An Introduction to Empirical Investigations. Aims of the School To provide an advanced treatment of some of the major models, theories and issues in your.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peer Review Process and Responding to Reviewers APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.
Advertisements

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Tips for Publishing Qualitative Research Sandra Mathison University of British Columbia Editor-in-Chief, New Directions for Evaluation.
Postgraduate Study & Research Methods COMM50 Planning the Dissertation.
Writing Abstracts Dr. Tamara O’Connor Student Learning Development P: E:
What happens after submission? Sadeghi Ramin, MD Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
Approaches to Publish rather than Perish: Some Lessons from the School of Hard Knocks Dr. John Loomis, Professor Dept. of Ag & Resource Economics Colorado.
Project Proposal.
Preparing for Submission or Avoiding the desk reject! Allan Macpherson.
GETTING PUBLISHED Chapter 18.
Writing for Publication
Empirical Analysis Doing and interpreting empirical work.
Good Research Questions. A paradigm consists of – a set of fundamental theoretical assumptions that the members of the scientific community accept as.
Reviewing the work of others Referee reports. Components of a referee report Summary of the paper Overall evaluation Comments about content Comments about.
Hypotheses. Hypotheses are about applying theory to your research question A good research paper starts with a context that conceptualizes the problem,
Research and Writing Seminar Thursday, – 16 35, room C To find an up-to-date version of the schedule and to read the papers check the website
Research problem, Purpose, question
Manuscript Writing and the Peer-Review Process
Writing a Literary Research Paper How to Read an Article of Literary Criticism.
A good research question:
Soc 3306a Lecture 4 The Research Report and the Literature Review.
The Submission Process Jane Pritchard Learning and Teaching Advisor.
JDS Special program: Pre-training1 Carrying out an Empirical Project Empirical Analysis & Style Hint.
Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.
Northcentral University The Graduate School February 2014
Basic and Applied Research. Notes:  The question asked is either “basic” or “applied”  “Try again…” NEVER with the same data set  *data mining*  Literature.
Assessment of MSc and PhD students E J Wood School of Biochemistry & Microbiology University of Leeds Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
EE325 Introductory Econometrics1 Welcome to EE325 Introductory Econometrics Introduction Why study Econometrics? What is Econometrics? Methodology of Econometrics.
Writing Journal articles Professor Ashok Ranchhod.
The Young Economist’s Guide to Professional Etiquette by D.S. Hamermesh.
1 How to review a paper by Fabio Crestani. 2 Disclaimer 4 There is no fixed mechanism for refereeing 4 There are simple rules that help transforming a.
Publishing in Measurement Journals Journals as People (Not Just Outlets), Publishing as a Process (Not Just an Event) Presentation for EDMS MSMS Steve.
Advanced Higher Physics Investigation Report. Hello, and welcome to Advanced Higher Physics Investigation Presentation.
 Remember, it is important that you should not believe everything you read.  Moreover, you should be able to reject or accept information based on the.
The Publication Process. Publication Steps Pre-Submission Initial Submission Behind the Scenes First Response Revise and Resubmit Revise for Submission.
How to read a scientific paper
LEVEL 3 I can identify differences and similarities or changes in different scientific ideas. I can suggest solutions to problems and build models to.
The Scientific Method involves a series of steps that are used to investigate a natural occurrence.
How to write a professional paper. 1. Developing a concept of the paper 2. Preparing an outline 3. Writing the first draft 4. Topping and tailing 5. Publishing.
Reviewing Papers© Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid, CS5014, Fall CS5014 Research Methods in CS Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid Computer Science Department Virginia Tech.
"Writing for Researchers" Monday, July :35-3:45PM. Laurence R Weatherley– Spahr Professor of Chemical Engineering, Department of Chemical and.
How to Satisfy Reviewer B and Other Thoughts on the Publication Process: Reviewers’ Perspectives Don Roy Past Editor, Marketing Management Journal.
Maximizing the Probability of Journal Article Acceptance By Ron C. Mittelhammer.
Facilitate Group Learning
 An article review is written for an audience who is knowledgeable in the subject matter instead of a general audience  When writing an article review,
Responding to Reviewers. Rare to get an acceptance with no changes So two paths, rejection or revise and resubmit Rejection Revise and Resubmit.
Thomas HeckeleiPublishing and Writing in Agricultural Economics 1 Observations on assignment 4 - Reviews General observations  Good effort! Some even.
Dealing with Reviews. Rejection hurts, but is it fatal?
Ian F. C. Smith Writing a Journal Paper. 2 Disclaimer / Preamble This is mostly opinion. Suggestions are incomplete. There are other strategies. A good.
Le parc japonais est beau et calme La fille japonaise est belle mais bavarde Ritsurin Park, Takamatsu.
Guide for AWS Reviewers Lois A. Killewich, MD PhD AWS AJS Editorial Board.
PSY 219 – Academic Writing in Psychology Fall Çağ University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Department of Psychology Inst. Nilay Avcı Week 9.
Paper III Qualitative research methodology.  Qualitative research is designed to reveal a specific target audience’s range of behavior and the perceptions.
What is Research?. Intro.  Research- “Any honest attempt to study a problem systematically or to add to man’s knowledge of a problem may be regarded.
Publishing in Theoretical Linguistics Journals. Before you submit to a journal… Make sure the paper is as good as possible. Get any feedback that you.
Dr. Sundar Christopher Navigating Graduate School and Beyond: Sow Well Now To Reap Big Later Writing Papers.
ACADEMIC PUBLISHING How a manuscript becomes an article.
Version 1.0 Copyright © 2008 AQA and its licensors. All rights reserved. A2 Unit 4B Issue Evaluation Exercise Y
SP_ IRS : Research in Inclusive and Special Education Lecture :Communicating Research. Presented By: Mr. S. Kumar Lecturer Education.
Customer Service Charter Introduction About SIMWEN A simulated work environment that will enable the student to complete 8 of the 10 units in Certificate.
How to Get Published: Surviving in the Academic World Stephen E. Condrey, Ph.D. Vice President, American Society for Public Administration Editor-in-Chief,
Research Methods in Business and Economics3 Jan Brzozowski, PhD.
Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success
Provide instruction.
Welcome! SSCI-E 100a Lecture 1.
Chapter 1: Introduction to Econometrics
The scope and focus of the Research
In-Service Teacher Training
Financial Econometrics Fin. 505
Presentation transcript:

An Introduction to Empirical Investigations

Aims of the School To provide an advanced treatment of some of the major models, theories and issues in your chosen field(s). To guide you through your reading of the empirical literature in your chosen field(s). To make you aware of the opportunities for further empirical work in your chosen field(s). To help you formulate a specific empirical research project that you can undertake. Your colleagues involved in course delivery here at the school will help with any follow up guidance you might need.

Why is empirical work important? Even abstract theory has to be grounded in the real world. Economics is not maths! Applied theorists have to motivate their work by empirical questions or observations. These are used to formulate models which are then tested on data. Policy evaluation and to predict expected outcomes from policy changes. To preserve our reputation and to give confidence to them who pay our wages!

Why should you do empirical work? Many questions in economics are essentially empirical or have a strong empirical element. Even if you consider yourself predominantly a teacher, it important for you to know how and why empirical results are obtained.

Why should you do empirical work? In general, we are better equipped to give advice on carrying out empirical investigations when we have done it ourselves. This is important because: - –As part of their training, students are increasingly required to carry out empirical investigations. –Graduates sometimes go on to work as professional economists and it is necessary for us to ensure they are properly trained.

Why should you do empirical work? –Professional economists have to be econometrically literate. –Technological developments have reduced the costs of empirical work so much that I doubt that future university students/researchers will be able to avoid it!

Some general points Econometric estimates are simply a sophisticated way of describing our data. –Really, just a technique for obtaining a set of conditional responses. –They tell us what relationships are stronger than if the variables were random.

Some general points Economic theory tells us: - –Which relationships are interesting. –How these relationships might be interpreted. –How to distinguish between causation and correlation.

Issues in empirical publications Each time you read a paper, be aware of; - –What question is being asked? –How is the data used to address the question? –What (if any) are the problems in such studies? –What conclusions are drawn? –On what assumptions are the conclusions based? –How far do you agree that the assumptions are realistic?

Planning an empirical investigation There are several simple steps to be followed when planning an empirical investigation: - –Make sure you are familiar with the theory that is relevant to your chosen topic. –Read other publications in the academic journals that are related to the topic you intend to investigate. –Try to use your review of the literature to identify suitable areas for investigation

Writing up an empirical investigation Most empirical papers follow a fairly standard pattern: - Introduction Motivation Literature review Development of a model Explanation of the data Testing the model Results Summary and conclusions

Submitting a Paper to Journal Before you submit a paper –Ask someone whose opinion you value to read and comment on it. –Think about any comments they make and, if necessary, re-write the relevant parts of your paper. –Carefully read the submission requirements. –Follow the ‘rule of the 3C’s’.

After Submission –Any paper submitted to a reputable journal is always sent to a referee for a report. –This can sometimes take quite a time. –Referee’s very rarely suggest accepting a paper without any revisions. –The usual responses are ‘Reject’ or ‘Revise and Re-submit’.

Responding to the Editor’s Decision Reject –Sometimes no reasons for the rejection are given! More usually reasons for the rejection are given. You have only two possible responses: - –1 Put your paper in the bin and start all over again! –2 Re-submit to a different journal.

Responding to the Editor’s Decision Revise and Re-submit –1 Reply promptly to the editor about your decision. –2 You must take on board most/all of the referee’s recommendations. –3 Sometimes referee’s reports appear hostile. –4 It is better if your response is polite and constructive! –5 Remember – nothing is certain!