Improving The Odds for Kids: Tracking The Success Of An Early Delinquency Intervention Program Jeffry A. Will, The Florida Center, University of North.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 st National Conference on Substance Abuse, Child Welfare and the Dependency Court Developing and Implementing Services for Children within the Substance.

Advertisements

Truancy Court Of Randolph County

JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.

Oklahoma Department of Corrections DUI Offender Profile

Using a National Jail Network to Track Probationers, Parolees & Sex Offenders Presented by: Teresa D. McKinney Division Manager - Planning & Development.

The Colorado Senate Bill (SB 94) Community Based Detention Program

Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March

REHAB Milestones Clinical Services Options IOP REHAB Milestones Clinical Services Options IOP Treatment Programs.

Where We Started In 1985, PACE recognized girls involved with the justice system had histories of trauma and abuse Girls were more likely than boys to.

Multisystemic Therapy (MST)

Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision

Preventing and Intervening in Delinquency through Integration and Coordination of Services.

Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS

Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05.

Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.

Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.

1 The Effectiveness of Project Adventure's Behavior Management Programs for Male Offenders in Residential Treatment Lee Gillis Aaron Nicholson Executive.

Evaluation of the Connecticut Judicial Branch’s Three Court-Mandated Family Violence Programs: FVEP, EXPLORE, and EVOLVE Stephen M. Cox, Ph.D, Professor.

DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.

A Case Study of the Intersection Between the Child Welfare and Criminal Justice Systems Charlene Wear Simmons, Ph.D. Parental Incarceration, Termination.

Youth Empowerment Services (YES) A Medicaid Waiver Program for Children with Severe Emotional Disturbances Clinical Eligibility Determination Texas Department.

Juvenile Justice History Review New York House of Refuge – First juvenile detention center – Became a place to put delinquent youth Included kids without.

WRAPAROUND MILWAUKEE “Never doubt that a small group of committed citizens can change the world: indeed, it’s the only thing that ever does.” Margaret.

Cuyahoga County Strengthening Communities – Youth (SCY) Project: Findings & Implications for Juvenile Justice David L. Hussey, Ph.D. Associate Professor.

ENCIRCLE: A COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIP FOR OUR YOUTH Led by Center for Learning & Development thanks to a grant from the Office of the Governor Criminal.

Crossover Youth: Research, Policy and Practice CYPM Overview

Table 1 Introduction  Overview  While predictors of recidivism and technical violations are often examined in probation and parole outcome research,

How do youth with emotional and substance use problems fare in the juvenile justice system? Alison Evans Cuellar, PhD Mailman School of Public Health Columbia.

John Petrila, J.D., LL.M. - Director. When: Florida Legislature created the Florida Criminal Justice Mental Health & Substance Abuse Technical Assistance.

Offender Supervision Control and Public Safety Issues.

Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.

Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.

ST. LOUIS FAMILY COURT Judge Jimmie M. Edwards July 21, 2011.

The Iowa Delinquency Assessment Tool

NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES.

Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief.

Missouri Re-Entry Program Analysis of offender release factors from 2005 to 2011 and selected demographics Boone County Prepared for Boone.

EFFECTIVE INTERVENTIONS FOR NEWBORNS WITH DRUG EXPOSURE AND THEIR FAMILIES Harolyn M.E. Belcher, M.D., M.H.S. Associate Professor of Pediatrics Johns Hopkins.

Changing the Status Quo for Status Offenders: New York State’s Efforts to Help Troubled Teens Michael Lens, Vera Institute of Justice Annie Salsich, Vera.

Chapter 10 Counseling At Risk Children and Adolescents.

Combating Truancy Knox County Truancy Initiative and the

Clackamas County Juvenile Drug Court Enhancement Evaluation (OR) NPC Research Outcome and Cost Evaluation Results.

Review of Judicial Branch Activities in “Raise the Age” Presented by the Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division June 28, 2012.

Adult Drug Courts: The Effect of Structural Differences on Program Retention Rates Natasha Williams, Ph.D., J.D., MPH Post Doctoral Fellow, Morgan State.

North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.

Community Indicators Cal-SIG Evaluation Training February 24, 2005.

Objectives: SWBAT Analyze the impact of recidivism on society Identify key aspects of the Juvenile Justice System 1.

The Eckerd Family Foundation Florida’s Juvenile Justice System: An Overview DRAFT.

Reducing adolescent cannabis abuse and co-occurring problems through family-based intervention Howard Liddle, Ed.D., Cynthia Rowe, Ph.D., Gayle Dakof,

 Performance assessments can:  help identify potential problems in the program  help identify areas where streamlining the process could be useful.

State Mental Hospital Continuity of Care Study Timothy L. Boaz, Ph.D. Keith Vossberg, B.A. Florida Mental Health Institute May 8, 2001.

Educational and Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Justice Youth What’s Wrong When We Know What’s Right? Ralph B. Thomas December 17, 2007.

Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &

Public Safety and Offender Rehabilitation Services Act of 2007 (AB 900) Implementation and Impact on County Mental Health Robin Dezember Chief Deputy Secretary.

Introduction Results Treatment Needs and Treatment Completion as Predictors of Return-to-Prison Following Community Treatment for Substance-Abusing Female.

DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE UPDATE Presented to: The Georgia Association of Homes and Services for Children.

NCADS Child Maltreatment 2000 Data about child abuse and neglect known to child protective Services (CPS) agencies in the United States in 2000.

Pam Lievesley 2002 ADOLESCENT DRUG USERS Pam Lievesley, Team manager Bury and Rochdale Drug Liaison Service Objective of the study  To describe the characteristics.

CLASSIFICATION Risk Institutional violence/misconduct Institutional violence/misconduct Suicide Suicide Recidivism Recidivism A standardized assessment.

Cleveland Municipal Drug Court: SAMHSA CSAT Adult Treatment Drug Court Grant Dr. Margaret Baughman Madison Wheeler, BS Paul Tuschman, BA Begun.

BackgroundBackground ObjectivesObjectives MethodsMethods Study Design 1E-06 One of the biggest challenges for the Child Welfare System is sustaining successful.

Juvenile Detention Alternatives Texas and Harris County Perspective Rebecca M. Beyda MD MS SAHM Conference, March 2014.

Recidivism Rates for DCJ Offenders Exiting Residential Treatment June 2007 Kim Pascual Research & Evaluation.

Juvenile Delinquency and Juvenile Justice

Department of Juvenile Justice

Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)

Wayne County Truancy Diversion Program

4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health

FIRST PLACEMENT IS THE RIGHT PLACEMENT

Arely M. Hurtado1,2, Phillip D. Akutsu2, & Deanna L. Stammer1

Presentation transcript:

Improving The Odds for Kids: Tracking The Success Of An Early Delinquency Intervention Program Jeffry A. Will, The Florida Center, University of North Florida Vicki Waytowich, Early Delinquency Intervention Program, Tim Cheney, Northeast Florida Center for Community Initiative University of North Florida

Improving the Odds for Kids Early Delinquency Intervention Program The EDIP Concept Age Arrest History Mental health History of EDIP EDIP 1 (Jacksonville, 1992) EDIP 2 (Tampa-St. Pete area, 1996)

Improving the Odds for Kids Components Residential Component Intensive Assessment 2 Weeks (+/-) “Home School” Attendance Therapeutic Intervention Individual/family/group therapy Social problem interventions

Improving the Odds for Kids Components Case Management 6- 9 Month Aftercare Multi-systemic Weekly Supervision Treatment Plans Linkages Mental Health Judicial/Community Service Family Interventions Leisure Education

Improving the Odds for Kids Components Referral Process Diversion State Attorney referred Diversion plan Non-compliance issues? Court Ordered Department of Juvenile Justice referred Sanction of probation Non-compliance issues?

Improving the Odds for Kids EDIP Locations

Improving the Odds for Kids EVALUATION History 6 th Year “Participatory Research” Approach Methodology Quantitative and Qualitative Approach Focus Groups Review of Program Records Review of DJJ Files This Report Primarily for

EDIP CLIENT DEMOGRAPHICS OVERALL RACE (n) Non-White Females8.7%14.1%11.9%9.7%13.7%10.1%7.6% Non-White Males33.3%37.0%32.2%30.4%26.8%36.7%37.4% White Females18.6%12.1%12.4%12.9%15.2%10.6%9.4% White Males39.4%36.7%43.6%46.9%44.3%42.6%45.6% AGE at ADMISSION (n) Average Age and Under5.5%6.6%7.3%9.2%4.9%6.5%4.8% 128.4%11.0%11.4%12.8%8.6%16.1%9.1% %28.1%23.2%17.4%21.6%19.1%34.5% %25.9%27.7%27.5%29.4%32.2%31.5% %24.6%28.2%29.4%28.8%25.1%18.8% 16 and Up4.4%3.8%2.1%3.7%6.9%1.0%1.2% Note: Overall, there were 347 clients served in and 272 clients served by in The discussion here does not include clients with files missing data on Race, Sex, and Age. Data Source: EDIP DataTrack Databases

TABLE 9 ACADEMIC PROFILE AdmissionDischarge Percent Change AdmissionDischarge Percent Change EDIP I GPA * % Unexcused Absences % % Referrals % % Grades Failed 73.6%n/a 68.1%n/aN/a EDIP II GPA % % Unexcused Absences % % Referrals % % Grades Failed 41.4%n/a 34.0%n/an/ * Less than 1% n/a Not Applicable Data Source: EDIP DataTrack Database

EDIP CLIENT ABUSE FACTORS BY LOCATION Jacksonville Discharged Tampa Area Discharged PRIOR TO EDIP Physical Abuse (YES) 14.5%6.2% Sexual Abuse (YES) 6.5%6.8% Emotional Abuse (YES) 15.1%11.2% Neglect (YES) 17.2%3.1% Alcohol Use (YES) 14.0%33.5% Drug Use (YES) 21.5%37.9% Data Source: EDIP DataTrack Database Improving the Odds for Kids

EDIP CLIENT ABUSE FACTORS BY LOCATION Jacksonville Discharged Tampa Area Discharged PRIOR TO EDIP73109 Physical Abuse (YES) 15.1%16.5% Sexual Abuse (YES) 6.8%12.8% Emotional Abuse (YES) 23.3%11.9% Neglect (YES) 11.0%3.7% Alcohol Use (YES) 24.7%43.1% Drug Use (YES) 37.0%50.5% Data Source: EDIP DataTrack Database Improving the Odds for Kids

EDIP RECIDIVISM RATES Overall 31.6% (n=171) 39.9% (n=308) NA39.2%35.8% EDIP % (n=70) 30.6% (n=186) 30.6%27.0%*24.2%* EDIP % (n=101) 54.1% (N=122) NA53.6%47.1%

EDIP I & EDIP II CORRELATIONS OF SELECT RISK FACTORS WITH DELINQUENCY INDICATORS Single Parent Income Assistance Prior Abuse Client Alcohol History Client Drug History Family Under 18 Arrested Family Over 18 Arrested Failed a Grade DJJ Referral Recidivism Location -.368** (347).146** (347).149** (347) -.232** (347) -.180** (347).069 (282).017 (279).332** (288) -.814** (297) -.234** (308) Single Parent ** (347) -.234** (347) -.156** (347) -.220** (347) (282).098 (279) (288).323** (297).023 (308) Income Assistance (347) (347) (347).044 (282).062 (279).071 (288) -.169** (297) (308) Prior Abuse ** (347).128* (347).076 (282).200** (279).058 (288) (297).074 (308) Client Alcohol History ** (347) (282) (279) -.123* (288).185** (297).033 (308) Client Drug History (282).022 (279) (288).154** (297).051 (308) Family Under 18 Arrested (272) (274) (243).086 (258) Family Over 18 Arrested (275) (240).053 (255) Failed a Grade ** (247) (262) DJJ Referral ** (277)

EDIP I & II CORRELATIONS OF SELECT RISK FACTORS WITH DELINQUENCY INDICATORS Single Parent Income Assistance Prior Abuse Client Alcohol History Client Drug History Family Under 18 Arrested Family Over 18 Arrested Failed a Grade DJJ Referral Recidivism Location (268) (272).161** (272) -.187** (272) -.169* (272) (259) (260).344** (259) -.545** (243) (171) Single Parent (268) (268) (268) -.132* (268) (255).047 (256).089 (255).021 (239).048 (168) Income Assistance (272) -.147* (272) (272).008 (259).086 (260) (259).061 (243) (171) Prior Abuse * (272).145* (272).043 (259).104 (260).003 (259).084 (243).016 (171) Client Alcohol History ** (272).013 (259).094 (260) (259).173** (243).124 (171) Client Drug History (259).129* (260) (259).231** (243).169* (171) Family Under 18 Arrested (257).058 (253) (231) (162) Family Over 18 Arrested (254).103 (232) (163) Failed a Grade ** (232).098 (161) DJJ Referral (149)

Improving the Odds for Kids Conclusions Prior to Major differences by location Referral process questioned For latest year No empirical support for referral and location causes of recidivism Alternative Explanations? Management differences? EDIP 2 change in residential management Different philosophy b/t FSYR and EDIP

Improving the Odds for Kids Future Research New 3-year contract New approaches Review of ALL years Focus on structural/management change Track long-term recidivism

Improving the Odds for Kids Questions?