1 8/26/08 AASHTO Special Committee on Transportation Security National Needs Assessment for Ensuring Transportation Infrastructure Security 2009-2015 (NCHRP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright High Street Consulting Group 2007 All-Hazards Security and Emergency Management Research Implementation Plan NCHRP Project (29)
Advertisements

Transit Security: An Overview of Activities Since 9/11 Eva Lerner-Lam President Palisades Consulting Group, Inc. ITE 2003 Annual Meeting August 24-27,
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
Transportation Operations Master Plan John Ward ITS-Pennsylvania Panel Discussion Vision for Achieving Regional Mobility through ITS November 23, 2010.
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
1 Continuity Planning for transportation agencies.
The Role of ITS Technology for Homeland Security Kentucky’s Experience.
Securing Our State: A Coordinated Approach Homeland Security Strategy for the State of Colorado.
Border Architecture US/Mexico Presented to Border Partnership Working Group 11 January 2006.
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Transportation Working Group ITS Experts Group Chicago, Illinois September 2002 Walter Kulyk, P.E. Director, Office of.
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program Regional Roll-out San Francisco, CA June 17-18, 2003.
Federal Transit Administration Office of Safety and Security FTA BUS SAFETY & SECURITY PROGRAM 18 th NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RURAL PUBLIC AND INTERCITY.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
Session 121 National Incident Management Systems Session 12 Slide Deck.
A Guide to Emergency Response Planning at State Transportation Agencies NCHRP Project 20-59(23) Published as NCHRP Report 525, Vol. 16.
November 2008 Michael Smith (SAIC) Steve Lockwood (PB Consult) NCHRP Project SP20-59 (17) CAPTA Costing Asset Protection: An All Hazards Guide for Transportation.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 7—Mass Care What Is It And How Will We Measure It? For sound, click on the megaphone and then move arrow.
Part of a Broader Strategy
1 Preparing Texas Today... Texas Preparedness Workshop November 16-17, 2005 Austin, Texas A Texas Community Partnership...for Tomorrow’s Challenges Governor’s.
Jeffery Graviet Emergency Services Coordinator, Salt Lake County Chairperson, Salt Lake Urban Area Working Group.
1 State of Good Repair Research Vincent Valdes Associate Administrator for Research, Demonstration, and Innovation July 9, 2009.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
National Preparedness All Hazards Consortium Corey Gruber Assistant Deputy Administrator, National Preparedness National Preparedness.
Operation Safe Commerce Transportation Security Administration Maritime & Land Security Tim Williamson – Maritime Cargo Branch.
Dixie Regional ITS Architecture Project Summary July 31, 2006.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
IS-813: ESF #13 – Public Safety and Security
IntelliDrive SM Strategic Plan 2009 Ted Trepanier SSOM – SCOTE Manchester The IntelliDrive SM logo is a service mark of the U.S. Department of Transportation.
Critical Infrastructure Protection Overview Building a safer, more secure, more resilient America The National Infrastructure Protection Plan, released.
AASHTO Special Committee on Transportation Security & Emergency Management Summary of 2010 State DOT Security/Emergency Management Survey Results Final.
Copyright High Street Consulting Group 2007 SCOTSEM Draft Final 2010 Strategic Plan.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1 Critical Transportation Assets, and Sensitivity to Climate Change Gulf Coast Study,
Briefing on the Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Operations Coordination (MATOC) Program Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Michael.
V ehicle I nfrastructure I ntegration Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations and Acting Program Manager for ITS Joint Program Office.
ESF #3 – Public Works and Engineering IS-803 – February 2009 Visual 1 Public Works and Engineering ESF #3.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey A. Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Title: U.S. Department of Homeland Security Small Vessel Security Strategy Author: Sean K. Moon Economy: United States of America.
Business Continuity Program Orientation (insert presentation date) (This presentation is a template that requires adjustments to meet your needs)
Summary of NAST Major Accomplishments Dollars in Millions National Coalition White Paper NAST Congressional Testimony $54.5M RAND $2M Wind Tunnel Study.
Integrated Risk Management 36 – Month Final Status Report Christian DeVoll, Risk Management Specialist June 2013.
1 State Homeland Security: Priorities and Funding R. Chris McIlroy Homeland Security and Technology Division National Governors Association.
MATOC Trial Phase Dec 2008 to Jun 2009 Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Richard W. Steeg, PE Chair MATOC Steering Committee VDOT Regional.
Transit Bus Safety and Security Program Federal Transit Administration.
AASHTO’s Vision for SCOTSEM (and a ten year retrospective) Tony Kane Director, Engineering and Technical Services AASHTO SCOTSEM Summer Meeting Irvine,
Security and the National ITS Architecture ITS America 2003 Session 19: The State of the Practice: ITS and Homeland Security May 19, 2003 Minneapolis,
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Copyright High Street Consulting Group 2007 SCOTS 2008 – States’ Key All- Hazards Themes.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Bioterrorism and Emergency Preparedness November 16, 2005 Jon Huss Director, Community Preparedness Section.
Connected Vehicles Workforce FHWA Vehicle-to-Infrastructure
ORIENTATION WORKSHOP. Target Capabilities Assessment Purpose Objectives Structure of the Target Capabilities Assessment Process Overview The Self-Assessment.
NTOC National Summit November 7, 2011 Washington, DC Aliyah Horton Douglas E. Noble, P.E., PTOE Aliyah Horton Douglas E. Noble, P.E., PTOE Operations:
Implementation of the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act Briefing for National Vaccine Advisory Commitee February 5, 2007 By: Brian Kamoie Acting.
2015 USACE Exercise – December 1, 2015 New Madrid Seismic Zone – Earthquake FEMA Mission, Legal Authorities and Regional Capability Overview Gus Wulfkuhle.
1 Item #10 Progress Report on Actions to Improve Regional Transportation Communication and Coordination During Incidents John M. Contestabile Director,
ITS Device Standards & Procurement Project PURPOSE  Develop a series of Standards & Strategies designed to guide and provide consistency across the development.
Arlington County’s Transit ITS Program Needs Assessment and Planning Study Presented to ITS Virginia | July 17, 2015.
1 Iowa Emergency Management Association Iowa Homeland Security and Emergency Management Department Emergency Management Program Development Course EMERGENCY.
DHS/ODP OVERVIEW The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) implements programs designed to enhance the preparedness.
Threat into Risk: A Challenge for Security Guidance AusRAIL 2006 Tony Beard Office of Transport Security Department of Transport and Regional Services.
SEC 470 OUTLET The learning interface/sec470outletdotcom.
AASHTO Special Committee on Transportation Security
SCOTS 2008 – States’ Key All- Hazards Themes
Federal Protective Service
Introduction to: National Response Plan (NRP)
The Intercity Bus Security Grant Program & Associated Initiatives 2019 BISC Summer Meeting Kerry L. Thomas Chief, Transportation Infrastructure Security.
URS Washington Group International, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

1 8/26/08 AASHTO Special Committee on Transportation Security National Needs Assessment for Ensuring Transportation Infrastructure Security (NCHRP 20-59/Task 26) Charles Wallace, PI Telvent Farradyne

2 8/26/08AASHTO SCOTS Committee Research Project Team Telvent Farradyne: Telvent Farradyne: Charles Wallace, PICharles Wallace, PI David YohananDavid Yohanan Doug Ham, original PIDoug Ham, original PI Other staff assistanceOther staff assistance PB Consult: Steve Lockwood PB Consult: Steve Lockwood

3 8/26/08AASHTO SCOTS Committee Original Project Stimulus Increased security-related costs incurred by state Departments of Transportation (DOTs) Increased security-related costs incurred by state Departments of Transportation (DOTs) Need to estimate total costs to inform AASHTO’s formation of federal funding request during reauthorization process Need to estimate total costs to inform AASHTO’s formation of federal funding request during reauthorization process For use in AASHTO’s Bottom Line Report For use in AASHTO’s Bottom Line Report Updates 2002 Report Updates 2002 Report

4 8/26/08AASHTO SCOTS Committee Update Project Stimuli New federal initiatives: New federal initiatives: National Incident Management System (NIMS)National Incident Management System (NIMS) National Response Plan/Framework (NRP/F)National Response Plan/Framework (NRP/F) National Infrastructure Protection PlanNational Infrastructure Protection Plan Embrace all-hazards risk managementEmbrace all-hazards risk management Review of changes in threat exposure Review of changes in threat exposure Reflect states’ security investments since 2002 report Reflect states’ security investments since 2002 report Update cost estimates for next reauthorization Update cost estimates for next reauthorization Add transit and commercial vehicle needs Add transit and commercial vehicle needs Address State Transportation Agencies (STAs), not just “DOTs” Address State Transportation Agencies (STAs), not just “DOTs”

5 8/26/08AASHTO SCOTS Committee Security Programs (Legs) Protection of Mobility Assets Protection of Mobility Assets Enhancement of Traffic Management Capabilities Enhancement of Traffic Management Capabilities Improvement of State Transportation Agency Emergency Response Improvement of State Transportation Agency Emergency Response

6 8/26/08AASHTO SCOTS Committee Critical Mobility Assets: Identified Assets No significant changes in the approximately 450+ existing bridges and 50+ tunnels No significant changes in the approximately 450+ existing bridges and 50+ tunnels Some bridges and tunnels have added protectionSome bridges and tunnels have added protection More protection needed, possibly add someMore protection needed, possibly add some Major transit stations and commercial vehicle terminals Major transit stations and commercial vehicle terminals

7 8/26/08AASHTO SCOTS Committee Critical Mobility Assets: Countermeasures Maximizing explosive standoff distance Maximizing explosive standoff distance BarriersBarriers Denial of access Denial of access Fences and locksFences and locks Minimizing time-on-target Minimizing time-on-target Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) surveillanceIntelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) surveillance Selective protection Selective protection Blast shieldingBlast shielding

8 8/26/08AASHTO SCOTS Committee Critical Mobility Assets: Countermeasures (cont’d) Increase ITS surveillance for security Increase ITS surveillance for security Prevent vehicles from being used as platforms for weapons of mass destruction Prevent vehicles from being used as platforms for weapons of mass destruction Increased protection against improvised explosive devices, suicide perpetrators, and rocket- assisted munitions Increased protection against improvised explosive devices, suicide perpetrators, and rocket- assisted munitions

9 8/26/08AASHTO SCOTS Committee Traffic Management Capabilities: Program Elements ITS deployment: ITS deployment: Automated vehicle- detection technologyAutomated vehicle- detection technology Surveillance systemsSurveillance systems Advance traveler information systemsAdvance traveler information systems Plus: Plus: Federal/state-run centers coordinating across state linesFederal/state-run centers coordinating across state lines Joint interagency Fusion CentersJoint interagency Fusion Centers

10 8/26/08AASHTO SCOTS Committee State Transportation Agency Emergency Response: Program Elements General emergency management planning, training, and exercises General emergency management planning, training, and exercises National Incident Management System (NIMS)National Incident Management System (NIMS) National Response Framework (NRF)National Response Framework (NRF) National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP)National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP) Planning for key security elements including vulnerability assessment and evacuation planning Planning for key security elements including vulnerability assessment and evacuation planning Development and deployment of expanded interoperable interagency communications Development and deployment of expanded interoperable interagency communications Expanded and upgraded real-time security operations and coordination including the protection of traffic management centers Expanded and upgraded real-time security operations and coordination including the protection of traffic management centers

11 8/26/08AASHTO SCOTS Committee Total 2002 Costs ($Millions) Protecting Mobility Assets Protecting Mobility Assets $ 1,522 Capital$ 1,522 Capital $ 882 Operating/yr$ 882 Operating/yr Enhancement of Traffic Management Capabilities Enhancement of Traffic Management Capabilities $ 3,654 Capital$ 3,654 Capital $ 1,914 Operating/yr$ 1,914 Operating/yr Improvement of State Transportation Agency Emergency Response Improvement of State Transportation Agency Emergency Response $ 936 Capital$ 936 Capital $ 1,638 Operating/yr$ 1,638 Operating/yr Total Total $ 6,112 Capital$ 6,112 Capital $ 4,434 Operating/yr$ 4,434 Operating/yr Grand Total 6-yr Capital and O&M = $10,534 Grand Total 6-yr Capital and O&M = $10,534

12 8/26/08AASHTO SCOTS Committee 2008 Cost Bases Protecting Mobility Assets Protecting Mobility Assets InfrastructureInfrastructure Consider deployments to date Consider deployments to date Escalate 2002 costs per Producer Pricing Index (PPI) Escalate 2002 costs per Producer Pricing Index (PPI) Estimates by Steve Lockwood Estimates by Steve Lockwood TransitTransit American Public Transportation Association (APTA) Survey in 2004 American Public Transportation Association (APTA) Survey in 2004 Carried forward without escalation per APTA testimony Carried forward without escalation per APTA testimony Extended Operations & Maintenance through 6 years Extended Operations & Maintenance through 6 years Estimates by David Yohanan Estimates by David Yohanan Commercial Vehicles (CV)Commercial Vehicles (CV) Known commercial vehicle security programs Known commercial vehicle security programs Advice from TSA Advice from TSA Estimates by David Yohanan Estimates by David Yohanan

13 8/26/08AASHTO SCOTS Committee 2008 Cost Bases (cont’d) Enhancement of Traffic Management Capabilities Enhancement of Traffic Management Capabilities Considered deployments to date (e.g., considerable ITS deployment)Considered deployments to date (e.g., considerable ITS deployment) Escalate 2002 costs per PPIEscalate 2002 costs per PPI Above estimates by Steve LockwoodAbove estimates by Steve Lockwood Linking of Traffic Management Centers and State/Local Intelligence Fusion Centers based on team experienceLinking of Traffic Management Centers and State/Local Intelligence Fusion Centers based on team experience Improvement of State Transportation Agency Emergency ResponseImprovement of State Transportation Agency Emergency Response Same as first three bullets aboveSame as first three bullets above

14 8/26/08AASHTO SCOTS Committee Total 2008 Costs ($Millions) Protecting Mobility Assets Protecting Mobility Assets Highway InfrastructureHighway Infrastructure $1,687 Capital $1,687 Capital $ 141 Operating/yr $ 141 Operating/yr TransitTransit $ 5,200 Capital $ 5,200 Capital $ 800 Operating/yr $ 800 Operating/yr Commercial VehiclesCommercial Vehicles $ 69 Capital $ 69 Capital $ 36 Operating/yr $ 36 Operating/yr Total Protecting Mobility AssetsTotal Protecting Mobility Assets $ 6,956 Capital $ 6,956 Capital $ 977 Operating/yr $ 977 Operating/yr

15 8/26/08AASHTO SCOTS Committee Total 2008 Costs (cont’d, $M) Enhancement of Traffic Management Capabilities Enhancement of Traffic Management Capabilities $ 3,426 Capital$ 3,426 Capital $ 300 Operating/yr$ 300 Operating/yr Improvement of State Transportation Agency Emergency Response Improvement of State Transportation Agency Emergency Response $ 1,254 Capital$ 1,254 Capital $ 1,638 Operating/yr$ 1,638 Operating/yr Total Total $11,636 Capital$11,636 Capital $ 1,586 Operating/yr$ 1,586 Operating/yr Grand Total 6-yr Capital and O&M = $21,152 Grand Total 6-yr Capital and O&M = $21,152

16 8/26/08AASHTO SCOTS Committee Project Deliverables Updated report (supplement to 2002 report) Updated report (supplement to 2002 report) 2-page executive summary to go in AASHTO Bottom Line Report 2-page executive summary to go in AASHTO Bottom Line Report Updated cost spreadsheets Updated cost spreadsheets

17 8/26/08AASHTO SCOTS Committee Project Schedule Preliminary Draft Final Report approved by the Panel 8/19/08 Preliminary Draft Final Report approved by the Panel 8/19/08 Revised Final Report to be delivered 8/30/08 Revised Final Report to be delivered 8/30/08

18 8/26/08 AASHTO Special Committee on Transportation Security Questions? Graphic courtesy of Michigan State University, “Critical Incident Protocols, a Public-Private Partnership”