10-1--2010 First Steps 10-1-2010 Update The following pages contain proposed and approved changes to the First Steps Program. Please refer to the individual.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TREATMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Advertisements

DDRS Health Homes Initiative: Meeting the Triple Aim through Care Coordination. Shane Spotts Director, Indiana Division of Rehabilitation Services May.
An Audiological Management Manual for UNHS Referrals Antonia Brancia Maxon, Ph.D. Karen Ditty, M.S. Kathleen Watts, M.A. Diane Sabo, Ph.D. Karen Munoz,
1 Advisory Council April 1, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
1 EEC Board Meeting May 10, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Subchapter M-Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act Program Part 273-Education Contracts under Johnson-OMalley Act.
BCW Standards: Service Coordination Presentation to: Babies Can’t Wait (BCW) Providers Presented by: BCW Technical Assistance Unit Date: April 2012.
Team Meetings in Early Intervention Provider Onboarding Series 4 By: Brenda Amos-Moss and Donna DeSanto.
C ontent of the IFSP Produced by NICHCY, In this module, you’ll learn:  Why the IFSP is so important in early intervention  The 8 types of information.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
Understanding the IEP Process
Illinois Early Intervention and Medicaid Presented by: Janet D. Gully, Chief & Jennifer Kepner Illinois Department of Human Services – Bureau of Early.
Medicaid Documentation Guidelines for Case Managers
Family Centered Approach Hussain Ali Maseeh, Psy.D. Director of SEDIC.
Home and Community Based Services for Children with Autism Waiver (HCBS-CWA)
Autism Waiver. Approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and became effective Includes 8 services; services are available.
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
MA Department of Public Health Bureau of Family Health and Nuttrion DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH SPECIALTY SERVICES FOR VERY YOUNG CHILDREN WITH ASD Ron.
Potpourri: Summary of Important Points to Remember Presenters: Jill Harris Laura Duos NOVEMBER 2011.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
1 Public Hearings: May , 2013 Child Care Development Fund Massachusetts State Plan Federal Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015.
NECTAC in collaboration with ITCA
1 Implementation of the New Part C Eligibility Criteria Effective 7/1/2010.
Administrator Checklist Research and Training Center on Service Coordination.
A Brief Overview of California’s Early Start Program Early Intervention Services in California Developed by California MAP to Inclusion and Belonging…Making.
Special Education Policies, Practices, and Programs
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Iowa Council for Early ACCESS: Overview Vision: Every child, beginning at birth, will be healthy and successful Mission: Early ACCESS builds upon and provides.
Screening Implementation: Referral and Follow-up What Do You Do When the Screening Test Is of Concern? Paul H. Lipkin, MD D-PIP Training Workshop June.
Understanding Transition from Early Intervention to Preschool An Overview for Families New Jersey Department of Education New Jersey Department of Health.
The Comprehensive Perinatal Services Program
Enhancing Communication Among Health Care and Educational Programs How Privacy Regulations Impact Delivery of Effective Services by Karl R. White National.
1 Using a Statewide Evaluation Tool for Child Outcomes & Program Improvement Terry Harrison, Part C Coordinator Susan Evans, Autism Project Specialist.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
1. Today’s Purpose 1. Familiarize participants with Early ACCESS. 2. Familiarize participants with Early ACCESS process. 3. Familiarize participants with.
What’s New?. Planning for Child Evaluator Training First Steps is using Survey Monkey to support planning in the coming year The Kentucky PLE Needs Assessment/
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN:
PUT AWAY THE PANIC BUTTON! IMPLEMENTING THE NEW PART C FEDERAL REGULATIONS IN VIRGINIA Part 2 June 27, 2012.
Be an Expert! Using and Explaining ESIT's New Procedural Safeguards Forms Joicey Hurth, Kathi Gillaspy, Anne Lucas Cathy Buchanan & Rene’ Denman 1.
1 Orientation to April 2012 Changes in Early Steps Policy Handbook and Operations Guide.
Pre-referral, Referral, and Post-Referral Procedures Presented by: Jill Harris and Rhonda Spence NOVEMBER 16, 2011.
Michigan State Plan for Early On ® February
THE NEW PART C FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND NATIONAL TRENDS IN SERVICE DELIVERY GETTING INTO THE SYSTEM.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
THE NEW PART C FEDERAL REGULATIONS GETTING INTO THE SYSTEM.
Integrated systems of care Presented by: Jolanta McCall Head of Paediatric Audiology/NHSP.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
DIRECT NURSING SERVICES 1. WHAT ARE DIRECT NURSING SERVICES? Direct Nursing Services are a direct shift nursing service provided by an RN or LPN for an.
What Parents Need to Know: The New Part C Federal Regulations and National Trends in Service Delivery Lynda Cook Pletcher May 10, 2012 Region 6 Parent.
Developing Strong Transition Protocols Infant Toddler Program, Head Start and Early Childhood Special Education Shannon Dunstan Idaho State Department.
Interview Design Four Focal States Connecticut, Indiana, North Carolina, Massachusetts Additional States Arizona, Utah, Washington State Interview Protocol.
Infants, Toddlers, & Young Children with Disabilities ECSE 641 Spring 2015 (Lee, 2010)
Children’s Policy Conference Austin, TX February 24, ECI as best practice model for children 0-3 years with developmental delays / chronic identified.
Early Intervention Services in Natural Environments Indicators C-1, C-2 and C-7 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance.
CCB TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CALL July 12, :30-1:30 1.
2015 Early Intervention (EI) Colorado State Plan Policies and Procedures: An Update for EI Providers Early Intervention Colorado October 2, 2015.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
ROSIE D. V. ROMNEY Implementing the Court Order. The Court Decision 1/26/06: Court enters sweeping decision finding Massachusetts in violation of EPSDT.
Module 3 Early ACCESS Process Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Iowa Department of Education.
Team Meetings in Early Intervention
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
New IFSP – Policy and Procedures Update
Eligibility Determination IFSP Meetings IFSP Service Implementation
Leadership Academy Special Education.
Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

First Steps Update The following pages contain proposed and approved changes to the First Steps Program. Please refer to the individual pages for updates and implementation timelines. DDRS is continuing to review comments regarding the proposals, therefore, an implementation date has not been established for each activity. DDRS will release further details as individual proposals are finalized. You may submit comments or questions to:

Effective Increase requirements for higher intensity services Require State prior approval for the following: Delivery of an individual service at a frequency of 2 times per week or greater Delivery of an individual service over 60 minutes in duration Considerations: Delivery of services continues to meet the intent of the early intervention system Resources to review PA’s Estimated Savings: $500,000 Process: Notice to providers and SPOEs Develop internal review process

Effective Tighten enrollment requirements for Developmental Therapists Enrollment Guidelines Degree in early childhood or special education with a focus on early childhood development DTs enrolled at an associate level for the first year. After one year, the provider may request to advance to the specialist level Considerations Additional focus and expertise on early childhood development Increased supervision and quality controls Help to reduce the number of new providers coming into the system with minimal early childhood experience Existing providers would be “grandfathered” into the new requirements Estimated Savings: Enrollment at Associate level $100,000 due to lower rate Stop gap for future spending due to the reduction of new providers coming into the system. Process: Modification to personnel requirements

Effective Newborn Hearing Screenings (NBH) Infants that do not pass their newborn hearing screen will be directed to their primary medical home for follow-up and necessary audiology evaluations Considerations: ISDH holds the responsibility for coordination of the NBH process and rule making ISDH is supportive of the desire of First Steps to decrease involvement in follow-up activities Promotes coordination with primary care physician Time saving at the SPOE due to reduced intakes Reduced number of audiology evaluations Estimated Savings: $500,000 in audiology services SPOE cost saving is undetermined at this time Process: Notification to ISDH, clarification to SPOEs, Notice to providers. ISDH will notify birthing hospitals and audiology staff.

Proposed ED team evaluation procedures Streamline evaluation procedures, while increasing responsibility of the ED team members to monitor the Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP), including placing the teams under the SPOEs Limit minutes available for evaluation or establish a per assessment rate Limit minutes available for ongoing assessment and monitoring of the IFSP. Require written feedback on the child’s progress and the appropriateness of the plan Limit annual evaluation to one ED team provider for those children with a medical diagnosis that meets eligibility Increased monitoring of ED team through per child cost analysis Considerations: Limited reimbursement may result in reduced monitoring by ED team members Estimated Savings : Cost saving is dependent on the approach, however ranges from $500,000 to $1,000,000 Process: Finalize rates, modifications to the ED team manual, modification to the SPOE contracts with ED team requirements (not required but may be recommended), report development for monitoring.

Effective Modify reimbursement for IFSP meeting attendance Remove payment authorization for ongoing providers to attend IFSP meetings as a separate authorization. Parents may request provider’s attendance at the IFSP meeting as a component of their ongoing service. Considerations: Child progress, service recommendation and outcomes should be included in the required quarterly reports. Therefore, SCs and ED teams should have adequate information to develop the IFSP. Estimated Savings : Cost saving is anticipated at $500,000 Process: Process Clarification to SPOEs and providers First Steps will honor any outstanding authorizations or written meeting invitations, issued prior to Without prior written approval, providers may bill on either the ongoing authorization or the IFSP meeting authorization. Billing for both ongoing service and meeting attendance will result in an audit finding. It is anticipated that effective , CPT code T1023 will be added as an available selection within the service description.

Effective Increase provider education regarding appropriate services Continued clarification of the following: Eligibility requirements No post operative services Appropriate use of informed clinical opinion Consideration: Clarification will support best practices Estimated Savings: While some cost savings may be noticed, reinforcement of policy services more as a “stop gap” for misuse of funds. Process: Written clarification

Effective Improve guidelines for use of clinic setting BCDS should provide clarification on when it may be appropriate to discuss with families the option of having services in a clinic setting. The following are examples of times when this discussion may be appropriate: Kids on the Autism spectrum Kids with auditory or visual impairment Evaluation days in clinic Considerations: Rate for onsite services is 20% less than services in the natural environment Consideration should be given to paying onsite services at the Medicaid rate While emphasis is placed on the provision of services in the natural environment, Federal law does allow for case by case exceptions Cost saving is dependent on the final rates Monitoring for abuse or increase of services by provider groups would be necessary

Effective Increase Parent Participation While current procedures require caregiver participation, consideration should be given to strengthen the participation of the parent Require active parent participation during sessions within the home Require active caregiver participation at every therapy session When services are provided outside of the home, require active parent participation at a minimum of 1 time per month Continue to enforce that parents must be present and involved in all evaluations Considerations: Increase parent involvement resulting in greater education of parent to support their own child Inconvenience for some families Scheduling difficulties for providers-increased need for flexibility in scheduling Sets clear expectation for the First Steps program May need to better define “active participation” Estimated Savings: Unknown at this time Note: Transition to begin , changes effective Nov 1, 2010

Effective Three Month Authorizations While the IFSP must be written for a one year period, service authorizations within the IFSP may be written for a shorter period of time. This would allow greater input from the ED team on the appropriateness of the services and require providers to provide input into the outcomes and progress of children Progress report with justification should be required prior to continue authorization of service Report must contain documentation of the ICD-9 code directly addressed by the service Prior to the addition of a service, an evaluation must be completed and ICD-9 code obtained. Considerations: 3 month auths are standard practice in the health care industry Increase quality and use of ICD-9 codes will result in an increase in TPL reimbursement Estimated Savings: $1,000,000 Process: Policy clarification Note: Transition to begin , changes effective Nov 1, 2010

Proposed Provider Networks Consolidation of providers to form networks/groups Multidisciplinary Agency (required to maintain 3 providers from each discipline: Developmental, Occupational, Physical, and Speech Therapy Providers with the ability to obtain and provide all other required e.i. services ) Demonstrated successful ability to bill insurance Physical service location, open to the public 5 days per week during normal business hours Revenue streams outside of First Steps Quality Assurance structure with written policies and procedures, meeting contractual obligations, including but not limited to, compliance with FERPA and HIPAA. Structure that provides staff support, provides continued education and mentoring for providers, with a clear line of authority. Considerations Reduced number of payees, allowing for increased monitoring and reduce administrative overhead Increase team communication and collaboration Increased local supervision of and increase mentoring of providers Potential for increased leverage to negotiate service areas and reduction in rates 5% Need to minimize disruption to families as providers leave or change employment: Consider honoring current auths and phase in new enrollment criteria Transition costs for Service Coordinators to facilitate changes Process: Policy clarification, amendment of provider agreements and personnel guide

Effective SPOE/LPCC cost saving Contract Cuts 15% cut of the SPOE/LPCC funding Considerations: Need to “do things differently” Need to identify core processes and those that are “nice” Increase in caseloads Allow flexibility between LPCC and SPOE funding as new budgets are developed. Estimated Savings: $1.6m Process: Contract amendment

Effective Cost Participation - Suspension of services for accounts 60 days or greater past due First Steps is in the process of implementing procedures that would suspend services to families where the cost participation account is 60 days or greater past due. Families would remain eligible to receive those services for which Federal law does not allow a fee to be accessed. Estimated savings: $150,000 Effective

Effective Assistive Technology Eliminate the payment for orthotics as a First Steps service*. Estimated Savings: $600,000 *Completed May 2010