PHOS calibration in CDB framework M.Bogolyubsky, Y.Kharlov B.Polichtchouk, S.Sadovsky IHEP, Protvino ALICE off-line week 3 October 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALICE TOF FESTIVAL Offline tools and GRID scenario for the ALICE TOF detector A. De Caro (University of Salerno and INFN) CERN – Bdg.29, October 20 th.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
1 ALICE EMCal Electronics Outline: PHOS Electronics review Design Specifications –Why PHOS readout is suitable –Necessary differences from PHOS Shaping.
HLT & Calibration.
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 HLT – a source of calibration data One of the main tasks of HLT (especially in the first years) –Monitoring of the detector performance –Analysing calibration.
Jianchun (JC) Wang, 08/21/99 RICH Electronics and DAQ Chip Carrier Short Cable Transition Board Long Cable Data Board Crate J.C.Wang Syracuse University.
Status of calorimeter simulations Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP.
FMS review, Sep FPD/FMS: calibrations and offline reconstruction Measurements of inclusive  0 production Reconstruction algorithm - clustering.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
03/27/'07T. ISGC20071 Computing GRID for ALICE in Japan Hiroshima University Takuma Horaguchi for the ALICE Collaboration
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
TOF Meeting, 9 December 2009, CERN Chiara Zampolli for the ALICE-TOF.
PHOS offline status report Yuri Kharlov ALICE offline week 7 April 2008.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
Summary of PHOS Internal Notes (part I) Rafael Diaz Valdes 10/25/20151.
1 xCAL monitoring Yu. Guz, IHEP, Protvino I.Machikhiliyan, ITEP, Moscow.
Gael Rospabe Lapp 15/04/08 CaloSoft Meeting 1 Ecal calibration using  0 Sabine Elles/ Marie-Noëlle Minard/ Gaël Rospabé.
TOF, Status of the Code F. Pierella, Bologna University and INFN TOF Offline Group ALICE Offline Week, June 2002.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL, Feb 2005 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software update L3 display 200 GeV February.
1 Behaviour of the Silicon Strip Detector modules for the Alice experiment: simulation and test with minimum ionizing particles Federica Benedosso Utrecht,
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
28 June 2010 LHCb week St Petersburg M.N Minard 1 Calorimeter status Hardware status Controls & monitoring Timing alignment Calorimeters calibration Pending.
PHOS offline status report Dmitri Peressounko ALICE offline week,
The 21st International Conference on Ultrarelativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions, March 30 – April 4, Knoxville, TN Results from cosmics and First LHC.
C. Oppedisano, 9 October 2007, ALICE Offline Week 1 RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHM CALIBRATION OBJECT ESD STRUCTURE ONGOING TASKS.
Measurement of J/  -> e + e - and  C -> J/  +   in dAu collisions at PHENIX/RHIC A. Lebedev, ISU 1 Fall 2003 DNP Meeting Alexandre Lebedev, Iowa State.
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
Electron Detection in the SiD BeamCal Jack Gill, Gleb Oleinik, Uriel Nauenberg, University of Colorado ALCPG Meeting ‘09 2 October 2009.
Prospects in ALICE for  mesons Daniel Tapia Takaki (Birmingham, UK) for the ALICE Collaboration International Conference on STRANGENESS IN QUARK MATTER.
1ECFA/Vienna 16/11/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare these test beam data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. CALICE has tested an (incomplete) prototype.
PHOTON RECONSTRUCTION IN CMS APPLICATION TO H   PHOTON RECONSTRUCTION IN CMS APPLICATION TO H   Elizabeth Locci SPP/DAPNIA, Saclay, France Prague.
NEUTRAL MESON PRODUCTION IN PP AND PB-PB COLLISIONS AT LHC Dmitry Blau, for the ALICE collaboration NRC “Kurchatov Institute” LHC on the March
STAR J/  Trigger in dA Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Trigger Workshop at BNL October 21, 2002.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
The ALICE Experiment Event by Event fluctuations ALICE TOF Calibration 30th November 2007Chiara Zampolli1.
RHIC CNI Polarimeter status RHIC CNI Group February 26, 2008.
ALICE Offline Week October 4 th 2006 Silvia Arcelli & Chiara Zampolli TOF Online Calibration - Strategy - TOF Detector Algorithm - TOF Preprocessor.
Javier Castillo 1 Muon Embedding Status & Open Issues PWG3 - CERN - 15/02/2011.
1 S, Fedele, Student Presentations, 2004/08/04S Amazing Title Slide Reworking the CES Cluster Reconstruction Algorithm By: Steve Fedele Advisor: Pavel.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
1 EMCAL Reconstruction in Pass pp 900 GeV 29/03/2010 Gustavo Conesa Balbastre.
Π 0 and η meson production in pp collisions at 0.9, 2.76 and 7 TeV measured with ALICE LHC on the march November 2011 Boris Polishchuk (IHEP, Protvino),
PHOS offline status report Yuri Kharlov ALICE offline week 7 July 2008.
Energy Calibration of BESIII EMC  ‘Digi’-calibration Bhabha calibration  0 calibration Radiative Bhabha calibration  ‘Cluster’-calibration.
M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' workshop1 M0’ linearity study  Contents : Electronic injection Laser injection Beam injection Conclusion.
Reconstruction tools for the study of short-lived resonances in ALICE pp collisions at the LHC startup 1.The ALICE 2.Short-lived resonances.
Two particle correlations: from RHIC to LHC Francesco Noferini Bologna University INFN – sez. Bologna ALICE-TOF Tuesday, May 16th Villasimius (Italy) HOT.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
Monthly video-conference, 18/12/2003 P.Hristov1 Preparation for physics data challenge'04 P.Hristov Alice monthly off-line video-conference December 18,
Beam test Analysis Micromegas TPC by Wenxin Wang.
January 2009 offline detector review - 2 nd go 1 ● Offline – Geometry – Material budget – Simulation – Raw data – OCDB parameters – Reconstruction ● Calibration.
IPHC, Strasbourg / GSI, Darmstadt
Rainer Stamen, Norman Gee
CALGO: Software Tasks cal software:
TOF CALIBRATION DATABASE
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
ALICE Offline Week, CERN
HLT & Calibration.
Pulse Shape Fitting Beam Test September, October CERN
First physics from the ALICE electromagnetic calorimeters
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Presentation transcript:

PHOS calibration in CDB framework M.Bogolyubsky, Y.Kharlov B.Polichtchouk, S.Sadovsky IHEP, Protvino ALICE off-line week 3 October 2005

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 2 Outline 1.Review of PHOS calibration algorithms 2.Software description 3.Decalibration procedure 4.Calibration procedure - Step 1 – calculation of per-cell coefficients using mean amplitudes in crystals and writing them to CDB - Step 2 – reading of the coefficients from CDB and using them in PHOS reconstruction Summary

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 3 PHOS geometry PHOS has 5 modules Each module consists of EMC and CPV 1 EMC module contains 3584 crystals 1 CPV module contains 7168 pads

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 4 Requirements for calibration precision 0.5% uncertainty of energy reconstruction results in 2% of prompt photons spectrum uncertainty at Pt=50 GeV

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 5 Calibration algorithms: by wide e - beam calibration (beam test 2003) PHOS module should be exposed by a wide electron beam at fixed known energy E 0 Calibration coefficients  i are found from minimization of the functional Total deposited energy is summed over 5x5 area around the max. cell

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 6 Calibration algorithms: EMC run-time calibration by electrons EMC can be calibrated by tracks found by the global tracking procedure and identified as electrons (similar to calibration by e - beam) Where E i is electron energy in event i. Needed statistics is to be estimated yet.

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 7 Calibration algorithms: EMC run-time calibration by mean energy PHOS will be polulated by photons distributed uniformly vs X,Y. On average there will be 10 reconstructed photons per module per one central Pb-Pb collision. Mean rec.photon energy can serve as a measure of calibration. To store statistics of 1000 events per channel needed for calibration, one needs 5 minutes of LHC run.

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 8 Calibration algorithms: EMC run-time calibration by  0 mass 200,000 central Pb-Pb events (4 minutes of LHC run) Calibration coefficients can be found by minimization of  0 mass. It requires low combinatorial background  high p T  longer exposition. p T >5 GeV is a lower limit for this calibration. To calibrate each cell with 1000-event statistics one needs 10 days.

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 9 Calibration algorithms: CPV run-time calibration by mean charge CPV responds to charged particles passing through CPV gas volume. On average there will be 100 charged particles per module per one central Pb-Pb collision. Similar to PHOS EMC, CPV fired pads will be distributed uniformly vs X,Y. Pad response function (induced charged) can serve as a measure of calibration. To store statistics of 1000 events per pad needed for calibration, one needs <1 minute of LHC run.

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 10 Software package Classes used/modified: - CDB storage classes (cvs version 1.1) - AliPHOSCalibData (PHOS calibration object) - AliPHOSGetter (+Set/Get calibration obj.) - AliPHOSDigitizer (+read (de)calibration coeff. per crystal) - AliPHOSClusterizerv1 (+read calibration coeff per crystal)

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 11 Calibration object structure AliPHOSCalibData: Float_t fADCchannelEmc [5][56][64]; // convertion from ADC counts to GeV Float_t fADCpedestalEmc [5][56][64]; // ADC pedestals These class contain the methods to set and to get the calibration parameters by the relative channel number (module, column, row). The actual dimension of arrays fADCchannelEmc and fADCpedestalEmc correspond to the number of crystals in PHOS (nEmc=17920).

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 12 “Decalibration” procedure ($ALICE_ROOT/PHOS/macros/CalibrationDB/AliPH OS/SetCDB.C) v oid SetDB() { TString DBFolder="deCalibDB"; // create local directory AliPHOSCalibData *calibda=new AliPHOSCalibData("PHOS"); // create new calibration object TRandom rn; for(Int_t module=1; module<6; module++) { for(Int_t column=1; column<57; column++) { for(Int_t row=1; row<65; row++) { fADCchanelEmc=rn.Uniform( , ); // random ADC gain factors (Cmax/Cmin = 5) fADCpedestalEmc=rn.Uniform(0.0045,0.0055); // random ADC pedestals (+-10% spread from 0.005) calibda->SetADCchannelEmc(module,column,row,fADCchanelEmc); calibda->SetADCpedestalEmc(module,column,row,fADCpedestalEmc); } AliCDBMetaData md("PHOS/Calib/GainFactors_and_Pedestals",...); // create metadata object for calibration data AliCDBLocal *loc = new AliCDBLocal(DBFolder.Data()); AliCDBStorage::Instance()->Put(calibda, md); // write calibration object into DB! }

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 13 Simulation of “decalibrated” data ~200K Hijing min. bias events were generated into PHOS aperture and transported using aliroot.

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 14 Digitization of “decalibrated” data void Dig(Int_t nevents=1) { //Dititize events assuming SDigits already produced. //Load calibration database into aliroot session //and set it to AliPHOSGetter. AliCDBLocal *loc = new AliCDBLocal("deCalibDB"); AliPHOSCalibData* clb = (AliPHOSCalibData*)AliCDBStorage::Instance() ->Get("PHOS/Calib/GainFactors_and_Pedestals",gAlice->GetRunNumber()); // retrieve calibration object! AliPHOSGetter* gime = AliPHOSGetter::Instance("galice.root"); gime->SetCalibData(clb); // make calibration object available for digitizer AliSimulation sim ; sim.SetRunGeneration(kFALSE) ; sim.SetMakeSDigits("") ; sim.SetMakeDigits("PHOS") ; sim.Run(nevents) ; }

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 15 Amplitudes in cells Mean amplitudes in cells differ a lot => relative calibration coefficients are necessary to adjust channels to the same mean value.

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 16 Step 1: adjustment of mean amplitudes in cells Adjustment coefficient for i-th crystal C[i]= /A0, where A0 – mean amplitude in arbitrary chosen “reference” cell. Measure of adjustment: width of C[i]*  [i] distribution (red line), where  [i] - “decalibration” coefficient.

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 17 Step 2: reconstruction using adjustment coefficients Adjustment coefficients of Step 1 were read from CDB and applied on the clusterization stage: fADCchanel[i] = /C[i] ADC counts -> GeV subject of fine tuning!

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 18 Pi0 mass Pi0 mass gives energy scale Comparison: Pi0 width obtained with hardcoded identical calibration coefficients was 6 MeV

PHOS calibration in CDB framework 19 Conclusion PHOS run-time calibration procedure is “in the first approximation” implemented within the CDB framework. Crude calibration procedure using mean amplitudes alignment gives approx. 5% calibration accuracy. Alignment of mean amplitudes gives pretty good start guess about the calibration coefficients, however, more refined calibration procedure based on pi0 mass minimization is necessary To explore: stability of results in dependence of “reference cell” choise (noisy channel? dead?)