Goal #2- Continuous Improvement. Common Themes Shared leadership Clear direction & focus Everyone involved Alignment Goals and Measures Aim of the Organization.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.

Advertisements

District Accreditation

Quality Liaison Network May 15, Agenda Year in Review Year in Review Changes for 07 & 08 Changes for 07 & 08 Complete Paperwork Complete Paperwork.

Continuous Improvement Update June 11, (Your School/Departments Mission Statement Here) (Your School/Departments SMART Goals Here)

©2005, Harris Interactive Inc. All rights reserved. Cedar Rapids Community School District Results - Key Overall District Findings.

Part III The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence

Continuous Improvement Update The Integration of Continuous Improvement and Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment & Technology October 13 th, 2008.

Quality Liaison Meeting Thursday – April 10, 2008 Wilson Middle School.

The Integration of Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment and Continuous Improvement Board of Education Update October 13 th, 2008.

Support Services Department- Leadership Teams Involving Everyone in the Plan on a Page!

Continuous Improvement In the CRCSD Putting the Pieces Together.

Support Services Department- Leadership Teams Alignment: Setting and Communicating Direction.

Continuous Improvement In the CRCSD

Quality Liaisons January 23rd, Please sit by level.

Mission. Ground rules created by students Classroom mission statements Classroom & student measurable goals Quality tools and PDSA used regularly The.

A Continuous Improvement Update. Category 1 Leadership Requires leaders to set and communicate direction consistent with stakeholder requirements –H–How.

Department Leadership Teams Involving Everyone in the Plan on a Page! November 17, 2009.

The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence

The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence A framework for continuous improvement.

Support Services Department- Leadership Teams Involving Everyone in the Plan on a Page!

Agenda Technology Department KAIZEN event/report out Technology Department KAIZEN event/report out Updating the Plan on a Page for Updating the.

Support Services Department- Leadership Teams Involving Everyone in the Plan on a Page!

Iowa Association of School Boards November 18, 2005.

YOU are LEADERS of the change process Are you feeling the heat of communicating the vision of change? Are you feeling the heat of communicating the vision.

Using Baldrige to Create Organizational Alignment & Integration

Strategic Visioning Process Pleasant Valley District #62

Religious Education Program Review January Religious Education Program Review Terms of Reference Terms of Reference  Communication between stakeholders.

Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Athletic Program Leader Proposed Adaptations.

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.

TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP The Philadelphia Story The School District of Philadelphia’s CEO Region Gregory Shannon, Regional Superintendent Malika A.

1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.

SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan

Nadine Drew Lynn Goldman Merrie Meyers Charles Webster.

1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.

District Leadership Team Stakeholder Involvement in the District Strategic Plan! Session #1 September 9th, 2010.

PPS Department Update Denise Doolittle, Director Paul Pattavina, Supervisor Lori Secchiaroli, Supervisor December 15, 2014.

1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.

Example of Maryland Performance Management Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator MARYLAND STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION Fall 2008.

“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”

Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA

Segment 5: Sample Activities Federal Accountability Requirements School Leadership Instructional Supervision 1.

Single Plan for Student Achievement Session #2.

Strategic Planning and AdvancEd Accreditation In partnership with Quality New Mexico Taos NMSBA Leadership Conference July 13, 2012.

Annual Report of the State of the Cedar Rapids Community School District Cedar Rapids Museum of Art November 4, 2005 – 8:00 a.m.

AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.

Leadership Team July 24, Learning Targets 1. Familiarize and use The Framework of Teaching in the areas of engagement and questioning to observe.

CCSS Road Map: The goal of implementing the Common Core State Standards is to ensure that instruction in our schools is changing dramatically.

AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.

Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.

Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems Brevard Public Schools District Accreditation.

Building Balanced Scorecards Thompson Leadership Team May 20, 2010 Annette Overton, Quality Performance Department.

Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.

Ensuring Success For Each Student AdvancED District Accreditation Process Five-Year External Review March 13 – 16, 2016 Produced by Mr. Tony Pickett, Assistant.

Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Maxey Elementary December 9 and 10, 2013.

ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.

Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.

Keys to Success: Districts PAM SHELEY CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING INDISTAR SHEPHERD FOR THE BUREAU OF INDIAN EDUCATION.

S UPPORT S ERVICES D EPARTMENT - L EADERSHIP T EAMS Involving Everyone in continuous improvement! Session 4 – April15 th, 2011.

Choice Activity What would it be like to present to the school board and district leadership? 1.The need for an EBISS District Leadership Implementation.

Turning Around Chronically Low- Performing Schools Nelson Colbert, Science Instructional Specialist Richmond Public Schools Richmond, VA.

August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.

MAPLE VALLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT PD January 18, 2016.

Standard 1: Teachers Demonstrate Leadership a. Teachers lead in their classrooms.

Kentucky Core Academic Standards Pike County Schools.

USD 261 Haysville District Initiatives. USD261 Haysville DISTRICT MOTTO: Caring, effective learning for all. MISSION STATEMENT : The mission of the Haysville.

School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.

Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.

From Rhetoric to Action

District Leadership Team

Presentation transcript:

Goal #2- Continuous Improvement

Common Themes Shared leadership Clear direction & focus Everyone involved Alignment Goals and Measures Aim of the Organization Aligned Acts of Improvement

Progress & Accomplishments Balanced Scorecard Revisions 4 Quality Levels Quality Deployment Instrument Training & Professional Development Action Research Teams Quality Liaisons Department Leadership Teams Stakeholder Surveys Iowa Recognition for Performance Excellence (IRPE) Award

Balanced Scorecard Revisions 4 Quality Levels Quality Deployment Instrument Training & Professional Development Action Research Teams Quality Liaisons Department Leadership Teams Stakeholder Surveys Iowa Recognition for Performance Excellence (IRPE) Award

Balanced Scorecard Revisions 4 Quality Levels Quality Deployment Instrument Training & Professional Development Action Research Teams Quality Liaisons Department Leadership Teams Stakeholder Surveys Iowa Recognition for Performance Excellence (IRPE) Award

3.D) Increase % of staff implementing practices of the 4 Quality Levels

Progress & Accomplishments Balanced Scorecard Revisions 4 Quality Levels Quality Deployment Instrument Training & Professional Development Action Research Teams Quality Liaisons Department Leadership Teams Stakeholder Surveys Iowa Recognition for Performance Excellence (IRPE) Award

Professional Development Participation Nearly 600 participants Variety of Quality Classroom workshops Leading Continuous Improvement 6 elementary schools trained Estimate: nearly 45% of teaching staff have participated in quality training

Professional Development District trainers Next generation of training/coaching

Progress & Accomplishments Balanced Scorecard Revisions 4 Quality Levels Quality Deployment Instrument Training & Professional Development Action Research Teams Quality Liaisons Department Leadership Teams Stakeholder Surveys Iowa Recognition for Performance Excellence (IRPE) Award

Action Research Teams All schools participating 4 times/year PDSA- school improvement model Shared leadership Setting and Communicating Direction

Progress & Accomplishments Balanced Scorecard Revisions 4 Quality Levels Quality Deployment Instrument Training & Professional Development Action Research Teams Quality Liaisons Department Leadership Teams Stakeholder Surveys Iowa Recognition for Performance Excellence (IRPE) Award

Quality Liaisons Internal capacity and support Meet monthly Network with other liaisons Support the implementation of the 4 Quality Levels Main communication channel between the District and school

Progress & Accomplishments Balanced Scorecard Revisions 4 Quality Levels Quality Deployment Instrument Training & Professional Development Action Research Teams Quality Liaisons Department Leadership Teams Stakeholder Surveys Iowa Recognition for Performance Excellence (IRPE) Award

Department Leadership Teams Shared leadership structure for Support Service Departments Cabinet, supervisors/managers and front line employees 12 departments 60 employees Meet 4 times/year Aligning to the District Plan on a Page

(Departments Mission Statement Here) (Departments SMART Goals Here)

Progress & Accomplishments Balanced Scorecard Revisions 4 Quality Levels Quality Deployment Instrument Training & Professional Development Action Research Teams Quality Liaisons Department Leadership Teams Stakeholder Surveys Iowa Recognition for Performance Excellence (IRPE) Award

Stakeholder Surveys District Survey Committee Survey instruments for: Parents Students Staff Community Scorecard measures to determine stakeholder satisfaction over time

Progress & Accomplishments Balanced Scorecard Revisions 4 Quality Levels Quality Deployment Instrument Training & Professional Development Action Research Teams Quality Liaisons Department Leadership Teams Stakeholder Surveys Iowa Recognition for Performance Excellence (IRPE) Award

2006 Iowa Recognition for Performance Excellence Award Continue to use feedback report to drive improvements External recommendations and OFIs

Everyone needs to make it theirs!

Goal #2- Continuous Improvement