Building a European Classification of Higher Education Institutions Ideas, Concepts, Goals Frans van Vught, Frans Kaiser & Don F. Westerheijden.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Bologna Shaping the Agenda Bologna today and tomorrow Lesley Wilson Secretary-General, European University Association.
Advertisements

Attractiveness of the HEIs in the EHEA An Introduction to WG 3 Pavel Zgaga University of Ljubljana Bologna Conference Fostering student mobility: next.
THE DYNAMICS OF DIVERSTITY IN THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA Prof.dr. F. van Vught Bologna Seminar Bologna 2020 Ghent, May, 2008.
Report of Working Session 3 Bologna Conference Fostering student mobility: next steps? Fostering student mobility: next steps? Involving stakeholders for.
Future Trends on Student Involvement in Quality Assurance Agencies
WP3. Evaluation, Monitoring and Quality Plan Dr. Luis Sobrado 27 th May 2011.
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
Developing a Classification of Higher Education Institutions in Europe Frans van Vught May, 2006.
Building a European Classification of Higher Education Institutions Workshop ‘New challenges in higher education research and policy in Europe and in CR’,
Workshop Mapping Estonian Universities Frans Kaiser & Marike Faber, Tartu (Estonia) 21 March 2011.
Quality and the Bologna Process Andrée Sursock Deputy Secretary General European University Association (EUA) EPC Annual Congress, March 2005, Brighton.
EUA Convention of European Higher Education Institutions Graz, May 2003 Theme 5 Pushing forward Bologna and Prague.
European Higher Education in a Globalised World EUA Convention Graz, May 2003 Frans van Vught University of Twente.
Employability in context of the Bologna Process Gayane Harutyunyan Bologna Secretariat Yerevan, May 2014.
ECTS-A COMMON LANGUAGE FOR RECOGNITION Gayane Harutyunayn, Head of Bologna Secretariat, Armenia 4 December 2014, Yerevan, Armenia Baghdad, Iraq Online.
Enhancing the quality of distance learning at Western Balkan higher education institutions Danijela Milošević University of Kragujevac, Faculty of technical.
Towards a Multi-dimensional Ranking: Transparency in Missions and Performances of Higher Education Institutions The EU context Sophia Eriksson Waterschoot.
Ecdc.europa.eu Christian Tauch DG Education and Culture Fostering student mobility: Next steps?
EUA Higher Education Convention, Graz, May 29-31, 2003 Group 5A First discussion: overriding principles of the two-cycle structure overriding structural.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
The role of European standards and guidelines for the development of the national system of independent assessment of the quality of higher education Seidakhmetova.
HOW CAN YOU HELP EMU TOWARDS INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION BY EUA?
Ranking effects upon students National Alliance of Student Organization in Romania (ANOSR) Member of European Students' Union (ESU) Academic cooperation.
The Perspectives from Universities Regarding Implementation of Indonesia Qualification Framework Gerardus Polla Rector of BINUS University 29 April 2009.
Strategic Framework for European cooperation in education and training
The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.
What Can National Rankings Learn from the U-Multirank-Project ? Gero Federkeil, CHE, Germany IREG-Forum: National University Rankings on the.
Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Tibor Szanto ENQA Rogaska Slatina, 30 November 2007.
Erasmus centralised actions and higher education policy Brussels, 23 rd January 2012 Vanessa Debiais-Sainton Endika Bengoetxea Higher Education; Erasmus.
The European Dimension of Quality Assurance Henrik Toft Jensen EUA Conference “Quality Assurance in Higher Education and Vocational Education and Training.
ENQA a key player in the European Higher Education Area Meeting of the Belarus University System representatives Minsk, March 2013 Josep Grifoll / Жузэп.
Enhancing the quality of distance learning at Western Balkan higher education institutions Maja Bozovic University of Kragujevac, Faculty of technical.
Classifying higher education institutions: why and how? EAIR Forum ‘Fighting for Harmony’, Vilnius August 2009 Frans Kaiser Christiane Gaehtgens.
ECTS – Advantages and Disadvantages TEMPUS CORINTHIAM Beit Daniel, Israel 19 December 2010 CORINTHIAM ECTS BOLOGNA INTERNATIONALISATION QUALITY ASSURANCE.
ECTS Users’ Guide 2015 Approved at Yerevan Ministers’ Meeting May 2015.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN BULGARIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Prof. Anastas Gerdjikov Sofia University March 30, 2012.
Dublin, 22 February 2011 I.EU Higher Education Policy and The Bologna Process II.ECTS and DS Labels 2011 Ruard Wallis de Vries European Commission Directorate.
Classifying European Institutions of Higher Education Phase II Frans van Vught.
Improving the recognition system Prof. Andrejs Rauhvargers President, Lisbon Convention Committee.
European Higher Education in Flux – challenges for the next decade - Lesley Wilson Secretary General, EUA EAIR, Vilnius, 24 August 2009.
Bob Johnson, ECBE, SEEC 11 Nov Qualification Frameworks and Credit - Articulation with Europe Bob Johnson Commissioner for Credit Rating European.
Internal quality development and assurance in HEIs Seminar on quality assurance in higher education in Armenia Yerevan, 4 June 2007 Karin Riegler Senior.
Curriculum reform Tirana 16th-17th March. A bit about ESIB ESIB-the National Unions of students in Europe is an umbrella organization representing over.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
Date: in 12 pts The Second Africa-EU initiative: Harmonisation, Quality and Accreditation supporting PAQAF Deirdre Lennan, European Commission.
THE 4 DIMENSIONS OF QUALITY IN THE ERASMUS EXPERIENCE
Bujar Gallopeni Head of Kosova Center for International Cooperation in HE & RTDI Edinburgh, 10 June 2014 Kosova Education Strategic Plan The.
1 EAN CONFERENCE June 30 – July 2, 2008, Berlin. 2 „Challenges for Europe: European Higher Education in a Global Setting“ Barbara Weitgruber Austrian.
Implementing the LLL Charter Michael H örig EUA Programme Manager Nicosia, Cyprus 22 November 2010.
ESG 2015: Linking external and internal QA Involving stakeholders Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
Andy Gibbs Yerevan 2009 Winter School “Promoting European Dimension in Higher Education”
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Education and Culture Life Long Learning: Education and Training policies School Education and Higher education.
European Higher Education Area: focus from structures to better learning Head of Higher Education Unit Helka Kekäläinen, PhD.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
Analysis of Current State in Internationalisation Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Zlatan Buljko Zlatan Buljko Federal Ministry.
The Social Dimension/Lifelong Learning: EC perspective Maria Kristin Gylfadottir DG EAC, European Commission.
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Analysis of current state in internationalization from the accreditation aspect of HEIs Maja.
Classification & Ranking in Higher Arts Education New EU developments and the role of ELIA.
European Higher Education in a Global Perspective Lesley Wilson Secretary General European University Association Oslo, 11 March 2008.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Mobility, Recognition, ECTS Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
Financial autonomy and accountability of the Public Higher Education Institutions: Lessons learned from the FAITH project Prof. Ass. Dr. But Dedaj Dean.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Student Study and Work Placement Mobility
Transparency Initiatives European Higher Education
Senior project leader at CIEP Former President of ENQA
The Malta Qualifications Framework (MQF)
Quality assurance of higher education in the European Higher Education Area - developments and ways forward Paula Ranne, Deputy Director European Association.
Recognition of Qualifications as a stepping stone for further integration Brussels, 26 June 2018.
National Correspondents for Qualifications Frameworks (QF-EHEA)
Presentation transcript:

Building a European Classification of Higher Education Institutions Ideas, Concepts, Goals Frans van Vught, Frans Kaiser & Don F. Westerheijden

Definitions Diversity: The level of variety in a system at a specific point of time.The level of variety in a system at a specific point of time.Differentiation/Diversification: The process in which the diversity of a system increases.The process in which the diversity of a system increases.

A General Distinction External Diversity: differences between entities in a system.differences between entities in a system. Internal Diversity: differences within entities in a system.differences within entities in a system.

In Higher Education Systemic/Structural/Institutional Diversity: The level of variety in different types of institutions.The level of variety in different types of institutions. Programmic Diversity: The level of variety in types of programmes offered.The level of variety in types of programmes offered.

History of Diversity in European Higher Education Middle Ages “… the sixty or so universities of the medieval West were … extremely various as regards their numbers, their intellectual orientations, their social role and the … institutions themselves”. “Nevertheless, … the universities had, at least in ideal terms, a universalist vocation. Although of course situated in a particular town or country, they could wield an influence whose extent was determined … simply by their intrinsic capacity to attract”. J. Verger, Patterns, in: A History of the University in Europe, Volume I, 1992

Early Modern Europe (1500 – 1800) “… it is possible to define a few major types of university institutions”. “… universities in the strict sense of the term …, recognized or legitimated by the de facto supreme authority in the territory by its granting the rights to award degrees”. “… teaching academies, higher or illustrious schools … which could claim university status but had not obtained all its privileges, especially that of awarding degrees”. “… the college, teaching … in the form of propaedeutic classes for university entrance or merely as an elementary form of higher education”. W. Frijhoff, Patterns, in: A history of the University in Europe, Volume II, 1996 History of Diversity in European Higher Education

Modern Europe (1800 – ) “Of the sovereign states on the map of Europe in 1993, four had been formed in the sixteenth century, four in the seventeenth, two in the eighteenth, seven in the nineteenth, and no fewer than thirty-six in the twentieth”. N. Davies, Europe, A History, 1996 “The political culture represented by the nation demanded cultural domestication and social standardization right from the start … The university therefore took on the society- building role of providing a ‘national education’… Universities were to meet the needs of the modern state…”. B. Henningsen, A Joyful Good-Bye to Wilhelm von Humboldt, in: G. Neave et al (eds), The European Research University, 2006 History of Diversity in European Higher Education

Trends Trends From a European system to national systems.From a European system to national systems. Formalization of diversity in national regulation.Formalization of diversity in national regulation. Increasing but “hidden” institutional diversity.Increasing but “hidden” institutional diversity. History of Diversity in European Higher Education

The European Higher Education Area (EHEA) Sorbonne declaration (1998): “harmonization of the architecture of the European higher education system”. Bologna declaration (1999): “to achieve greater compatibility and comparability … taking full respect of the diversity of cultures, languages, national education systems and university autonomy”.

The EHEA Outcomes Trends Reports (1999, 2001, … 2007): increasing implementation of structural changes (two or three cycles, ECTS, Diploma Supplement);increasing implementation of structural changes (two or three cycles, ECTS, Diploma Supplement); different national interpretations;different national interpretations; large variety of operationalisations.large variety of operationalisations.

Diversity in the EHEA General picture Macro-level structural convergence. Large (increased?) meso- and micro-level diversity.

Diversity in the EHEA Recreation of a European system (structural convergence). Continued diversity between national systems. Large, hidden institutional diversity remains.

 Diversity is a strength!  By means of a European classification  Needs to be made transparent Diversity in the EHEA

 Carnegie Classification (USA): 1973, 1976, 1994, 2000, 2006  Chinese higher education classification: 2007 Classifications are International Phenomena

 Profiles European higher education at a global scale Functions of European Classification of Higher Education Institutions  Provides basis for effective policies and investment strategies  Offers relevant information to stakeholders and clients  Allows institutional development strategies  Facilitates benchmarking, networking and partnerships  Is a prerequisite for rankings

 the methodologies of ranking are judged to be ‘simplistic and lacking transparency’. (Hazelkorn, 2007)  ‘with increasing competition between institutions, … it is likely that rankings will continue to grow in importance … Further consideration and acknowledgement of wider factors (than in a single league table only) should be considered so that the diversity of institutional mission and focus is taken into account’. (HEFCE, 2008) Classification and Rankings

 Stakeholder approach: exploration and discussions  First phase: basic design principles The Classification Project  First phase: first set of dimensions and indicators  Second phase: second adapted set of dimensions and indicators

 Inclusive for all European HEIs  A posteriori information Design principles  Multi-dimensional  Focus on ‘objective’ data  Non-hierarchical

 Non-prescriptive  Flexible  Parsimonious regarding additional data needs  Related to European Register of Quality Assurance Agencies (EQAR) Design principles

First Version of a European Classification Based on: interaction with stakeholdersinteraction with stakeholders analysis of existing data sourcesanalysis of existing data sources in-depth case studiesin-depth case studies survey to assess relevance, validity, reliability and feasibilitysurvey to assess relevance, validity, reliability and feasibility

First Version of a European Classification of HEIs Education Research and innovation International orientation Community engagement Size and setting

 Highest degree offered (degree level)  degrees/diplomas granted per level  Subject mix  Orientation of programmes  number of programmes offered for licensed professions  Involvement in LLL  number of mature (> 30 years) students as % of total enrolment Education First Version of a European Classification of HEIs

 Research intensiveness  peer reviewed publications per academic staff  scientometric ‘crown’ indicator  Innovation intensiveness  Financial volume privately funded research as % of total financial volume  Number of start-ups  Number of filed patents  Income from licensing Research and innovation First Version of a European Classification of HEIs

 Teaching and staff  international degree seeking students as % of total number of students  incoming international/European exchange students as % of total number of students  outgoing international/European exchange students as % of total number of students  joint international programmes as % of total number of programmes offered  programmes offered abroad  fte international academic staff as % of total academic staff International orientation First Version of a European Classification of HEIs

International orientation  Research  Financial turnover in EU research programmes as % of total financial research volume First Version of a European Classification of HEIs

 Size  Total number of students (per degree level)  Total number of fte’s academic staff  Total financial turn over per year  Mode of delivery  distance learning programmes as %  Part-time programmes as %  Public/private character  Income from government sources as % of total income  Legal status size and settings First Version of a European Classification of HEIs

 Cultural engagement  Number of concerts  Number of exhibitions  Regional engagement  Graduates in the region  Turnover in EU structural funds  Extra-curricula courses for region  Importance of regional income Community engagement First Version of a European Classification of HEIs

 work in progress  further statistical analyses Next steps  develop on-line tool  reduce number of dimensions  communication process with stakeholders and preview  institutionalisation and ownership  ‘communities’ for special dimensions

Future use of the Classification Examples  Providing information to stakeholders and clients about characteristics of a higher education institutions

Examples Future use of the Classification

Examples  Providing assistance to institutional strategies and inter-institutional partnerships, benchmarking, and networking Future use of the Classification

Examples

The European Classification of Higher Education Institutions  Is about ‘mapping’ the field of higher education in Europe  Join the further development of this instrument  see:

The European Classification of Higher Education Institutions Thank you for your attention! Thank you for your attention! This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This presentation content reflects the views only of the author. The Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.