BIOCHLOR A Screening Level Natural Attenuation Model and Database for Solvents C.E. Aziz C. J. Newell A.P. Smith Groundwater Services, Inc. J.R. Gonzales.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numerical Modeling of Biodegradation Analytical and Numerical Methods By Philip B. Bedient.
Advertisements

Mass Transport of Pollutants
Biodegradation and Natural Attenuation
Introduction to SCREEN3 smokestacks image from Univ. of Waterloo Environmental Sciences Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering and Technology.
Dale T Littlejohn Senior Geologist. What is fate and transport in the vadose zone? Vadose Zone Hydrocarbon release from buried pipeline Aquifer Surface.
Using CSIA for Biodegradation Assessment: Potential, Practicalities and Pitfalls B. Sherwood Lollar University of Toronto S. Mancini, M. Elsner, P. Morrill,
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Conceptual models for petroleum hydrocarbon sites.
Contaminant Fate and Transport Processes Philip B. Bedient Environmental Science and Engineering Rice University, Houston, TX.
FIGURE 4-1 Some fate and transport processes in the subsurface and atmospheric environment.
LDEQ’s RECAP Domenico and Summer’s Models. DOMENICO MODEL.
1 Kent S. Sorenson, Jr. Ryan A. Wymore Enhanced Bioremediation for Treatment of Chlorinated Solvent Residual Source Areas – Case Study and Implications.
4A10 Construction Research & Innovation BioGeoChemistry Professor Mark Dyer TrinityHaus.
KELLY HAYDEN Applying GIS to Watershed Pollution Management.
Case Studies Natural Attenuation Assessment at Plattsburgh Air Force Base, New York Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division.
Modeling Bioremediation and Natural Attenuation Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental.
Introduction to GW contamination and
Interdisciplinary Modeling of Aquatic Ecosystems Curriculum Development Workshop July 18, 2005 Groundwater Flow and Transport Modeling Greg Pohll Division.
Evaluating Natural Attenuation
Gas Phase Transport Principal Sources: VLEACH, A One-Dimensional Finite Difference Vadose Zone Leaching Model, Version 2.2 – United States Environmental.
Introduction to the ISC Model Marti Blad NAU College of Engineering.
BIOPLUME II Introduction to Solution Methods and Model Mechanics.
Remedy Analysis for Sierra Army Depot, Building 210 Area
Radionuclide dispersion modelling
Evaluation of Florida C&D Debris Groundwater Monitoring Data Presentation discusses: Results of analysis of groundwater monitoring data Results of groundwater.
Employee Presentation p 1
Groundwater Pollution GW 10a Enhanced Natural Attenuation.
FRAMES-2.0 Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
BIOSCREEN AND BIOCHLOR Natural Attenuation Modeling Tools
Fate and Transport of Ethanol in the Environment Presented to the Environmental Protection Agency Blue Ribbon Panel Presented by Michael C. Kavanaugh,
The Hyporheic Zone: Example of a field study Matt Miller Contributions from D. McKnight and N. Mladenov.
1 Welcome to the CLU-IN Internet Seminar Practical Models to Support Remediation Strategy Decision-Making – Part 2 Sponsored by: U.S. EPA Office of Superfund.
1 Section 5: Limitations. 2 ISCO Limitations  Saturated Zone vs Unsaturated Zone  Chemistry  CoSolvents  Geology /Geochemistry/Hydrogeology  NAPL.
(Zheng and Bennett) Steps in Transport Modeling Calibration step (calibrate flow model & transport model) Adjust parameter values Traditional approach.
4 Application of Environmental Isotopes in Studies of Biodegradation of Organic Contaminants in Groundwater Ramon Aravena, Department of Earth Sciences,
Ministry of Environment and Energy Danish EPA Ad Hoc International Working Group on Contaminated Land ”Natural attenuation in Denmark” by Kim Dahlstrøm,
Hierarchical Modeling Linking to Science-Support Models EXAMPLE Hierarchical Modeling Linking to Science-Support Models Groundwater Modeling System RT3D.
1 Effective Characterization Technologies Deana M. Crumbling, M.S. Technology Innovation Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. (703)
Bioremediation-From the Lab to the Field
Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät Fachbereich Geowissenschaften Modeling Reductive Biodegradation of Chlorinated Ethenes Shenghua Yue, Dr. Fernando.
Evaluation of Intrinsic Biodegradation and Amendments to Support Enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery of Sediments Tom Krug and David Himmelheber, Geosyntec.
Groundwater Pollution
TCE and 1,2-DCE Biotransformation Inside a Biologically Active Zone Anthony W. Holder, Philip B. Bedient, and Joseph B. Hughes Environmental Science and.
Petroleum Vapor Intrusion 2013 Springfield Environmental Summit Valerie Garrett Technical Environmental Specialist Hazardous Waste Program, Tanks Section.
1 Welcome to the CLU-IN Internet Seminar Visit the Clean Up Information Network online at Practical Models to Support Remediation.
19 Basics of Mass Transport
Constructing student knowledge of mass transport through interpretation of field data x Jodi Ryder Central Michigan University vs x.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © A high-order accurate and monotonic advection scheme is used as a local interpolator to redistribute.
Working With Simple Models to Predict Contaminant Migration Matt Small U.S. EPA, Region 9, Underground Storage Tanks Program Office.
Tracers for Flow and Mass Transport
Biological Treatment of Residual DNAPL
HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Overview
(Z&B) Steps in Transport Modeling Calibration step (calibrate flow & transport model) Adjust parameter values Design conceptual model Assess uncertainty.
Elise A. Striz, Hydrologist USEPA ORD National Risk Management Research Laboratory Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Div. Ada, OK US EPA Optimal.
B1 Fe(0) and Coke as “Active” Cap Media for PCB Destruction/Sequestration Gregory V. Lowry Kathleen M. Johnson Paul J. Murphy Meghan L. Smith EPA-TIO Anacostia.
Bedrock Aquifer Workshop Providence, RI November 2000 John E. Vidumsky, P.E. DuPont Corporate Remediation Group.
Workshop U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Pacific Northwest National Laboratory November 15-17, 2005 Constituent Data Editor.
INTEGRATED SITE REMEDIATION Targeting Contaminants in Soil, Groundwater, and Vapor.
Assessing Variability in Petroleum Vapor Intrusion Jim Weaver United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National.
Benefits of Laboratory Treatability Studies in Support of Full-Scale Design for In Situ Remedies Michaye McMaster Geosyntec Consultants Sandra Dworatzek.
Application of CSIA in Assessing and Cleaning Organics-Contaminated Sites Dr. Yi Wang Director, ZymaX Forensics Isotope April 5, Brownfields 2011.
GSI ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Houston, Texas (713) Workshop 1: Assessment and Evaluation of Vapor Intrusion at Petroleum.
CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT MECHANISMS
Groundwater Contaminant Fate & Transport Modeling EPD Guidance Robin Futch, P.G. Carolyn Daniels, P.G. Allan Nix Geologist/Compliance Officer, RRP/LPB/EPD.
Mark L. Brusseau University of Arizona
Vít Matějů, Robin Kyclt, Alena Polenková* ENVISAN-GEM, a.s.
Empirical Attenuation Factors Predictions & Observational Data
Sean Anderson, P.Eng., QPESA Steve Russell, B.Sc., QPRA
Modeling Natural Attenuation with GROUNDWATER SERVICES, INC.
Introduction to BIOPLUME III
A Modeling Approach to Assess the Feasibility of Water Injection, Storage, and Recovery  ASR Recoverability Guidance Project Reinaldo E. Alcalde Dr. Charles.
Presentation transcript:

BIOCHLOR A Screening Level Natural Attenuation Model and Database for Solvents C.E. Aziz C. J. Newell A.P. Smith Groundwater Services, Inc. J.R. Gonzales P.E. Haas Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence Y. Sun T.P. Clement Battelle Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

BIOCHLOR Model Domenico Solution for Groundwater Transport Reductive Dechlorination/ Sequential First Order Rxns Reductive Dechlorination/ Sequential First Order Rxns

Why Use BIOCHLOR? Method for Estimating Plume Lengths System to Organize Site Data Tool to Help Understand Site Processes Screening Tool for Applicability of NA Supporting Line of Evidence for NA Method for Estimating Plume Lengths System to Organize Site Data Tool to Help Understand Site Processes Screening Tool for Applicability of NA Supporting Line of Evidence for NA

BIOSCREEN vs. BIOCHLOR: Similarities Domenico Analytical Model Microsoft Excel Platform User-Friendly Interface Based on Site Database Free Over the Internet Domenico Analytical Model Microsoft Excel Platform User-Friendly Interface Based on Site Database Free Over the Internet

BIOSCREEN vs. BIOCHLOR: Differences Petroleum Hydrocarbon Sites – BTEX Biodegradation: Petroleum Hydrocarbon Sites – BTEX Biodegradation: BIOSCREEN BIOCHLOR Solvent Sites More Complex Biodegradation: Solvent Sites More Complex Biodegradation: -1st Order Decay or -Electron Acceptor Limited -1st Order Decay or -Electron Acceptor Limited - Sequential Reactions - Different Zones - Sequential Reactions - Different Zones

BIOCHLOR: Key Processes Advection (1-D) Dispersion (3-D) Sorption Biodegradation: -Reductive dechlorination -Sequential reactions (parents to daughters) -Limited hydrolysis Different biodegradation zones Advection (1-D) Dispersion (3-D) Sorption Biodegradation: -Reductive dechlorination -Sequential reactions (parents to daughters) -Limited hydrolysis Different biodegradation zones

BIOCHLOR Model Domenico Solution for Groundwater Transport Reductive Dechlorination/ Sequential First Order Rxns Reductive Dechlorination/ Sequential First Order Rxns

Sequential Reactions PCETCEDCE VC ETH Rate PCE = –  1 C PCE Rate TCE =  1 y 1 C PCE –  2 C TCE

Reactive Transport Equations A-D Equation (1-D advection, 3-D dispersion) etc.... Rate PCE = d C PCE d t = L ( C PCE ) -  1 C PCE Rate TCE = d C TCE d t = L ( C PCE ) +  1 y 1 C PCE -  2 C TCE Rate TCE = d C TCE d t = L ( C PCE ) +  2 y 2 C TCE -  3 C DCE L ( C 1 ) = – v d C 1 d x + D x d 2 C 1 d x 2 + D y d 2 C 1 d y 2 + D z d 2 C 1 d z 2

BIOCHLOR Model Domenico Solution for Groundwater Transport Y. Sun / T.P. Clement Transformation

Distance from Source TCE DCE VC Results in BIOCHLOR

BIOCHLOR Model: Other Features Two Reaction Zones for Mixed Sites Zone 1: High Decay Rates (Carbon Present) Zone 2: Low Decay Rates (No Carbon) Source PCE TCE DCE VC ETH PCE TCE DCE VC ETH PCE TCE DCE VC ETH PCE TCE DCE VC ETH Zone 1 Zone 2

BIOCHLOR Model: Other Features Single Vertical Plane Source Single Vertical Plane Source Superimposed Sources (Connor et al., 1995) Superimposed Sources (Connor et al., 1995) Source 1 Source 2 Source 3

Predicts Parent, Daughter Compound Concentrations BIOCHLOR Model: Summary Provides Analytical Solution to Transport Equations with Sequential Reactions Simulates Two Biodegradation Zones for Mixed Sites Zone 1 Zone 2

BIOCHLOR Version 2.0 Rate Constant Decision Support System Source Decay Option Animation Feature Rate Constant Decision Support System Source Decay Option Animation Feature

Version 1.0: Available on CD OR Download free Currently: Jan. 2000: ( CsMOS Web Page ) How To Get BIOCHLOR... Version 2.0: Available: Fall 2000

BIOCHLOR Demonstration Case Study: Cape Canaveral AS, Fire Training Area Release: Solvents, degreasers, JP fuels ( ) Site Hydrogeology : Avg. Depth to Groundwater Hydraulic Conductivity Hydraulic Gradient Typical Groundwater Seepage Velocity 1.8 x cm/sec ft/ft 112 ft/yr 5 ft BGS

BIOCHLOR Interface – Input Parameters

BIOCHLOR Output

Individual Chlorinated Solvent Output

Array Output