Intensive Actuarial Training for Bulgaria January 2007 Lecture 13– Funding Methods for Defined Benefit Plans By Michael Sze, PhD, FSA, CFA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IAS 19 vs. FAS158, 132R, 87, etc. versus. The scope is broad and includes wages, vacation or holiday pay, bonus, termination benefits, etc. as well as.
Advertisements

PENSIONS Accounting and Reporting Issues
South Dakota Retirement System Board Consideration of Assumption Changes September 5, 2012.
Intensive Actuarial Training for Bulgaria January, 2007 Lecture 2 – Life Annuity By Michael Sze, PhD, FSA, CFA.
Overview of Act 120 of 2010 A Look at PSERS Retirement Benefit Changes Presentation at: PASBO Annual Conference March 16, 2011.
1 GASB 45 Implementation Options ACBO Fall Conference October 16, 2008 Presented by Geoffrey L. Kischuk, FSA, MAAA, FCA Total Compensation Systems, Inc.
Public Plan Solvency & Funding GFOA Meeting October 6, 2011 Gary S. Curran, FCA, MAAA, ASA, EA CONSULTING ACTUARY G. S. Curran & Company, LTD N.
LAPERS Presentation Gary S. Curran, FCA, MAAA, ASA, EA CONSULTING ACTUARY G. S. Curran & Company, LTD N. Glenstone Place Baton Rouge, LA (225)
McGraw-Hill /Irwin© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS Chapter 17.
Pensions ACCTG 5120 David Plumlee.
© 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 17 Pensions.
Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Slide 17-1 Chapter Seventeen Pensions Pensions.
Pension Accounting Chapter 17
Contribution Rates and Benefits of the U.S. Pension System International Pension Conference FIAP and the Chilean Pension Funds Administrations Association.
Retirement Planning and Employee Benefits for Financial Planners
FA3 Lesson 7. Pension costs and obligations 1.Pensions 2.Defined contribution vs. defined benefit 3.Accounting for pensions 4.Pension worksheet.
McGraw-Hill /Irwin© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. PENSIONS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS Chapter 17.
Changes in Accounting and Reporting for Pensions Presented to Senate Finance Committee _____________________________________.
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting Clinic VII McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Illinois SURS Member Guide –Contributions (page 2) –Disability Benefits (pages 7-9) –Disability Retirement Allowance (page 10) –Retirement Benefits (pages.
Intensive Actuarial Training for Bulgaria January 2007 Lecture 4 – Life Insurance Reserve & Minimum Capital By Michael Sze, PhD, FSA, CFA.
City of Hallandale Beach Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
FCERA April 2008 Interest Crediting FCERA Board Interest Crediting and Excess Earnings Policy Discussion Wednesday, April 16, 2008 Paul Angelo,
Fritzie Archuleta, ASA, MAAA, Senior Pension Actuary Actuarial Office.
City of Hallandale Beach Retirement Plan Actuarial Review June 1, 2011.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review April 15, 2013.
1 Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 19.
Changes in the Measurement of Pensions in the US National Income and Product Accounts Brent Moulton Group of Experts on National Accounts –
Employee Benefits Gavin Aspden Head of Innovation and Technical Development 8 September 2009.
County of Onondaga GASB Valuation Presentation Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEBs) December 5, 2007.
The Reserving Actuary’s Role in Risk Assessment: Value Added by the Reserving Actuary in Identifying and Helping Mitigate Financial Risk Both on the Balance.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 Introduction to the Actuarial Valuation: Funding and Assumptions January 12, 2006 P.
OPEBs: Implementation Issues for Public Power Joni Davis, Manager Financial Accounting and Reporting Omaha Public Power District September 27, 2005.
1 Interpreting Actuarial Information Fritzie Archuleta, ASA MAAA Senior Pension Actuary, CalPERS February 21, 2013.
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits Chapter 15 Robinson, Munter and Grant.
Arizona State Retirement System Presentation to the Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona January 7, 2011.
Intensive Actuarial Training for Bulgaria January 2007 Lecture 14 – Pension Plan Experience Analysis By Michael Sze, PhD, FSA, CFA.
Collin County Retirement Plan Briefing September 7, 2010.
Presented by: G.S. Curran & Co. GASB 68 FOR COST SHARING EMPLOYERS OF THE ASSESSORS’ RETIREMENT FUND.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 Review of Actuarial Methodology Issues November 8, 2006 P.
Actuarial Assumptions and Methods: What is Reasonable?
County of Riverside ■ Office of the Auditor-Controller GASB Statement No. 45 Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Other Postemployment Benefits.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts OPEB Commission Meeting April 5, 2012.
Board Retreat – Oct 20, 2011 FCERA 2011 Retirement Board Retreat October 20, 2011 Paul Angelo, FSA Andy Yeung, ASA The Segal Company, San Francisco v2.
AS-15( REVISED 2005) EMPLOYEE’S BENEFITS. AS-15 (Revised 2005 – Employee’s Benefit) BASIC PRINCIPLE -Recognize the expenses of benefit to employees during.
Retirement Planning Session
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs to accompany Deegan, Australian Financial Accounting 7e 12-1 Chapter 12 Accounting for employee benefits.
SHARED RISK PLAN FOR ACADEMIC EMPLOYEES OF UNB (AESRP) Pre-Retirement Seminar UNB Human Resources & Organizational Development.
Intensive Actuarial Training for Bulgaria January 2007 Lecture 1 – Theory of Interest and Applications By Michael Sze, PhD, FSA, CFA.
Unfunded Actuarial Liabilities For a Defined Benefit Plan: UAL t = AL t – F t ”Funding Ratio” = F t / AL t We can calculate this Unfunded Actuarial Liability.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) Presentation to the Joint Board of Supervisors.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 Member Contribution Rates - Changes to Calculation of COL Rates January 10, 2007 P.
January 13, 2015 Town of San Anselmo June 30, 2014 OPEB Valuation Review.
Governmental Accounting Pensions and Other Postemployment Benefits Local Government Corporation.
1 Accounting for OPEB Retiree Health Benefits Committee September 11, 2006.
1 Contributory Pension Scheme Members’ Meeting 26 February 2016.
Copyright © 2015 GRS – All rights reserved. RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan January 13, 2015 Pension Fund Status As of January 1, 2014.
PENSION PLAN OF ANNE ARUNDEL MEDICAL CENTER
Lecture 23 Pension Plan Funding
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits
Who is Actually Paying the Bill? By Brad Heinrichs, FSA, EA, MAAA
Financial Statement Analysis K.R. Subramanyam
Service Center Training: Plan Provisions
RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan February 9, 2016 Pension Fund Status
Director, Center for Workers’ Benefits and Capital Strategies, AFT
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force
Actuarial Audit of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth October 21, 2008.
Insurance and Pension Fund Operations
Presentation transcript:

Intensive Actuarial Training for Bulgaria January 2007 Lecture 13– Funding Methods for Defined Benefit Plans By Michael Sze, PhD, FSA, CFA

Overview Review the concept DB retirement plan Present Value of Projected Benefits (PVB) Major Actuarial Cost Methods –Accrued Benefit Method (AB) –Entry Age Normal Method (EAN) –Aggregate Method (AGG) –Frozen Initial Liability Method (FIL) –Attained Age Normal Method (AAN) –Individual Level Premium Method (ILP)

Concept of DB Retirement Plan Retirement income is basically a stream of payments –Commences upon retirement of employee –Payable as long as the person lives –May have spousal benefits upon death of employee Basic principle of funding –Retirement income is in the future –Funding must occur during active career of employee –Funding methods are different ways to spread that cost into the different years of active career

Present Value of Benefits (PVB) PVB is actuarial discount value of the total projected benefits the employee will earn if he/she works until retirement Steps to calculate the PVB –1. Calculate the projected benefit, based on projected pay, projected service. Benefit is payable for many years after retirement –2. Calculate the present value of this benefit at retirement age –3. Calculate the discounted value of 2. to current age

Major Actuarial Cost Methods Accrued Benefit Method (AB) –Spread PVB strictly according to service Entry Age Normal Method (EAN) –Spread PVB according to present value of service –May or may not reflect pay increases in the spread Aggregate Method, Frozen Initial Liability Method, Individual Level Premium Method –Variations of the EAN

Accrued Benefit Method (AB) Cost is calculated for each individual employee: –Total cost for projected benefit is pvb –The normal cost (nc) is just pvb/ts –ts is the number of years from the date the employee is hired to the date of retirement –Past service liability, also called the actuarial liability (al) is just nc x s Where s is service of employee on valuation date PVB, NC, and AL for the entire plan are just sums of these items for all employees

AB (Continued) Alternative method to calculate al Instead of determining the pvb for total projected benefit, based on total projected service (ts) –Determine the present value for accrued benefit based on service to-date s –This should be equal to the al determined above –Here al still reflect projected pay of the employees The method of determining AL above can also be applied to accrued benefits without pay projection This is called the accrued benefit value (ABV)

AB (Continued) NC is the cost of the retirement plan for each year of service In particular, NC is the cost for the current year There should be contribution to cover the NC AL is the accumulated NC for all past years There should have been contributions to cover AL These contributions together with investment return constitutes assets (A) in the plan

AB (Continued) If every thing happens according to expectation, then A = AL –We say that the plan is fully funded If things do not happen according to expected (e.g. investment return less than expected), A < AL –Unfunded Liability (UL) = AL – A This must be amortized over a number of years Amortization payment must be paid in addition to NC If A > AL, the plan has surplus (Surp) –Surp = A – AL Surp may be used to reduce contribution requirements

AB (Continued) Causes for Unfunded Liability/Surplus –Contributions higher/lower than required –Benefit increases –Actuarial assumption changes –Plan experience different from the actuarial assumptions (called actuarial gains/losses) –Actuarial gains/losses will be discussed in greater detail in the next lecture UL/Sur affects the required contribution: through amortization payments

Entry Age Normal Method This is the method to spread each individual pvb over present value of all service (past & future) The cost is calculated for each individual employee –Each year of service has weight of 1 –Each future year is discounted back to current date by interest and survivorship –Each past year is grossed up with interest and reciprocal of survivorship probability –pvts = Sum of present values of services –pvfs = Sum of present values of future services –eannc = pvb / pvts –eanal = pvb – eannc x pvfs / pfts PVB, AL, NC for entire plan is just sum of these for all employees

Entry Age Normal Method by Compensation (EANC) The EAN in the previous slide spreads the PVB by service For pay related plans, it is more common to spread the PVB by compensation For each individual employee, calculate pvtc by –applying salary scale and other factors to the compensation (c ) each year in the calculation of pv –pvtc = Sum of pv of compensation for each year –Pvfc = Sum of pv of compensations for future years –eancnc = pvb x c /pvtc –eancal = pvb – eancnc x pvfc/pvtc For the entire plan, PVB, AL, NC are just sum of the individual cost items

EAN (Continued) After the AL and NC have been calculated according to EAN or EANC –The UL,Surp, and required contributions are calculated in the same manner as under AB For same plan and same employees: –ABNC < EANNC for young employees –ABNC > EANNC for older employees –The cross over point is typically between –ABAL < EANAL

Aggregate Cost Method (AGG) In AB and EAN, the NC is first calculated for each individual and then summed up In AGG, the NC is determined for the entire plan PVB, PVFS or PVFC, TC are calculated as the sum of the individual items No AL and UL are calculated under this method NC = (PVB – A) x TC / (PVFS or PVFC) All cost for benefit increases, actuarial assumption changes, actuarial gains/losses are spread over future years

Frozen Initial Liability Method (FIL) This is a hybrid between the EAN and the AGG In the initial year –AL, and NC are calculated using EAN –Unfunded frozen initial liability (UFIL) = AL In each subsequent years –UFIL is updated interest + NC – contribution –New NC = (PVB – A – UFIL) x TC / PVFC

FIL (Continued) Basically, for FIL, the actuarial gains/(losses) are spread over future years When there are benefit increases, or assumption changes –The cost impact is calculated using EAN –This is added to the UFIL as another layer Each layer of UFIL has its own amortization schedule Each year, the required contribution consists of the NC + amortization payments

Attained Age Normal Method (AAN) This is exactly like FIL, except that the UFIL is determined using AB

Individual Level Premium Method (ILP) This method is often used for funding benefits through an insurance contract For each individual, at the time that a benefit is created, –The pvb is determined Based on total service ts and pay without projection –This is spread over future service nc = pvb / pvfs This nc is kept constant for future years Each benefit increase, including that caused by pay increase, results another layer of nc There is no AL under this method NC for the entire plan is sum of nc for all employees