Resonant mass detectors Pia Astone 4 th Amaldi conference Perth July 8-13, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
Advertisements

September 21, 2005Virgo Status – ESF Workshop1 Status of Virgo B. Mours.
Participants: C-1:Cryogenic last-stage suspensions (interferometers) (F.Ricci-G.Frossati) Objectives: -Design new suspension elements for the last stage.
A SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM INSPIRALING NEUTRON STARS AND BLACK HOLES Using data taken between July 2009 and October 2010, researchers from the.
Jonathan Gair Graduate Seminar, St.Catharine’s College, 28 th November 2005 The Black Hole Symphony – listening to the Universe with gravitational waves.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
LIGO Status and Advanced LIGO Plans Barry C Barish OSTP 1-Dec-04.
Final Thoughts and Highlights Barry C. Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 Okinawa 24-June -05 LISA.
G.A.Prodi - INFN and Università di Trento, Italy International Gravitational Event Collaboration igec.lnl.infn.it ALLEGRO group:ALLEGRO (LSU)
LIGO-G W Report on LIGO Science Run S4 Fred Raab On behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1 Observing the Most Violent Events in the Universe Virgo Barry Barish Director, LIGO Virgo Inauguration 23-July-03 Cascina 2003.
1 GWIC Gravitational Wave International Committee Report to PaNAGIC 9-Sept-03.
Gravitational Wave Detectors: new eyes for physics and astronomy Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University.
G Z April 2007 APS Meeting - DAP GGR Gravitational Wave AstronomyKeith Thorne Coincidence-based LIGO GW Burst Searches and Astrophysical Interpretation.
Oct 2006 g.modestino1 Experimental results correlating GW detector data and Gamma Ray Bursts Giuseppina Modestino LNF ROG Collaboration INFN – LN Frascati,
Auriga, Explorer and Nautilus Eugenio Coccia INFN Gran Sasso and U. of Rome “Tor Vergata” GWADW Elba 2006.
ILIAS GW Meeting Mallorca - October 23-24, 2005Luca Taffarello Status of the commissioning of the AURIGA detector Luca Taffarello (INFN Sezione di Padova)
The Astrophysics of Gravitational Wave Sources Conference Summary: Ground-Based Detectors ( Hz) Kimberly New, LANL.
Paik-1 Search for Gravitational Waves Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland and Seoul National University January 12, 2006 Seoul, Korea KIAS-SNU Physics.
Annecy/Dec'04 1 ALLEGRO:status Dec 2004 Warren Johnson, Bill Hamilton, Peter Zhang, Andrew Weber, Damon Nettles, Jon Hanson, Mark Burgamy, Jordan Weaver.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
Gravitational Wave Arezu Dehghafnar Physics Department SUT.
STATUS of BAR DETECTORS G.A.Prodi - INFN and University of Trento International Gravitational Event Collaboration - 2 ALLEGRO– AURIGA – ROG (EXPLORER-NAUTILUS)
Paris, July 17, 2009 RECENT RESULTS OF THE IGEC2 COLLABORATION SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVE BURST Massimo Visco on behalf of the IGEC2 Collaboration.
Acknowledgements The work presented in this poster was carried out within the LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC). The methods and results presented here.
GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 STATUS OF EXPLORER AND NAUTILUS INFN – LN Frascati, LN Gran Sasso, Sez. Roma 1, Roma 2 and Genova Universities “La Sapienza”
Status of LIGO Data Analysis Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Dec.
Analysis techniques for data from resonant-mass detectors Pia Astone SPIE conference, Waikoloa, Hawaii,
Searching for gravitational radiation from Scorpius X-1: Limits from the second LIGO science run Alberto Vecchio on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
Coincidences in gravitational wave experiments Pia Astone 4 th Amaldi conference Perth July 8-13, 2001.
TAMA binary inspiral event search Hideyuki Tagoshi (Osaka Univ., Japan) 3rd TAMA symposium, ICRR, 2/6/2003.
INTERPRETATION of IGEC RESULTS Lucio Baggio, Giovanni Andrea Prodi University of Trento and INFN Italy or unfolding gw source parameters starting point:
LIGO-G Z The AURIGA-LIGO Joint Burst Search L. Cadonati, G. Prodi, L. Baggio, S. Heng, W. Johnson, A. Mion, S. Poggi, A. Ortolan, F. Salemi, P.
The AURIGA experiment: updates and prospects BAGGIO Lucio ICRR on behalf of AURIGA collaboration The AURIGA detector re-started data taking in Dec 2003,
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
GRBs & VIRGO C7 run Alessandra Corsi & E. Cuoco, F. Ricci.
1 Gravitational Wave Astronomy using 0.1Hz space laser interferometer Takashi Nakamura GWDAW-8 Milwaukee 2003/12/17.
Toward a 3rd generation European Gravitational Wave Observatory Dual R&D: presented by Massimo Cerdonio INFN Section and Department of Physics Padova how.
ILIAS WP1 – Cascina IGEC – First experience using the data of 5 bar detectors: ALLEGRO, AURIGA, EXPLORER NAUTILUS and NIOBE. – 1460.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Searches for Compact Binary Coalescences in LIGO and Virgo data Gabriela González For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration APS.
LIGO- G D Gravitational Wave Observations with Interferometers: Results and Prospects Stan Whitcomb for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2 nd.
Gravitational wave astronomy: a facilities overview Barry C. Barish Caltech AAS San Diego 13-Jan-05 LISA.
Data analysis for impulsive sources with resonant g.w. detectors Pia Astone ROG collaboration Villa Mondragone International school of Gravitation and.
ILIAS WG1 - April 7 th, 2005 G.W. ANTENNA NAUTILUS LNF - FRASCATI G.W. ANTENNA EXPLORER CERN - GENEVA Bar Al 5056 M = 2270 kg L = 2.97 m Ø = 0.6 m A =
TAUP 2007, Sendai, September 12, 2007 IGEC2 COLLABORATION: A NETWORK OF RESONANT BAR DETECTORS SEARCHING FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES Massimo Visco on behalf.
GWDAW11 – Potsdam Results by the IGEC2 collaboration on 2005 data Gabriele Vedovato for the IGEC2 collaboration.
LIGO-G M Press Conference Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders Caltech (on behalf of a large team) APS April Meeting Philadelphia 6-April-03.
LIGO- G D Results from the LIGO Science Runs Stan Whitcomb for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Aspen Winter Conference on Gravitational Waves.
Status of AURIGA AURIGA Sept 21 st 2005 Massimo Cerdonio INFN Section and Department of Physics University of Padova,
GW – the first GW detection ! Is it a start of GW astronomy ? If “yes” then which ? «Счастлив, кто посетил сей мир в его минуты роковые !...» Ф.Тютчев.
Mike Cruise University of Birmingham Searches for very high frequency gravitational waves.
Gravitational Waves What are they? How can they be detected?
Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 IGEC 2 REPORT International Gravitational Events Collaboration ALLEGRO– AURIGA – ROG (EXPLORER-NAUTILUS)
Thomas Cokelaer for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. APS April Meeting, Jacksonville, FL 16 April 2007, LIGO-G Z Search.
Brennan Hughey MIT Kavli Institute Postdoc Symposium
Detecting a Galactic Supernova with H2 or GEO
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
Detecting a Galactic Supernova with H2 or GEO
on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Coherent wide parameter space searches for gravitational waves from neutron stars using LIGO S2 data Xavier Siemens, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Spokesperson, LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Stochastic Background
GW Data Analysis (from an experimentalist’s point of view)
Stochastic background search using LIGO Livingston and ALLEGRO
Gravitational wave detection and the quantum limit
Stochastic gravitational wave and its spectral property
Joint bar-IFO observations
Presentation transcript:

Resonant mass detectors Pia Astone 4 th Amaldi conference Perth July 8-13, 2001

….these early experiments initiated research into gravitational waves experiments that is still ongoing. Current g.w. experiments are descendants of Weber’s original work

M ; T ; Q The Eq of geodetic deviation is the basis for all the experiments to detect g.w. Thermal noise, T=300mK, D L= m They play a role that is similar to L ; P ; F for interferometers

Main characteristics of the detectors ALLEGRO : 2300 kg, Al antenna, The two resonance frequencies are 897 and 920 Hz. Cooled at 4.2K Operational since 1991 IT IS IN BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA (U.S.A.) AURIGA : 2230 kg, Al antenna Cooled at 200 mK, with a liquid helium dilution refrigerator The two resonance frequencies are 921 and 930 Hz Operational since 1997 IT IS IN LEGNARO (PADOVA) Explorer : 2270 kg, Al antenna Cooled at 2.6 K The two resonance frequencies are 888 and 919 Hz Operational since 1990 IT IS AT CERN NAUTILUS : 2260 kg, Al antenna Cooled at 130 mK, with a liquid helium dilution refrigerator The two resonance frequencies are 905 and 924 Hz Operational since Dec IT IS IN FRASCATI (ROME) Niobe : 1500 kg, Niobium antenna Cooled at 5 K. The two resonance frequencies are 694 and 713 Hz Operational since 1993 IT IS HERE

The expected signal h is a short pulse ( a few ms). Bars can look for: The expected value on Earth, if 1% of M o is converted into g.w. in the GC, is of the order of Bursts

Two collapsed objects ( 2 neutron stars, 2 black holes, one of each), that orbit each other at close range and high orbital frequency. Amplitude and frequency increase with time, until the final merge. h Time[s] h Bars can look for: Chirp

Bars can look for: Signals from rotating neutron stars, stars in binary systems Continuous signals

Noise, produced from a high number of uncorrelated events Cosmological origin: it is the result of processes that happened immediately after the Big-Bang. If measured, it will allow to discriminate various cosmological models Astrophysical origin: it is the result of more recent event (redshift z order of 2-5). It is due to unresolved processes of gravitational collapses. It will provide information on star formation rates, supernova rates, black holes Bars can look for: Stochastic background

AN EXAMPLE OF STRAIN SENSITIVITY of a resonant g.w. detector NAUTILUS 1999 Sqrt(T/MQ) Note that the bandwidth depends ONLY on the transducer and amplifier Calibration signal

659 d 553 d 852 d 221 d 200 d ON times for the various detectors

THE ALLEGRO DETECTOR IS VERY STATIONARY AND HAS A VERY HIGH DUTY CYCLE Tobs= 328 days !! h=1* ALLEGRO 1998 Talk by S. Heng

The AURIGA sensitivity (first run 97-99) July, 1999 h= / sqrt(Hz) B=6 Hz Talk by A. Ortolan

Explorer, Nautilus and Niobe are now working with a sensitivity of h=4-5* June 2001 h=4* h=7* Talks by Visco, Coccia, Blair

NEWS on the detectors ALLEGRO : It has been relocated and will be again on the air in a few weeks. (2.0 * /sqrt(Hz), B= 1 Hz) Next: It will be equipped with a new 2-mode transducer and with a Wellstood SQUID amplifier. The expected bandwidth is 60 Hz, and the expected strain sensitivity 1 * / sqrt(Hz) AURIGA : A new readout (new double stage SQUID, new tranducer) is being tested. New mechanical suspensions (360 The system will be operative before the end of this year. The expected strain sensitivity is 6* / sqrt(Hz) B= /sqrt(Hz) Phase I (2001) 2* /sqrt(Hz) B= /sqrt(Hz) Phase II (2002 ) Explorer : the tranducer and the SQUID have been replaced. This year: increase the Q of the transducer to increase the strain sensitivity. Work on the SQUID (to reduce extra noise) We expect a bandwidth of 30 3* /sqrt(Hz); Next year: Install cosmic ray detectors around the bar NAUTILUS : after the summer the bar will be replaced and the new system will work at 935 Hz; A new transducer and SQUID (the same used for Explorer) will be used (to increase the sensitivity) We expect: 6* Hz Niobe : it has been cooled down again in Feb The readout system has been improved, to increase the sensitivity (new low noise micro wave amplifier) The antenna has been equipped with cosmic ray detectors (Univ. of Adelaide osmic ray detector array)

Explorer strain sensitivity ( ) But the system was not stable in this situation AND /sqrt(Hz) /sqrt(Hz)

present condition increasing Q and decreasing electronic noise decreasing electronic noise Explorer strain sensitivity /sqrt(Hz) GOAL for this year : S h =( /sqrt(Hz)) 2 B= /sqrt(Hz) Calibration

The expected AURIGA strain sensitivity: Phase I (2001) Operating Temperature 1.5 K S h =( /sqrt(Hz)) 2 B= /sqrt(Hz) h= (burst) Phase II (2002) Operating Temperature 100 mK S h =( /sqrt(Hz)) 2 B= /sqrt(Hz) h= (burst) Talk by J.P. Zendri; Posters by Vinante, Marin

Optical readout for AURIGA Bar motion read by FP cavity, mounted between the bar and the resonant transducer May 2001: the system has been operating on a room temperature bar, in Legnaro (10 days) /sqrt(Hz) /sqrt(Hz) Talk by M. De Rosa Next steps: Underst. agreement with model Test optomechanical parts at low temperature Develop and test a cryogenic prototype

NAUTILUS at 935 Hz (after the summer): expected strain sensitivity with the new transducer Hz 1/sqrt(Hz) 6* Hz 840 Hz 980

554 d 416 d 852 d 221 d 186 d ON times for the various detectors

Results of the First Analysis ( data, old protocol) No detection of g.w. bursts above That is no events which converted 0.07 solar masses in the Galaxy h=4 x Discussion for IGEC: refer to the talk of G. Prodi at this conference

Net observation times ( data-New protocol) 1 detector: 1322 (past:625) days 2 detectors: 713 (past:260) days 3 detectors: 178 (past: 90) days 4 detectors: 29 (past: 16) days 5 detectors: 0 (past: 0) days The total span of the time of the analysis is 4 years=1460 days In case of an astronomical trigger, the time coverage is 90%, over 4 years

Search for bursts -what we plan to do- Analysis of the IGEC data (new protocol  more information). New algorithms. We are preparing for future analysis in collaboration with interferometers : 1) use of Frames 2) study of the problem (waveforms versus detector’s bandwidth) The use of FRAMES for the AURIGA detector: see the poster of Gabriele Vedovato Optimum filters for bursts: see the poster of Sabrina D’ Antonio

EXPLORER and NAUTILUS Feb Crosscorrelation measurement of stochastic g.w. background with two resonant detectors (Astr. Astroph 351,1999) (see also Phys. Lett. B, 385, 1996) 12 hours of data Bandw.=0.1 Hz Omega_gw < 6* S h Hz Hz

Stochastic g.w. background -what we plan to do- New limit using AURIGA I and NAUTILUS: with t_obs=4 month; S hN =(6* * ) 2 1/Hz ; S hA =(1* ) 2 Hz Omega_gw=10 -1, Df=1 Hz Year 2002 (a factor 2 better if AURIGA is tuned at 935 Hz). Joint analysis with Virgo (S hV =(1* ) Hz): Virgo – AURIGA II: 3*10 –3 (1 year, Df=80 Hz) Virgo – NAUTILUS: 5*10 –3 (1 year, Df= 1 Hz) (and also: Virgo-AURIGA-NAUTILUS). S. Vitale et al. Phys. Rev D, 55,1997;Maggiore Phys Rep ,2000 Joint analysis with LIGO. LIGO–ALLEGRO : *10 –4 ( 40 km apart) S. Finn, A. Lazzarini grqc (2001)

0.1 is obtained using LIGO I (h(f)= /sqrt(Hz) at 1kHz ) the present ALLEGRO (h(f)=2* /sqrt(Hz)) 1 year (analysis done at pieces of 2-3 months) and a bandwodth of 1 Hz 3*10-4 is obtained using LIGO II (h(f)= /sqrt(Hz) at 1kHz) Improved ALLEGRO h(f)= /sqrt(Hz) 1 year (analysis done at pieces of 2-3 months) and a bandwodth of 50 Hz W =0.1 can be obtained using LIGO I (h(f)= /sqrt(Hz) at 1kHz ) the present ALLEGRO (h(f)=2* /sqrt(Hz)) 1 year (analysis done with periods of 2-3 months) and a bandwidth of 1 Hz W =6*10 -4 is obtained using LIGO II (h(f)= /sqrt(Hz) at 1kHz) Improved ALLEGRO h(f)= /sqrt(Hz) 1 year (analysis done with periods of 2-3 months) and a bandwidth of 60 Hz

Continuous wave analysis Limits for signals in the GC and Tucanae has been obtained using 3 months of ALLEGRO 1994 data, at a level of the order of h c =5*10 –24 (Hamilton, Pr. of the 2 nd E. Amaldi1997) Limit for signals in the GC, using 95 days of Explorer data h c =3*10 –24 (ROG+Frasca+ Papa, subm to PRD, 2001)

Continuous wave analysis Overall sky search (2 days,Df=0.8Hz) of data is now running and will end by the summer: the analysis will put limits at the level of h c =3*10 –23 (the procedure is in Astone, Borkowsky, Jaranowsky, Krolak, gr-qc/ subm. to PRD,2001) Incoherent analysis over 1 year of data of Explorer 1991 (Astone,Krolak,Rog coll:”A fast search for continuous g.w. signals”…we are writing the paper Extend the analysis to data So far we have done random search of the parameter space for 1 million points. We choose a threshold for SNR of 6.6. We have obtained 123 thr. crossing. Each event is verified by two matched filters with the parameters of the event. See the Krolak’ s talk at the GR16 We will use the Rome strategy for the pulsar search, developped for Virgo (Frasca,Palomba,Ricci and the ROG collaboration)

Use of the NAUTILUS data at 935 Hz to search for the neutron star in the SN1987A S h =( /sqrt(Hz)) 2 t obs =1 year h 0 =sqrt(2 S h / t_obs)= The signal : P= 2.14 ms, dP/dt= Hz/s The estimation of oblateness is order of  h of order (Middleditch et al., New Astronomy, 5, 243, 2000) AURIGA Phase I or Phase II with the bar at 935: S h = /sqrt(Hz)  h 0 =sqrt(2 S h / t_obs)=( 15 – 5 )

A new activity Spherical detectors a sphere has 5 modes of vibration interacting strongly with a g.w. Each mode can act as a separate antenna, oriented towards a different polarization or direction

SMALL SPHERICAL DETECTORS in preparation Material=Cu Al Diameter=65 cm Mass=1 ton Frequency=3 kHz Brazil: Mario Shenberg The Netherlands: Mini GRAIL Italy: Sfera Mini GRAIL

Gravitational waves are a tool for astronomical observations “they can reveal features of their sources which no one could ever learn by electromagnetic or neutrino studies” Kip Thorne

The Nautilus g.w. detector and the interaction with cosmic rays Thermo-acustical model of interaction of cosmic rays with a bar detector (Liu-Barish, De Rujula, Cabibbo, Amaldi-Pizzella) “Expected” result for low-amplitude signals October 98-Jan 99 (Phys. Rev Lett. 84, Jan 2000) “Unexpected” result for high-amplitude signals (Phys. Lett. B 499, Jan 2001)

E = K. 87 TeV. The value of the merit factor, estimated from the signal, is Q = Unfiltered signal (V 2 ) The signal after the filtering (kelvin) The biggest event observed has E=58 K (the energy released in the bar is 87 TeV)

The problem is very interesting, as it involves: gravitational waves, cosmic rays, particle detection, low temperature physics 1)Analysis of the data obtained with NAUTILUS at 1 K 2) Cosmic ray detectors will be installed around Explorer Refer to the talk of F. Ronga at this meeting 3)Cosmic ray detectors have been put around Niobe (different superconducting material)

CONCLUSIONS We have many interesting improvements and analyses to do The collaboration within the entire g.w. community is essential for the exploration of this new frontier of kwnoledge

Dato il tasso di aspettazione di EAS al livello del mare [5]: (  = n o paricelle cariche/m 2 ) [5]G. Cocconi, Encyclopedia of Physics Vol.46 p.228 (Publisher, City, 1961)  1 energia media attesa per un evento con molteplicità maggiore di M E energia media misurata

Sensitivity to continuous waves h c = sqrt(S h /t_obs) if the source is known hchc Ground based detectors and Pulsar Sources 1 year

IGEC DETECTORS

The detector sensitivity to the various signals: Burst h: Sh, Df ; matched filters ; coincidences between 2 or more detectors Continuous sources h c : Sh, t_obs ; only one detector; Fourier analysis, pattern tracking Stochastic background W _gw: Sh 1, Sh 2 (h), Df, t_obs ; crosscorr. 2 or more detectors

A rotating neutron star: It will emit g.w. if the mass distribution is non axis-simmetric along the rotation axis. About 10 9 NEUTRON STARS are expected to exist in the Galaxy, but only ~ 1000 have been detected, most as PULSARS.

The expected AURIGA strain sensitivity h= (burst) S h =( /sqrt(Hz)) 2 B=50 Hz

NEWS on the detectors ALLEGRO : It has been relocated and will be again on the air in a few weeks. Next: It will be equipped with a new transducer and with a new SQUID amplifier. The expected bandwidth is 50 Hz, and the expected gain in strain sensitivity a factor of 10 ( 1 * / sqrt(Hz) ) AURIGA : A new readout (new capacitive tranducer and new SQUID) is being tested. The system will be operative after the summer The expected bandwidth is 50 Hz and the expected gain in strain sensitivity is a factor 4 ( 1* / sqrt(Hz) ) Explorer : the tranducer and the SQUID have been replaced. Now the bandwidth is 50 5* /sqrt(Hz); Next year: increase the Q of the transducer to increase the strain sensitivity. Install cosmic ray detectors around the bar NAUTILUS : after the summer the bar will be replaced and the new system will work at 935 Hz; A new transducer and SQUID (the same used for Explorer) will be used (to increase bandwidth and sensitivity) Niobe : it has been cooled down again in Feb The readout system has been improved, to increase the sensitivity The antenna has been equipped with cosmic ray detectors

0.1 is obtained using LIGO I (h(f)= /sqrt(Hz) at 1kHz ) the present ALLEGRO (h(f)=2* /sqrt(Hz)) 1 year (analysis done at pieces of 2-3 months) and a bandwodth of 1 Hz 3*10-4 is obtained using LIGO II (h(f)= /sqrt(Hz) at 1kHz) Improved ALLEGRO h(f)= /sqrt(Hz) 1 year (analysis done at pieces of 2-3 months) and a bandwodth of 50 Hz W =0.1 can be obtained using LIGO I (h(f)= /sqrt(Hz) at 1kHz ) the present ALLEGRO (h(f)=2* /sqrt(Hz)) 1 year (analysis done with periods of 2-3 months) and a bandwidth of 1 Hz W =3*10 -4 is obtained using LIGO II (h(f)= /sqrt(Hz) at 1kHz) Improved ALLEGRO h(f)= /sqrt(Hz) 1 year (analysis done with periods of 2-3 months) and a bandwidth of 50 Hz

NEWS on the detectors ALLEGRO : It has been relocated and will be again on the air in a few weeks. (2.0 * /sqrt(Hz), B= 1 Hz) Next: It will be equipped with a new 2-mode transducer and with a Wellstood SQUID amplifier. The expected bandwidth is 60 Hz, and the expected strain sensitivity 1 * / sqrt(Hz) AURIGA : A new readout (new double stage SQUID, new tranducer) is being tested. New mechanical suspensions (360 The system will be operative before the end of this year. The expected strain sensitivity is 6* / sqrt(Hz) B= /sqrt(Hz) Phase I (2001) 2* /sqrt(Hz) B= /sqrt(Hz) Phase II (2002 ) Explorer : the tranducer and the SQUID have been replaced. Now the bandwidth is 50 5* /sqrt(Hz); Next year: increase the Q of the transducer to increase the strain sensitivity. Install cosmic ray detectors around the bar NAUTILUS : after the summer the bar will be replaced and the new system will work at 935 Hz; A new transducer and SQUID (the same used for Explorer) will be used (to increase the sensitivity) Niobe : it has been cooled down again in Feb The readout system has been improved, to increase the sensitivity (new low noise micro wave amplifier) The antenna has been equipped with cosmic ray detectors (Univ. of Adelaide osmic ray detector array)

NAUTILUS: expected strain sensitivity with the new transducer App. Phys Lett. 72,115 (1998) dcSQUID Hz 1/sqrt(Hz)

Net observation times ( data-old protocol) 1 detector: 625 days 2 detectors: 260 days 3 detectors: 90 days 4 detectors: 16 days 5 detectors: 0 days The total span of the time of this first analysis is 2 years=730 days