Thematic Workshop on Standardization and Exchange of Land Use and Cover Information Wednesday, April 27, 2005 Chicago, Illinois.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spatial Resolution in Digital Images Digital Images –“Size” can change easily (zoom, subset, mosaic) –Pixel size is assumed not to change within an image.
Advertisements

SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENT Translating satellite images into meaningful geospatial information: The data fusion approach Mr. Amit A. Kokje PhD candidate, School.
VEGETATION MAPPING FOR LANDFIRE National Implementation.
NLCD and MODIS Landuse Processing Tools and Projection Issues in Modeling Limei Ran and Alison Eyth Center for Environmental Modeling for Policy Development.
Utility of National Spatial Data for Conservation Design Projects Steve Williams Biodiversity and Spatial Information Center North Carolina State University.
Tom Craven Matt Simon Anne Trainor.  Construct a RHESSys ecohydrologic model for Sandhills Region.
Snapshot of Northeast Ohio Environment. Overview Topography Watersheds Parks and Conservation Areas Land Cover (developed areas, forests, wetlands, agriculture)
The Use of Remote Sensing in Habitat Management for Wildlife Helen Holdsworth EES 5053 University of Texas at San Antonio December 2,
Major Operations of Digital Image Processing (DIP) Image Quality Assessment Radiometric Correction Geometric Correction Image Classification Introduction.
Remote Sensing and Internet Data Sources Unit 3: Module 12, Lecture 1 – Satellites and Aerial Photography.
DETERMINING LAND DEVELOPMENT EFFECT ON SURFACE RUNOFF USING GIS.
NUTRIENT RUNOFF EFFECTS ON JORDAN LAKE Brianna Young, Jennifer Jackson and Emily Nurminen.
C-CAP The Coastal Change Analysis Program Overview of C-CAP Products, Vision, Status, and Related Tools from the Coastal Services Center.
Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) Consortium Great Lakes Regional Data Exchange Land Cover / Land Use Chicago, IL April 27, 2005 Steve Raber.
Working with Raster Grids and Map Algebra Katherine Paybins, USGS.
Raster Based GIS Analysis
Matthew Wight Pennsylvania State University - Master of Geographic Information Systems - GEOG 596A – Fall 2014 Enhancing Coastal Conservation Planning.
School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia
Land Cover Mapping for the Southwest Regional GAP Analysis Project Tenth Biennial Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Conference, RS-2004, Salt.
The Role of RS Techniques in European Land Use Database Construction Centre for Geo-Information 1 The Role of RS Techniques in European Land.
Introduction, Satellite Imaging. Platforms Used to Acquire Remote Sensing Data Aircraft Low, medium & high altitude Higher level of spatial detail Satellite.
Spatial Analysis University of Maryland, College Park 2013.
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
An Object-oriented Classification Approach for Analyzing and Characterizing Urban Landscape at the Parcel Level Weiqi Zhou, Austin Troy& Morgan Grove University.
Bacteria Loadings Watershed Model Copano Bay watershed Copano Bay watershed Copano Bay Carrie Gibson CE 394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology Spring Semester.
Co-authors: Maryam Altaf & Intikhab Ulfat
Utility of National Spatial Data for Conservation Design Projects Steve Williams Biodiversity and Spatial Information Center North Carolina State University.
Image Classification: Introduction Lecture Notes 6 prepared by R. Lathrop 11/99 updated 3/04 Readings: ERDAS Field Guide 6th Ed. CH. 6.
Saving the Chesapeake’s Great Rivers and Special Places High Resolution Land Cover Data in the Chesapeake Bay Chesapeake Conservancy.
Image Classification: Introduction Lecture Notes 7 prepared by R. Lathrop 11/99 updated 3/04 Readings: ERDAS Field Guide 5th Ed. CH. 6:
Using spectral data to discriminate land cover types.
Land Cover Interpretation and Mapping Supplemental Material Lecture 1 prepared by R. Lathrop 8/03.
National Mapping Division EROS Data Center U. S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Operation Systems (EROS) Data Center World Data.
Lu Liang, Peng Gong Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley And Center for Earth System Science,
Page 1. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Landsat at 40: The Nation’s oldest Earth-observing satellite program Landsat at 40: The.
Remote Sensing Classification Systems
Characterizing, measuring and visualizing forest resources An inadequate treatment by an unqualified presenter.
Geomatics Tools for Inventorying and Assessing Headwaters Adam Hogg Inventory Monitoring & Assessment, Ministry of Natural Resources Eastern Region Headwaters.
A Forest Cover Change Study Gone Bad Lessons Learned(?) Measuring Changes in Forest Cover in Madagascar Ned Horning Center for Biodiversity and Conservation.
Geographic Information Systems in Water Science Unit 4: Module 16, Lecture 3 – Fundamental GIS data types.
North American Carbon Program Sub-pixel Analysis of a 1-km Resolution Land-Water Mask Source of Data: The North American sub-pixel water mask product is.
Land Cover Characterization Program National Mapping Division EROS Data CenterU. S. Geological Survey The National Land Cover Dataset of the Multi- Resolution.
February 25-26, 2003 San Diego, California Inventory & Monitoring Technology Development USDA Forest Service, Remote Sensing Application Center,
Rasters Steve Signell, Instructor Robert Poirier, TA School of Science Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Monday, February.
Washington Forest Stewardship Spatial Analysis Project “Using Geospatial Technologies to Implement Program Strategically”
Terrain Susceptibility Kyle Renner GIS in Water Resources 2015
Object-oriented Land Cover Classification in an Urbanizing Watershed Erik Nordman, Lindi Quackenbush, and Lee Herrington SUNY College of Environmental.
Realities of Satellite Interpretation (The things that will drive you crazy!) Rachel M.K. Headley, PhD USGS Landsat Project.
Citation: Moskal., L. M. and D. M. Styers, Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution near infrared aerial imagery: costs and applications.
Bi-national Land Cover Change for the Great Lakes Basin.
Updated Cover Type Map of Cloquet Forestry Center For Continuous Forest Inventory.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
Citation: Moskal, L. M., D. M. Styers, J. Richardson and M. Halabisky, Seattle Hyperspatial Land use/land cover (LULC) from LiDAR and Near Infrared.
Assessing the Tree Canopy in Jefferson County, WV Jarlath O’Neil-Dunne University of Vermont Spatial Analysis Laboratory.
High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Development for the Coastal United States Eric Morris (Presenter) Chris Robinson The Baldwin Group at NOAA Office for.
Landsat Satellite Data. 1 LSOS (1-ha) 9 Intensive Study Areas (1km x 1km) 3 Meso-cell Study Areas (25km x 25km) 1 Small Regional Study Area (1.5 o x 2.5.
Agricultural Land Use as it Relates to Land Slope James Plourde, Dr. Bryan Pijanowski Human-Environment Modeling & Analysis Laboratory Purdue University.
Bacterial TMDL Model for Copano Bay Research performed by Carrie Gibson at Center for Research in Water Resources Schematic processor tool developed by.
Detecting Land Cover Land Use Change in Las Vegas Sarah Belcher & Grant Cooper December 8, 2014.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Rasters Peter Fox – based on materials from Steve Signell
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
Factsheet # 12 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution.

Nutrient Runoff Effects on Jordan Lake
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
Limei Ran and Alison Eyth
GIS Aspect We used GIS to extract the watershed basin we were going to focus on so that we could obtain the NLCD landcover data for the catchments the.
Geographic Information Systems
Presentation transcript:

Thematic Workshop on Standardization and Exchange of Land Use and Cover Information Wednesday, April 27, 2005 Chicago, Illinois

Agenda Introductions (Names, Organization, LU/LC experiences) Facilities, Breaks, Lunch Arrangements Background –Workshop Goals and Objectives –RDX Conferences / Workshops –USEPA/EC Conference Call –CSO Coastal Managers Workshop –Great Lakes Regional Collaboration –LU/LC Mapping Program Inventory Morning Presentations Afternoon Group Discussions Expected Accomplishments

Challenges 1.Clearly define mapping requirements as a function of application needs 2.Discriminate between land cover and land use mapping emphasis 3.Assess scale / resolution needs 4.Assess classification details required 5.Anticipate hurdles for land use / cover exchange

Afternoon Group Discussions Classification Schemes 1. What are the most important classification categories? 2. What are the preferred characteristics of a basin-wide classifications scheme? Acquisition Requirements 1. What is the preferred spatial resolution/scale of land use or land cover polygons or grid cells? 2. What frequency of data collection is needed? Exchange Opportunities 1. What program activities need land use and land cover data to be shared between jurisdictions? 2. What barriers need to be overcome to allow for exchange of data between jurisdictions?

NOAA C-CAP Program Land cover and land cover change analyses were conducted for the entire U.S. coastal zone of the Great Lakes using Landsat Thematic Mapper and Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper satellite imagery. All states were completed in fall 2002, except Michigan. Michigan was completed in fall 2003.

NOAA C-CAP Program Environmental Characterization – Lake St. Clair Habitat Restoration and Conservation Project Great Lakes Commission and NOAA CSC to characterize the coastal habitats of Lake St. Clair. As part of the project, land cover and land cover change analyses were conducted for the Canadian side of the Lake St. Clair area.

MRLC – NLCD 29 classes of land cover data derived from the imagery, ancillary data, and derivatives normalized imagery for three time periods per path/row; Ancillary data, including a 30 m Digital Elevation Model (DEM) derived into slope, aspect and slope position; Per-pixel estimates of percent imperviousness and percent tree canopy;

MRLC – NLCD Water 11 Open Water 12 Perennial Ice/Snow Developed 21 Low Intensity Residential 22 High Intensity Residential 23 Commercial/Industrial/Transportation Barren 31 Bare Rock/Sand/Clay 32 Quarries/Strip Mines/Gravel Pits 33 Transitional Forested Upland 41 Deciduous Forest 42 Evergreen Forest 43 Mixed Forest Shrubland 51 Shrubland Non-natural Woody 61 Orchards/Vineyards/Other Herbaceous Upland 71 Grasslands/Herbaceous Herbaceous Planted/Cultivated 81 Pasture/Hay 82 Row Crops 83 Small Grains 84 Fallow 85 Urban/Recreational Grasses Wetlands 91 Woody Wetlands 92 Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands Land Cover Classification System Key - Rev. July 20, 1999

MRLC Imagery data referenced to the National Albers Equal map projection; imagery re-sampled using cubic convolution to 30m pixels, and; all 8 TM bands processed (including thermal and pan bands) for Landsat 7 data Available - Sensor Reflectance Dataset and Terrain Corrected

NRCan - CCRS Landsat 7 Orthorectified Imagery –the orthoimage data set is a complete set of cloud-free (less than 10%) orthoimages covering the Canadian landmass and accuracy of 30 metres or better in the South and 50 metres or better in the North for a 90% level of confidence. Available at

Michigan DNR – MIRIS – Current Use Inventory 82 Counties covered by 1978 Land Use Mapping project Referenced to Michigan Georef Coordinate System 1:24,000 scale Based on photo- interpretation of color aerial photography 54 detailed land use categories Intermittent updates for selected counties for specific projects and by regional planning agencies

Wisconsin DNR - WISCLAND The WISCLAND Land Cover data set is a raster representation of vegetation/land cover for the state of Wisconsin. The source data were acquired from the nationwide MRLC from The data should be used at a scale of at least 1:40,000