Introduction to Evaluation. Objectives Introduce the five categories of evaluation that can be used to plan and assess ACSM activities. Demonstrate how.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 UN Coherence: High level monitoring and evaluation approach.
Advertisements

Planning M&E to Tell Our ACSM Story. Objectives Discuss how ACSM activities can address barriers to help reach national TB control targets. Describe how.
Unit 1. Introduction TB Infection Control Training for Managers at the National and Subnational Levels.
Selecting the Right Evaluation Method. Objectives Why should we evaluate? Which activities should we evaluate? When should we evaluate? How should we.
METHODOLOGY FOR THE REVIEW/EVALUATION OF POLICY DOCUMENTS By Kwami DADJI, Health Officer HIV/AIDS, TB, Malaria & OID African Union Commission.
GENERATING DEMAND FOR DATA Module 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data-informed decision making  Understand the role of.
Module 1: Key concepts in data demand & use
Comprehensive M&E Systems
I NTRODUCTION TO B ASIC D ATA A NALYSIS AND I NTERPRETATION FOR H EALTH P ROGRAMS.
Measuring Change Evaluation Phase EME 6636 Change Management Instructor: Dr. Darabi Yang Xu.
Strategic Management Process Lecture 2 COMT 492/592.
Role of Result-based Monitoring in Result-based Management (RBM) Setting goals and objectives Reporting to Parliament RBM of projects, programs and.
MEASURE Evaluation MEASURE Evaluation’s Monitoring and Evaluation Workshop for Tuberculosis Programs.
Key Terms for Monitoring and Evaluation. Objectives Explain the difference between monitoring and evaluation. Introduce the most common M&E terms. Review.
A presentation on THE SOCIAL MARKETING OF RURAL SANITATION
Management Response to the Annual Report on the Evaluation Function in UN Women in 2014.
Session 12 Implementing and Evaluating the Campaign Session 12 Slide Deck Slide 12-1.
SESSION ONE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISALS.
Cross Border Animal Health Plan of Action – Kenya and Uganda Four Strategic areas 1. To improve prevention, management and control of cross border animal.
UNDP Support to UN Cooperation in Moldova Annual Programme Review UNDP Moldova 18 December, 2003.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
SMART Objectives.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Unit 10. Monitoring and evaluation
Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Cross-Cutting Advocacy Issues Data Collection Monitoring and Evaluation.
The inspection of local area responsibilities for disabled children and young people and those who have special educational needs Charlie Henry HMI National.
Overview of Advocacy, Communication, and Social Mobilization.
Aid for Development Effectiveness -Managing for Development Results- Terence D. Jones UNDP Third International Roundtable Managing for Development Results.
Multi-Year Plans Strengthening immunization systems and introduction of hepatitis B vaccine in Central Europe and the Newly Independent States St. Petersburg,
Real-World Challenges of M&E. Objectives Outline the “real-world” challenges of conducting program monitoring and evaluation. Identify practical and feasible.
Indicators for ACSM.
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
TANZANIA’S MONITORING SYSTEM: CHALLENGES AND WAY FORWARD BY EKINGO MAGEMBE POVERTY MONITORING OFFICER (MoF-TANZANIA )
21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 1. 21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 2 Family and Community Medicine Department.
Experiences in Tanzania: Community Based Efforts to Support HIV/TB Integration Jackson Mugyabuso Dr. Charlotte Colvin PATH 25 July 2012.
The inspection of local area responsibilities for disabled children and young people and those who have special educational needs Mary Rayner HMI Lesley.
Framework and Toolkit for UN Coherence, Effectiveness and Relevance at Country Level: Step 7 – Monitor & Evaluate.
The P Process Strategic Design
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Evaluation of NRNs Andreas Resch, Evaluation Advisor.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Monitoring and Evaluation for ACSM Charlotte Colvin, PhD TB/HIV Technical Officer PATH 23 February 2010.
Monitoring Activities Answer the Following Questions: What is being done? Scope How well is it being done? Quality Are we doing it on a large enough scale?
The P Process Eight Key Questions 1. What is the communication problem? 2. What do we need to do? 3. What materials/interventions do we need to develop?
Roadmap & Actions Expert Consultation Health in All Policies.
Advocacy, Communication and Social Mobilization Working Group ACSM Paul Sommerfeld, Chair.
Monitoring and Evaluation of ACSM Interventions to Support TB Prevention and Care.
ACSM at Country Level Sub Group Meeting
NFM: Modular Template Measurement Framework: Modules, Interventions and Indicators LFA M&E Training February
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Define program components Define.
What We Will Discuss Today u Communication u Promotion v Setting the promotion budget and mix v Advertising v Sales Promotion v Public Relations.
Tactics for improving evidence base. TACTICS OF ALL TACTICS FOR IMPROVING EVIDENCE BASE: YOU, ME, OUR COLLEAGUES If we understand the needs for evidence.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
MONITORING, EVALUATION & REPORTING UPDATES 2014 Annual Partners Forum 15 April 2014.
Session VII: Formulation of Monitoring and Evaluation Plan
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Collecting High-Quality Data
Project Name: Country:
Introduction to M&E Frameworks
Project Management Training
ACSM in 2010: Overview of SG Achievements
Putting It All Together! Collecting High-Quality Data
ACSM Subgroup 2011 Priority activities
Collecting High-Quality Data!
ACSM SG in 2009: Progress and Challenges
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Evaluation

Objectives Introduce the five categories of evaluation that can be used to plan and assess ACSM activities. Demonstrate how each evaluation category can be used to answer different evaluation questions. Review examples of each type of evaluation.

Evaluation is Part of the M&E Plan M&E Plan FrameworkIndicators Data Collection Data Quality Data Use and Reporting Evaluation Strategy Budget

Monitoring versus Evaluation Monitoring Data collected on program activities Ongoing, routine Focus on process and output, compared to target Are we doing the work we planned? Evaluation Data collected to answer specific questions Periodic Focus on outcome, impact How should we design our activities? How effective were they?

Categories of Evaluation 1.Baseline evaluation (needs assessment) 2.Formative evaluation 3.Process evaluation 4.Outcome evaluation 5.Impact evaluation

Baseline Evaluation/Needs Assessment Identifies our ACSM starting point Who do we need to reach and how? What activities are most important or most needed? Where do we need to go? What is the baseline value for key indicators?

Formative Evaluation Helps design activities for the target group Strengthens interventions by getting the right message to the right people Pre-testing Do we have the right message? Is this the right communication method? Are we reaching the right people? Do they understand the message?

Process Evaluation Documents what happens in a program What is going well, what is not, and why Often overlaps with monitoring Did we do what we planned? Is the program being implemented effectively? What challenges do we need to address? What best practices can we share? Lessons learned?

Outcome Evaluation What was the quality of our work – were we effective? Did we contribute to changes in key outcomes?

Impact Evaluation Contribution of ACSM interventions to high- level goals and objectives Generates evidence about effectiveness of ACSM activities Very rigorous, time consuming, and expensive Relies on high-quality baseline data collection. MUST be planned from the very beginning. In practice, rarely done.

Match the Question and Category! Do focus group members understand this message? FORMATIVE Did our program contribute to higher case detection in our country? IMPACT How many people know the symptoms of TB before we launch our media campaign? BASELINE

Match the Question and Category! Did pharmacists refer more customers for DOTS after our training? OUTCOME What did we learn about conducting effective advocacy work this year? PROCESS

Desig n ImplementationEnd BASELINE FORMATIVE PROCESS OUTCOME IMPACT When do we evaluate?

Creating a Framework BASELINE FORMATIVE PROCESS OUTCOME IMPACT

Questions?