Judy Lorenzo Manager, Transportation Planning Office Fundamentals of Metropolitan and Regional Transportation Planning Organizations in Washington State.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Danville Area Transportation Study. Fundamentals of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Adam Aull Danville Area Transportation Study MPO ASCE Presentation.
Advertisements

Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.
Subchapter M-Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act Program Part 273-Education Contracts under Johnson-OMalley Act.
Transportation Planning for Federal Land Management Agencies (FLMAs) SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006 SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006.
Transportation Strategy Board July 28, 2010 Responsible Growth.
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
ODOT STIP Process and Funding Jerri Bohard –Planning Section Manager –Transportation Development Division Jeff Scheick –Northwest Region Manager –Highway.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT 0 David Hutchinson Office of Policy Planning Department of Transportation Proportionate Fair Share Mitigation.
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) – ROW Impacts Dianna Nausley, HQ RES Assistant Program Administrator Washington State Department.
Chapter 43 An Act Relative to Improving Accountability and Oversight of Education Collaboratives Presentation to Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
SILC ORIENTATION. Department of Health & Human Services Administration for Community Living Independent Living Administration Centers for Independent.
MAP Washington State Public Transportation Symposium August 26, 2013.
Tribal Participation in State Public Transportation Programs: The Washington State Story Thursday, May 31, 2007 Cathy Silins Acting Director, Public Transportation.
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
The Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO): MPO Basics 26 JANUARY 2015 CAPE COD METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION.
Metropolitan Transportation Planning: Primer FHWA/FTA Transportation Planning Capacity Building Program.
In Berkshire County Sarah C. Hoecker. Economic Development Districts What is an Economic Development District? An EDD is a geographic location created.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Region IV Introduction to FTA Grant Programs.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 3 Module 3: CSS and Livability In Area Wide Planning.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Maryland Health Benefit Exchange: An Update October 5, 2011 Charles Milligan DHMH Deputy Secretary, Health Care Financing.
Planning for Economic and Industrial Development Managing Your Update Bruce Hunt Planners Forum 2014.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Transportation Planning Organization(TPO) City Council Workshop November 12, 2013.
State Board of Corrections An Overview of Public Law 2008 Chapter 653.
Ed Christopher Resource Center Planning Team Federal Highway Administration 4749 Lincoln Mall Drive Matteson, IL 60443
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Virginia Association of Planning District Commissions October 4, 2012.
Introductions Introduction to TCAG Federal Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Responsible for long-term planning for all modes of surface transportation.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO TCC & CAC Presentation – August 21, 2012.
Metropolitan Transportation Planning: Primer FHWA/FTA Transportation Planning Capacity Building Program.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
EMPOWERING LOCAL SENATES Kevin Bontenbal, South Representative Stephanie Dumont, Area D Representative.
Fiscal Monitoring and Oversight Tecumseh Local School District January 8, 2013 Roger Hardin, Assistant Director Finance Program Services (614)
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Consulting with Idaho Tribes in Planning Transportation Development 14 th Annual NW Tribal Transportation Symposium Patti Raino, ITD.
Transportation Investment Act of 2010 AASHTO/MTAP Conference December 6-9, 2010 Savannah, Georgia Steve Kish, Transit Program Manager Georgia Department.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
Transportation Funding Workshop Nova Southeastern University December 10, 2012.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
ODOT STIP Process and Funding Jerri Bohard –Planning Section Manager –Transportation Development Division Steve Leep –Program and Funding Services Manager.
AASHTO ANNUAL MEETING STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANNING BILOXI, MS OCTOBER 30, 2010 Potential Changes to STAA Planning Process and Performance Measurement.
U.S. Department of Transportation Planning Certification Review National Capital Region Transportation Management Area TPB Tech Committee Briefing March.
1 Cross-Cutting Issues 5310-JARC-New Freedom U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration SAFETEAU-LU Curriculum August 7, 2007.
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) Association of MPOs 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite345 Washington, DC
OneBayArea Grant Update ( Cycle 2 STP/CMAQ) Regional Advisory Working Group April 3, 2012 Craig Goldblatt, MTC.
Regional Planning CCRPC Board Training March 21, 2012.
Statewide and Nonmetropolitan Planning Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPOs) State Programs Meeting 8/7/13 John Sprowls Community Planner,
1 Review of Draft FY2009 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Ronald F. Kirby Director, Department of Transportation Planning National Capital Region Transportation.
1 Section 5310: Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration SAFETEA-LU.
1 Briefing on the TPB Transportation Planning Process Certification Summary Report Sandra Jackson Federal Highway Administration Transportation Planning.
Skagit-Island Special Needs Transportation Committee 7/10/2014.
A Strategic Agenda for Pinellas County’s Future Growth Whit Blanton, FAICP Pinellas Planning Council & Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization August.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
1 PSRC and Comprehensive Plan Updates City of Duvall Joint Planning Commission / City Council Duvall, WA March 5, 2014.
Next Steps.  To begin Planning Council discussion about the MPO’s Next Steps. Now that the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan has been updated and adopted,
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
An Introduction to Florida’s Coordinated Transportation System Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged April 8,
Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Carmen Monroy Director, Office of Policy Planning April 28, 2016.
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Creating a P.L Plan.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK FEBRUARY 15, 2018 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS CALLING FOR A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF PASADENA AND THE.
Polk Transportation Planning Organization April 14, 2011
Take Your Money and Run! Federal Transit Funding Opportunities
Performance based planning and programming
Presentation transcript:

Judy Lorenzo Manager, Transportation Planning Office Fundamentals of Metropolitan and Regional Transportation Planning Organizations in Washington State MPO/RTPO 101 Public Transportation Symposium and Vendor Expo August 27, 2013 Lynn Peterson Secretary of Transportation Cam Gilmour Deputy Secretary of Transportation Matt Kunic Tribal and Regional Coordination Branch Manager

Today’s Discussion History of Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPO) Difference Between Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) and RTPOs RTPO Membership and Organizational Structure RTPO Duties and Functions Elements of Regional Transportation Plans (RTP) and Regional Transportation Improvement Programs (RTIP) Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Role in RTPOs Administrative and Financial Aspects of RTPOs 2

WSDOT’s Role with RTPOs WSDOT (As Asset Manager and Fiduciary Agent): Monitors and ensures compliance with state regulations Provides technical assistance and shares data Serves as a member of the Policy Board Serves as a member of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Coordinates and consults on regional transportation planning activities and studies Coordinates inter-agency planning activities Administers the RTPO reimbursable grant program Approves the RTPO Unified Planning Work Programs and Budgets Approves written requests for subcontracting 3

History of RTPOs 4

RTPOs Were Created in 1990 The 1990 Transportation Policy Plan recommended that the legislature create RTPOs. RTPOs were created as part 3 of the Growth Management Act and the statewide planning process to address: –Transportation issues that crossed jurisdictional boundaries –Transportation and land use relationships 5

6 Regional Transportation Planning Organizations

The Purpose of an RTPO WAC (1) RTPOs are a formal mechanism for local governments and the state to coordinate transportation planning for regional transportation facilities. 7

RTPO Establishment Criteria RCW Each RTPO…shall: Encompass at least one complete county Have a population of at least 100,000, or contain a minimum of three counties; and Have as members all counties within the region, and at least 60% of the cities and towns within the region representing a minimum of 75% of the cities' and towns' population. In urbanized areas, the regional transportation planning organization is the same as the metropolitan planning organization designated for federal transportation planning purposes.

Determining Region Planning Boundaries WAC Local governments should decide the geographic extent and composition of their region. The region should reflect common transportation concerns and a willingness among the local governments to work together in a cooperative planning process. WAC Based upon the identified needs and probable funding levels within the region, the proposed future transportation network defines specific facility or service improvements, transportation system management strategies, and demand management strategies proposed for implementation on the regional transportation system. 9

10 Whose Role is it Anyway? Policy Board TAC RTPO Director RTPO Staff WSDOT LeadStaff Certify Adopt Recommend Manage Staff Approve Adopt Recommend Lead Staff Participate Adopt Recommend Lead Development Staff Participate Adopt Recommend Lead Staff Participate Approve Participate

The Difference Between MPOs and RTPOs 11

The Difference Between RTPOs and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) State legislation created RTPOs. Federal legislation created MPOs. An RTPO covers both urban and rural areas and receives state funding in support of its planning efforts. An MPO covers an urbanized area and receives federal funding in support of its planning efforts. 12

Relationship to MPOs RTPOs should be integrated with the MPO program in urban areas. The federal MPO and state RTPO requirements of these organizations are complementary. 13

MPO Duties Coordinate the metropolitan planning process for all members and participants Develop and Adopt the: –Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) –Agreements (MOAs) with Transit and DOT(s) –Documented Public Participation Process –Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) –Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) –Annual Listing of Obligated Projects Self-Certify compliance with federal regulations 14

RTPO Membership and Organizational Structure 15

RTPO Policy Board 16 Membership must include: Cities and towns Counties WSDOT Transit agencies Ports Private employers RTPOs are also encouraged to include tribes.

Lead Planning Agency RTPO Organizational Structure 17 Policy Board Technical Advisory Committee Signatories to the Interlocal Agreement, with WSDOT, Transit Agencies, Tribes, Ports, and others. Staff from the entities on the Policy Board and any additional entities as desired -Staff to the RTPO -Determined by the Policy Board -Responsible to both committees and for delivering the RTPO work plan (UPWP) Administrative planning funds Membership is documented in the Interlocal Agreement

RTPO Policy Board, continued RCW Each regional transportation planning organization shall create a transportation policy board. Transportation policy boards shall provide policy advice to the regional transportation planning organization and shall allow representatives … within the region to participate in policy making. 18

RTPO Policy Board, continued RCW Any members of the house of representatives or the state senate whose districts are wholly or partly within the boundaries of the regional transportation planning organization are considered ex officio, nonvoting policy board members of the regional transportation planning organization. This does not preclude legislators from becoming full- time, voting board members. 19

RTPO Duties and Functions 20

The MPO, in cooperation with the State (DOT) and operators of publicly owned transit, develops a UPWP that: –Documents planning activities to be performed with federal funds –Discusses planning priorities facing the metropolitan area, regardless of funding source The UPWP includes: –Statements & Budget of work to be done –Who will perform the work –Milestones and timelines Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) 21

There are two primary sources of federal transportation planning funds available to the MPO for operations: –FHWA PL-112 Funds –FTA Section 5303 Funds The UPWP is developed annually (or biennially) and adopted by the Policy Board. State DOT recommends approval of UPWP by FHWA/FTA The UPWP (and any amendments) must be approved by FHWA/FTA before any costs may be incurred. UPWP, cont’d 22

Functions of RTPOs RCW Prepare and periodically update a transportation strategy for the region. Prepare a regional transportation plan as set forth in RCW that is consistent with countywide planning policies Review Regional Transportation Plans every two years. Designate a lead planning agency to coordinate preparation of the regional transportation plan and carry out the other responsibilities of the organization. 23

Functions of RTPOs, continued RCW Develop, in cooperation with the department of transportation, operators of public transportation services and local governments within the region, a six-year regional transportation improvement program… which proposes regionally significant transportation projects and programs and transportation demand management measures. Where appropriate, certify that countywide planning policies adopted under RCW 36.70A.210 and the adopted regional transportation plan are consistent.36.70A.210 Include specific opportunities and projects to advance special needs coordinated transportation, as defined in RCW 47.06B.012, in the coordinated transit-human services transportation plan, after providing opportunity for public comment.47.06B

Functions of RTPOs, continued RCW Review level of service methodologies used by cities and counties… …Develop level of service standards or alternative transportation performance measures. Submit to the agency council on coordinated transportation, as provided in chapter 47.06B RCW, beginning on July 1, 2007, and every four years thereafter, an updated plan that includes the elements identified by the council…47.06B 25

Planning Opportunity Coordinated Human Services Transportation Plan RTPOs have the opportunity to develop a Coordinated Human Services Transportation Plan (HSTP) which: Address Emergency Management transportation needs for people who cannot transport themselves Provide new technologies to better deliver transportation to people with special needs Provides transportation alternatives for people with special needs crossing jurisdictional boundaries The plans are required to be updated every four years. 26

Elements of RTPs and RTIPs 27

28 Moving Washington

Plan Relationships Cities and counties develop comprehensive plans Counties develop countywide or multicounty planning policies Regional transportation plans are then developed to mesh with local plans and countywide planning policies Each regional transportation plan is a guide for achieving consistency among the local transportation plans in the region 29

Regional Transportation Plan RCW Each RTPO shall develop, adopt, and periodically update a regional transportation plan that: Is based on a least cost planning methodology that identifies the most cost-effective facilities, services, and programs; 30

Regional Transportation Plan, continued RCW Identifies and gives emphasis to those facilities, services, and programs that exhibit one or more characteristics: Crosses member county lines Is or will be used by a significant number of people who live or work outside the respective county Significant impacts are expected in more than one county Potentially adverse impacts can be better avoided or mitigated through adherence to regional policies Transportation issue remedy has regional significance 31

Regional Transportation Plan, continued RCW Provides for system continuity Establishes level of service standards for state highways and state ferry routes Includes a financial plan Assesses regional development patterns, capital investment and other measures Includes a proposed regional transportation approach Where appropriate, defines the relationship of high capacity transportation providers and other public transit providers regarding responsibility for and coordination between services and facilities 32

Regional Transportation Plan, continued RCW (3) All transportation projects, programs, and transportation demand management measures within the region that have an impact upon regional facilities or services must be consistent with the plan and with the adopted regional growth and transportation strategies. 33

Regional Transportation Improvement Programs WAC Regional transportation improvement programs (TIPs) are developed at least once every two years and shall: Be developed on a cooperative basis Consist of a list of regionally significant transportation projects and programs Consist of regionally significant projects included in the local six- year transit development plans and six-year comprehensive transportation programs Include all proposed WSDOT projects in the region; Include only projects consistent with the regional transportation plan; Include a financial section 34

WSDOT’s Role in RTPOs 35

WSDOT’s Role with RTPOs WSDOT (As Asset Manager and Fiduciary Agent): Monitors and ensures compliance with state regulations Provides technical assistance and shares data Serves as a member of the Policy Board Serves as a member of the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Coordinates and consults on regional transportation planning activities and studies Coordinates inter-agency planning activities Administers the RTPO reimbursable grant program Approves the RTPO Unified Planning Work Programs and Budgets Approves written requests for subcontracting 36

Administrative and Financial Aspects of RTPOs 37

RTPO Financing RCW RTPOs receive biennial state appropriations through WSDOT to carry out their program. Funding is calculated by formula and distributed to the lead agencies. This formula includes a base amount for each county within an RTPO plus an amount based on population. 38

RTPO Financing, continued RCW WSDOT can retain an amount to be administered as a discretionary grant program for special regional planning projects. This includes grants to allow counties with significant transportation interests in common with an adjoining county to participate in that region’s planning efforts. 39

Programming Opportunities Surface Transportation Program (STP) Future RTPO roles are under discussion with the Governor’s Office and the MAP-21 Steering Committee $175 million for Washington in FFY13. Continued flexible funding for Federal-aid highways, plus a requirement that the equivalent of 15% of the FFY09 bridge apportionment be set-aside for bridges off the federal-aid system. Eliminates several stand-alone programs but makes them eligible uses of STP funding. 50% of funds subject to sub-allocation based on population, the other 50% can be spent anywhere in the state. 40

Consolidated Highway Program Structure 41

Summary 42

RTPOs are: Responsible for coordinating transportation planning within their region. Required by law to develop long-range transportation plans cooperatively with the state, transit operators, and locals and are encouraged to include tribes. Required by law to certify that the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element is consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan. Required by law to develop a six-year transportation improvement program. The RTPO program is administered by WSDOT. Where there is an MPO, the lead planning agency is the same agency (except for Lewis Clark Valley MPO and Palouse RTPO) 43 Summary

44 Questions?