1 SHEFO New Trends in Capital Outlay August 16, 2002 Overview of the Demands on Capital for Construction and Facility Renewal at The University of Texas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Facilities Planning Process and the resulting Long Range Capital Needs Plan and State Five Year Construction Plan Los Rios Community College District.
Advertisements

Work in Progress: The Bridge to the Doctorate Experience A Reflection on Best Practices and Project Outcomes T. Aktosun (UT Arlington) A.Arciero, B. Flores,
UT San Antonio PeopleSoft Project September 2010.
The University of Texas System FY 2007 Operating Budget Presented to the Board of Regents August 2006.
Operating Budget Overview Presented to the Tuition and Fee Committee November 13, 2009 Presented to the Tuition and Fee Committee November 13, 2009.
An overview of the Coordinating Board criteria and review process Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (2008)
Presented to the: State Higher Education Executive Officers Professional Development Conference Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Presented by: J. Kent Caruthers.
A Framework to Understand College Access and Affordability at the National, State and Institutional Levels TAIR Conference 2008, Galveston Trish Norman,
Capital Planning Task Force Update Interim Report November 18, 2003 THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM.
Overview of UTSA’s Discretionary Budget Presented by: Mary Simon Sr. Director Budget and Planning Development.
Tuition & Fee Proposal and FY 2009 Budget Tuition & Fee Proposal and FY 2009 Budget Presentation to UTSA Staff Council June 26, 2008 Janet Parker, Associate.
The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National Reputation By Successfully Serving its Region The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National.
1 Orientation for New Advisory Board Members WPI Financial Overview October 23, 2008 Presented by Jeffrey Solomon, Executive Vice President/CFO.
Tuition & Aid Advisory Board A Discussion of UCB Priorities and Funding Strategies September 27, 2004.
Town Meeting 2006 / 2007 Budget June 2006 American University of Beirut.
HIGHER EDUCATION FUND (HEF) HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD.
Financial Issues in Higher Education Dr. David F. Finney.
Economic Impact of Medical Education Expansion in Nevada & Recommended Approach FUTURE 1.
Overview of UTSA’s Discretionary Budget
November 5, 2010 Closing The Gaps by 2015 Where We Are Now Closing The Gaps by 2015 Where We Are Now.
Tuition-Designated Fees University of Texas at San Antonio.
All About the Money: The State Budget One Voice: A Collaborative for Health and Human Services September 30, 2004 Eva De Luna Castro, Budget Analyst
UTSA Presentation to the Legislative Budget Board September 28, 2010 UTSA Presentation to the Legislative Budget Board September 28, 2010 Legislative Appropriations.
FY 2009 Budget Highlights. FY 2009 Operating Budget UTSA’s strategic goals provide the framework for budget priorities: – –budget plan focuses on the.
John Carroll University Board of Directors Presentation Vice President for Finance and Administrative Services Financial Update December 14, 2004.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. Creating Big Ideas: Long-Term Capital Planning – A.
WELCOME! GREATER 288 PARTNERSHIP Promoting the Gateway to Texas GREATER 288 PARTNERSHIP Promoting the Gateway to Texas.
TENNESSEE BOARD OF REGENTS FINANCIAL OVERVIEW JANUARY 19, 2010 Presentation to the Association of Government Accountants’ Winter Seminar.
ASU One University – In Many Places ASU’s Commitment to the Demand for Higher Education in a Growing Valley of the Sun.
 Net Student Revenues  2384 undergraduate students  Comprehensive Fee - $57,900  90% receive institutional aid –average aid $25,300.
Oregon State University Budget Overview Faculty Senate, December 12, 2013.
FY05 SHERM Annual Report Key workload, performance, and managerial aspects of the UTHSCH Safety, Health, Environment & Risk Management function.
  Institutional Support Expenditures divided by Total Operating Expense - Auxiliary Exp.   According to the Legislative Budget Board: “provides an.
Public universities will survive. Can public higher education? The Clair Maple Memorial Address August 4, 2003 Larry R. Faulkner, President The University.
Summary of the Report to THECB April Vision  To become a premier public research university providing access to educational excellence  Interdisciplinary.
Lighting the Next-Generation Network Across Texas an update on the project _________________________ ___________ Jim Williams.
The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX /11/111 Graduate Education Costs The cost of graduate education is higher.
MATRICES 4EVER. ANNOUNCEMENTS ACT debrief ANNOUNCEMENTS Reminder that deadline for June SAT & ACT are coming up fast!! May 8 But sooner is better to.
Overview of State Budget FOR THE 2012–13 BIENNIUM JANUARY 2011 HOUSE VERSION   LBB baseline appropriations for state government ops total $156.4 billion.
The University of Texas at San Antonio FY 08 Annual Financial Report Highlights January, 2009.
Legislative Budget Request Mark B. Rosenberg Chancellor Board of Governors State University System of Florida August 10, 2006.
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
California State University 2003/04 Final Budget Update.
Private Support for Infrastructure and Central Services Growing with a Sustainable Financial Model Private Support for Infrastructure and Central Services.
10/9/2003Tuition Policy Advisory Committee1 Appendix.
Business Practices Seminar Evolving Higher Education Business Environment M. Dwight Shelton, Jr. October 26, 2015.
Average Published Charges for Full-Time Undergraduates by Sector, (Enrollment-Weighted) — Sample too small to provide meaning information. SOURCE:
Kelly Ratliff Associate Vice Chancellor Student Affairs Leadership Team October 4, 2012 Campus Budget Overview.
1 Budget Overview Budget Information Committee February 26, 2007.
Tuition-Designated Fees University of Texas at San Antonio.
Overview of Finances and Academic Costs Cost of Education Committee December 9, 2010.
Overview of Budget, Finances and Academic Costs Cost of Education Committee August 7, 2009.
Higher Education May 3, Higher Education More than 1.3 million students attend one of the state’s universities, colleges, community college districts,
The University of Texas Pan American Designated Tuition Increase Proposal Fiscal Year 2006 Starting September 1, 2005.
State of the States Brian Sigritz Director of State Fiscal Studies NASBO NASACT Middle Management April 12, 2016.
The Business of Higher Education Fundraising : Understanding the Basics Tom Jennings, Vice President for University Advancement Florida State University.
December 3, 2009 Closing The Gaps by 2015 Where We Are Now Closing The Gaps by 2015 Where We Are Now.
UTPA in Context S.J. Sethi, Ph.D. Executive Director Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness September 6, 2011.
THECB 10/2007 Closing the Gaps by 2015 Presentation for: 2007 Governing Board Conference David W. Gardner October 29, 2007.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Closing the Gaps by 2015 Final Progress Report.
HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE AND BUDGETING May 2017
Equipment Maintenance Direct $pend Opportunity
Higher Education May 2, 2017.
Higher Education GOVT 2306, Module 12.
Tuition & Fee Comparisons
Ohio University Cost Diagnostic
Renovation and Expansion
Academic Health Services Center
Trends in College Pricing 2018
Average Published Charges for Full-Time Undergraduates by Sector, (Enrollment-Weighted)
Presentation transcript:

1 SHEFO New Trends in Capital Outlay August 16, 2002 Overview of the Demands on Capital for Construction and Facility Renewal at The University of Texas System SID SANDERS, ASSISTANT VICE CHANCELLOR FOR FACILITIES PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM

2 The University of Texas System Key Statistics  34.5 Million Square Feet of Academic Facilities 58 Million Square Feet of Facilities Space 6 Health Institutions 9 Academic Institutions 160,000 Total Students  150,000 Academic Students $7.02 Billion Annual Operation Budget  $2.35 Billion Academic Budget

3 The University of Texas System System Map

4 The University of Texas System Current Facility Conditions Total Construction in 5-Year Cohorts

5 The University of Texas System Current Facility Conditions Estimated Renewal Requirements Average Annual Average Annual Average Annual Annual Total Arlington $ 13.1 $ 11.0 $ % Austin $ 57.3 $ 42.1 $ % Brownsville $ 3.3 $ 1.1 $ % Dallas $ 5.4 $ 4.6 $ % El Paso $ 10.8 $ 7.1 $ % Pan American $ 6.8 $ 5.7 $ % Permian Basin $ 1.8 $ 1.1 $ % San Antonio $ 6.8 $ 5.8 $ % Tyler $ 1.4 $ 1.3 $ % System $ 1.1 $ 0.9 $ % subtotal $107.8 $ 80.7 $ % (millions) Campus Total Bldg. Renewal E&G Bldg. Renewal Infra. Renewal Building Renewal/CRV SMC Dallas $ 25.1 $ 12.1 $ % MB Galveston $ 29.8 $ 13.7 $ % HSC Houston $ 15.1 $ 13.3 $ % HSC San Antonio $ 11.9 $ 11.5 $ % MD Anderson $ 25.7 $ 6.2 $ % HC Tyler $ 3.3 $ 0.9 $ % subtotal $110.9 $ 57.7 $ % TOTAL $218.7 $ $ %

6 The University of Texas System Current Facility Conditions Projected vs. Actual Capital Renewal Spending Average Annual Average Annual Campus Total Building Renewal E&G Building Renewal (Millions) (Millions) Projected Actual Projected Actual Academic $107.8 $48.1 $80.7 $40.6 Health $110.9 $59.1 N/A N/A Actual capital renewal spending has been running $40 million below projected amount to maintain existing facilities.

7 The University of Texas System Current Facility Conditions Long-Term Renewal Curves

8 The University of Texas System Demand for New Construction Develop centers of excellence with added doctoral programs, expanded research, and serve a more selective group of students Ensure that UT Austin becomes one of the Top Five public universities in the nation Grow enrollment by 87,000 from 150,000 to 237,000 by 2030 Ensure that development of one additional nationally ranked institution of first choice by 2010, another by 2020, and one more by 2030 Partial List of UT System Goals for 2030* *From Service to Texas in the New Century, January 2001

9 The University of Texas System Demand for New Construction Currently UT System has 160 square feet per student of E&G facilities. This is the mean for all Higher Education in the state. By 2030 this ratio will require 14,000,000 gross square feet of new E&G facilities 87,000 new students by 2030 Equivalent of building another UT Austin Capital Impact of Enrollment Growth Goal

10 The University of Texas System Demand for New Construction Based on inventories of UT Arlington, UT Dallas, and UT San Antonio Office/Admin=38.6% Average of Total E&G Space Classroom=34.4% Average of Total E&G Space Dry Lab=15.7% Average of Total E&G Space Wet Lab=11.3% Average of Total E&G Space 14 MGSF x x $210/GSF = $1.13 Billion for Office/Admin Space 14 MGSF x x $225/GSF = $1.08 Billion for Classroom Space 14 MGSF x x $260/GSF = $0.57 Billion for Dry Lab Space 14 MGSF x x $350/GSF = $0.55 Billion for Wet Lab Space Total Estimated Project Cost Total Estimated Project Cost=$3.33 Billion for 14 MGSF

11 The University of Texas System Capital Improvement Program Funding Sources Total CIP: $ 3,727.4 Million Note: Totals in millions of dollars 12% 18% 29% 15% 26% State support for capital construction has averaged just over 12% for the last eight years.

12 The University of Texas System Demand for New Capital Aggregate Capital Needs through 2030 (in 2002 dollars) New Academic E&G Facilities for Expanded Enrollment$3.33 Billion Unfunded Capital Renewal of Existing $1.12 Billion Academic E&G Facilities (40 million/year for 28 years) TOTAL $5.12 Billion New Supporting Campus Infrastructure $.67 Billion (Estimated at 20% of Aggregate New Facility Cost)

13 The University of Texas System Demand for New Capital High Potential Sources of New Capital Bonding Against Increases in Research Revenues Bonding Against Increases in Designated Tuition Gifts and Grants Bonding Against Self-Generating Revenues of Auxiliary Enterprises Limited Potential Sources of New Capital Bonding Against Current Tuition Direct State Funding Bonding Against Income from Endowment

14 The University of Texas System Conclusions To meet these substantial pressures, UT System will increasingly need to look at alternative sources of capital.  Private gifts and grants  Increased tuition  Increased research revenues  Increased designated fees  Increased auxiliary revenues State support has been static and is projected to remain so. UT System is facing a period of aging facilities and substantial population growth that will require billions of dollars in new capital to support.

15 Questions? SHEFO New Trends in Capital Outlay