STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR CRYONET 4.1.5 Formal Procedure for Station Inclusion January 20-22, 2014 GCW-CryoNet.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The GEOSS Science and Technology Stakeholder Network: A spin-off of the EGIDA Project Hans-Peter Plag, Ian McCallum, Steffen Fritz, Shelley Jules-Plag,

Advertisements

Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the Seventh Framework Programme Coordination actions ICT Calls Jan- March 2012.

WMO CAS achievements and challenges within WIGOS Sandro Fuzzi National Research Council, Italy WMO: Research Dept.

ISO 9001 : 2000.

SQA Standards Colloquium 28 February 2013 – Can Qualification Frameworks Provide a Useful Basis for Comparing Qualifications? Aileen Ponton, CEO,SCQF Partnership.

System Design/Implementation and Support for Build 2 PDS Management Council Face-to-Face Mountain View, CA Nov 30 - Dec 1, 2011 Sean Hardman.

The Global Cryosphere Watch Jeff Key 1 and Barry Goodison 2 1 NOAA/NESDIS, Madison, Wisconsin USA 2 World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

WGClimate Work Plan for John Bates, Chair WGClimate 4th Working Group on Climate Meeting.

CryoNet Overview and status Wolfgang Schöner Central Institute of Meteorology and Geodynamics Vienna, Austria.

Strategic, Annual Performance & Operational Planning Process

Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT

For each of the Climate Literacy and Energy Literacy Principles, a dedicated page on the CLEAN website summarizes the relevant scientific concepts and.

Data on the Web Life Cycle Bernadette Farias Lóscio March, 2014.

STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR CRYONET Formal Procedure for Station Inclusion January 20-22, 2014 GCW-CryoNet.

Sustaining Arctic Observing Networks - SAON Data and Information Services for Arctic observational activities Jan René Larsen SAON Secretary Arctic Monitoring.

SAON is a process to support and strengthen the development of multinational engagement for sustained and coordinated pan-Arctic observing and data sharing.

The European Network for Quality Assurance in VET Dissemination Conference Eurobanqua LdV Project Athens 15/2/2008 Giorgio Allulli Vicechairperson of ENQAVET.

A U.S. Sponsored Observing System of the Global Earth Observing System of Systems  Focus on the Network –Data Management –Products Global Seismographic.

Session Chair: Peter Doorn Director, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS), The Netherlands.

The AIACC Project Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change in Multiple Regions & Sectors UNFCCC Workshop Bonn 9 June 2003.

1 Health Level Seven (HL7) Report Out Population Science and Structured Documents Workgroup (SDWG) Riki Ohira September 22, 2011.

Chapter 7 Developing a Core Knowledge Framework

CryoNet Network of Cryospheric Surface Observations Wolfgang Schöner Central Institute of Meteorology and Geodynamics Vienna, Austria.

Why Archiving and Preserving GIS Data Is Important Maps tell a compelling story of change over time. They document movement, progress, and change to the.

VET Business Co-operation Conference 24 April 2012 Workshop 3 Flexible pathways in VET and Validation of non-formal and informal learning promoting lifelong.

WMO Information Service for Cold Regions WMO Global Cryosphere Watch (GCW) Geneva, 13 January 2014 Dr Wenjian Zhang, Dr Miroslav Ondráš WMO Observing and.

Slide 1 WGISS CEOS WGISS 21, Budapest 8-12 May 2006 WGISS Contribution to GEO WGISS Contribution to GEO Ivan Petiteville.

WMO WIGOS from the CAS Perspective Sandro Fuzzi National Research Council, Italy WMO: Research Dept.

WMO Cliquez pour ajouter un texte GLOBAL CRYOSPHERE WATCH CryoNet Asia Workshop in Beijing, China - Report - CryoNet Team Meeting, Reykjavik, Iceland

Chapter 7 Developing a Core Knowledge Framework

Adoption of RDA-DFT Terminology and Data Model to the Description and Structuring of Atmospheric Data Aaron Addison, Rudolf Husar, Cynthia Hudson-Vitale.

Mentoring Program Implementation: Best Practices Mentoring Program Success September 12, 2011 v.3.

S&I Integration with NIEM (DRAFT) Standards Development Support June 8, 2011.

1 EQF – Referencing criteria Criteria and procedures in 10 points to ensure that the information made public - is validated by the competent authorities,

CEOS Priorities for 2013 Agenda 3 Kerry Ann Sawyer CEOS Executive Officer CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA 12 March 2013.

Symposium on Global Scientific Data Infrastructures Panel Two: Stakeholder Communities in the DWF Ann Wolpert, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Board.

The European Network for Quality Assurance in VET Giorgio Allulli Vicechairperson of ENQAVET Board MEDA-ETE Annual Forum2008.

The ERA-NET TRANSCAN-2, in continuity with the preceding ERA-NET TRANSCAN, aims at linking translational cancer research funding programmes in 15 Member.

Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.

DAOS Meeting October 2015 Beijing 1 Year of Polar Prediction There has been a growing interest in the Polar Regions in recent years, because of concerns.

WMO Moving from the WIGOS Framework towards the Pre-operational Phase A. Makarau President of RA I.

The Global Cryosphere Watch Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS, Madison, Wisconsin USA South America GCW Meeting, Santiago, October

Global Cryosphere Watch Árni Snorrason, Barry Goodison and Jeff Key GCW Boulder, USA, December 10, 2015 ……….For the past, present and future state of the.

Data Systems Integration Committee of the Earth Science Data System Working Group (ESDSWG) on Data Quality Robert R. Downs 1 Yaxing Wei 2, and David F.

GEO Implementation Boards Considerations and Lessons Learned (Document 8) Max Craglia (EC) Co-chair of the Infrastructure Implementation Board (IIB) On.

SEDAC Long-Term Archive Development Robert R. Downs Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center Center for International Earth Science Information Network.

Developing the process for assessment of sites proposed to CryoNet A review of relevant processes and recommendations for GCW Starkweather Boulder, CO.

NOAA EDMC Ocean Observatories Initiative Cyberinfrastructure Karen Stocks OOI CI Data Curator University of California, San Diego Ocean Observatories.

EUDAT receives funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 programme - DG CONNECT e-Infrastructures. Contract No EUDAT Aalto Data.

CEOS Working Group on Information System and Services (WGISS) Data Access Infrastructure and Interoperability Standards Andrew Mitchell - NASA Goddard.

COST Action and European GBIF Nodes Anne-Sophie Archambeau.

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 SI O S Svalbard Integrated Arctic.

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Planning for a Team Science Evaluation ∞ NIEHS: Children’s Health Exposure Analysis.

WMO Polar and High Mountain activities GLOBAL CRYOSPHERE WATCH

Global Cryosphere Watch (GCW) achievements

Global Cryosphere Watch Developing Synergies at Global Level

OceanDocs Digital Repository of Marine Science Research Outputs

Peter Shepherd COUNTER March 2012

Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.

Exploitation of ISS Scientific data - sustainability

Policy Context for MDTFs/NGOs Engagement

Secretariat 12 to 16 February 2017 Abu Dhabi, UAE

Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018

CryoNet Overview Wolfgang Schöner on behalf of the GCW-CryoNet team

Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations

A Case Study for Synergistically Implementing the Management of Open Data Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications.

COLLABORATION AND ENGAGEMENT WITH CROSS-CUTTING WMO PRIORITIES; WIGOS MAIN OBSERVING COMPONENTS GLOBAL CRYOSPHERE WATCH 25 Jan 2019 Árni Snorrason Chair,

CryoNet Network of Cryospheric Surface Observations

Presentation transcript:

STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES FOR CRYONET Formal Procedure for Station Inclusion January 20-22, 2014 GCW-CryoNet

Considerations, given a set of criteria Procedure should support the well-aligned & committed; vet the poor fits. Engagement is success. Procedure should involve some type of expert/peer review; evidence for inclusion evaluated against criteria Procedure should focus on capturing as much documentation about station as possible Institutional (POC’s; maintenance plans, etc.) Infrastructure (What’s there? Coordinates? Station History, etc.) Inventories (instruments, datasets, products, etc.) January 20-22, 2014 GCW-CryoNet

What leads to lower/higher engagement? January 20-22, 2014 GCW-CryoNet Core mission not well- aligned with the network; decentralized or limited governance. Scientific objectives well- aligned, but supported by revolving grants (weaker governance, ad hoc POC’s, worse documentation); some contributions to global networks. Station’s relevant capacity not yet fully developed. Full mission alignment; Strong central governance; strong record of contributions to global networks; excellent institutional support (e.g. POCs) & well- maintained documentation. Low/No contributions to global networks of interest.

Procedure: Capture documentation January 20-22, 2014 GCW-CryoNet Institutional & POC’s -Principal Investigators -Data Managers -Station Operators -Strategic/Implementation plans -Maintenance plan Infrastructure: -Facilities/Platforms -Communications -Logistics -Maps/Blueprints/Photos -… Observational Inventories -What instruments? -What standards/processing? -What networks? -What datasets? -What data products?

ESTABLISHMENT OF CRYONET Interaction with other Networks January 20-22, 2014 GCW-CryoNet

Interaction will be mission-dependent January 20-22, 2014 GCW-CryoNet NetworkBuilding Observ- ational Capacity Facilitating Trans- national Access Facilitating Data Manage- ment Developing Measure- ment Standards Enabling Cal-Val Activities Producing Synthesis Science GCWx?xxx? IASOAxxx?x INTER-ACTxx??

And constrained by common science… January 20-22, 2014 GCW-CryoNet CryoNET Developing standards, documenting and managing datasets for Atmosphere-Surface exchanges over Arctic Cryosphere. Flux Measurements. Other topics of mutual interest to IASOA+CryoNET: climate & weather; solid precipitation; snow photochemistry; ???

CRYONET DATA POLICY Potential CryoNet data policy/IASOA experiences January 20-22, 2014 GCW-CryoNet IASOA Considerations (maybe more approach than policy) 1.We are just a catalog, but we did include authoring provision 2.Only includes long-term data; avoid issues with idiosyncratic 3.If the data isn’t accessible, we don’t (want to) include it (red/yellow/green rating) 4.Harvest as much as possible even if it doesn’t meet our standards; lobby for it to meet our standards (e.g. BSRN, GAW) 5.Crowd-sourcing versus Tooth Pulling (maintenance!!) 6.Support giving credit, citations, looking to build in DOI capability

January 20-22, 2014 GCW-CryoNet Policy Recommendations Document all datasets using metadata that is compliant with international data management procedures. Use machine readable interfaces (e.g. xml) Use flexible and domain generated vocabularies to describe datasets, support crosswalks in the background. Create recommended standards for file formats (date formats, etc.) and interfaces to data that will simplify access to and utilization of GCW datasets. Wherever possible facilitate machine interfaces to datasets, enabling higher order services to be built on data by e.g. AMAP and other relevant bodies.

January 20-22, 2014 GCW-CryoNet For Consideration…datagrams Visual representation of metadata and data processing steps Links infrastructure and dataset documentation Acts as “Virtual Data Mentor” Maintenance intensive

GCW WEBSITE, CRYONET SERVICE AND CAPACITY BUILDING Experience from capacity building January 20-22, 2014 GCW-CryoNet Iterative cycle of expanding observations; improving data fitness; bringing together experts; motivating them with publications. What we’d like to do more: Work directly with information stakeholders.