Working Group 5 Draft Report On Sub Working Group Conclusions 1

WG 5 Approach Performed interference analysis in both direction – Government systems to LTE – LTE to Government Systems Determined separation distance for federal operations and LTE systems 2

Sub Working Group Aeronautical Mobile Telemetry (AMT) Conclusions: Sharing is not feasible between AMT and LTE Range of separation distance requirements would severely limit LTE deployment in top 100 commercial markets Changes to WG5 agreed assumptions may change the range of required protection distances and in turn may render different conclusions Identified Possible Future Analysis 3

Sub Working Group Small Unmanned Aerial Systems Conclusions: Sharing does not appear feasible, based on the analysis result identifying large separation distance requirements Industry view at this time is conclusion cannot be assessed due to insufficient Publicly Releasable Data Analysis Focused on Protection Distances – UE to SUAS: beyond 300 KMs – SUAS to Base Stations: at least 285 KMs Identified Possible Future Analysis 4

Sub Working Group Air Combat Training Systems Conclusions: Sharing would likely impose unacceptable operational or economic constraints on ACTS operators or wireless operators. – UE to ACTS: KM distances – ACTS to Base Stations: KM distances Identified Possible Future Analysis, including some sharing techniques 5

Sub Working Group Precision Guided Munitions/Other Airborne Systems Conclusions: 8 Systems Identified PGM, TactiLink, VORTEX, ROVER, DRAGOON, LITENING/Sniper: – Relocation to comparable spectrum JTRS AMF: – Protection Zones at selected priority areas for entire band/elsewhere MHz TTNT (exc Navy): – Protect DOD priority sites for entire band MHz 6

Future Analysis Options Identified Time-based & Geographic-based Sharing Off-tuning of LTE Base Stations Notching specific LTE channels at selected locations Alternate interference threshold based on desired signal level desired Possible effects of clutter/terrain UE Antenna Height 7