Floridas Outcome-Based Evaluation Program Technical Session LSTA Coordinators Annual Conference November 16-17, 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.
Advertisements

Lessons Learned: How to Survive the Development of Outcome Measures Cherie McCraw, M.L.S., Library Consultant, Division of Library and Information Services.
The Rocky Road to OBE FL November Need for Success Administrative and management tools Senior level buy in State Library and field training Nurturing.
EVALUATION OF LSTA FIVE-YEAR PLAN Presented by: Ester Smith, Ph.D. EGS Research & Consulting.
How to Apply for an Interlibrary Cooperation Grant from the Alaska State Library March 23, 2013 Alaska Library Association Conference Valdez.
1 Title I Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session May 23, 2011.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
A Meta-Assessment of Statewide Program Evaluations Jeffrey Pomerantz Carolyn Hank School of Info. & Library Science UNC Chapel Charles R.
WIOA Timeline and Action Plan for States
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
Learner Link – Durham County Increasing Access to Early Childhood College Courses Durham’s Partnership for Children Child Care Services Association Durham.
Catulpa Community Support Services.  Use of an electronic data entry program to record demographic data and case notes to reflect service delivery 
Governor’s Prevention Initiative for Youth: Evaluation Jane A. Ungemack, Dr.P.H. Evaluator University of Connecticut Health Center.
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
Welcome to The Expert Community Forum 19 November 2007.
1 Module 6 Putting It All Together. 2 Learning Objectives At the end of this session participants will understand: The monitoring and evaluation process.
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
A Charge to Collaborate: IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT WHAT WE DO… IT’S ABOUT HOW WE DO IT…
Milwaukee Digital Inclusion Program Draft: January 26, 2007, Milwaukee Department of Administration.
Shelley Ardis Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind Outreach Services: 30 Years of Successful Services.
Principals’ Council Meetings May  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Improving Student Outcomes: Using Technical Assistance.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Transition Planning Parent Information Meeting Brooke Gassman, Keystone AEA Parent - Educator Coordinator Lori Anderson, DCSD Transition Facilitator Stephanie.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Significant Changes to the Monitoring Process  Self-assessment by school districts.  Greater involvement of parents and other stakeholders.  Improved.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
RAISING THE LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT OF PUPILS WITH MLD USING RESEARCH LESSON STUDY Dr Jeff Jones Development Leader.
The Regionalization Project New Regional Field Coordinator Orientation.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Our Journey with Family Engagement An Overview of North Penn School District’s experiences with Family Friendly Schools As part of our strategy to Engage.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Florida’s Outcome-Based Evaluation Program Finding the Fit with Multitype Library Cooperatives Sondra Taylor-Furbee June 15, 2002.
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING FOR Mary Mehsikomer Division of School Improvement November 2006.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
STARTALK: Our mission, accomplishments and direction ILR November 12, 2010.
Measuring and reporting outcomes for BTOP grants: the UW iSchool approach Samantha Becker Research Project Manager U.S. IMPACT Study 1UW iSchool evaluation.
2009 OSEP Project Directors Meeting Martha Diefendorf, Kristin Reedy & Pat Mueller.
Project Design Jennifer Coffey OSEP May 4,
Midwest Child Welfare Implementation Center MCWIC Purpose Our purpose is to facilitate the implementation of systemic change to improve outcomes for children.
Jaquanda Pugh Teacher assist II February 22, 2010.
Improving Results-Based Management in Grants to States: Transitioning to Virtual Collaboration Training Presentation by Matthew Birnbaum, PhD., IMLS Evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
1 Family Network on Disabilities of Florida, Inc Whitney Road Clearwater, Florida Phone: (727) Toll free: (800)
Midwest Child Welfare Implementation Center MCWIC Purpose Our purpose is to facilitate the implementation of systemic change to improve outcomes for children.
2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Effective Collaboration between Parent Centers and Early Childhood.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Enhancing Parent Engagement: The Indicator 8 Training Modules Series January, 2011.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Building Successful Collaboration between Parent Centers.
O S E P Office of Special Education Programs United States Department of Education Aligning the State Performance Plan, Improvement Strategies, and Professional.
CSBG ROMA NEXT GENERATION
ACF Office of Community Services (OCS) Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Survey of Grantees Satisfaction with OCS Survey of Eligible Entities Satisfaction.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
LSTA Grant Workshop Jennifer Peacock, Administrative Services Bureau Director David Collins, Grant Programs Director Mississippi Library Commission October.
Figure 1. Basic Logic Model Structure
Measuring Project Performance: Tips and Tools to Showcase Your Results
Equitable Services Under ESSA
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Systemic Student Support (S3) Academy
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Transition Outcomes Project Report Out Meeting
Overview of the Kansas Technical Assistance System Network: Using Technical Assistance to Facilitate Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Kerry.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
2019 Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Floridas Outcome-Based Evaluation Program Technical Session LSTA Coordinators Annual Conference November 16-17, 2000

Access for All: Libraries in Floridas Future; A Plan for the Continued Development of Floridas Libraries n Goals: –Direct digital Internet access –Telecommunications networks for Florida Library Network –Technology to facilitate distance learning –Address critical issues that impact Floridas communities

Eligible Types of Libraries n Public Libraries n Multitype Library Cooperatives n Academic Libraries n Special Libraries n School Libraries

Categories for n Adult or Family Literacy n Born to Read n Library Services to Older Adults n FloriNet Connectivity n Library Automation n Linking Libraries

Categories for 2001 n Access for Persons Having Difficulty Using Libraries n Library Technology Connectivity and Services

Traditional Project Measurement:

Outcomes Measurement

Sample Common Outcomes n Parents read to their children n Older adults use information to enhance their lives n Older adults learn to use computers n Public uses technology to get information n Public learns to use technology

Indicators n Show that the outcomes have been achieved- Number of parents who read daily to their children n Ties to the common outcome- but indicator may be project specific n Each outcome has at least one indicator

Setting Targets n Most programs cannot establish targets in the first year of collecting data n We suggested that only ongoing projects set targets

Training And Assistance Provided for n LSTA Grant Writing Workshops n Capacity Building Workshops n Liaison Consulting Assistance

First Year Expectations n Refine outcome models n Tools listed on midyear report n Annual report describing outcomes n Exemplary Project Recognition Program

Timetable for Evaluation n 1st Year logic models not scored n Outcome-based grants began October 2000 n 2nd year grants –Models will be scored –Targets should be set for continuing projects

Evaluation Personnel n State and Federal Grants Office n Research Office n Liaison Consultants Role n RFP for outside evaluation

Strategies Timeline n 1998 –Bureau of Library Development gets United Way training –Directors Conference Presentation –Florida participates in first IMLS pilot project

Strategies 1999 n OPPAGA Review- liked outcome concept n October Directors Conference -- Sadlon and Associates presented program n Born to Read Capacity Building Workshop- each group worked on an outcome plan at workshop

Strategies 2000 n LSTA Grant Writing Workshop- new format and application n Grants submitted in March all had logic models which were not scored but were required n Panel at Directors Conference gave positive feedback n November 2000 Capacity Building Workshop

Challenges n Initial resistance from State Library staff –We were comfortable with older goals/objectives and outputs n Concerns: – That it was just another fad –Would be intrusive –Would be more work –Governing agencies would not understand the language

Successes n BLD staff finally understood it n BTR Capacity Building Workshop and Grant Writing workshops were turning points- THE FIELD GOT IT! n Logic model helps grant writing process n Accountability n We know that the programs make a difference!

Our Commitment for Support n Help libraries understand the difference between outputs and outcomes n Help libraries focus on the impact their projects have on the public-their outcomes n Encourage libraries to create the systems needed to measure and use the data

Our Support System n Liaison consultants –work with libraries in their area n Research Office –Survey design and pre-testing –Work on indicators n Continued Workshops

Additional Needs n State Library needs to know what other states are doing n Need ideas for support to libraries and how to make it better

Need for Success: n Support of administration n A champion for the project n Outside help n Nurturing approach for those who apply for grants