 21-22, 2005 Ray Larsen for SLAC ILC Electronics Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wednesday July 19 GDE Plenary Global Design Effort 1 Instrumentation Technical System Review Marc Ross.
Advertisements

Q11: Describe how the effects of power supply failures on integrated luminosity will be mitigated. TESLA Response : –Mainly consider two types of magnet.
Americas Region ILC Electronics Manufacturing Opportunities Linear Collider Industrial Forum of America (LFCOA) SLAC, May 1-2, 2006 Ray Larsen.
26-Sep-11 1 New xTCA Developments at SLAC CERN xTCA for Physics Interest Group Sept 26, 2011 Ray Larsen SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory New xTCA Developments.
Ray Larsen Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista ARD Division SLAC National Accelerator Lab ILC GDE Meeting Beijing March
LP33 Series UPS kVA 400Vac/CE
BHEL – Electronics Division, Bangalore
Operations and Availability GG3. Key decisions Summary of Key Decisions for the Baseline Design The linac will have two parallel tunnels so that the support.
3U ATCA Shelf October Proprietary and Confidential-
Presents The Silver Family An Integrated Approach to Processors, Data Communication and Head End Integration.
ILC Marx Modulator Development Program G.E. Leyh, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Hamid Shoaee LCLS FAC Controls June 17, LCLS Control System Personnel Linac & BC2 Controls progress LTU, Dump Controls.
1 Low-energy RHIC electron Cooler (LEReC) Update November 17, 2014.
Shelf Management & IPMI SRS related activities
Dayle Kotturi SLC April 29, 2004 Outline Motivation Key Components Status Update SLC / EPICS Timing Software Tasks Hardware.
Hamid Shoaee Accelerator Readiness Dec. 2, ‘08 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Controls Department LCLS Maintenance.
EPICS on TPS RF System Yu-Hang Lin Radio Frequency Group NSRRC.
GlueX Solenoid Update George Biallas May 12, 2010 GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
Question 27: Outline the key steps for industrialization of machine components and the likely remaining vulnerabilities in achieving them. Achieving industrialization.
The planned new system Tom Himel Dec 1, Outline Controls has multiple related projects Decided to use mainly µTCA architecture Description of.
Low Voltage Power Requirement of TOF FEEs. Maximum tray. Low Noise:  Periodic and Random Distortion (PARD) < few mV RMS Floating.
Single Board Computers and Industrial PC Hardware at the CLS
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz September 10, 2007.
Linac Marx Modulator Update Trevor Butler 10/29/2014.
IMPROUVEMENT OF COMPUTER NETWORKS SECURITY BY USING FAULT TOLERANT CLUSTERS Prof. S ERB AUREL Ph. D. Prof. PATRICIU VICTOR-VALERIU Ph. D. Military Technical.
SCU Layout Concept - Minimal Segmentation Joel Fuerst (ANL) SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting Dec. 16, 2014.
BDS Magnet-Power System-Facility Optimization1 ILC BDS Kickoff Meeting Basis for Magnet, Power System and Cooling Facility Optimization Discussion Paul.
Drive beam magnets powering strategy Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko CERN, Electronic Power Converter Group (TE-EPC) OUTLINE : Suggestion of.
Klystron Modulator for Proton Driver
Tunnel Electronics Baseline Issues Snowmass Workshop August 25, 2005 Ray Larsen for SLAC ILC Group.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
SLAC ILC High Availability Electronics R&D LCWS IISc Bangalore India Ray Larsen, SLAC Presented by S. Dhawan, Yale University.
Power Supply System for DRFS
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Integrated Testing George Ganetis Integrated Testing ASAC Review October 14-15, 2010.
1 Global Design Effort Beijing GDE Meeting, February 2007 Controls for Linac Parallel Session 2/6/07 John Carwardine ANL.
ILC BDS Kickoff Meeting Magnet Power Supplies RDR Concepts and Completeness Paul Bellomo SLAC Power Conversion Department October, 2007.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
-Proprietary and Confidential-
SLAC High Availability Electronics Architectures & Standards for ILC The Case for Five 9’s Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Program.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
1 The Cost & Schedule to Accomplish the Transition Proposed SLAC Controls Upgrade December 1, 2010 Ray Larsen.
1 Global Design Effort: Control System Vancouver GDE Meeting, July 2006 Controls Global System Review John Carwardine, ANL (For Controls Global Group Team)
The recent history and current state of the linac control system Tom Himel Dec 1,
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SCL Vacuum Control System Upgrade Derrick Williams
ILC Test Facility at New Muon Lab (NML) S. Nagaitsev Fermilab April 16, 2007.
1 Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Controls & LLRF Working Group: Tuesday Session (29 May 07) John Carwardine Kay Rehlich.
1 V. Kashikhin for ILC ALCPG 2007, FNAL Meeting October 23, 2007 Ring to Main Linac Magnets.
SLAC NLC & ILC Cost Modeling Ray Larsen January 28, 2006.
Industrial Participation & SRF Infrastructure at Fermilab Phil Pfund with input from Harry Carter, Rich Stanek, Mike Foley, Dan Olis, and others.
D&D Review 6 August PEP-II Minimal Maintenance State Upkeep Stan Ecklund (J. Seeman, S. DeBarger, D. Kharakh, M. Zurawel)
CEA DSM Irfu SIS LDISC 18/04/2012 Paul Lotrus 1 Control Command Overview GBAR Collaboration Meeting Paul Lotrus CEA/DSM/Irfu/SIS.
Patrick’s Updates - 8/30/11 (one slide for each of the following) 1.XTCAV Project 2.ASTA Gun Test Facility Instrumentation & Controls 3.Fast wire scanner.
Control System Considerations for ADS EuCARD-2/MAX Accelerators for Accelerator Driven Systems Workshop, CERN, March 20-21, 2014 Klemen Žagar Robert Modic.
Aug 23, 2006 Low Power HLRF System and Impact on Distributed RF System Shigeki Fukuda and Task Force Team of DRFS in KEK KEK.
October 19, 2004R.S. Larsen & R.W. Downing 1 Electronics Packaging Issues for Future Accelerators and Experiments 2004 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium October.
1 Global Control System J. Carwardine (ANL) 6 November, 2007.
K. Luchini LCLS Lehman Review - Controls Breakout, May 11th 2005 Magnet Power Supplies K. Luchini Overview Hardware Software.
COOLING & VENTILATION PLANTS M. Nonis – CERN EN Department / CV Group Annual Meeting of the FCC study – Rome 14 th April 2016.
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz August 16, 2007.
Redundancy in the Control System of DESY’s Cryogenic Facility. M. Bieler, M. Clausen, J. Penning, B. Schoeneburg, DESY ARW 2013, Melbourne,
The Survey of the Power Supply Reliability at SSRF
Development of a Marx-Generator for the drive beam electron gun
EDR HLRF Work Packages Draft Summary
Performance of RHIC Vacuum Instrumentation and Control
General presentation about recent status of DRFS
ILC Cryogenic Systems Draft EDR Plan
Personal Computers and Applications
Klystron Power Supplies for ILC
Electron Source Configuration
LINAC PROTON SOURCE MODULATORS
Presentation transcript:

ILC Electronics Manufacturing Opportunities ILC Industrial Forum at Fermilab September 21-22, 2005 Ray Larsen for SLAC ILC Electronics Group

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen2 Outline  I. Power Electronics Modulators Power Supplies  II. Controls & Networks  III. Instrumentation

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen3 Subsystem Relative Costs

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen4 2-Tunnel Model w/~Penetrations ~6in. Penetration Module Tray

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen5 I. Power Electronics  Modulators Est. Production Cost 4% TPC Est. Range $ M  Power Supplies Est. Production Cost ~4% TPC

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen6 Modulators: TESLA and Marx

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen7 Design Comparison  600 Units total  Assume Dual Tunnels, short HV cables to klystron  TESLA – Current Baseline design PFN, IGBT redundant switch at 1/10 HV, bouncer flattener, step-up Xfmr to 120KV, 140A  MARX – R&D Design Potential 40-50% cost reduction, 10X lower switch current, losses. Plug-in module design to backplane, IGBT switch arrays each board, vernier board flattener, redundant switches, modules, diagnostic controllers, robotic module swap

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen8 Manufacturing Comparison  TESLA: Traditional capacitor banks in cabinets, point-to- point interconnects, separate charging source at 10KV DC, separate dual discharge switch, separate oil-filled transformer. Entire unit can be contracted to assembler Could subcontract switches, transformer, HV cable assemblies, controls subassemblies Modulators and Xfmrs separately factory tested.

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen9 Manufacturing Comparison 2  MARX Transformer-less oil-free design Each unit has 16 plug-in circuit board modules Total boards = 9600 for 600 units 60% Parts cost in IGBT switch sub-modules Total sub-modules =10 per module, 96,000 for 600 units Capacitors mount on each module Operates in sealed box with air-water heat exchanger Contract for fully assembled factory tested units Subcontract all subassemblies to standard PC board manufacturers.

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen10 Installation Comparison  TESLA Install tested units in large cabinets, move units into tunnel position depending on how large can handle. May have to separate racks. Install transformer, HV connections separately Repair in situ or remove failed Xfmr  MARX Install box 2x2x1.5m, populated with modules optional. Option: Populate, service with robotic module remove and replace system. Can work 24/7 from maintenance depots along machine.

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen11 Power Supplies  High Availability 1/n Modular Designs where failure will interrupt machine  Apply as needed to: KW to 100KW single load or string supplies Multi-channel Corrector supplies Cryogenic magnet supplies

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen12 HA PS Concept – Quads, LGPS  n/N parallel modules for DC magnet supply (1/5 shown)  Overall load current feedback  Dual Diagnostics Controller Mezzanine Card each module

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen13 HA PS Module - Correctors, Cryo Motherboard Dual Serial Control IO Independent Carriers Hot Swappable Optional: Redundant n/N w/ Switchover Dual Bulk 48V DC In DC Out

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen14 Manufacturing Injection, Damping Ring and Beam Delivery all warm supplies, LGPS & Modular  Main Linac quads, correctors cryogenic low voltage, high current, low power supplies  Total units estimates LGPS 1/n redundant supplies:1500? Modular n-channel supplies: 3000? Cryogenic modular supplies: 3000

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen15 II. Controls & Networks  Review of existing SLAC Linear Collider & PEP Control System Redundant DEC (HP) Alpha mainframes with 4 tandem processors each Remote Multibus SBC IOCs throughout systems IOCs fan out over multiple serial links to CAMAC simple communications controllers SLCnet, PEPnet, Pnet custom protocols Special fast timing net locked to Linac, PEP RF

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen16 Existing SLC Layout, Networks

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen17 SLC-PEP Controls Architecture

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen18 SLC-PEP Summary

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen19 SLC-PEP Upgrade Plan

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen20 SLC-PEP Upgrade Summary

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen21 ILC Proposed Architecture

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen22 ILC Proposed Summary

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen23 Central Controls Cluster

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen24 Linac Sector Nodes

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen25 Manufacturing  Controls Est. = 4% of TPC.  Propose all controls to be designed to HA platform.  ATCA under study as candidate de facto standard.  Modules, hardware, base software -- commercial contracts from standard suppliers.  Custom design necessary for some data switching, fast timing modules; commercial manufacture.  Total modules est. ~4,000 (not incl. instrumentation)  Ethernet & Timing fiber plants substantial cost item.  HA software major engineering effort, cost

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen26 III. Instrumentation  Front End Instrument Modules Est. at 2.5% of TPC.  Standard Packaging system required. Use ATCA HA packaging, concepts Some custom design necessary Assume 2-tunnel model for packaging R&D on Robotic Service System Assume 2-Tunnel Model Consider 1-Tunnel issues as backup (Cost vs. Availability)

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen27 ILC Linac Instrumentation (~40m) ~1m ATCA Standard Module

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen28 Sector Node Instrument Modules  ATCA Style Carrier Modules, Hot Swappable  ATM Mezzanine Modules, Hot Swappable  Stand-Alone or Shelf Cluster  Dual Redundant Serial I/O, Power  Robotic Replaceable

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen29 Manufacturing  All instrument packaging to be as far as possible in standard HA modules and hot-swappable sub- modules.  Estimate ~ 1 ATCA carrier card w/ sub-modules per meter of machine, ~25,000 total carriers, 100,000 mezzanine modules.  Standard hardware and PC board techniques.  Custom designs for high performance, reliability, minimum cost.

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen30 Addenda: Single Tunnel Cost Study  In post-Lehman Review studied placing instruments inside beam tunnel in concrete holes (TEEs) for radiation protection to reduce overall costs. Study known as CD0.4.  Seemed feasible but for availability would need remote robotics servicing.  Applied to BPMs, LLRF, vacuum pumps-gauges- valves, magnet movers, temperature, MPS-BCS- PPS...  Note: Study was not for HA redundant design, did not estimate civil or robotics costs.

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen31 Lehman ($253M) vs. CD 0.4 ($118M) Potential Cost Reduction: $135M (53%)

September 21-22, 2005ILC Electronics Industrial Opps R.S. Larsen32 Comment on Robotics Servicing  Study of robotic service system conducted by J. Cornuelle in collaboration with Stanford ME department graduate engineering students. Simple manipulations of removing, replacing modules in tunnel. Cost payback appears viable; major positive impact on availability (avoid machine shutdown to replace modules). Viability in dual tunnel also significant in providing 24/7 operation to minimize size, cost of crews.  All ILC electronics systems planned to be modular, robotically serviceable, some hot-swappable.  Significant manufacturer system opportunity.