Elementary RtI Liaison Meeting Shirley Jirik, Ed.D. RtI Coordinator October 30, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
Issue Analyses RtI Yvette Benton Brad Baietto Brad Scarbrough.
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
Robyn Seifert February 6,  smarterbalanced.org  K-12 EDUCATION  Administrators 2.
C4K Overview Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids Partnering with Iowa’s Local Schools.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development October 9, 2009.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention MN Response to Intervention Center Ann Casey, Ph.D. Director St. Croix River Ed. District
The ABC’s of PLC and RTI Shanna Brooks NCESD Literacy Specialist.
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
What is RTI? Purpose  How a school responds to students who are not progressing.  Organized into three Tiers in order to provide intervention at various.
Response to Intervention By: Angelique Gunderson.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
The general structure of the facilitation notes will be:
Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS): Overview. Objectives Become familiar with: Common language of MTSS Tier I, II, III 2.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
Creating an RTI Culture at the Building Level in Order to Make Sound Eligibility Decisions Oak Hills Local School District Cincinnati, Ohio UC Summer Institute.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Arshall Public Schools Walking the Talk: The Role of Leadership in Implementing an RtI Framework Presented By: Barb Sramek, District Administrator Barb.
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
Blending Academics and Behavior Dawn Miller Shawnee Mission School District Steve Goodman Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning.
Response to Intervention in School Improvement Plans Macomb ISD April, 2011.
An Introduction to - PBIS in Roseburg Public Schools: RTI, Professional Learning Communities and How to Respond When Kids Don’t Learn.
Data Summit July 27, 2012 Stephanie Smyka RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION.
Elementary RtI Liaison Meeting Shirley Jirik, Ed.D. SVVSD RtI Coordinator October 15, 2013.
Welcome HS & MS RtI Liaisons! Shirley Jirik, Ed.D. SVVSD RtI Coordinator January 29, 2013.
Secondary RtI Liaisons May 2, 2013 Shirley Jirik, Ed.D. SVVSD RtI Coordinator.
Secondary RtI Liaison Meeting Shirley Jirik, Ed.D. RtI Coordinator November 13, 2013.
D62 Response to Intervention
MAISA Annual Conference June 21, 2012  Leadership and vision  Focused and intentional action  Knowledge and capacity building  Accountable for student.
Response to Instruction & Intervention Training Banning High School RtI2.
Michelle Coconate RtI Facilitator Interventionist Meeting Woodruff Career & Technical Center August 27, 2015.
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
Michelle Coconate RtI Facilitator Interventionist Meeting Administration Building September 17, 2015.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
High Plains Education Cooperative.  A Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS) is a term used in Kansas to describe how schools go about providing supports.
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
SEVEN RTI FOUNDATIONS MAMLE Fall 2011 Conference Heidi McGinley, RtI Support System Project Director.
RtI True or False? T or F -With RtI, the learning and progress of all students is assessed. T or F - RtI is only about interventions. T or F - All students.
Presented by Dr. Jalilah Dukes and Bobbie Sievering Chicago Heights School District 170 October 2010.
Los Angeles Unified School District “MyData 201- Data-Based Decision Making, RtI2 and MyData” Co-hosted by your RtI and MyData Teams
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… … a process for providing high quality instruction, assessment, and intervention that allows schools to.
Using DIBELS to Improve Reading Outcomes in Grades 3-5.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Response to Intervention Teaching and Learning February 19, 2015 Michelle Coconate.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Assessment in an RtI Model 1. Assessment as a Cycle AreaWhenHowMeanUse McAfee, Leong, Bodrova Basics of Assessment 2004.
School-Based Problem-Solving for Individuals (SBIT)
Response to Intervention Instruction. Agenda Ultimate Purpose Components of RtI Expectations Break Problem Solving Teams Homework.
USING RTI TO IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN LITERACY A Report to Our Stakeholders TEMPLATE to fill in/ add to/ delete as you see fit! SCHOOL NAME– Board.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Responsiveness to Instruction: Using a Problem Solving Model to Guide Student Support Team Decision Making Pender County Schools Summer 2009.
Teacher-Based Problem-Solving for Groups (TBIT)
Issue Analyses RtI Yvette Benton Brad Baietto Brad Scarbrough.
ESE Blended Cafe Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) A Parent Guide
Response to Intervention = RTI
Response to Intervention in Educational Transformation Schools
DSUSD MTSS Implementation (Multi-Tiered System of Supports)
ABC Unified School District
Presentation transcript:

Elementary RtI Liaison Meeting Shirley Jirik, Ed.D. RtI Coordinator October 30, 2013

Purpose To learn more about implementing Response to Intervention and to collaborate with other leaders about this process.

Learning Targets Learn how others are progress monitoring & options for this in St. Vrain Learn what other schools use for intervention & options in St. Vrain Discuss teaming structures that schools have in place and what support is needed Complete District CDE RtI Rubric

Introductions Think of a Halloween memory or fall activity that you enjoy Introduce yourself at your table and briefly share a Halloween memory or fall activity

District Update District RtI Leadership Team – Sample assessment frameworks – November meeting on assessment and then will move to intervention PALS Quick Checks & RtI Lexia Core5

Housekeeping Items RtI Blog for Power Point/Resources CDE RtI Implementation Rubrics Requirements for Liaison Stipend – Attendance of 4 Half Day District Liaison Meetings – Share important information with building administration – Complete documentation (RtI Plans, Rubrics)

SHOW AND TELL FROM RTI INNOVATIONS CONFERENCE

Tier 1 GOAL: 100% of students pass benchmark assessments Tier 1 effective if approx. 80% are meeting benchmark assessments with only access to Core. Tier 2 For approx. 20% of students Tier 1 Core + Supplemental …to pass benchmark assessments. Tier 2 Effective if approx % of students in group improve performance (i.e., gap is closing) Tier 3 For Approx 5% of Students Tier 1 Core + Supplemental + Intensive Individual Instruction …to pass benchmark assessments. Tier 3 Effective if there is progress (i.e., gap closing).

Critical Features of RtI Team approach Problem-Solving Process Evidence-based practices Behavior Support Academic Support Data-Based Decisions Dawn Miller, RtI Innovations, 2013

PROGRESS MONITORING Learning Target #1

Ways to Progress Monitor in St. Vrain AIMSweb DIBELS easyCBM ABCs of CBM Alpine Achievement Galileo Quizzes

Progress Monitoring Rotation At poster boards: – Questions about progress monitoring – What tools do you use for progress monitoring at your school? – District support you need to successfully implement progress monitoring Direct Instruction- progress monitoring tool in Alpine/ custom spreadsheet tool

INTERVENTIONS Learning Target #2

Intervention Rotation At poster boards: – Questions about intervention – What interventions do you use at your school? – District support you need Direct Instruction- how do you make time to implement intervention?

TEAMING STRUCTURES Learning Target #3

What structures are needed? Professional Learning Communities Grade level/dept. Meetings Problem- Solving Team Building Leadership Team Dufour, 2009, Buffum, Mattos, Weber, 2012

Teaming Rotation At poster boards: – Questions about teaming – What teams do you use at your school and is it effective? – District support you need Direct Instruction- are grade level teams meeting? What support is needed?

DISTRICT CDE RTI RUBRIC

Grouping by Intensity: Tier 2 Current Recommendations Early Literacy (K-3)or (K-6) – an additional 30 minutes of targeted instruction should be provided beyond the core with homogeneous groups of 3-5 student, 3-4 days per week Adolescent Literacy (4-12) Homogeneous instruction can be provided to groups as large as 10 to 16 students for minutes per day or one class period, 3-4 days a week

Supplemental K-12 Early Literacy (K-3)or (K-6) – an additional 30 minutes of targeted instruction should be provided beyond the core with homogeneous groups of 3-5 student, 3-4 days per week Adolescent Literacy (4-12) – Homogeneous instruction can be provided to groups as large as 10 to 16 students for minutes per day or one class period, 3-4 days a week

Grouping by Intensity: Tier 3 Current Recommendations Early Literacy (K-3)or (K-6) – 60 additional minutes of instruction beyond the core instruction with homogeneous groups of 1-3 students Adolescent Literacy (4-12) – Grades 4-8 small groups of 1-4 students for minutes per day – High school small groups of 1-5 students for minutes per day

Intensive K-12 Early Literacy (K-3)or (K-6) – 60 additional minutes of instruction beyond the core instruction with homogeneous groups of 1-3 students Adolescent Literacy (4-12) – Grades 4-8 small groups of 1-4 students for minutes per day – High school small groups of 1-5 students for minutes per day