Intro to Glacial Systems Present vs. past glaciation Glacier classification Glaciers and time Glaciers as systems –Open vs. closed –Energy fluxes and reservoirs –Mass fluxes and reservoirs
Present vs. Past Glaciation Now – One major (Antarctica) and one minor (Greenland) ice sheets Then – At least three major (Antarctica, Laurentide, Fennoscandian) and several minor (Greenland, Cordilleran, Patagonian…) ice sheets
Present vs. Past PresentPast Antarctica – 12,535,000 km 2 Greenland – 1,726,400 Laurentide – 147,250 Fennoscandia – 3,800 Rockies/AK – 76,900 Asia – 115,000 Alps – 3,600 S. America – 26,500 Australasia – 1,000 TOTAL – 14,898,000 13,800,000 2,295,300 13,337,000 6,666,700 2,610,100 3,951,000 37,000 870,000 30,000 44,383,000 (After Flint, 1971)
What do we know? S. Laurentide S. and E. Fennoscandian Atlantic shelves Russia Cordillera N. Canada X X X
“Glacier” Classification – Ice Sheets Ice Sheets: Subcontinental+ in scale –Dictate their own topography (unconstrained)
Ice Caps Ice Caps –Local to regional in scale –Dictate their own topography (eventually)
Ice Caps
Glaciers Variable in scale Controlled by existing topography (constrained)
Glacier Types Valley glaciers –Length>>width Cirque glaciers –Length ~ width
Glacier Types Niche glaciers –Length << width
Ice Shelves Floating termini Nourished from up-ice and above Ablate by basal melt and calving
Subspecies of Glaciers: Outlet Outlet glacier (from ice cap or sheet)
Ice Fields Transection glacier (“ice field”) –Radial flow, but topographically confined
Piedmont Piedmont glacier (unconfined at toe)
Piedmont
Adjectives Calving Hanging
Glacier Response Times Glaciers are (by definition) permanent. Each responds to climate across characteristic time-scales: –Ice sheets – ~ 10 3 years –Ice caps – ~ 10 2 years –Glaciers – ~ 10 1 years –Glacierets – ~ years
Glaciers as Systems Best viewed as an open system –Mass & energy in Radiation, rock debris, snow –Movement & work Erosion, transport, deposition –Mass & energy out Long-wave radiation, till, meltwater Atmosphere Lithosphere Hydrosphere Atmosphere Lithosphere Hydrosphere INPUTSOUTPUTS
Glacier Systems Ice Sheets Glaciers
The Global Cryosphere Ice Sheets and their behavior –Theory –Antarctica –Laurentide –Fennoscandian/Barents Dominantly from Hughes, T. J. (1998) Ice Sheets Sugden & John, 1976
Theory: first approximation Ice sheets are defined as subcontinental or larger ice masses that define their own topography.
Schematic: second approximation
Theory: Ice Sheet Flow As the ice deforms, it moves away from its initial point – both downward and outward
Schematic: Ice Sheet Flow Pure shear Simple shear combinations complexities
Ice Sheet Stability Ice sheets, unlike glaciers, commonly display instability associated with positive feedback loops
(negative feedback) (positive feedback) As ice sheet shrinks, ablation area decreases As ice sheet shrinks, accumulation area decreases “Normal”
Antarctic Ice Sheet 12.5 x 10 6 km 2 Partly terrestrial-based –East Antarctic Partly marine-based –West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS)
W.A.I.Sheet Larsen I.S.
Ice Shelves Floating –Thin (X00 m) –Variable budget Major loss = calving –Unstable! –“Pinning points”
Topographic Profile Surface slopes Bed elevations Ice shelves
Ice Flowlines Ice sheet flow is more complex than one might think!
Nunataks McMurdo Dry Valleys Nunataks (unglaciated terrain surrounded by ice) are surprisingly significant –Ice reconstruction –Biological refugia –Ecological curiosities Courtesy NASA; Earth ObservatoryEarth Observatory
Ice Streams Focused flow within an ice sheet –Velocity x 100+ –Drains ice domes –Carves bed
Ice sheet initiation Theories –Highland/windward Mountains first –“Instantaneous glacierization” Lowlands first –Marine ice transgression Oceans first
Past ice sheets Alternative hypotheses –Arrows = wind/H 2 O –Black = nucleation How can they be tested?
Laurentide Sugden (1977) –Simple profile model –Single central dome “Equilibrium ice sheet”
Laurentide Clark+ (1996) –Inferred from uplift –Several domes “Dynamic ice sheet” Truth? –This plus time variation
Laurentide decay Radiocarbon dated –Variable rates –Δarea = Δvolume = Δsea level –Laurentide drives Barents?
Fennoscandian/Barents Sensitive to sea level –Early initiation? –Late growth? –Early decay?