Loop Motion, Rigid-body Helix-Coil transitions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Infrared spectroscopy of metal ion-water complexes
Advertisements

Relaxation Time Phenomenon & Application
Big Question: We can see rafts in Model Membranes (GUVs or Supported Lipid Bilayers, LM), but how to study in cells? Do rafts really exist in cells? Are.
Influence of solvation on 1-aminonaphthalene photophysics: ultrafast relaxation in the isolated molecule, molecular clusters and solution by Raúl Montero,
Molecular Dynamics: Review. Molecular Simulations NMR or X-ray structure refinements Protein structure prediction Protein folding kinetics and mechanics.
Ionic Conductivity And Ultrafast Solvation Dynamics Biman Bagchi Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, INDIA.
Measurements of the Complete Solvation Response in Ionic Liquid Sergei Arzhantsev, Hui Jin, Gary A. Baker, and Mark Maroncelli J. phys. Chem. B 2007,111,
Force Field of Biological System 中国科学院理论物理研究所 张小虎 研究生院《分子建模与模拟导论》课堂 2009 年 10 月 21 日.
Computational methods in molecular biophysics (examples of solving real biological problems) EXAMPLE I: THE PROTEIN FOLDING PROBLEM Alexey Onufriev, Virginia.
Chem 388: Molecular Dynamics and Molecular Modeling Continuum Electrostatics And MM-PBSA.
A. Nitzan, Tel Aviv University ELECTRON TRANSFER AND TRANSMISSION IN MOLECULES AND MOLECULAR JUNCTIONS AEC, Grenoble, Sept 2005 Lecture 2.
Photoactivation of the Photoactive Yellow Protein chemistry department Imperial Colege London London SW7 2AZ United Kingdom Gerrit Groenhof, Berk Hess,
Quantum decoherence of excited states of optically active biomolecules Ross McKenzie.
The Calculation of Enthalpy and Entropy Differences??? (Housekeeping Details for the Calculation of Free Energy Differences) first edition: p
Generation of short pulses
Biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy BIOCHEMISTRY BEYOND STRUCTURE Protein dynamics from NMR Analytical Biochemistry Comparative Analysis.
Biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy BIOCHEMISTRY BEYOND STRUCTURE Protein dynamics from NMR Analytical biochemistry Comparative analysis.
Behaviour of velocities in protein folding events Aldo Rampioni, University of Groningen Leipzig, 17th May 2007.
Fluctuations and Brownian Motion 2  fluorescent spheres in water (left) and DNA solution (right) (Movie Courtesy Professor Eric Weeks, Emory University:
A. Nitzan, Tel Aviv University SELECTED TOPICS IN CHEMICAL DYNAMICS IN CONDENSED SYSTEMS Boulder, Aug 2007 Lecture 2.
High Spin Ground States: d2, d3, d6, and d7
Spectroscopy of Proteins. Proteins The final product of the genes, translated form genes (mutation in gene leads to a mutated protein) Made of a verity.
Molecular Luminescence
Time out—states and transitions Spectroscopy—transitions between energy states of a molecule excited by absorption or emission of a photon h =  E = E.
Water. Buried Water Molecules -Binding -Reactions Surface Water Molecules -Structure -Dynamics -Effect on Protein Motions Water in and on Proteins.
Infrared spectroscopy of Li(methylamine) n (NH 3 ) m clusters Nitika Bhalla, Luigi Varriale, Nicola Tonge and Andrew Ellis Department of Chemistry University.
The Geometry of Biomolecular Solvation 1. Hydrophobicity Patrice Koehl Computer Science and Genome Center
1 Femtosecond Time and Angle-Resolved Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Aqueous Solutions Toshinori Suzuki Kyoto University photoelectron.
Bioinf. Data Analysis & Tools Molecular Simulations & Sampling Techniques117 Jan 2006 Bioinformatics Data Analysis & Tools Molecular simulations & sampling.
Dynamics in Complex Chemical Systems Biman Bagchi Indian Institute of Science Bangalore
Protein Folding & Biospectroscopy Lecture 5 F14PFB David Robinson.
1 Miyasaka Laboratory Yusuke Satoh David W. McCamant et al, Science, 2005, 310, Structural observation of the primary isomerization in vision.
Effect of Aromatic Interactions on Flavin's Redox Potential: A Theoretical Study Michael A. North and Sudeep Bhattacharyya Department of Chemistry, University.
 Four levels of protein structure  Linear  Sub-Structure  3D Structure  Complex Structure.
Vibrational Relaxation of CH 2 ClI in Cold Argon Amber Jain Sibert Group 1.
NMR Analysis of Protein Dynamics Despite the Typical Graphical Display of Protein Structures, Proteins are Highly Flexible and Undergo Multiple Modes Of.
1.Solvation Models and 2. Combined QM / MM Methods See review article on Solvation by Cramer and Truhlar: Chem. Rev. 99, (1999)
Protein Folding Programs By Asım OKUR CSE 549 November 14, 2002.
Weihong Qiu, Luyuan Zhang, Oghaghare Okobiah, Yi Yang,
/81 1 3D Structure calculation. Structure Calculation In general some form of restrained Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulation is used to obtain a set of.
States and transitions
Chem. 860 Molecular Simulations with Biophysical Applications Qiang Cui Department of Chemistry and Theoretical Chemistry Institute University of Wisconsin,
Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Protein Dynamics from NMR 03/19/02 Protein and Peptide Drug Analysis, pages Amide proton exchange Heteronuclear relaxation Application to determine.
Water layer Protein Layer Copper center: QM Layer Computing Redox Potentials of Type-1 Copper Sites Using Combined Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical.
Computer Simulation of Biomolecules and the Interpretation of NMR Measurements generates ensemble of molecular configurations all atomic quantities Problems.
Combination of Scattering Experiments with Molecular Simulation What Drives the Protein Dynamical Transition? Simplified Description of the Transition?
Study of Pentacene clustering MAE 715 Project Report By: Krishna Iyengar.
Electronic Spectroscopy of DHPH Revisited: Potential Energy Surfaces along Different Low Frequency Coordinates Leonardo Alvarez-Valtierra and David W.
The MD simulation shows that in the case of PBN, reorientation of the AN molecule to reach the optimal geometry of the CT-AQ state is not likely to be.
Insight into peptide folding role of solvent and hydrophobicity dynamics of conformational transitions.
Alessandro Cunsolo INFM Operative Group in Grenoble and CRS-Soft, c/o Institut Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, France On the new opportunities opened by the development.
Structure-Function Relationship of Retinal Proteins.
Infrared Spectra of Chloride- Fluorobenzene Complexes in the Gas Phase: Electrostatics versus Hydrogen Bonding Holger Schneider OSU International Symposium.
Lecture 9: Theory of Non-Covalent Binding Equilibria Dr. Ronald M. Levy Statistical Thermodynamics.
Semiclassical approach for all-atom nonadiabatic simulations of excitation energy transfer processes in photosynthetic complexes Young Min Rhee Department.
Effect of Length and Flexibility of Axle Components on Shuttling Dynamics in Rotaxane Type Molecular Machines I’m Ryohei Kano from Tobe lab. The title.
Molecular Spectroscopy OSU June TRANSIENT ABSORPTION AND TIME-RESOLVED FLUORESCENCE STUDIES OF SOLVATED RUTHENIUM DI-BIPYRIDINE PSEUDO-HALIDE.
Development of a cavity ringdown spectrometer for measuring electronic states of Be clusters JACOB STEWART, MICHAEL SULLIVAN, MICHAEL HEAVEN DEPARTMENT.
IR photodepletion and REMPI spectroscopy of Li(NH 2 Me) n clusters Tom Salter, Victor Mikhailov, Corey Evans and Andrew Ellis Department of Chemistry International.
Methods and Software NAMD (NAnoscale Molecular Dynamics) is a parallel molecular dynamics code designed for high performance simulation of large systems.
Femtosecond conical intersection dynamics of tryptophan in proteins and validation of slowdown of hydration layer dynamics Jin Yang, Luyang Zhang, Lijuan.
A Computational Study of RNA Structure and Dynamics Rhiannon Jacobs and Harish Vashisth Department of Chemical Engineering, University of New Hampshire,
Biological Water, Protein Structure and the Dynamical Transition
Ultrafast studies of resonance energy
Maintaining Adiabaticity in Car-Parrinello Molecular Dynamics
Origin of Cooperativity
Biophysical Tools '04 - Fluorescence
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Mechanisms of Tryptophan Fluorescence Shifts in Proteins
Presentation transcript:

Lys-Trp-Lys: Structure and Solvation by Molecular Dynamics Simulations Ali Hassanali

Loop Motion, Rigid-body Helix-Coil transitions Protein Dynamics Atomic Fluctuations, Side-Chain Motion Ligand docking flexibility 10-15 – 10-12 s Loop Motion, Rigid-body Motion of helices 10-9 – 10-6 s Active site conformation adaptation, Binding Domain and Subunit motion 10-6 – 10-3 s Hinge-bending, catalysis Folding/unfolding, Helix-Coil transitions Hormone activation, catalysis 10-3 – 104 s Water Dynamics – Protein Dynamics – Biological Functioning

Indole-Water/Indole-Protein Debate Agreement on two time-scales existing – disagreement on what causes the long time-scales. Fundamentally: Experimental techniques characterize degree of perturbed water differently MRD: Magnetic Resonance Dispersion (Halle. et. al.) Dielectric Relaxation (Steinhauser et.al. , Weingartner et.al. ) NMR Fast water Long time scale is dominated by fluctuation of side-chains. QENS (quasi electron neutron scattering) (Head-Gordon et.al) TDFSS (Zewail et.al., Zhong et.al., Bagchi et.al.) Slow water Long time scale is attributed to dynamic exchange between bulk and hydration shell protein biological?? water

Theoretical Model La state Mulliken charges obtained from CASSCF calculations by Sobolewski and Domcke Chem. Phys. Lett. 315 (3-4): 293, 1999. S0 state dipole ~ 2.41 D and La state dipole ~ 4.96 D “Excitation” achieved by instantaneously changing ground-state charges to excited state charges No QM integrated into this technique. (Callis. et al) No adjustment to ground-state charges to avoid force-field clashing.

KWK Isomers KN N KC Ground State: KN < N < KC Excited State: N < KN < KC Isomeric structures driven by interactions and potentially hydrophobic interactions.

Free-Energy Calculations Free energy difference between each isomer and reference structure determined Thermodynamic Integration techniques used MD simulations yield free-energy differences and free-energy derivatives Ground State: Excited State: KN :71%, N: 20%, KC: 9% KN :35.8%, N: 50.2%, KC: 13.9% Ground-state free energy calculations with GROMOS96 yield same ordering

making any changes to the GROMOS96 forcefield. Importance of these interactions in chemistry and biology: stabilizing protein structure during/after protein folding, protein-ligand recognition. Dougherty. Science, 271(5246): 163, 1996. Chipot et. al. JACS 118 (12): 2998 1996, show that forcefields underestimate binding energy between toluene and ammonium in gas phase by ~ 6 kcal mol-1 They also demonstrate that this binding energy is reduced in solvent between the range 3 - 4.7 kcal mol-1 Aliste et. al. Biochemistry, 42(30):8976,2003 conduct their analysis without making any changes to the GROMOS96 forcefield. LJ well-depths ~ 10 kcal mol-1 A realistic model will account for unequal polarization effects and one lysine should be farther away from the indole (Minoux and Chipot, J.Am. Chem. Soc., 121(44):10366, 1999)

Fluorescence Anisotropy Karplus et al. Biochemistry, 22(12):2884, 1983 Data fit with a double exponential for both MD and experimental data Short time component attributed to local wobbling motion of tryptophan Long time component represents tumbling of peptide with pi-cation complex. Pi-cation complex doesn’t mean lysine is rigid! (Qiu et. al. J.Phys. Chem.,B 109(35): 16901,2005) Note first 100 fs of experimental data represents internal conversion between 1La and 1Lb states

Explicit time dependence on La excited state potential surface Stokes Shifts Double energy difference between absorbed and emitted photons Depends on the electronic excitation energy. Gas phase excitation energy of indole chromophore is ignored in our calculations due to cancel out Explicit time dependence on La excited state potential surface Excited t No modeling of Lb La conversion Ground

Competitive Solvation Long equilibrium excited and ground state runs Inverse correlation between indole-protein and indole-water solvation energies Indole-protein/water fluctuate over a very large range but total solvation energy does not! Competition independent of water model. SPC demonstrates same phenomena Range of ground-state fluctuations is less but still exists. Relationship to rugged landscape of proteins/peptides where gains/loss in enthalpy and entropy pave the free energy landscape?

Stokes Shifts Results Stokes shifts data for three isomers shown with error-bars Three important time scales Inset shows inertial regime Inertial regime dominated by indole-water solvation Ground Excited t

N-Complex Fits MD Experiment Total Stokes shift show remarkable agreement Experimental inertial decay is slower than MD: experimental or MD (forcefield) artifact? No isomerization detected in experiment Small errors in barrier size can affect rates of activated processes in MD Were Stokes shifts observed long enough to witness isomerization?

N-Complex Solvation Steady lowering of solvation energy drives overall process Initial drop over 1 ps is dominated by indole-water contribution 0.79 ps and 54 ps solvation process involves compensation between protein and water to solvate indole For KN and KC , isomerization makes similar analysis difficult

N-Complex Peptide Readjustment Clear motion of lysine NT ammonium toward indole by ~ 0.08 nm C-terminus lysine side-chain moves by same distance but farther away N-terminus lysine side-chain also shows minor adjustment

KN & KC Peptide Readjustment KC shows clear response by moving toward indole and then relaxing KN shows a less discernible process perhaps due to faster isomerization rates Remote lysines for both isomers show clear response by moving away from the indole ring Other coordinates for KN might reveal similar behavior as KC

Peptide Dynamics, Isomerization NH3 + NH3 + KN N KC N Chain-extension breaks pi-cation and perhaps hydrophobic interactions Isomerization rates for KN is faster than KC KC isomerization is driven by kinetics, even though it is at a higher free energy than KN

Peptide-Motions

Acknowledgements Sherwin Singer Dongping Zhong Tanping Li Members of Singer and Zhong groups Thank you for listening! Funding Sources: LIGDP and NSEC