Ag Weather Net Founded 2004 Funded by the Western Region IPM center Workgroup Program
Ag Weather Net
What brought us together? All have worked to develop IPM tools based on weather data All reached the same conclusion The benefits of crop, pest, and disease forecasting models are only realized if we have high quality weather and forecast data at sufficient spatial resolution. Prior collaborations among most members
Current Membership Len Coop, OSU &IPPC: Pest modeling, GIS interpolation & delivery Chris Daly, OSU &PRISM Group: Spatial climate analysis Alan Fox, Fox Weather, LLC: Ag. weather modeling & forecasting Dave Gent, USDA-ARS NFSPRC: Epidemiology (hops) Gary Grove, WSU: Director WA AgWeatherNet & Epidemiology Doug Gubler, UC Davis: Epidemiology and extension (fruits & nuts) David Hannaway, OSU: Forage Crops and Extension Paul Jepson, OSU IPPC: Director IPPC; IPM and biosecurity Dennis Johnson, WSU: Epidemiology and extension (potatoes) Walt Mahaffee, USDA-ARS: Epidemiology (small fruit & nursery) Bill Pfender, USDA-ARS NFSPRC: Epidemiology (grass seed) Joyce Strand, UC IPM: Ag. meteorology and information systems Carla Thomas, UC Davis & NPDN: Epidemiology, biosecurity & IPM Ag Weather Net
To develop a science-based system that provides principles and procedures to access, synthesize, distribute, and use weather and climate data products to improve crop management decision-making abilities through the delivery of weather based information.
Ag Weather Net Group Philosophy/Principles IPM is local and personal. Any regional or national approach must be based on a consortium of local IPM efforts linked together with some aspects coordinated or provided at a regional or national level. Facilitating the availability of weather and climate based information will require public and private enterprises. Benefits of competition and innovation must be balanced against development of general standards that may suppress innovation.
Ag Weather Net Group Philosophy/Principles Seek contributions and collaborations from outside the group Long term sustainability of a system will depend on expanding partnerships to include forestry, urban planning, recreational settings, transportation, etc.
Ag Weather Net Why is the group succeeding? Diverse expertise Subject matter and career point First established common ground then developed direction Constant change in who are the dominant leaders of the group Various forms of communication that occur regularly More than one meeting a year
Ag Weather Net Where are We Going? Interactive Virtual Weather Station
Ag Weather Net
Where are we? Virtual Weather Station 1.0 Ag Weather Net
12,500+ weather stations assimilated per day nationwide Hourly or better from MesoWest plus several grower-run networks
Ag Weather Net Deriving Weather from Climate Climatologically-Aided Interpolation (CAI) Climatology as first guess field Near real-time station data used to modify first guess field Downscaling Weather maps at higher spatial resolution than climatology Calculate local elevation regressions using fine- grid DEM
Ag Weather Net PRISM Climate Today’s Spatial Estimates Today’s Anomalies
Ag Weather Net Generates gridded estimates of climatic parameters Moving-window regression of climate vs. elevation for each grid cell Uses nearby station observations Spatial climate knowledge base weights stations in the regression function by their physiographic similarity to the target grid cell Ag Weather Net
Ag Weather Net Rain Shadow: Mean Annual Precipitation Oregon Cascades Portland Eugene Sisters Redmond Bend Mt. Hood Mt. Jefferson Three Sisters N 14 in/yr 90 in/yr 100 in/yr PRISM Station Weighting Terrain orientation Terrain steepness Moisture Regime Elevation 10 in/yr Ag Weather Net
Coastal Effects: July Maximum Temperature Central California Coast Monterey San Francisco San Jose Santa Cruz Hollister Salinas Stockton Sacramento Pacific Ocean Fremont N 34 ° 20 ° 27 ° Oakland Preferred Trajectories PRISM Station Weighting Coastal Proximity Elevation Inversion Layer Ag Weather Net
Ukiah CloverdaleLakeport Willits Clear Lake Pacific Ocean Lake Pilsbury. N PRISM Station Weighting Topographic Index Inversion Layer 12 ° 17 ° 9°9° 16 ° 10 ° 17 ° Ag Weather Net
Improving Resolution of Spatial Interpolation 4 km/pixel Ag Weather Net
0.8 km/pixels Improving Resolution of Spatial Interpolation Ag Weather Net
New m Old km
Ag Weather Net MtnRT – Fox Weather, LLC Directly downscales coarse-grid forecast model output Local prediction for Rain/Temp/RH/LW, wind, at 2 km Well-developed, operational, out to 5 days for OR, WA, CA Predicts inversion heights and nocturnal cold layers Spatially accounts for terrain and Coastal effects PRISM Forecast System – OSU PRISM Group Modifies a long-term climatology with forecast model output Uses CAI (“climatological fingerprint”) In early stages of development Experimental operation for temp only, 24-hr forecasts 0.8 km resolution for NW OR
Ag Weather Net MtnRTPRISM 100-km forecast model grids (GFS) 0.8-km PRISM all- day climate grid 0.8-km current weather grid Station observations 0.8-km 12-hrly forecast grid 0.8-km 12-hrly forecast grid Gaussian filter IDW Interp IDW Interp MtnRT 2-km 6-hrly forecast grid Mt1hr interp Basic QC 2-km 1-hrly forecast grid
Ag Weather Net Where are we? Virtual Weather Station 1.0 Ag Weather Net
Hop Powdery Mildew
Ag Weather Net Powdery Mildew Risk Index 1. If >6 continuous hours > 30°C, then -20 points, else; 2. If > 2.5mm rain, then -10 points, else; 3. If >6 continuous hours > 30°C on previous day, then no change in the index, else; 4. If at least six continuous hours between °C, then +20 points, else; 5. If none of the above rules apply, then -10 points. A 0 to 100 index0
Ag Weather Net Comparison of actual vs estimated weather data in calculating powdery mildew index
Ag Weather Net
# OF SPORES X NIGHT & A.M. WEATHER # OF INFECTIONS + HEAT UNITS NEW PUSTULES [ RAIN ] WITHIN – PLANT SPREAD
Ag Weather Net
Ground Obs. Forecasts Realtime PRISM Targ. Clim. PRISM Static PRISM
Ag Weather Net Estimation of missing data Flatliner checks – repeating values Compare extreme values with record highs and lows Spatial consistency checks Develop “bad boy” list
Ag Weather Net Temperature gradient Corvallis – Newport = 3.8C Temperature gradient Corvallis – Newport = 10.8C C N C N
Ag Weather Net One of several cold-weather patternsA warm, dry weather pattern
Ag Weather Net Weather Research and Forecast Model WRF Next generation meso-scale forecast model (after MM5) Developed by NCAR, NOAA, Air Force, et al. Operational at 37-km for western US at Fox Weather Beta testing for use with MtnRT More accurate forecasts than 100-km GFS, especially in coastal areas
+ + PRISM Targeted Climatolo gies MtnRT Temperatures MtnRT Winds
Ag Weather Net Future MtnRT- PRISM km forecast model grids (WRF) 0.8-km PRISM all-day or targeted climate grid 0.8-km current weather grid Station observations 0.8-km 3-hrly forecast grid 0.8-km 3-hrly forecast grid Gaussian filter PRISM MtnRT 4-km 3-hrly forecast grid Mt1hr interp Spatial QC 0.8-km 1-hrly forecast grid 0.8-km 1-hrly forecast grid 0.8-km 3-hrly forecast grid 0.8-km 3-hrly forecast grid IDW Interp IDW Interp Bias Correct Bias Correct Adjusted 0.8-km 1-hrly forecast grid Adjusted 0.8-km 1-hrly forecast grid 0.8-km 1-hrly forecast grid 0.8-km 1-hrly forecast grid
Ag Weather Net Public Weather Data Expected configuration
Station placement not always optimal
Ag Weather Net Does sensor location matter?