1 Fall Managing TXSTATE For Supervisors Office of Human Resources 601 University Drive Suite340 J. C. Kellam Bldg San Marcos, Texas 78666 Classification.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
Advertisements

1 Market Pricing Organizations seek to offer market based pay rates in order to attract and retain competent employees There are two basic methods to recognize.
Countdown to Career Banding: Research Branch
Compensation & Classification Study Brevard Public Schools Compensation & Classification Study Brevard Public Schools July 17, 2007 Employee Orientations.
Classification Approvals for New and Modified Positions to be Posted HR/Compensation approval is required in the following cases: The requested position.
June 17,  Title Conversion  Career Service Pay Plan (Pay Grid)  Differentials  Initial (Partial) Implementation  Accessing Future Pay.
Mt. San Antonio College CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY February 2012.
Staff Council Presentation You and Your PSD “Position Source Document” Human Resources Eduardo Salaz Associate Vice President and Chief Human Resources.
1 Miami Dade College Reclassification Study Facilities Presented by the Division of Human Resources February 2007.
Market Based Pay System The Market Based Pay System Project.
1 Miami Dade College Reclassification Study Presented by the Division of Human Resources February 2007.
Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Meeting
Human Resources Office of 1 Classification and Compensation Redesign Job Family Studies Project Overview.
Human Resources Peer Network Fundamentals of Compensation and Utilizing the CPCA Compensation & Benefits Survey April 3, 2014 Presented by: Brenda Gilchrist,
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Salary Findings April 25 th, 2011 Faculty Senate Budget Committee.
Management Forum Presentation November 3, 2008 Lynne Gervais, Associate Vice-Principal Human Resources 1.
A step by step guide to recruiting vacancies. Completing a recruitment request- position descriptions: All requests for recruitment begin with an appropriate.
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Salary Survey Report January 30, 2007 State of Kansas.
STAFF COMPENSATION PROGRAM TOWN HALL MEETINGS FEBRUARY 2004.
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
Pay Structure Decisions
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
Erin Packwood 2005 Competitive Compensation Review Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) January 17, 2006.
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Review of Unclassified Pay Plan February 1, 2007 State of New Hampshire.
0 Module 2.3: Personnel Implications. 1 In this module, we’ll address several key areas. What are the proposed class specifications? How do they compare.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
2005 Supervisory and Professional Salary Survey Final Report September 14, 2005.
Writing job descriptions The Easy Way! 1. Why Job Descriptions? *Helps the HR department to determine the right pay range *Attract the right candidates.
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
A Report On The Great Work Of The Faculty Salary Administration Review Group March 11, 2015.
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MIHE Mashal Institute of Higher Education.
Compensation:  Compensation is the methods and practices of maintaining balance between interests of operating the company within the fiscal budget and.
Classification & Compensation Study Outside firm (BCC) was hired to perform: Classification Study Internal Equity Pay equity compliance Study.
Compensation Project Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Finance Committee Meeting Project Overview
BUILDING A UNIVERSITY FOR THE GLOBAL CENTURY Presented by: Terri Phillips and Sheila Wright Associate Vice President for HR and Compensation Manager.
Benchmarking Compensation & Benefits: How Do You Compare? Christina L. Greathouse, Ph.D. Strategic Performance Group April 30, 2008.
JOB EVALUATION & SALARY STRUCTURE DESIGN
Texas State Classification Training HUMAN RESOURCES.
 Compensation Philosophy  Implementation Policies and Procedures  Survey  Timing, Position Descriptions, Pay Plan Relationships, Cost  Additional.
Chapter 9 Managing Compensation
Job Classification and Compensation Study Midwestern State University [date] Presented by:
Advances in Human Resource Development and Management Course code: MGT 712 Lecture 12.
Agenda Study Process Outreach Summary Salary Quartile Analysis
Customised Solutions Sample Reports 2009 Australia.
11-1 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. fundamentals of Human Resource Management 4 th edition by.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services January 11, 2016.
Creating a Salary Structure 101
City of Missoula July 26,  FY07 compensation and classification plan  25 Pay Grades  Entry level, midpoint and maximum  30% spread from entry.
2011 Salary Administration Process Review TOM Presentation May 31, 2011.
Human Resources, Development, and Engagement Classification & Compensation Information September 17 th – 24 th.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Town of Carolina Beach Executive Summary for the Town Council Classification and Pay Study March 2015.
City of Galveston Classification & Compensation Study Discussion Preliminary Findings and Recommendations.
New Mexico Highlands University
2012 COMPENSATION STUDY RESULTS July 18, 2012 Board of Aldermen Worksession.
FURMAN UNIVERSITY Compensation Structure. INTRODUCTION  Compensation Study  Salary Grades  Cost of Living/Merit Increases.
Compensation and Classification Study for Midwestern State University April 29, 2015 Presentation of Results.
Compensation Structure and Merit Process
Staff Compensation Structure
Pay and Classification Report Carolina Beach, North Carolina
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Pay Survey Practices - Part II
Job Evaluation Salary Administration Program
Career Banding Program for North Carolina State Government Employees
FVP Review and Presentation of the SCPS Evergreen Study to the Spotsylvania County Board of Supervisors.
Compensation 101 A Primer for HR Professionals
Compensation Process.
Staff Classification & Compensation Study
LUHR Compensation Program.
Presentation transcript:

1 Fall Managing TXSTATE For Supervisors Office of Human Resources 601 University Drive Suite340 J. C. Kellam Bldg San Marcos, Texas Classification Compensation

Benchmark jobs- representative positions which are commonly found in most participating organizations. This means that not all jobs/positions are surveyed. 2 Primary Markets: Local, University 2

Markets University Market –Defined by PC. –CUPA-HR Mid-Level Administrative and Professional Salary Surveys. –Positions that are recruited nationally and/or are unique to institutions of higher education. –Median rate used to establish pay plan minimums. “Unweighted Median Salary by Budget Quartile-Doctoral Institutions.” 3

Markets Local Market –Defined by PC. –Our primary local market survey data comes from purchased surveys for the Austin/San Antonio area. –I-35--San Antonio-Austin Corridor- Local Vendors –Unweighted median rate used to establish pay plan minimums. 4

Markets Local Market –Titles determined by PC which are not recruited nationally and are not unique to higher education. –Recruited locally. –Approximately 100 survey titles. –Data from purchased surveys from local human resources management groups in conjunction with national consulting firms. –Represents local (public and private) employers and employees in benchmark jobs. –Examples: Accountants, IT positions, HR positions, Admin Assts, Custodians, Nurses. 5

Budget –Our FY 12 budget is $450,288,000 –CUPA Survey Quartile is: $326-$555.4 (Admin Comp) –CUPA Survey Quartile is $286.2-$493.1 (Mid- level) –2 nd Quartile for both surveys –Median is the middle figure of a rank ordered list or the average of the two middle figures. 6

Compensation Previous surveys focused on comparison to market pay plan minimums. Medians are greater than pay plan minimums. Results in higher pay ranges, greater maximums and minimums. 7

Compensation Market rate” is median rate Local, University pay plan minimums= 96% of median rate placed on nearest grade. Nearest grade: Minimum could be higher or lower than median rate. HR only makes recommendations on pay plan minimums, not actual salaries. HR encourages implementing 100% of market results. 8

Compensation Survey position descriptions represent a summary of the most important duties, not all duties. Survey position descriptions do not represent individual GOJAs. Represent duties performed by a class of employees, not individual employees. 9

Compensation Plug- Used by all employers to establish the relative value of positions. Used when evaluating a position which does not have a match in the market data. 5PC- Used by president’s cabinet to determine the proper pay plan minimum. 5CB- Indicates a continuation of the current pay plan minimum. GA- Indicates the number of “grades above” another position in relative value. Represents usage of a plug. GB- Indicates the number of “grades below” another position in relative value. Represents usage of a plug. 10

Compensation Example: Duplicating Equipment Operator- market data Printer II- 140% Dup. Equip. Op. Printer I, Bindery Operator, Phototypesetter, Camera Operator- 90% Printer II. PC members approve plugs for positions in their division and approve pay plan relationships. 11

Compensation HR provides survey data to PC members who make the final decision regarding pay plan relationships and minimums. HR also provides options for no cost reallocations, CPI-U figures and other data. 12