Project Nexus Workgroup AQ Backstop Date Options 7 th October 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CONFIDENTIAL - Title of presentation © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc. All rights Reserved. 1.
Advertisements

12/10/20141 Project Nexus Workgroup Settlement Issues 15 th May 2012.
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic) Meeting 3, 18 th July 2011.
Proposal to Change the UNC AQ ‘Backstop Date’ to accommodate the 2010 Seasonal Normal Review DESC – 2nd October 2009 NOTE: Instances where TBC is stated.
1 Project Smart Metering Portfolio Foundation & DCC Day 1 Updates April 2013.
Project Nexus Workgroup Primes & Subs 7 th October 2014.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Implementation of Non Effective Days Nexus Workgroup – March
1 Project Nexus Market Differentiation Topic Workgroup 14 th & 15 th July 2009.
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
Project Nexus Workgroup Unique Sites 4 th November 2014.
AQ Amendment: Relevant UNC obligations and additional Validations Applied 27 May 2010.
Version /08/2008 The AQ calculation and validation process Compiled and delivered from the xoserve AQ Team for Review Group 209 Susan Prosser & Steve.
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup Meeting 19 – Meter Reading.
AQ Overview.  Annual Quantity (AQ) is a value held for each meter point that reflects the expectation as to the volume of gas that a meter point will.
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
UNC G7.3.7 Invoicing Read Estimation Proposal Requirement for Read Estimation & Proposed Methodology Dean Johnson Distribution Workstream – 25 th August.
Project Nexus Workgroup Read Validation following Transfer of Ownership 13 th October
Meter Read Validation 11 th August Background The meter read validation principles were developed under ‘The Settlement’ BRD and formed part of.
Distribution Network Interruption - Initialisation 28 September 2010.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
11 User Pays User Committee 11th January Agenda  Minutes & Actions from previous meeting  Agency Charging Statement Update  Change Management.
Project Nexus Workgroup – Invoicing 11 th August 2014.
1 Mod Review Group 126 Mar 2007 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  The review proposal is primarily concerned with restricting.
Project Nexus Workgroup Extension of Modification 0434 to permit retrospective updates pre-dating Project Nexus Go Live Date 9 th September 2014.
PN UNC Workgroup Read Validation 4 th October 2011.
1 Review Group 264 Rules & Options Analysis for BSSOQ Methodology Changes Post MOD th September 2009.
1 Mod Review Group 126 Apr 2007 slides 126 Review Group – Restriction of Invoice Billing Period  These slides describe the business rules for the treatment.
PN UNC 4 th September 2012 Reconciliation Issues (Action: NEX06/02)
Version PNUNC AQ Principles Workgroup Mod 0209 – Rolling AQ Presenter: Steve Nunnington 23 rd March 2010.
PN UNC Workgroup Invoicing 24 th October Objectives of the Workgroups To determine detailed business requirements Consider/review comments made.
ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
UNC Modification Proposal 0380 Periodic Annual Quantity Calculation Calculation of Daily Supply Point Capacity Alan Raper – DNCMF 26 th September 2011.
UNC0376A - Increased Choice when applying for NTS Exit Capacity – User Pays initial thoughts Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 01.
CONFIDENTIAL - Mod Initial Business Rules © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc. All rights Reserved. 1.
1 Modification 0152V Implementation Matters 25 October 2007.
Rolling AQ – Initial Calculation
Options for Mod 640 Replacement
UK Link Technology Refresh
Background - Tolerance Rules
Capacity/Commodity Split Impact on Suppressed reconciliations
Change Management Committee – June 2019 Update
Project Nexus Workgroup
Change Management Committee – June 2019 Update
UNC Mod Retrospective Invoice Limitation © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc. All rights Reserved.
UNC Mod 392/ IGT Mod 040 Proposal to amend Annex A of the CSEP NExA table, by replacing the current version of the AQ table August 2011.
CONFIDENTIAL - Title of presentation © 24 November 2009 EDF Energy plc
Project Nexus Workgroup
Mod Proposal 0268 : AQ Backstop Date
Current situation The submission of AQ Appeals and AQ Amendments using two alternative dates and reads that provide a more realistic indication of the.
SSP – PROVISIONAL LSP – SSP AMENDMENT RULES
Deferral of Retrospective Updates Functionality
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup
Nexus Workgroup Winter Consumption and the influence on Winter Annual Ratio (WAR) Bands 8th January 2014.
Project Nexus Workgroup
DN Interruption Phase II
Dave Addison August 2008 Application Support Updates
Project Nexus Workgroup
AQ Review System Calculation Overview
UNC Modification 0634 (Urgent) – Post Implementation Assessment
PN UNC AMR Topic Workgroup Meeting 14 – Meter Reading
Nexus Workgroup Read Validation Scenarios
Modification Proposal 136
Actions Updates Action 0282/006 – Exclude from AQ process
Meter Read Rejections ..
COR3007: UNC MOD 450B – Monthly revision of erroneous SSP AQs outside the User AQ Review Period Implementation UK Link Committee – May 2014.
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic)
Annual Quantity (AQ) 45.
Further Considerations
Xoserve Draft UIG Incentives Modifications 20 May 2019
Presentation transcript:

Project Nexus Workgroup AQ Backstop Date Options 7 th October 2014

Background Discussed at previous meetings the options around migrating a Backstop Date to the new system A ‘Backstop Date’ will prevent any reads prior to this date being used in the AQ process This potentially reduces the risk of reads not being subject to the new energy tolerance validations and reads not used in the annual AQ process being used in future AQ processes Various options have been discussed, the following slides documents 4 options. Propose each party considers the options & provides their preferred option, or any alternative option, for the November meeting where a decision must be made

Option 1 No Backstop Dates migrated to the new system –This includes any Backstop Dates currently applied as part of the annual review process are not migrated over

Option 2 The Backstop Date currently applied during the annual AQ Review only is migrated A Backstop Dates is currently applied where; –An AQ has been revised following a successful Shipper Amendment During Annual AQ review process An AQ has been revised following a successful Shipper Appeal During the Appeal Window –As a result of an Xoserve amendment Following validations the AQ calculated appears not to be reflective of the sites consumption

Option 3 Apply the same Backstop Date to all Supply Meter Points For example –1 st April 2015 (all reads pre 1 st April already considered in AQ 2015 review) or –1 st October 2015

Option 4 Apply a Backstop Date to all Supply Meter Points but a different date depending on the scenario For example –Apply the existing Backstop Date where there has been an AQ Amendment or Appeal during the annual review process –Apply a Backstop Date for AQs that have been carried forward –Apply a Backstop Date where an AQ was calculated, not challenged & the AQ went live on 1 st October

Next Steps All parties to provide their preferred option, or any alternative, at the November meeting Agreement gained at November meeting on which option to take forward for migration Where agreement can not be reached Option 2 will be applied to Supply Meter Points as these are the current arrangements