Management PARSEL. 6.1 Project management A formal project management structure will be set up from the start of the Project and continue the work of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
Advertisements

Head of Learning: Job description
Europe and Education School Education COMENIUS. The School Education Action of the European Community’s Programme “Socrates” on Education 2 nd phase:
Identification of critical success factors for implementing NLLS, through collaboration and exchange of expertise IDENTIFY LLP-2008-RO-KA1-KA1NLLS.
ECVET WORKSHOP 2 22/23/24 November The European Quality Assurance Reference Framework.
Consistency of Assessment
EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGY PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
What should be the basis of
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
1 National Training Programme for New Governors 2005 Module 3 Ensuring accountability.
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Local authorities’ role in implementing European Employment Strategy - case Finland Mr. Lauri Lamminmäki, Senior Adviser Association of Finnish Local and.
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
Ofsted lessons Clerks’ Update Jan Ofsted Sept 2012 The key judgements: Inspectors must judge the quality of education provided in the school – its.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 Updates continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director & Caroline Lansdown.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
Creating Entrepreneurship: entrepreneurship education for the creative industries David Clews Subject Centre Manager Higher Education Academy Art | Design.
GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA MINISTRY OF PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Evaluation Central Unit Development of the Evaluation.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
Consultation Responses A Volunteer Guide For further information please contact:
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA ACTIVITIES ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: EXPERIENCE AND CHALLENGES By. H.R.T. Muzale and R. Toba.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
3-MINUTE READ Draft SEN Code of Practice: for 0 to 25 years.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
Strengthening global awareness in the local communities - Kolping 2020 Strategy.
OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES Ensuring Ownership of PARSEL by Partners.
EPOCA – 11. June EPOCAConsortiumOrganisation.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
Tony Karbo, Ph.D. AHSI/UPEACE Africa Program.  Action or inaction taken by interested entities such as NGOs, Think Tanks, government departments, ministries,
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
SCHOOL BOARD A democratically elected body that represents public ownership of schools through governance while serving as a bridge between public values.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
DG Education et Culture Socrates - Comenius 1 Europe and education School education.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
DonQ – Air Project presentation. DonQ-Air – About project Objective: Objective: to encourage R&D activities in the aeronautic-related.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
Consortium building PHOENIX Training Course Laulasmaa, Estonia
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
An Introduction to Formative Assessment as a useful support for teaching and learning.
BCSM&Higa Ubeho RPOs COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE (COP) _____________ By: RUSANGANWA Léon Pierre PSF/BCSM Project Manager ____________________________________________________________.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
The Higher Education Academy - enhancing the student experience Teaching, learning and the disability agenda Yvonne Dickinson Adviser: Disability NADO.
Project Management Birutė Markevičiūtė Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 13 October 2008, Riga.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement Shirley Jones.
Guidelines for the Organization of Practical Placements for Students (PPS) Code of Practice for Actors Gregory Makrides – European Association of Erasmus.
ESPON Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café 18 May 2010 in Bruxelles Call for Proposals on Transnational Networking Activities (Projects carried through.
Global Partnership for Enhanced Social Accountability (GPESA) December 19, 2011 World Bank.
10 February “FP6 Networks of excellence” Colette Renier Research DG.
1 Project Coordinators’ meeting March 2010 NATIONAL TEMPUS OFFICES (NTOs) & HIGHER EDUCATION REFORMS.
Progress Report on Quality Issues SIPUS – Strengthening of Internationalisation Policies at Universities in Serbia February 18, 2015 Belgrade, Serbia.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.
Presentation of Work Package 6 (WP6) “Design and implementation of Dissemination Activities” MATcHES Kick-off meeting Feb 2014 Ruse, Bulgaria TEMPUS BG-TEMPUS-JPHES.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education Project updates Marcella Turner-Cmuchal.
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
MATcHES Kick-off meeting Feb 2014 Ruse, Bulgaria WORK PACKAGE 5.
Kick Off Meeting Largs, Scotland
Funded by the Erasmus+ Programme EPP JO-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP Lina Tsakalou
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
The Learning Networks under the ESF
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Culture Statistics: policy needs
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
Presentation transcript:

Management PARSEL

6.1 Project management A formal project management structure will be set up from the start of the Project and continue the work of the preparation team. This will involve three levels of project management: Project Coordinator PARSEL Steering Committee Project Internal Management

6.1.1Project Coordinator The Co-ordinator will be responsible for liaison with the Commission, the overall management of the Project and the distribution of funds received from the EU. As such, the responsibilities of the Project Coordinator are seen as providing an oversight of the project and progress made, by undertaking: financial management and making suitable financial arrangements; efficient cooperation and communication between all partners in the project; ensuring adequate coordination of activities and strong communicate with outside bodies; communicating progress and outcomes from the project to partners, the Commission and ensuring adequate dissemination.

The Project Coordinator will support the work package leaders, directly and via the steering committee, by: drawing attention to delivery dates and any potential problems in meeting the objectives of each work package by the consortium; ensuring that links are made between work packages in ways that take full advantage of synergies and inter-dependencies; checking that national developments are operating smoothly and meeting expectations.

6.1.2Steering Committee The Steering Committee will : meet (via video-conferencing) on a regular 3 monthly basis. advise the Co-ordinator on the overall direction of the Project, on any adjustment to the programme of work and on any significant changes in the use of resources or timing. support the Project Coordinator in ensuring overall partner coordination, workpackages meet their targets and evaluation instruments, linked to the outcomes of testing teaching/learning materials, are suitable for use in the partner countries and with comparable translations.

A particular function of the steering committee will be to ensure adequate attention is paid to formulating and upgrading dissemination plans and that these are timely put into action by each partner.

6.1.3Project Internal Management: Workpackage leaders will be from the 4 partners forming a first tier of management and will have clear responsibilities to the Co-ordinator for the timely sending of deliverables and for the specified developments, reports, guidelines, translations and progress coordination. Nevertheless, there will be a strong emphasis on the collaborative aspects of the Project and hence a commitment by all partners to ensure their contribution is well managed at the local level. This will be reinforced through the workshop meetings taking place every 4-5 months in which all partners will be expected to make presentations.

Communication to enhance internal management will be through s and, as necessary, direct telephone conversation both within the country and with the workpackage coordinators/Project Coordinator. Special efforts will be made to ensure adequate dissemination plans are in place by all partners, both for within the country and for the wider dissemination and that careful and timely attention is paid to the creation of journal articles and seminar/conference papers.

6.1.4Decision-Making Procedures There will be a formal procedure for the resolution of disputes through a majority vote within the steering committee with the Co-ordinator having both a deliberative and, if necessary, a casting vote.

6.1.5PARSEL Management Plan The role of all participants, and the related timelines, would be formalised through contracts drawn up between each of the partners by the Coordinator and agreed by the Steering Committee. The Project Management Plan will be detailed for each component of the project and agreed by the Steering Committee and will include the schedule of financial payments to be made to the partners. The Steering Committee will draw up plans for dissemination, both at the local and European/ international level, and for future plans beyond the project pertaining to the website and exemplary teaching/learning materials.

6.1.6Contract Management Financial control and reporting will be the responsibility of IPN. It will be the responsibility of the Co-ordinator to keep all partners of the project informed of all contractual matters relating to the Commission. The Project administrator, appointed within IPN, will be responsible to the Co-ordinator, in the first instance, and to the Steering Committee for the dissemination of information to all partners in good time for them to act. Additional members of staff will be appointed as required on a short-term contract or secondment basis to undertake duties relating to particular areas of concern.

6.1.7Information Flow and Updating of Workplan In addition to informal contacts, partners will report orally at each steering videoconference meeting and more formally, in writing, at each workshop meeting of the consortium. This will cover progress of work specified in the various work packages, problems encountered and how the problems were being tackled. There will be major reviews of the project developments at months 8, 18 and 24. The Project Co-ordinator will work with the work package leaders on the preparation of reports to the Commission; these will require approval by the project Steering Committee. The steering committee will decide on any updating of the workplans and the Project Co-ordinator will be responsible for conveying this to the Commission.

Deliverables will be sent to the Project Co-ordinator by the work package leaders by dates specified in the Management plan and in line with the achievement of the delivery dates set out in the table listing deliberables. Subject to the formal approval of the Steering Committee, the Project Co-ordinator and work package leaders will agree on any security measures appropriate prior to public access being granted to services and materials developed within PARSEL. Formal reports on the manner in which the authorship of the original examples of teaching/learning materials and work of the consortium is recognised and acknowledged during the dissemination of the model and exemplar materials will be made to the Steering Committee by the Project Co-ordinator, with extensive reports on exploitation plans being made by the time of the mid-term review (interim exploitation plan) and three months prior to the completion of the Project (final exploitation plan). The exchange of ideas and the extent of the deliberations during the Project will be conducted confidentiality.

6.1.8Quality Assurance Mechanisms Quality within PARSEL would be assured through the involvement of two groups: the project steering committee an external reference group

The Co-ordinator will be responsible for the active involvement of all groups at all stages in the evaluation of the work packages and for ensuring that the evaluations are completed on time. The steering committee however, would provide a major check on quality discussing matters of concern and will refer outcomes or actions required to the Project Co-ordinator.

External Reference Group An external reference group will be set up which will include: senior academics from other institutions, who have had experience as external examiners or assessors related to teaching/learning materials; and representatives from professional bodies concerned with education and training quality standards. At least one member will be from the ICASE management body. Procedures for the involvement of the quality assurance teams will be through involvement in the workshops held before the mid- term assessment and the final internal evaluation of PARSEL (workshops 3 and 7).

6.2Plan for using and disseminating knowledge One output of this project is to create an interactive website that would enable members to disseminate appropriate information, and allow teachers to have a source of exemplar materials and/or resources. This allows a coordinated management of all dissemination materials to ensure adequate coordination. And by this means the project intends to share evidence of exemplary strategies that promote effective reflective school teaching and provide a forum for the development of the school curriculum, assessment and methods that are exemplary with respect to relevant school science teaching.

The partners will create a regional network for relevance in science education. By operating at a local level, the partners will establish links with existing communities, and work with these, or establish other local dissemination links. The local links are seen as important in providing opportunities for translation of the materials into the local language and making available materials, tested in the local situation, which promote relevance of science teaching within a country. By linking internationally through ICASE, the partners forge additional international dissemination channels. The partners will audit provision and disseminate information with respect to strategies and developments they have evaluated. Partners will: create dissemination links within a country and internationally; contribute to the project operation and dissemination strategies; share expertise and materials that strive towards combating the EU concerns for a lack of future scientists and a well informed public on science and technology affairs; agree on a combined strategy for promoting best practice for relevance in science teaching and through local dissemination links test exemplars in secondary classrooms; evaluate, report and disseminate outcomes of testing the exemplary science teaching materials and resources to promote relevant science teaching.

The project thus sees important sub-objectives as: creation, enhancement and nurturing of opportunities for collaboration and partnership between network members; development of a shared vision between partners on relevant teaching materials; provision of a forum for discussion and dissemination of effective practice related to science teaching/learning materials and/or resources; development of questionnaires for teacher and students on the outcomes from using exemplar teaching/learning material in the classroom; raising the profile of relevance approaches in science education which strive to increase the popularity of science subjects in school and through the popularity of science and technology, developments within society.

6.2.2 Local Dissemination Strategy The project recognises that developing a shared vision between partners is not sufficient and that there is a need to disseminate this to teachers and stakeholders within a country. The major stakeholders are seen as science teachers, science teacher educators, curriculum developers, the scientist community and industry. The latter two groups are included because the voice of scientists is often very powerful within a country and their involvement and interest would be a major dissemination support. Industry, as a potential employer and with views on the type of science education that is important, is seen as another key stakeholder in the development of materials. Industry is often a sponsor of such materials and hence their involvement and interest would assist the future developments of materials and/or resources promoted as relevant for science teaching.

A key target for dissemination of materials and/or resources is naturally the science teacher and hence a key factor is not only their interest, but also their ability to accept and take ownership of the model for teaching material development. This is assisted by forming links with the local professional science teacher association and a key role for ICASE is disseminating outcomes to such associations. By involving teachers in testing the translated materials in the classroom, additional outcomes can be disseminated as well as developing ownership of the approach for relevant teaching materials in the classroom. Key sub-objectives related to local dissemination strategies: translation of the teaching/learning materials and/or resources into the local language; gain acceptance of the exemplar teaching/learning materials and the model for further development and use within science teaching; try out and monitor the use of such materials with a view to providing more dissemination information on outcomes on the relevance of the materials/resources in the local situation; formulating dissemination strategies to encourage greater use of the exemplar materials.

6.2.3 Wider Dissemination Objectives The network members of the project recognise the important need for dissemination and this is put forward as a key feature of the project. This applies not only to the model and the exemplar materials/resources related to this, but to dissemination to a range of European and other countries, based on the outcomes of using teaching/learning materials in the classroom The project would thus build on its extensive, existing international, regional and national relationships for this purpose. It would make particular use of its links with ICASE and the relevant science teacher education organisations with which it interlinks, as well as with institutions, scientists and industry though its known contacts. Key sub-objectives related to dissemination are this seen as: initiating mechanisms for the disseminating of relevant teaching/learning materials and/or resources with specific reference to promoting relevance of science teaching and raising the popularity of science in the eyes of students; ensuring trans-national co-ordination and dissemination of ideas and best practice related to science teaching and resource materials for relevance; further developing relevant national and international links.

The partners would have three clear functions: Contributing to a model, and accompanying exemplar teaching/learning materials and/or resources, based on a sharing of expertise and developments, reflecting best practice with respect to policy, practice and strategies related to the promotion of relevant science teaching, as a part of the project strategy to raise the popularity of science in schools. Guiding dissemination of the materials through testing in the local situation to wider stakeholders e.g. teacher educators, scientists and industry with respect to promoting relevant science teaching based on local issues and student interests. Dissemination of the model and exemplar materials/resources together with the outcomes of utilising the materials/resources in the classroom situation in a range of European and other countries. The partnerships created will provide an opportunity to raise the profile of issues identified by teachers at the local and national levels, as well as provide a mechanism by which the teacher voice on the theme of relevant science teaching and the many constraints to this, can inform national and international debate within the science education community.

6.3 Raising public participation and awareness The project will establish an effective mechanism for dissemination of exemplar materials based on the model at a national level in each participating country with the help of the partners and ICASE (links to the national science teacher association) to include: Education practitioners - teachers and schools Teacher educators - science educators and universities Scientists – Academy of sciences, universities Industry

The project will undertake the translation of exemplary materials into the local language (as appropriate) and test each translated material/resource in 3-5 classrooms in each country. The project will promote ownership of the model and determine the appropriateness of the exemplar teaching/learning materials and/or resources. The project will disseminate the materials and outcomes through a variety of channels. The testing will be carried out by identifying interested teachers, with the partners providing guidelines and developing instruments to measure outcomes.

The project will involve local teachers, teacher educators and industrialists in each of the planned workshops to be held in different participant countries. Through this it is planned to raise greater awareness and participation by education and industry groups in raising the standard of science education within the country. And by encouraging the exemplary materials or materials created by teachers based on the exemplary material in the schools, it is expected that greater public awareness will be raised by students communicating with their parents.