Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Confidentiality Issues.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collaborative Intellectual Property
Advertisements

Commercial confidentiality and PSI Razvan Dinca University of Bucharest.
The Legislative Position in Scotland Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004 SSI 2004 No.520 Professor Colin Reid, School of Law, University.
WIPO - TCCIA WORKSHOP ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FOR BUSINESS FOR SMEs Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania, May 10 and 11, 2005 Keeping Confidence: Trade Secrets in.
GATS & Telecom Transparency. Key Ingredients for Reform }Clearly set out policies in laws, regulations, licenses, contracts }Make all processes open.
AIPPI Forum & ExCo in Hyderabad (India) October 2011 Inventorship in Multi-Jurisdictions Report from China.
IP rights and competition law: Friends or foes? Etienne Wéry Attorney at the bars of Paris and Brussels Lecturer at Robert Schuman University (Strasbourg)
Mod_03_12 Alignment of TSC with Revised VAT Arrangements 29 th May 2012.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 5, 2007 Trade Secret – Part 1.
What is a “Request for Tender”? Typically a large and detailed document - often 30 + pages Describes the company’s organisational structure, historical/developmental.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 7, 2007 Trade Secret – Part 2.
Patents and trade secrets 6 6 Chapter. Patents  Grant of property rights to inventors  Issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)  Permits.
Protecting your company’s valuable information
Information Asset Classification
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Martin Oder, LL.M. The Emerging Role of the Competitive Dialogue.
ACE, ECCE & EFCA SEMINAR 21 October 2004 New EU Public Procurement Directive: EUROPEAN HARMONISATION OF PROCUREMENT PRACTICES IN THE SECTOR OF THE ENGINEERING.
The restriction of access to env. information related to protection of Confidential Business Information (CBI) Experience, Challenges & Best Practice 1.
The Sevilla process for supporting the implementation of the IPPC Directive Michael Parth Tallinn – Estonia 27 – 28 March 2008.
WATERLOO ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING Intellectual Property 1 WATERLOO ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING Intellectual Property Douglas Wilhelm.
Commercialization of R&D Results: How to Prepare For The Early Stages.
Aerospace Industries Association Intellectual Property Committee Fall 2009 meeting SMC Enabling Clause Holly Emrick Svetz (703)
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TRADE SECRETS COPYRIGHTS PATENTS.
Blue Skies Delaware; Clean Air for Life Confidentiality Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Air Quality Management Section.
Tax Information Exchange Agreements Formal Ratification 2011.
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 22, 2009 Class 6 Patents: Multilateral Agreements (Paris Convention); Economics of International Patent.
Access to Information and Public Participation in Developing and Operating PRTR Systems Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Programme October 15-16, 2007.
Access to Commercial Information A Comparative Overview Darian Pavli Open Society Justice Initiative.
CONFIDENTIAL © 2009 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of.
Presentation on the application of the restrictions on access to environmental information provided by article 4 (4) (d)-(f) of the Convention (agenda.
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture EIA, IPPC and SEVESO Links.
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES Public Involvement EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE.
CUTS International Capacity Building Training Programme on Advance IPR, WTO-Related Issues and Patent Writing April 28-May 02, 2008, Jaipur TRIPS – Article.
Trade Secrets Basics Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University.
© 2004 The IPR-Helpdesk is a project of the European Commission DG Enterprise, co-financed within the fifth framework programme of the European Community.
Intellectual Property Rights Economy and Ownership of Results in IST Projects The Research Council of Norway Niels Peter Thorshaug.
Protection of Trade Secrets; current issues WIPO-UKRAINE SUMMER SCHOOL ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – JULY 2011.
What Is A Trade Secret?. Trade Secrets Are Property: Intellectual Property.
Technology Forecasting. Forecasting predict or estimate a future event or trend. "rain is forecast for Lahore“ The use of historic data to determine the.
PATENTS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS Presented By: Navdeep World Trade Organization.
12.1 Plan Procurement: Introduction
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services 14 th September 2007.
1 Intellectual Property Rights David Worrall – Legal Department.
Lecture 11. Intellectual Property SPRING 2016 GE105 Introduction to Engineering Design College of Engineering King Saud University.
K. Lance Anderson Of Counsel Greenberg Traurig, LLP “Innovate Lea County” Conference A Model for Innovation.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Intellectual Property And Data Rights Issues Domestic & Global Perspectives Bayh-Dole act -- rights in data Henry N. Wixon Chief Counsel National Institute.
Dario Dainelli, Article 14.4.c: SR proposal Business operators shall keep, for a period ending not before the expected shelf life of the material.
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
TRADE SECRETS workshop I © 2009 Prof. Charles Gielen EU-China Workshop on the Protection of Trade Secrets Shanghai June 2009.
Technology Transfer Office
Dialogue on Competition Policy and Intellectual Property *
Intellectual Property
The Protection of Confidential Commercial or Industrial Information in Environmental Law: Analysis and Call for a Graded Concept of Protection Prof. Dr.
The protection of know-how in franchising networks
Technology Management Activities and Tools
Chapter 06: LEGAL ISSUES FOR THE ENTREPRENEUR
Research and the Data Protection and Freedom of Information Acts
National Contact Points (NCP) Training
ICN Cartel Working Group SG-1
The restriction of access to env. information
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) IN FP7
Intellectual Property
Steps during and after a Pre-commercial Procurement
Chapter # 6 Intellectual Property
The Aarhus Convention and Biosafety
Presentation transcript:

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Confidentiality Issues

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Directives IPPC Directive 96/61/EC EIA Directive 85/337/EEC, 97/11/EC Also relevant: Access to Information Directive 2003/4/EC

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture IPPC Directive Art. 15 Subject to confidentiality, the following should be made available to the public: Permit application Decision on the permit application, with reasons The permit, including updates Results of monitoring of releases.

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture EIA Directive Subject to confidentiality, the following should be made available to the public: Request for development consent Information on the proposed project (Art. 5) The decision, any conditions and reasons for the decision Description of main measures to reduce / avoid the major adverse effects

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Access to Information 2003/4/EC Art. 4.2 Request for environmental information may be refused, inter alia, if it would seriously affect: d)Confidentiality of commercial or industrial information e)Intellectual property rights f)Confidentiality of personal data g)Third party rights h)Protection of the environment

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture The Art. 4.2 exceptions are to be interpreted in a restrictive way. Need to weigh the public interest of disclosure against the interest served by the refusal. Cannot refuse to disclose information on emissions to the environment.

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture UK Guidelines

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Commercial confidential information Three categories 1.Trade secrets 2.Commercial confidences 3.Intellectual property

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Trade secrets (1) Information: is or may be used in trade / business Is not generally known in that trade/business Has economic value from not being generally known Is the subject of reasonable efforts to keep its secrecy

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Trade secrets (2) Would include information, e.g Formula Pattern Programme Method Technique Information contained in a product, device or mechanism

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Commercial confidences (1) Extends beyond trade secrets, since the information does not need to be capable of industrial or commercial application or use Two basic types of such information:

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Commercial confidences (2) 1.Information which has an intrinsic commercial value, where that value depends on the ability of the operator to maintain its confidentiality Criteria: a)Commercial – inc financial, scientific & technical information b)Confidential – has been treated as such by the operator

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Commercial confidences (3) Examples of 1: Information on proposed projects, tenders Details of decision-making processes Cost structures Development plans Production oriented information not under “trade secret”

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Commercial confidences (4) 2. Information which may not have intrinsic commercial value, but whose disclosure may unreasonably disadvantage the operator in the conduct of their lawful business. So is more of a “catch all” type of category of information

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Commercial confidences (5) Examples of 2 Background information about the organisation that may in some way influence the way the organisation develops or operates in the future.

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Intellectual property (1) Information: Linked to R&D of new equipment, designs, processes, Typically in advance of production/use stage

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Intellectual property (2) Note: When deciding if such information should be disclosed – Remember that the disclosure of an invention before an application for a patent has been submitted may prevent the owner from obtaining a patent!

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture In deciding whether information should be commercially confidential, there are two key questions: 1.Would the information be useful to a competitor, and would otherwise be unobtainable to them? 2.Would disclosure of the information unreasonably damage the commercial interests of the operator?

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Three tests to answer these two questions Test 1 Is the information within one of the 3 categories: Trade secret Commercial confidence, or Intellectual property?

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Test 2 Would its disclosure be likely to prejudice to an unreasonable degree the commercial interests of the operator?

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Test 3 Is the information readily available in the public domain? e.g. via Public registers Consent applications Planning applications External emergency plans (Seveso II) Technical literature Published incidence reports Press articles or other media publications

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture If answers to: Test 1 = yes Test 2 = yes Test 3 = no Information should be determined to be commercially confidential

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture If answers to: Test 1 or 2 = no Test 3 = yes Information should NOT be treated as commercially confidential

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture In UK test is applied very strictly The operator has to make a very strong case for commercial confidentiality As a result there are very few applications in the UK (and no decisions of the CA have been challenged!)

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture In early days of IPPC, many operators thought that they had to include everything about their installation on the permit application Thus there were many concerns about Commercial Confidentiality (CC)

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture View of the CA Need to look at the purpose of the IPPC permit Is there a bearing on the environmental performance of the installation? Are there any environmental impacts? If NO – then probably do not need to include this information on the application – thus issue of CC does not arise

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Chemical companies Thought that they had to include details of all chemicals on application Concerns that this would give a competitive edge to competitors View of CA Only needed to include information on chemicals in general terms Therefore issue of CC did not arise

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Snack (crisps) producer Worried that it would have to disclose chemicals used in flavouring View of CA Has no bearing on environmental performance of the installation, so needed to be included in application

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture So message is: Remember what the overall purpose of the IPPC permit is for Important to discuss issues with operator in pre-application stage Application does not have to include everything: Discuss with operator before application is made If it does not have to be included in the application, then issue of CC may be resolved before it is raised

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture How long does information remain confidential? Information that is deemed to be CC one day may not be CC at a later date Remember – e.g. patents are only valid for a limited period of time

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture In UK If CA agrees with operator that information may be CC It only remains so for 4 years (or shorter period of time if specified by CA) Then operator has to re-apply for CC

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Chemical company wanted to test a new process Had not yet applied for patent CA Information could be CC for a limited period of time (until patent had been applied for)

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Sometimes have to think laterally! Major company, many coal-fired LCPs for producing electricity Applied for “substantial change” to introduce sulphur scrubbers at all its LCPs Wanted this information to be CC for a limited period of time

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture CA granted application for CC Company wanted the sulphur scrubbers as it intended to move from (domestic) hard coal (low sulphur) to (imported) brown coal (high sulphur) Scrubbers needed to remove SO2 to stay within ELV limits

Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Problem: Final agreement with new suppliers of the lignite coal had not been reached Company concerned that if information on the scrubbers came out this would highlight their intention to change suppliers of coal This may affect world prices of coal before agreement had been reached So wanted CC until agreement had been concluded.