Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/1326r0 Extend Submission Panasonic Nov 2012 PSDU Size For Receiver Sensitivity Power Level Date: 2012-11-12 Authors:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Doc.: IEEE /1106r0 Submission September 2012 Osama Aboul-Magd, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 A Short-Header Frame Format Date: Authors:

Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0657r1 May 2012 Panasonic Slide 1 Target PER at receiver sensitivity power level for use case 1g Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1294r0 Submission September 2011 Rolf de Vegt, QualcommSlide 1 Spec Framework Text for.11ah Bandwidth Modes Date: Authors:

ZTE corporation doc.: IEEE /1086r2 September 2012 Submission TIM Compression for No Buffered Unicast Traffic Date: Slide 1 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0371r0 Submission March 2012 Ron Porat, Broadcom BF Feedback and Protocol Date: Authors: Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /0373r0 Submission March 2012 Ron Porat, Broadcom BF Frame Format Date: Authors: Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /0598r0 Submission May 2012 Steve Grau, Juniper NetworksSlide 1 Layer 3 Setup with Dynamic VLAN Assignment Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1489r0 Submission Nov Heejung Yu, ETRISlide 1 Green-Field 11ac Packet for TGah Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1357r3 Nov Slide 1 Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation Date: Authors: Weiping Sun, Seoul National University.

Doc.: IEEE /0026r0 Submission January 2011 Sameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 VHT Supported MCS Field Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE p Submission September 2008 Carl Kain, Noblis (USDOT) Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values Date:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0608r1 May 2015 Tomoko Adachi, ToshibaSlide 1 Regarding trigger frame in UL MU Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0609r2 May 2015 Yan Xin, Huawei TechnologiesSlide ay Timeline Date: Authors:

Discussions on the Definition of CCA Threshold

Submission doc.: IEEE /0924r0 July 2015 Sean Coffey, RealtekSlide 1 Straw polls on preferred ways forward in 11ah Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0672r0 Submission May 2011 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 IEEE ah network operation & management consideration for functional requirement.

Doc.: IEEE /0363r1 Submission Pilot Value Definitions March 2012 Seunghee Han, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /376r1 Submission March 2012 Anna Pantelidou, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 On The BSS Max Idle Period Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /650r0 Submission May 2012 Anna Pantelidou, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Grouping Methodology Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0246r0 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jing-Rong HsiehHTC Corp. 1F, 6-3 Baoqiang Road, Xindian district, New Taipei City,

Submission doc.: IEEE /0627r0 May 2012 Ron Murias, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Preamble Format For 1 MHz Beamforming Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/1138r1 Month Year Filip Mestanov (Ericsson)Slide 1 To DSC or not to DSC Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1288r1 Submission November 2010 Sameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 Frame Format for GroupID Management Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:

Doc.: IEEE /0061r0 Submission Jan 2013 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 Receiver Sensitivity Levels Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0273r7 May 2012 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 SFD Text for Upper Layers Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .

Submission doc.: IEEE /0079r2 January 2016 Kentaro Taniguchi, ToshibaSlide 1 Allocation sizes for BCC in OFDMA Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0363r2 Submission Pilot Value Definitions May 2012 Yongho Seok (LG Electronics), Hongyuan Zhang (Marvell)Slide 1 Date:

Doc.: IEEE /0400r0 SubmissionZander Lei, I2R SingaporeSlide 1 ACK Transmission Date: Authors: March 2012.

Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /0216r1 Submission February 2012 James Wang et al, MediaTekSlide 1 Comment Resolution Receiver Parameters Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0961r0 July 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Consideration on Multi-STA BlockAck Optimization Date:

Doc.: IEEE /0778r0 Submission Zhendong Luo, CATR July MHz PHY Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.

Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA

AP Power Saving Date: Authors: May 2017 Month Year

Signalling Support for Full Bandwidth MU-MIMO Compressed SIG-B Mode

Consideration on Max Idle Period Extension for ah Power Save

EDMG capabilities for Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing in SU-MIMO

On the Implementation of Dynamic Load Balancing for A-BFT Channel

TBD clarification for TGba D0.1 (WUR Duty cycle)

AID Selection Date: Authors: September 2010 Month Year

Tx EVM for MCS-10 in ah Date: Authors: Nov 2013

DMG Base MCS and Length Supplementary Slides

Flexible Wider Bandwidth Transmission

Proposal for IEEE802.11g Receiver Maximum Input Level in OFDM Mode

19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea

<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2011

DMG Base MCS and Length Supplementary Slides

Bandwidth Indication Design for 120MHz

Bandwidth Indication Design for 120MHz

Consideration on WUR frame for Fast Scanning

Pilot Value Definitions

TIM Compression for No Buffered Unicast Traffic

Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015

MU Synchronization Requirements for SFD

19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea

Straw polls and Motions on Spec text for and

Target PER at receiver sensitivity power level for use case 1g

Spoofing of EDMG Control Mode PPDUs

19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea

Consideration on Max Idle Period Extension for ah Power Save

EDMG capabilities for Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing in SU-MIMO

Straw polls and Motions on Spec text for and

Dynamic TIM and Page Segmentation

4-bit CRC for 1 MHz and 2 MHz modes

<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>

19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea

TG ax DSC derived CCAeff and OBSS_PD

Additional SC MCSs in clause 20 (DMG PHY)

Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1326r0 Extend Submission Panasonic Nov 2012 PSDU Size For Receiver Sensitivity Power Level Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1326r0 Extend Submission Panasonic Nov 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE /1326r0 Extend Submission Panasonic Nov 2012

Submission doc.: IEEE /1326r0 Extend Submission Panasonic Nov 2012 Abstract Propose PSDU size to determine receiver minimum input sensitivity level.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1326r0 Extend Submission Panasonic Nov 2012 Background and motivation 11ac receiver minimum input sensitivity definition is unsuitable for 11ah devices because PSDU size 4096 octets for this measurement may be too long especially for a sensor network. 11ac spec document mentions [1] “The packet error rate (PER) shall be less than 10% for a PSDU length of 4096 octets with the rate-dependent input levels listed in Table Using same PSDU size for all modes may be preferable as 11ac says. In case of using the same PSDU size, the PSDU size has to be supported by all 11ah devices. Therefore, PSDU size should be specified by considering sensor devices because PSDU size those devices basically can handle must be the shortest one.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1326r0 Extend Submission Panasonic Nov 2012 In case of use case 1g (sensor network), typical packet size must be around 250 octets based on current smart utility network. (e.g. IEEE g [2] uses this value to measure receiver sensitivity) Typical TCP/IP packet size is up to 256 octets. Suitable PSDU size 256 octets PSDU should be used for all MCSs.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1326r0 Extend Submission Panasonic Nov 2012 Summary PSDU size 256 octets should be used to measure the receiver minimum input sensitivity for all MCSs. Even sensor devices can support 256 octets PSDU size.

Submission doc.: IEEE /1326r0 Extend Submission Panasonic Nov 2012 [1] Draft P802.11ac_D4.0 [2] IEEE g-2012 References

Submission doc.: IEEE /1326r0 Extend Submission Panasonic Nov 2012 Straw Poll Do you agree to add the following sentence in the SFD? PER shall be less than 10% for a PSDU length of 256 octets with rate-dependent input levels TBD. Reference 11ac spec document mentions “The packet error rate (PER) shall be less than 10% for a PSDU length of 4096 octets with the rate-dependent input levels listed in Table

Submission doc.: IEEE /1326r0 Extend Submission Panasonic Nov 2012 Move to add the following sentence in the SFD: PER shall be less than 10% for a PSDU length of 256 octets with rate-dependent input levels T.B.D Motion