1 Modeling Pricing in the Planning Process Ram M. Pendyala Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of South Florida, Tampa U.S. Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Advertisements

Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
CONGESTION KSG HUT251/GSD 5302 Transportation Policy and Planning, Gomez-Ibanez OUTLINE OF CLASS: 1.NATURE AND SEVERITY 2.MENU OF REMEDIES 3.ENGINEER’S.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
13 th TRB National Planning Applications Conference May 8-12, Reno, Nevada Tara Weidner, Rosella Picado and Erin Wardell Parsons Brinckerhoff.
GE541 Economic Geography of Transport October 30th.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Estimating Congestion Costs Using a Transportation Demand Model of Edmonton, Canada C.R. Blaschuk Institute for Advanced Policy Research University of.
Agent-based Dynamic Activity Planning and Travel Scheduling (ADAPTS) Model  ADAPTS scheduling process model: –Simulation of how activities are planned.
Value Pricing for Transportation in Washington, D.C. Martin Wachs, Director Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Berkeley.
May 2009 Evaluation of Time-of- Day Fare Changes for Washington State Ferries Prepared for: TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group presented by Ron West Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Model Task Force Meeting November 29, 2007 Activity-based Modeling from an Academic Perspective Transportation Research Center (TRC) Dept. of Civil & Coastal.
Urban Transport in the Developing World. Elements of Urban Transport Sector Urban public transport: Urban public transport: On-street systems (for buses,
15 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Tuesday, May 19 th, 2015 – Atlantic City, NJ Integrating Travel Demand Models & SHRP2 C11 Tools:
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Project: Model Integration Options Greg Erhardt DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th,
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. TOPICS 1.ROADS AND PUBLIC GOODS 2.RATIONALE TO JUSTIFY ROAD BUILDING 3.URBAN PLANNING AND TRAFFIC CONGESTION (UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES)
Problem Statement and Motivation Key Achievements and Future Goals Technical Approach Kouros Mohammadian, PhD and Yongping Zhang (PhD Candidate), CME,
Research | consulting | technology safety and efficiency in transport through knowledge Moving people and freight in the urban.
1 A Model of Within-Households Travel Activity Decisions Capturing Interactions Between Household Heads Renni Anggraini, Dr.Theo Arentze, Prof.H.J.P. Timmermans.
SHRP2 C10: Jacksonville Partnership to Develop an Integrated Advanced Travel Demand Model and a Fine-grained Time- sensitive Network Key Agency Partners:
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. TRB Applications Conference – Freight Committee May 7, 2013.
A New Policy Sensitive Travel Demand Model for Tel Aviv Yoram Shiftan Transportation Research Institute Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Act Now: An Incremental Implementation of an Activity-Based Model System in Puget Sound Presented to: 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
For Model Users Group June 10, 2011 Kyeil Kim, Ph.D., PTP Atlanta Regional Commission.
Expert Forum on Road Pricing, USDOT, November 14-15, 2005, Alexandria, VA1 Making the State of the Art the State of the Practice: Modeling Tools for Road.
Presentation to the Sustainable Prosperity Conference
1 Activity Based Models Review Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Model Task Force Data Committee October 17, 2008.
Travel Data Simulation and Transferability of Household Travel Survey Data Kouros Mohammadian, PhD and Yongping Zhang (PhD Candidate), CME, UIC Prime Grant.
Utilizing Advanced Practice Methods to Improve Travel Model Resolution and Address Sustainability Bhupendra Patel, Ph.D., Senior Transportation Modeler.
Lecture 1 Introduction- Manifestations of Transport and Tourism.
Finance: The Critical Link The Transportation – Land Use – Environment Connection Brian D. Taylor October 2003 Institute of Transportation Studies.
Modeling in the “Real World” John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council April 19, 2005.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 18: Demand Forecasting.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Capturing the Effects of Smart Growth on Travel and Climate Change Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers Modeling for Regional and Interregional Planning Caltrans.
A Firm-Based Freight Demand Modeling Framework: Qi Gong and Jessica Guo, PhD. Transportation and Urban Systems Analysis Lab Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Behavioral Modeling for Design, Planning, and Policy Analysis Joan Walker Behavior Measurement and Change Seminar October UC Berkeley.
The Annual Meeting of the RSAI – The Israeli Branch, Tel-Aviv University, January 10, 2010 Development and estimation of a semi- compensatory residential.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
David Connolly MVA Transport, Travel and SHS Data SHS Topic Report: Modal Shift.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
SHRP2 C10A Sensitivity Testing of an Integrated Regional Travel Demand and Traffic Microsimulation Model TRB Planning Applications Conference May ,
Case study Oslo: PT optimisation under different rules for revenue use REVENUE final conference Brussels 29th - 30th November 2005 Jon-Terje Bekken Institute.
SHRP2 C10A Final Conclusions & Insights TRB Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013 Columbus, OH Stephen Lawe, Joe Castiglione & John Gliebe Resource.
Presented to Model Task Force Model Advancement Committee presented by Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Date November 24, 2008.
Www-civil.monash.edu.au/its Institute of Transport Studies National Urban Transport Modelling Workshop, 5 March 2008 Travel Demand Management Geoff Rose.
Economic Significance of the Border: A Perspective at the Regional and National Levels for both Passenger and Freight Movements Bruno Penet HDR | Decision.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
Transportation Forecasting The Four Step Model. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate.
Systems Analysis Group One ABM for Four Cities: Experience of ABM Estimation on a Pooled Dataset of Multiple Surveys Surabhi Gupta, Peter Vovsha, Gaurav.
Vehicle Size Choice and Automobile Externalities: A Dynamic Analysis Clifford Winston Jia Yan Brookings Institution Washington State Univ.
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
1 Forecasting Traffic for a Start-Up Toll Road 12 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference May 18, 2009 David Schellinger, P.E. Vice.
Household Members’ Time Allocation to Daily Activities and Decision to Hire Domestic Helpers Donggen WANG and Jiukun LI Department of Geography Hong Kong.
Urban Planning Group Implementation of a Model of Dynamic Activity- Travel Rescheduling Decisions: An Agent-Based Micro-Simulation Framework Theo Arentze,
ILUTE A Tour-Based Mode Choice Model Incorporating Inter-Personal Interactions Within the Household Matthew J. Roorda Eric J. Miller UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO.
Responses to Gas Prices in Knoxville, TN Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates Mike Conger, P.E.
Presented to Toll Modeling Panel presented by Krishnan Viswanathan, Cambridge Systematics, Inc.. September 16, 2010 Time of Day in FSUTMS.
Impacts of Free Public Transport – An Evaluation Framework Oded Cats Yusak Susilo Jonas Eliasson.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
How may bike-sharing choice be affected by air pollution
2009 Minnesota MPO Conference August 11, 2009
Presentation transcript:

1 Modeling Pricing in the Planning Process Ram M. Pendyala Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of South Florida, Tampa U.S. Department of Transportation Alexandria, VA; November 14-15, 2005 Expert Forum on Road Pricing and Travel Demand Modeling

2  Introduction and Motivation  Role of Travel Demand Modeling  Variety of Pricing Mechanisms  Road Pricing Projects: U.S. and Abroad  Pricing and Network Dynamics  Experiences with Toll Road Forecasting  Sources of Errors in Forecasts  Four/Five-Step Travel Demand Models Outline

3  Key Behavioral Processes Underlying Response to Pricing Policies  Advances in Travel Demand Modeling Methods and Paradigms  Conclusions and Future Directions Outline (continued)

4  Pricing and innovative toll strategies  Drivers pay marginal cost of travel – congestion and externalities  Travel demand management strategy  Reduce auto travel – mode & destination shifts  Suppress auto travel – eliminate or combine trips  Reduce peak period congestion – temporal shifts  Revenue generation  Invest in transport infrastructure improvements  Pay off debt  Desire for high volumes of paying users  Conflicting objectives? Introduction and Motivation

5  Sketch planning techniques  Elasticity methods  Peer city comparisons  Similar facility comparisons  Stated preference research  Estimates derived from stated preference data  Travel demand modeling systems  Variations of four-step travel demand modeling methods  Forecast patronage, traffic impacts, and revenue stream into future Planning Methods for Pricing Strategies

6  Traffic and travel demand impacts  VMT, VHT, travel time, delay, traffic volumes  Accessibility impacts  Revenue generation perspective  Patronage or volume of demand by time of day  Market penetration by payment type/technology  Short- and long-run demand elasticities  Social equity and environmental justice  Mobility, accessibility, and economic impacts by market segment (income, car ownership, gender, age, etc.) Pricing-Strategy Related Impacts

7  Public transport pricing systems  Parking pricing  Standard (flat) tolls  Shadow tolls  Area-Based/Distance-Based Congestion Charging  Variable/Dynamic/Value Pricing/Tolls: Facility-Based  HOT Lanes/FAIR Lanes  Credit-based congestion pricing Variety of Pricing Mechanisms

8  FHWA ’ s five types of value-pricing projects  A. Pricing on existing roads  B. Pricing on new lanes  C. Pricing on toll roads  D. Pricing of parking and vehicle use  E. Region-wide studies/initiatives  Several operational and others under study  Considerable international experience  Singapore: 25+ years of experience  Central London: 2-3 years of experience Road Pricing Projects: U.S. and Abroad

9  Optimizing traffic networks using pricing mechanisms  Minimal-revenue congestion pricing to induce system optimal performance  Dynamic traffic network simulation  Variety of electronic toll/pricing technologies  Mix of users changes over time  Modeling impacts of variable pricing requires explicit recognition of network dynamics Pricing and Network Dynamics

10  Several projects described in paper  SR 91 express lanes in California  San Diego I-15 congestion pricing project  Lee County (Florida) variable pricing project  Singapore congestion pricing implementation  Central London congestion charging scheme  All projects report various degrees of success  Decrease in traffic congestion, particularly in peak periods  Substantial patronage/usage of toll facilities Pricing Project Experiences

11  Toll road forecasts with traditional travel demand model systems  Minor variations to incorporate sensitivity to pricing  Analysis of toll road forecast accuracy  Toll road forecasts overestimated traffic by 20-30%  Review of 87 toll road projects: Average ratio of actual/forecast patronage is 0.76  Suggest presence of significant systematic optimism bias  Previous experience with toll facilities helps improve accuracy of forecasts Toll Road Forecasting Experience

12  Errors in socio-economic and land use forecasts that serve as inputs to model system  Errors in input assumptions including model coefficients, costs, rates, value of travel time  Errors in coding networks and node/link attributes by time-of-day  Errors in truck travel forecasts  Errors in estimate of ramp-up period  Errors in behavioral paradigms underlying travel demand forecasts Sources of Errors in Forecasts

13  In response to pricing …  Trips may be eliminated due to additional cost  New trips may be induced due to improved level-of-service  Traditional models unable to account for impacts of accessibility on trip generation (activity participation) Induced/Suppressed Travel

14  In response to pricing …  Trips may be combined/linked into chains/tours  Additional cost may induce desire for efficiency  Shifts in trip timing may lead to trip chain formation  Need to recognize inter-dependencies among trips in a chain (e.g., mode, destination) Trip Chaining and Tour Formation

15  Behavioral response to pricing strategies influenced by …  Spatio-temporal flexibility and constraints  Defining time-space prisms  Time allocation and time use behavior (activity episode duration)  Scheduling/timing of activities and trips  Time of day modeling along the continuous time axis Time-Space Geography

16  Traveler response to pricing strategies dependent on host of interactions  Interactions among household members – activity allocation and joint activity engagement behavior  Activity scheduling and re-scheduling behavior  Inter-dependencies among activities and trips in a complete activity-travel pattern  History dependency and inter-temporal relationships  In-home – out-of-home activity substitution and complementarity Agent-Based Interactions and Inter-dependencies

17  Primary impact on specific trip(s) subjected to pricing strategy  Interactions/inter-dependencies result in host of secondary/tertiary impacts  Complete activity-travel pattern subject to change as trips are …  rescheduled and chained  shifted in time, mode, destination, route  Impacts on other household members Secondary/Tertiary Impacts

18  Simulation of complete activity-travel patterns for each individual in population  Modeling at the level of the individual decision-maker  Represent behavioral decision-making processes  Capture differences (taste-variation) across individuals  Synthesize and evolve population over time  Reflect population dynamics  Ramp-up period represents evolutionary period of learning and adaptation Microsimulation Approaches

19  Pricing policies increasingly variable/ dynamic in nature  Travel times, costs, paths, and speed-flow patterns constantly updated  Dynamic traffic assignment algorithms to reflect network dynamics  Integrate with activity-based models  Appropriate feedback loops – network impacts on activity patterns Dynamic Traffic Assignment

20  Host of medium and longer term choices potentially impacted by pricing policies  Residential and work location choice  Vehicle ownership choice  Business location choice  Changes in property values and land accessibility  Evolution of urban system  Feedback between activity-travel demand model and land use simulation model Integrated Urban Systems and Activity-Travel Modeling

21  Heterogeneity in population attributes  Attitudes and perceptions towards pricing strategies  Preferences for and values attributed to alternative behavioral responses  Values of travel time savings and travel time reliability  Learning and adaptation strategies  Recent advances in econometric model formulation and estimation  Presence of heterogeneity in value of travel time savings proven Heterogeneity in Population Attributes

22  Attitudes and perceptions shape behavior (and vice-versa)  Nature and magnitude of response to pricing policy  Adaptation strategies adopted  New activity-travel pattern considered “ acceptable ” or “ satisfactory ” or “ optimal ”  Adoption of electronic toll collection technologies  Habitual vs. occasional use of tolled facility  Help inform model framework, behavioral paradigm, and model specification Role of Attitudes and Perceptions

23  Tour-based and activity-based microsimulation model systems  Advanced econometric model estimation methods  Reflect behavioral decision-making processes  Cause-and-effect relationships  Integrated modeling of land use – activity/travel demand – traffic network continuum with feedback  Long-term to short-term choices  Not necessarily unique to pricing policies – many other emerging behavioral, policy, technology, and environmental issues Towards a New Generation of Modeling Approaches

24  Unique nature of pricing schemes that amplify issues with models  Direct cost/monetary implications  Direct travel time/reliability implications  Direct infrastructure finance implications  Absence of incorporation of monetary constraints (expenditures vis- à -vis income)  Some decrease in VMT growth, but generally little (short-term) impact of fuel price rise Pricing Considerations

25  What should toll reflect/accomplish?  Value of travel time savings  Value of travel time reliability  Facility construction/maintenance costs  Congestion/externality costs (full cost pricing)  Network-wide ripple effects  Shifts to facility due to improved LOS  Shifts away from facility due to added cost  Shifts to improved toll-free facilities Pricing Considerations (continued)

26  Modify attribute of least impact first?  Route shift  Temporal shift  Trip chaining shifts  Destination shifts  Mode shifts  Activity (re)allocation  Activity participation (elimination/addition)  Auto ownership  Workplace/residential location  Implications for behavioral modeling Hierarchy of Behavioral Response?

27  Widespread interest in implementation of innovative pricing schemes/technology systems  Toll road forecasts coming under intense scrutiny  Determine contribution of various sources of error  Input data/assumptions/variable forecasts  Model specifications/parameters/variables  Behavioral paradigm/framework  Heterogeneity in traveler perceptions and values Key Opportunities

28  Several real-world projects offering data on observed behavior  Conduct longitudinal surveys of behavior in conjunction with ongoing projects  Test and validate advanced travel demand modeling methods  Controlled studies involving comparisons of forecasts offered by different modeling methods  Special experiments to understand behavioral adaptation, heterogeneity, and attitudes/perceptions Key Opportunities