Continuous Improvement in the Classroom

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Action Research Deployment Teams
Advertisements

Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
The Continuous Improvement Classroom
Professional Learning Community Secondary Leaders
Continuous Improvement Professional Learning Community Framework What does it look like? What does it look like? Module Two.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
PDSA in the Classroom
P D S A REVIEW ACT PLAN STUDY DO Plan Continuous Improvement
Enhancing our guiding philosophy of continuous improvement
Agenda December 11, 2008 Learning by Doing Break
Continuous Improvement
Agenda For Today! School Improvement Harris Poll Data PDSA PLC
Reading ARDT Teams September 10 & 11, Agenda Your Role Your Role Big Picture Big Picture PLC for ARDT PLC for ARDT CI support CI support Plan on.
Action Research Deployment Teams November 29/30, 2006.
Continuous Improvement Update The Integration of Continuous Improvement and Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment & Technology October 13 th, 2008.
Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
PDSA Classroom.
Pre Planning: Identification of Need 1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations 2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments 3.
Agenda For Today! Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) Professional Learning Communities (Self Audit) School Improvement Snapshot School Improvement.
Agenda - January 28, 2009 Professional Learning Community – Jefferson HS Learning by Doing What does the data tell us? ITED results SIP Goals Data Questions.
The Integration of Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment and Continuous Improvement Board of Education Update October 13 th, 2008.
© 2008 ETS ATI, Portland, OR
The Continuous Improvement Classroom
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Agenda For Today! Welcome/Housekeeping
Introductions & Welcome!
Quality Liaisons November 6th, Responsibilities of the Quality Liaison: Main communication channel between the District and school/department Serve.
The Continuous Improvement Classroom Please sit by SIP goal area 1.) Find the SIP goal area that matches the Action Research area you work on.
Action Research Deployment Teams September, 2006.
Implementing Continuous Process Improvement in Our Schools
The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence A framework for continuous improvement.
The Continuous Improvement Classroom
School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
Differentiated Instruction Introduction
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Instructional Decision Making
Tracy Unified School District Leadership Institute – “Leading the Transformation” Breakout Session Authentic Data Driven Decision Making July/August 2014.
Setting SMART Goals with Students. Class & Student Goals Set the Target  Focus on learning & achievement  SMART Goals are:  Specific, Measurable, Attainable,
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
To use this PowerPoint you will need the following documents found in this module: OIP Stage 3 for the BLT The BLT 5-Step Process Visual The BLT 5-Step.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Connecting the Dots BISD’S LEARNING PLATFORM AND ESTABLISHING EXPECTATIONS FOR LEARNING RUBRIC.
Building Leadership Teams Driving Continuous Improvement Throughout the School! Session #3 January 2012.
Glendale Elementary School District Professional Development August 15, 2012.
Professional Learning Communities Changing the Way of Thinking About Teaching and Learning.
Building Leadership Teams
Action Research Deployment Teams March, Agenda  Team reflection  Completing the PDSA cycle  Team planning for continuous improvement.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
Moving Forward!. Responds to identified needs of the district and community, based upon data, and Provides Framework and Vehicle for School Improvement.
Susan Schaeper Klein ISD. What is a PLC? “A Professional Learning Community (PLC) is educators committed to working collaboratively in ongoing processes.
Why must we do Data Teams? We know the implementation of DT benefit STUDENTS -helps teachers identify exceeding/proficient students and plan for targeted.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
Becky Martin Continuous Improvement Facilitator Paul Hayes Secondary Student Services Facilitator 17th National Quality Education Conference October 2009.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
RtI Initiative Intensive Coaches Institute 9/8/09 Setting the Context.
Inquiry Team and Student Growth. “Best” Practices Think about some best practices within the last 20 years in the field of science. In the field of education,
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
Inquiry Team and Student Growth. “Best” Practices Think about some best practices within the last 20 years in the field of science. In the field of education,
BENCHMARK #3 “ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS TO GUIDE THE RIGHT WORK” PLC YEAR 2 DAY 2 INQUIRY CYCLE.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
Data Teams The Way of Our Work: Differentiated Accountability MTSS
تحقیقات عملیاتی دکتر نگین مسعودی علوی
Data Teams The Way of Our Work: Differentiated Accountability MTSS
Presentation transcript:

Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities

Agenda February 26, 2009 PLC Overview Learning by Doing Chapter 5 Subject Area discussion What’s worked and what hasn’t with your low performing students? Team time Next steps Closing & Evaluation

Al aligned and focused on the process of PLC and the product of formative assessment Principles and Building Leadership Teams on Process Learning Council and In-service on Product and using the Process of PLC FYI: Learning Council is made up of curriculum facilitators and lead teachers who have responsibility for curriculum

PLC Big Ideas & Core Values Continuous Improvement Philosophy Ensuring that students learn Learning for all A Culture of Collaboration Teamwork Focus on Results Data-Driven Decisions Same as PDSA

PLC Crucial Questions What do we want each student to learn, know, or be able to do? What evidence do we have of the learning? How will we respond when some students don’t learn? Frame our conversations and allow us to drill deeper Introduced these Q’s during the 07-08 school year How will we respond to those who have already learned?

Student Crucial Questions What do I need to know? Where am I now? How do I get there? What happens if I fail?

PLC Critical Questions What do we want students to know and be able to do? Standards/Student Learning Expectations Classroom SMART goals How will we know if they can do it? Formative assessments Multiple data sets How will we respond when they don’t? or they already have? Differentiated Instruction Systems of intervention (supplemental to intensive)

What do you expect to see? Student learning Expectations Formative Assessment Collaboration

In-Process Measures – Summative & Formative Assessments Building Leadership Team ITBS/ITED Summative Assessments School Improvement Plan ARD Team Communication ARD Team SEB ARD Team Math SMART Goal SMART Goal SMART Goal In-Process Measures – Summative & Formative Assessments

Most effective/best practice teaching and learning strategies? Pre Planning: Identification of Need 1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations 2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments 3. Review assessment data 4. Identify areas of need based on assessment Identify areas of strength and weakness? Plan: 1. Describe the current process for addressing the identified area of need (flow chart) 2. Review data to determine baseline performance in the specific area identified (Run Chart/Pareto Diagram) 3. Identify potential root causes contributing to the identified area of need (Cause & Effect Diagram, 5 Why’s, Relations Diagram) 4. Study research-based best practice/improvement theory addressing areas of need What do they know? What have they learned? Action Research Overview for Professional Learning Communities DO 1. Plan for implementation of improvement theory (Force Field Analysis, Action Plan) 2. Implement research-based best practices improvement theory based on root causes according to the Action Plan 3. Monitor the implementation of research-based best practice/improvement theory to insure integrity and fidelity 4. Assess student learning Act: 1. Standardize the implementation of research-based best practice (improvement theory) that improved student learning (revise the flow chart to reflect changes made to the system) 2. If improvement theory was unsuccessful continue the PDSA cycle (try another improvement theory based on the next identified root causes) Most effective/best practice teaching and learning strategies? Into your classroom Study: 1. Examine student assessment results (compare to baseline) 2. Assess the impact of research-based best practice/improvement theory on student achievement Have they learned it? What do we do if they don’t?

What to learn? Evidence of learning? If they don’t? If they do? PLAN DO STUDY ACT ITBS Summative Assessment BL Team School SIP ITBS Summative & Formative Assessment PLAN DO STUDY ACT AR Teams Math-Communication-SEB SMART Goal Formative Assessment What to learn? Evidence of learning? If they don’t? If they do? PLAN DO STUDY ACT Grade Level team Using I can statements to look at what students know and evidence of the learning What does the teacher do if students aren’t learning – regroup students as needed Subject Area Teams Std Learning Expectations

Learning by Doing Chapter 5 Pg 91 Collaboration focused on the right things Critical Issues pgs 100-101 Emotional Intelligence pg 103 Where do we go from here? Questions to guide our work

Are the strategies identified in the SIP Action Plan improving student achievement? How Do You Know? What’s worked and what hasn’t with the low performing students? Share, by school, your SIP goal, improvement theory, data and results Be prepared to take the information back to your school team

Team Tasks Preliminary SIP Planning Task from last session Share what you learned from the subject area discussions How might this effect your school improvement plan for next year? Task from last session What is your PLC vision for this school year? Identify 2 or 3 things you would like to have in place in your school by the end of the year. Choose one person to report aloud to the whole group.