New Hope School District November 22, 2010 Presented by NATC Reform Commission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohio Improvement Process - OIP
Advertisements

Six Core Principles of a Professional Learning Community
Professional Learning Communities At Glasgow High School.
Whole Faculty Group Study An Overview of WFGS Feb 5-12, 2006 Dr. Eric Jakubowski An Overview of WFGS Feb 5-12, 2006 Dr. Eric Jakubowski.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Simons Valley School Coming Together Areas of Focus 1. Building Community 2. Team Teaching 3. Reading Comprehension across the curriculum 4.
School Effectiveness Framework Professional Learning Communities Flintshire / Merthyr Pilot Professor Alma Harris Michelle Jones.
Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Conclusion 1.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Waldon Elementary School Everyone Learning Everyday Tamara Skordahl Principal – Implementation of Professional.
Created by CCCOE AB212 Center-Based Professional Learning Communities Project Project Overview Developed by Contra Costa County Office of Education.
Professional Learning Communities and Response to Intervention Yorktown High School Action Plan.
Structuring Retreats to Share Findings and Discuss Recommendations Paul Cobb and the MIST Team.
Professional Learning Communities OKGEAR UP Public Schools April 2, 2015.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
ROTARY INTERNATIONAL’S STRATEGIC PLAN. WHAT IS A STRATEGIC PLAN? It is a living management tool that: Provides long-term direction Builds a shared vision.
Developing an Individual Professional Growth Plan
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
The Instructional Core Team (ICT). The Charge 1. Understand the charge of the ICT and decide whether you want to commit to it This may be the most challenging.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
The Third Year Review A Mini-Accreditation Florida Catholic Conference National Standards and Benchmarks.
Problem-Based Learning Project EDA 6061 November 14, 2009 Team Heron.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
1 Historical Perspective... Historical Perspective... Science Education Reform Efforts Leading to Standards-based Science Education.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Using Adequate Resources to Double Student Performance Sarah Archibald Allan Odden CPRE Invitational Conference February 21, 2007.
Bringing About Change Using Professional Learning Communities OSPI Winter Conference 2006 Dave Colombini – Principal, South Kitsap High School Dan Whitford.
Vision for a Successful High School by Shelley Klein, 2013.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Module Four: Resources for Learning A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
High Performance Leaders in Irving Independent School District (IISD) Administrator’s Leadership Conference August 3, 2010 Leadership 1.
Parent Guide to School Based Planning DISCOVER THE EXCELLENCE There are only two lasting bequests we can hope to give our children. One of these is roots;
Proposed Areas of Focus & District Priority Board Meeting April 22, 2014 Kevin. L. O’Gorman, Chief Academic Officer Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
FASA Middle School Principal ’ s Leadership Academy Don Griesheimer Laura Hassler Lang July 22, 2007.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
REGIONAL TRAINING UNIT Leading and Managing Achievements and Standards in the Special School and the Learning Community.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Welcome Back to Day Two Q and A Professional Learning Communities SMART Goals Mission Statement for improving parent-school relations Book Study “ The.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Administrator Support for PBIS Wayne RESA Chris McEvoy
OEA Leadership Academy 2011 Michele Winship, Ph.D.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
Mirrinda Huddlestun EDU 650: Teaching, Learning &Leading in the 21 st Century Professor Wendell LaTouche December 05, 2015 The Big Interview.
School Effectiveness Framework Professional Learning Communities Professor Alma Harris Michelle Jones.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
J. Sterling Morton High Schools
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
Professional Learning Communities
Southern Regional Education Board Annual Leadership Forum
Jeff McCoy, Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Westport Middle School
Presentation transcript:

New Hope School District November 22, 2010 Presented by NATC Reform Commission

Video Link e=related

In Flight Construction = Educational Reform Programs Initiatives One and done trainings TYNT & LYNT How can we pull everything together to target real student achievement while still operating the School District on a daily basis?

Professional Learning Communities EQ: What are Professional Learning Communities (PLC)?

Professional Learning Community (PLC) Utilizes teacher collaboration focused on student learning. Maximizes the knowledge and experience of current staff to impact long term improvement. ISSLC #2 Guided by a clear vision: At New Hope School District all decisions, policies and resources support engaged learning and student achievement in an environment that promotes personal excellence, respect, diversity and civic responsibility every day to enable students to become contributing members of society and successful participants in the global economy.

New Hope School District PLC ? Whole Faculty Study Groups

Developed by Carlene Murphy Teacher Director of Staff Development 35 years in Augusta, GA Public School System National Staff Development Council Past President WFSG research- 18 years ( ) Proven success record at all levels of public education School districts across the U.S. have seen success

Whole-Faculty Study Groups Whole-Faculty Study Groups (WFSGs) is a student driven approach to build a community in which professionals continuously strive to increase student learning. This is accomplished as practitioners deepen their own knowledge and understanding of what is taught, reflect on their practices, sharpen their skills, and take joint responsibility for the students they teach. “Whole-Faculty” means that every faculty member at a school is a member of a study group focusing on data-based student instructional needs. In such a context, a study group is a small number of individuals joining together to increase their capacities to enable students to reach higher levels of performance. The collective synergy of all the study groups advance the whole school. - Carlene Murphy Author, Whole Faculty Study Groups

Whole Faculty Study Groups Focused and guided by two questions: What do students need for teachers to do so that teachers will have a deeper understanding of what they teach? What do students need for teachers to do so that teachers will be more skillful in how they teach?

Whole-Faculty Study Groups Simply: Structure Vehicle Place

WFSG are NOT: A new program Task Force A one and done training and initiative Quick fix ******************************************************** Whole Faculty Study Groups = A way to focus school wide and individual teacher’s efforts through collaboration as a way to target effective instruction and student achievement.

Whole-Faculty Study Groups Student centered Student needs determine member needs Leadership rotates Asks: “What do I need to do and learn in order to change how I teach and what I teach?” All members are equal and share the responsibility of the group. Instructional techniques are practiced in the group members’ classrooms before sharing with others. 3-5 members per group

Principles (3) 1. Students are 1 st ! 2. Everyone participates 3. Leadership is shared 4. Responsibility is equal 5. The work is public

Traditional New Hope Meetings Department/Grade Level Committees Managerial focus Agenda is developed by building administration Lead by a grade level/department chairperson Interaction and communication is often one- way Members are appointed or “volunteered” Lead by a chairperson Objectives are usually dictated by the administration or driven by “name “ of committee Limited actual control Finite in nature

WFSG Process/Cycle 1. Analyze student data 2. Identify student needs 3. Categorize student needs 4. Complete Individual Action Plan 5. WFSG design Action Plan 6. WFSG implement the Action Research 7. The whole faculty analyzes impact of AP

What Will Drive NHSD WFSG? The School Improvement Plan and SWOTS! 1. Analyze student data 2. Identify student needs 3. Categorize student needs

New Hope Key Areas Mentor Program Assessment Reading initiative

WFSG in Action Teacher groups of 3 – 5 people are established The groups focus on the student needs identified in the District Improvement Plan and SWOTS. An action plan is created by the group. The teachers collaborate to identify instructional techniques that will target the areas of need. Individual teachers attempt these techniques in their classrooms and then report back to the group. The effective techniques are then shared with the whole faculty/District.

Where are we now? Initial District assessment (SWOTS)- completed Vision and Mission Statements -revised The Improvement Plan was approved by PDE All District and building level administrators have attended WFSG training. Performance Tracker has been purchased

What happens next? Professional Development: A core group of teachers from each building will attend PLC/WFSG training institute in December Pilot PLC/WFSG teams will begin working as a PLC during the remainder of the SY. Pilot team data will be shared District wide in June. The Pilot team will train the remaining teachers in the New Hope SD during the Summer 2011 PD institute. Full implementation – August 2011.

“Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success.” - Henry Ford

1. DuFour, R., Dufour, R., Eaker, R., & Many (2006) Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning Communities at work., (2-4). 2. Dufour, R. (2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, May, 2004, Murphy, C. and Lick, D. (2005). Whole-Faculty Study Groups: Professional Learning Communities That Target Student Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. 4. Murphy, C. and Lick, D (2006). The Whole-Faculty Study Groups Field book: Lessons Learned and Best Practices From Classrooms, Districts, and Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. 5. Piercey, D. (2010) Why don’t teacher collaborate? A leadership conundrum. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1),