RIGOR IN ASSESSMENTS Nov 14 – Teach for America Break-Out Session.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Advertisements

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Argument Paper – Am I on the Path Toward Achieving my Career Goals? Using self-reflective data gathered from RIASEC, Multiple Intelligence Survey, evidence.
Congruency to Math Standards How do we successfully monitor and support our teachers when we can’t be an expert in every content area?
Close Reading: Focusing on Taking a Stand (Chapter 2 cont.)
An approach to teaching it. Jacqueline is purchasing her first car and feels torn as she balances conflicting desires and messages. She yearns to be seated.
Science Breakout New Teacher Meeting 6, Year 2 March 31, 2011.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Analysis Grade 5—Module 3.
Final Session: Whole Group Please sit together with the other associates from your district (as much as possible) April 27, 2005.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge in Math K-5 Math Back to School Conference
Understanding the Process and the Product Professional Development Spring, 2012.
Scientific Method Film Canister Lab.
ALIGNMENT. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE Define ALIGNMENT for the purpose of these modules and explain why it is important Explain how to UNPACK A STANDARD.
Unit 2 – Making It Real Learning Objectives Reflect on your classroom instruction to identify the literacy components you are already using and how they.
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
Model Performance Indicators.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions A Close Look at Grade 9 Module.
Region 11: Math & Science Teacher Center Solving Equations.
Science Gateway Assessment 1 2 Preparing for the Science Gateway.
Ronniee-Marie Ruggiero Title III Access to Core Coach Stevenson Middle School Presenters : Xavier Contreras, Bertha Melendez, Frank Rodriguez Language.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Ratios Grade 8-Module 1 Integer Exponents.
HS-MASS 2 Project: Mathematics Overview of Sessions 1&2 for Teachers.
Mathematical Processes. 2 What We are Learning Today Mathematical Processes What are they? How do we teach through these processes? How do students learn.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Making Group Work Productive PowerPoints available at Click on “Resources”
VCE Learning. To unpack the challenge of enhancing the quality of VCE learning What does the student need to know about how to interpret the task ? Ho.
1 Focusing on the FCAT Test-Taking Strategies Grades 3-5 Nancy E. Brito, Department of Assessment , PX47521 Information.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
Sunnyside School District
Keys to success on the Gateway: A checklist  Demonstrate that you understand the writing task  Address and develop all parts of the writing task  Organize.
A scale of cognitive demand.  Code with a ? to indicate that you have never heard of this,  Code with a + to indicate that you know something about.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
Universal Access/SDAIE Session 3: Lesson Planning Protocol - Language Objectives Title III Access to Core Professional Development Office of.
Scientific Communication
Language of Math Using the Language of Content to increase confidence and competence.
LOOKING AT ASSESSMENTS DOK – PART 2. GOALS FOR TODAY Review Depth of Knowledge (DOK) levels Identify assessment questions of various DOK levels Understand.
+ Operations and Algebraic Thinking Success Implementing CCSS for K-2 Math Day 2.
HOW TO WRITE FORMAL LAB REPORTS. WHAT ARE THE STEPS? 1. Name and Lab partners 2. Period 3. Title 4. Purpose and Hypothesis 5. Procedures 6. Data 7. Data.
Learning Targets January 21, 2008 Londa Richter & Jo Hartmann TIE.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Mathematics PCK Workshop #1 Day 2 RAMALLAH, PALESTINE MARCH 22 & 24, 2013.
Professional Learning Resources Download presentations and resources from today’s sessions!  Go to BISD homepage  Departments  Professional Learning.
From Infusing Rigor & Research into Instruction and Assessment presentation USOE, Salt Lake City, UT February 25-26, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D. Center for.
1 Focusing on the FCAT Test-Taking Strategies Grades 9-11 Nancy E. Brito, Department of Assessment , PX47521
Getting to Know Webb’s. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level One (recall) requires simple recall of such information as fact, definition, term, or simple procedure.
Common Core: Depth of Knowledge Rigor for Coaches.
Preparing Teacher Candidates to Address Academic Language for the edTPA Bryan Gillis Ph.D. Associate Professor of English Education and Literacy Kennesaw.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
How to Teach Science using an Inquiry Approach (ESCI 215 – Chapter 1)
Instructional Leadership Planning Common Assessments.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGIES WELCOME Differentiation Strategies: How to Meet the Instructional Needs of Each Student in Your Classroom DOE# IS Brandman.
TRANSITIONING TO NGSS: FROM CONCLUSION WRITING TO ARGUING FROM EVIDENCE Day 3 Craig Gabler Regional Science Coordinator ESD 113.
Collaboration to Refine and Enhance Science Teaching (CREST) Welcome Teachers! Thursday, January 28, 2016.
La Paz Intermediate School National School to Watch 2011,2014,2017
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Exam Technique What were you taught last year about exam technique?
SHOULD STUDENTS BE PAID TO DO WELL IN SCHOOL?
HOW TO WRITE FORMAL LAB REPORTS
HEALTH ISSUES IN EDUCATION: WHAT IS APPROPRIATE FOR OUR SCHOOLS?
Tackling Timed Writings
HS Physical Science Spring 2017
15 Minute Comprehension Activities
ARE GREEN TECHNOLOGIES
Presentation transcript:

RIGOR IN ASSESSMENTS Nov 14 – Teach for America Break-Out Session

FIRST THREE: 2 minutes  Open the PDF document titled “DOK (your content area)”  Open the Word document titled “(your content area) – DOK of objectives AND items”

DO NOW: 3 minutes Using the periodic table below, write the Electron Configuration for Lead (Pb).

DO NOW Con’t: 1. Is this question hard? Why or why not? 2. Is this question rigorous? Why or Why not? 3. Why might your answers to questions 1 and 2 be different? Share out – 2 minutes

Hook and Session Take-Aways: 3 min  We want to teach our students to take assessments in our classrooms that match the rigor of the standardized assessments they are required to take so that they are prepared for those assessments.  Session Take-Aways:  Analyze an assessment item in order to determine the level of rigor.  Write an assessment item of the appropriate rigor level so that it matches the objective or standard being assessed.  Explain the importance of having assessments and lessons of the appropriate rigor.

A Look at Standardized Questions

Rigor is IMPORTANT.  You may be thinking that the standardized test items you just looked at were WAY harder than most of the questions that you give your students.  You may be worried that your kids are not ready for these types of questions.

Rigor is IMPORTANT.  Common misconceptions:  My kids can’t do this. Yes they can. It is up to you to teach them HOW to perform rigorous tasks by teaching them how to problem-solve and connect concepts together by doing think-alouds, sharing their thoughts with their peers, and doing lots and lots of rigorous practice.  My kids aren’t focused enough to do this (i.e. my classroom management isn’t there yet). Rigorous lessons are a HUGE part of investing your kids in your class. Kids are intrinsically curious and eager to learn. By providing rigorous materials, you are engaging them in a truly authentic way.

Rigor is IMPORTANT.  Kids will be faced with rigorous assessment items at some point.  The earlier we start teaching and assessing at a high level of rigor, the more prepared they will be!

DOK Levels in a Nutshell  DOK 1 – One step, one piece of recalled information…DONE!  DOK 2 – Know a piece of information and do something with it (multiple steps).  DOK 3 – Multiple steps with multiple decision points or connecting multiple ideas and concepts.  At DSST (unit tests, finals): DOK 1 – 20-40% DOK 2 – 40-50% DOK 3 – 20%

Depth of Knowledge Levels 1 minutes

DOK of objectives  DOK of your assessment items should MATCH the DOK of the objective.  It is okay if your assessments have items that build to your intended DOK level, but you must hit it!  Or else, when they come to the TCAP/SAT/ACT, they won’t be at a high enough knowledge/skill level to answer the questions that align to an objective/standard.

DOK of objectives: I Do  Science: Interpret weather data and the changes that occur over time (graph, charts, weather maps). DOK 2  Draw conclusions from scientific evidence and indicate whether further information is needed to support a specific conclusion DOK 3  Math: Use the order of operations to simplify expressions. DOK 1  Create, interpret and use a frequency table and/or histogram DOK 2/3  English: Summarize the key points and identify the main idea of an article. DOK 2  Analyze the use of imagery in To Kill a Mockingbird DOK 3  Social Studies: Explain the impact of the first 10 Amendments in the Bill of Rights on life today. DOK 3  Identify the capitals of each state in the United States of America. DOK 1

DOK of objectives: We Do  Science: Use common metric prefixes and make conversions between them. DOK 1 Build/draw a circuits and explains the flow of energy through them. DOK 2  Math: Create a circle graph using raw data. DOK 3 Identify and describe patterns and sequences. DOK 2  English: Write complete, grammatically correct sentences. DOK 2 Define “metaphor,” and “simile,” and compare and contrast the two. DOK 1/2  Social Studies: Rank the causes of the Civil War and justify your ranking. DOK 3 Summarize the 3 branches of government. DOK 2

DOK of Objectives: You Do (8 min)  Open “(your subject) DOK of Objectives AND Items.”  Find someone who is in your same content area (if possible). Social Studies – use English examples  Read through the beginning explanation, if you want more rationale for DOK levels  Then scroll down to “Sample (Subject) Objectives” Spend 5-7 min identifying the DOK level of each objective. Check yourself with the answer key at the end of the objectives. Ask questions if you need to!

DOK of Objectives  Questions?

DOK of Items  Turn and Talk: What are the DOK levels for each of the questions below? #1#2 3 x 2111 x 35  Same DOK level (1g) since this “performing a routine procedure”, even though the right one is more difficult.

Try another one!  What is the DOK level here?

Final group practice: DOK level?

DOK Practice– 10 minutes  With your partner, go back to the document you were just in.  Scroll down to example assessment items.  Identify the DOK level of the items and then check yourself at the bottom.  Ask questions! ** There is an additional document called “Social Studies DOK Questions Examples” – check that out if you teach social studies ** Also check out “Science - More Items DOK Examples” if you want more science practice

Next Steps (possibly with your MTLD)  Take a look at your next test.  Find the DOK level of the objectives to be tested.  Then find the DOK level for each objective’s questions.  Do they match?  If there is a misalignment between DOK of objective and test, either:  Rewrite the questions to make them the correct level of rigor OR  Add more questions that scaffold up to the correct level of rigor