2013 U.S. Supreme Court Preview Sarah Edson, Esq. Mullen High School

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prior Knowledge What do you know about our Judicial System?
Advertisements

The Justices of the Supreme Court. Chief Justice John Roberts Born 1955 Lawyer Judge Legal Counsel to President Reagan Appointed by George W. Bush in.
The Future of the Court Death Watch Name Born Age Apptd. President Ideology* John Paul Stevens Ford 10 William H. Rehnquist 1924.
AS OF: 4 JAN JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR. 29 SEP 2005 Age at appointment: 50 Appointed by President George W. Bush Senate vote:
Supreme Court Top of the Judicial Branch in the Federal Government. Final say in all matters dealing with the United States Constitution.
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Constitution The Constitution was created on September 17 in It was ratified on June 21,
THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM THE JUDICIARY. JOHN MARSHALL.
Chief Justice of the United States: JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR. Associate Justices: ANTONIN SCALIA – President Reagan (1986) ANTHONY M. KENNEDY – President Reagan.
The Judiciary Chapter 12. Interpretation of Judicial language Stare Decisis: “to stand on decided cases” Appellate Court: A court reviewing a case originally.
Highest Court in the U.S..  Created to interpret (explain) the Constitution.  Judicial Review: Cases looked over to see if they are Constitutional/
THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM Chapter 5 – The Judicial Branch
 Interprets the laws  Determines if they are constitutional or not.
The U.S. Supreme Court. U.S. Supreme Court Today  Chief Justice John Roberts, Jr.  Associate Justices: ANTONIN SCALIA ANTHONY M. KENNEDY CLARENCE THOMAS.
The Justices of the Supreme Court. Chief Justice John Roberts Born 1955 Lawyer Judge Legal Counsel to President Reagan Appointed by George W. Bush in.
The Constitution The first three Articles of the Constitution lay out the three co-equal branches of the United States government. The first three Articles.
The United States Supreme Court. The Justices John Roberts Chief Justice The Youngest The Youngest Appointed by G.W. Bush Appointed by G.W. Bush 2005.
Supreme Court Justices. Back row (left to right): Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen G. Breyer, Samuel A. Alito, and Elena Kagan. Front row (left to right): Clarence.
Federal Courts. The American Court Structure  Dual court system: 1. set of state and local courts 2. Federal courts Judiciary Act of 1789 established.
Supreme Court Justices. Chief Justice – John G. Roberts Born January 27, 1955 Fall 2011—56 yrs. Old Nominated by President G.W. Bush, 2005 Senate Confirmation.
Section 1.2 The Court System and Trial Procedures.
Supreme Court at Work Unit 6: Judicial Branch Ms. Ramos.
 We make sure the laws are obeyed by all citizens.  The name of the people are the president and the vise president.
Supreme Court Cases -Highest Court in the Nation -All Decisions are Final -Usually Appellate Jurisdiction Only -Only hears about of thousands of.
Date: November 4, 2010 Topic: The Supreme Court Aim: How does a case find its way to the Supreme Court? Do Now: Take out question sheet from yesterday.
The United States Supreme Court
Current Supreme Court 3 Major Steps in the Federal System District Court Court of Appeals Supreme Court CourtsJudges.
Branches of Government: The Judicial Branch. The Supreme Court Building 
Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. Appointed Chief Justice by George W. Bush in 2005 Conservative.
THE SUPREME COURT. Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court are (from left) Clarence Thomas, Sonia Sotomayor, Antonin Scalia, Stephen Breyer, Chief Justice.
What you need to know about.... Facts  There are nine judges on the court  The judges are called “justices”  The main justice is called the “Chief.
SCOTUS Supreme Court of the United States Supreme Court is the ultimate court of appeals in the United States. The Supreme Court agrees to hear cases.
Judicial Branch Chapter 8 Sections 1, 2, 3, and 4.
The Judicial Branch. The Role of the Judicial Branch To interpret and define law To interpret and define law This involves hearing individual cases and.
Supreme Court Top of the Judicial Branch in the Federal Government. United States Supreme Court.
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin Lorraine Jones Yu Sun.
AIM: How is the Judicial Branch organized under the Constitution? Do-Now: Based on current knowledge what do you know about the Judicial Branch?
Supreme Court Basics. Background – Only court mentioned in Const. (Article III) – Consists of 8 Associate Justices and 1 Chief Justice Number of Justices.
Ch. 18 The Federal Court System Section : The Supreme Court.
Federal Courts. Federal Court System Each of the states has its own court system who have their authority based in state constitutions. The SCOTUS and.
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT A new term of the Supreme Court opens on the first Monday in October.
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES What is the purpose of the Supreme Court? **It is the final authority on the Constitution Judicial Review!!
Supreme Court Top of the Judicial Branch in the Federal Government. Final say in all matters dealing with the United States Constitution.
By: Ja’kayla Hamilton ExecutiveLegislativeJudicial 3 Branches.
Section 3. The Court Decisions are final Intended to be as powerful as the other two branches Chief Justice & 8 associate justices – Appointed for life.
The United States Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts (2005-present) Nominated by George W. Bush Education: John Roberts attended Harvard College.
November 4, Judicial review is the power of courts to declare unconstitutional the actions of the other branches and units of government.
Criminal Law vs. Civil Law
Article III The Judicial Branch.
Supreme Court Justices (2013)
A Level Government & Politics
The Judicial Branch.
The Judicial Branch Article III.
The United States Supreme Court
The U.S. Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court The _______ Branch.
Unit 2 – Branches of Government & Federal Power
Interpretation of laws
The Constitution of the United States of America
Congress and the Courts
U.S. Supreme Court.
Unit 5: The Judicial Branch
Basics of the Federal Government
The Judicial Branch.
Current Makeup of the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court Ch
Appeals Courts Losing party may be able to appeal the decision to an appeals (appellate) court Losing party will ask the court to review the decision.
Supreme Court Notes.
US Supreme Court (SCOTUS)
Judicial Branch Chapter 8 Sections 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Presentation transcript:

2013 U.S. Supreme Court Preview Sarah Edson, Esq. Mullen High School

Agenda Previous term Background: Fisher v. University of Texas Background: Florida v. Jardines Moot Court Activity Classroom Materials Other cases to watch

Current Court

Chief Justice John Roberts, Bush (2005) Antonin Scalia, Reagan (1986) Anthony Kennedy, Reagan (1988) Clarence Thomas, Bush (1991) Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Clinton (1993) Stephen Breyer, Clinton (1994) Samuel Alito, Jr., Bush (2006) Sonia Sotomayor, Obama (2009) Elena Kagan, Obama (2010)

Supreme Court Number of merit opinions: Number from state courts: Number from federal circuit courts: Of the federal courts, which circuit had the highest number? content/uploads/2012/06/SB_scorecard_OT11_final.pdf content/uploads/2012/06/SB_scorecard_OT11_final.pdf Which two justices had the highest agreement rate? Which two justices had the lowest agreement rate?

Of the merit opinions, how many were 9-0? How many were 5-4? Of the 5-4 decisions, which justice was in the majority the most? Who authored the most opinions (total)? Who authored the most 9-0 decisions?

Which majority opinion author had the fewest number of days between argument and opinion? Which Justice had the highest average number of questions? Which Justice had the highest frequency as the first questioner?

Last year’s cases U.S. v. Jones: Unanimous decision that the use of the GPS on a person’s car constituted a search and unconstitutional without a warrant Florence v. Burlington: 5-4 decision – suspicionless searches of inmates can be reasonable regardless of the offense

Fisher v. University of Texas Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 1978 Med School admissions policy: Regular admissions program “special” program for candidates who identified as minority – 16 spots in program reserved Supreme Court said program was a race-based classification and therefore applied strict scrutiny test Is the classification absolutely necessary to meet a compelling state interest? Court said no – held that race can be a “plus” but can’t be only factor and quotas are not valid

Gratz v. Bollinger, 2003 University of Michigan undergrad admissions policy (1995) had number of seats reserved for minorities 1998 policy changed to a 150-point selection index where various factors (including race/ethnicity) earned a candidate points Court (6-3) decision held that both policies were unconstitutional – process not individualized but rather mechanical Majority: Rehnquist, O’Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer Dissent: Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg

Grutter v. Bollinger, 2003 University of Michigan Law School admissions policy considered race as a factor in deciding a student’s acceptance Court (5-4) held that student body diversity is a compelling state interest – a “critical mass” of students from underrepresented groups can enrich classroom discussion, produce cross-racial understanding, and break down racial stereotypes Law school admissions policy upheld Majority: O’Connor, Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer Dissent: Rehnquist, Kennedy, Scalia, Thomas

Florida v. Jardines U.S. v. Place, 1982 Dog sniff search of luggage at airport detected drugs Court (9-0) held that dog sniff is not a search Kyllo v. U.S., 2000 Thermal imaging of home detected areas of home were hotter than others, consistent with cultivation of marijuana Court (5-4) held that the use of thermal imaging was a search and therefore presumptively unreasonable without a warrant Majority: Scalia, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer Dissent: Rehnquist, Stevens, O’Connor, Kennedy

Illinois v. Caballes, 2004 During a traffic stop a drug-detection dog alerted the officer to presence of marijuana in car Court (6-2) upheld the search Majority: Stevens, O’Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Breyer Dissent: Souter, Ginsburg

At your tables One case per table Identify Petitioner’s arguments Identify Respondent’s arguments Identify potential questions from Justices

Classroom Materials /2012_NCSS_Workshop_Materials /2012_NCSS_Workshop_Materials urt_summer_institute_for_teachers urt_summer_institute_for_teachers