12-Oct-15 The Tsunami Evaluation Coalition. 12-Oct-15 The Tsunami Evaluation Coalition (TEC) January 2005: Several agencies discussed with ALNAP how to.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Questions and Answers: About the ECB Project AIM Standing Team workshop: Joint Evaluations Casablanca, November 2011.

Advertisements

1 Preliminary Consultative Meeting on Building a Global Network of NGOs for Community Resilience to Disasters, Geveva, October Global Platform for.

Group 2 Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response (AADMER) A common ground for Disaster risk identification, assessment and monitoring; Disaster.

International Recovery Platform (IRP) Current context for recovery Post-disaster recovery leads to rebuilding risk. Support to recovery by UN agencies,

Delivering as One Viet Nam Country-led Evaluation Kigali, 20 October 2009.

Delivering as One UN Albania October 2009 – Kigali.

Workshop B NGOs and the Cluster Roll-Out Strengths and Suggestions for the Future.

FTI AS A CATALYST FOR REFORM: Madagascars Experience October 13, th Annual NETF Seminar.

A REVIEW OF THE HUMANITARIAN COUNTRY TEAM (HCT) IN NIGERIA & RECOMMENDATION FOR WAY FORWARD Presented at the HCT 05/06/2014.

SSATP ANNUAL MEETING 2010 Kampala, UGANDA OCTOBER 18-21, 2010 TRANSPORT STRATEGY UPDATING PROCESS IN BURKINA FASO Sub-Saharan Africa Transport Policy Program.

Tsunami Evaluation Coalition 8-Aug-15 The Tsunami Evaluation Coalition: What Worked and What Did Not? European Evaluation Society 2006.

TEC Initial Findings v040 8-Aug-15 Initial findings from the TEC.

Presentation title goes here this is dummy text Joint Office : -What have we learned?- “Delivering as One” through Joint Programming and Joint Programmes.

1 UNity in diversity One UN Steering Committee Meeting 9 November 2007 One UN-Delivering as One in Rwanda.

UN REDD a collaborative programme of UN agencies on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation to support developing countries FAO-UNDP-UNEP.

Briefing to UNFPA on UNHCR Operations Geneva 07 February 2007.

Long Term Perspectives on the Response to the Indian Ocean Tsunami, 2004 Oslo, 19 October 2009 Joint Evaluation Findings Public Presentation.

Accountability in the humanitarian system Global Cluster Leads Donor Meeting April 21 st 2009.

July 2011: OECD-DAC Working Party on Aid Effectiveness, Paris June 2011: Joint Global Assembly of Open Forum and Better Aid Platform to prepare for HLF4.

Humanitarian coordination S3.1 session day 5 3 training delivered by lead partners Habitat for Humanity, RedR and Shelter Centre on 2 nd to 9 th July 2011.

UNCTAD ICT and E-Business Branch 9/17/2015 / 1 Joint UNCTAD-ITU-UNESCAP Workshop Information Society Measurements in Asia-Pacific Bangkok, July 2006.

Global Action Plan and its implementation in other regions Meeting for Discussion of the draft Plan for the Implementation of the Global Strategy to Improve.

Project Overview, Objectives, Components and Targeted Outcomes

Mozambique Floods and Cyclone RTE 22-Sep-151 Mozambique Floods and Cyclone Real Time Evaluation Cosgrave J, Gonçalves, G, Martyris D, Polastro R, and M.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Danida EVALUATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PARIS DECLARATION ON AID EFFECTIVENESS Presentation prepared for DAC Network.

Coordination and Net Working on DRR Rapid Emergency Assessment and Coordination Team (REACT) Bishkek November, 2009.

Strengthening Results-Based Management Capacities to Support National Development Project Status November 2013.

The IASC Humanitarian Cluster Approach Angelika Planitz UNDP BCPR Developing Surge Capacity for Early Recovery March 2006.

The Humanitarian Community MPAT Tempest Express – March 2008 Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Disaster Response in Asia and the Pacific: A Guide to International Tools and Services.

Independent Monitoring & Evaluation for Accountability Presented to Health Sector Steering Committee, 21 st July 2009.

1 Joint humanitarian impact evaluation: options paper Tony Beck 25 th ALNAP Meeting, London, 18 th November 2009 Commissioned by the Evaluation and Studies.

“Beyond 2008” A Briefing 11th European Conference on Rehabilitation and Drug Policy Working together – Partners for Change Ljubljana, 6 June,

United Nations Office of Funds and Programmes Cape Verde.

Tsunami Evaluation Coalition (TEC): An Introduction.

NCSA AS A TOOL FOR INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (ARMENIA EXPERIENCE) Anahit Simonyan June, 2004 Bratislava UNDP ARMENIA.

Safe community environments and disaster resilient societies Asian Disaster Reduction & Response Network (ADRRN) Founded in 2002 and now has 34 members.

The Poverty Environment Initiative (PEI) in the Asia Pacific Region Draft Outline of the Regional Strategy.

The International Aid Transparency Initiative Why is it relevant to private aid organisations? Partos Plaza, Netherlands, 14 th October 2010.

2 Why do we need a “data revolution” and what should it include? What do we want to achieve? What do we need to produce What are the next steps?

LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROGRAMMES (LEAPs) Succesfull SEA for local planning.

UN Reform and the CCA / UNDAF process UN Reform and the CCA / UNDAF process.

Tsunami Evaluation Coalition: Progress to Date. Background OCHA, WHO, ALNAP Secretariat + DANIDA, USAID Level 1 Purpose: To promote a sector wide approach.

JICA Tanzania Office DPG-Health 7 Nov Joint International Study on “Effective TC for CD” （ What it is and the current status) Tanzania Joint Management.

1 SUPPLY DIVISION Procurement and Supply Management Technical Assistance.

ALNAP and the ICRC By John Mitchell. ALNAP is ‘a unique sector-wide network comprising most of the major actors in international humanitarian relief’

NDIA PMCS May Rosslyn, VA Earned Value Management System Acceptance Working Group Buddy Everage Working Group Lead.

Achieving the MDGs: RBA Training Workshop Module 2: Managing an Effective Process May 9-12, 2005.

NSDI Strategic Plan Update January 14, NSDI Strategic Plan High-level Timeline 2 Timeframe Activity Dec - Feb Project Start-up – COMPLETED Feb -

More Timely, Credible and Cost Effective Performance Information on Multilateral Partners Presented by: Goberdhan Singh Director of the Evaluation Division.

PROJECT DVPT / REPORTING at ACTED. Executive Summary 1.ACTED PD / Reporting structure 2.The objectives of Reporting 3.Presentation of ACTED’s Main Donors.

Elaine Ireland Global Health Advocacy Officer, International HIV/AIDS Alliance Rome, 9 th February Delivering Effective Aid for Health: International Health.

Bangladesh Joint Country Assistance Evaluation: Assessing Total ODA at the Country Level Presentation to OECD DAC November 2006 Bruce Murray Director General.

NSDI Strategic Plan Update FGDC Coordination Group Meeting November 19, 2013.

UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM IN MADAGASCAR Coordination of the UNDAF Process and the Role of the United Nations system Organizations Joint session of UNDP/UNFPA,

DIPECHO Advocacy Network Initiative (DANI) LESSONS LEARNT & THE WAY FORWARD DMWG Meeting, April 25 th 2008 Presented by Vu Xuan Viet Project Manager CARE.

Strategic Objective 3 Pilot Independent System Wide Evaluation (ISWE) Progress, Emerging Lessons and Next Steps.

“Delivering as One” through Joint Programming and Joint Programmes

Joint Cash Based Transfer (CBT) Feasibility Assessment

KNOWLEDGE SHARING CONCEPT NOTE

Review of integrated PSM resources and tools and introduction to group work Upjeet Chandan ICCM FTT 17th February 2016.

STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING – 25 April 2016

UN REDD FAO-UNDP-UNEP July 2008

IHP+ First Steering Committee Meeting 15 January 2014

Management Group on Statistical Cooperation - MGSC

General Principles Align with country systems whenever they meet the minimum acceptable level. Harmonize among development partners, when all or part of.

Humanitarian Architecture in Bangladesh

Primary Health Care Improvement Global Stakeholder Meting, Geneva

Future of Public Health in Kansas: Local Pilot

Presentation of the project and its activities

Presentation transcript:

12-Oct-15 The Tsunami Evaluation Coalition

12-Oct-15 The Tsunami Evaluation Coalition (TEC) January 2005: Several agencies discussed with ALNAP how to coordinate a tsunami evaluation effort to maximise learning while minimising duplication. February 2005: An ensuing meeting in Geneva led to the foundation of the TEC (guided by a CMG; hosted by ALNAP).

12-Oct-15 What are the TEC’s objectives? Level 1 Purpose To promote a sector wide approach to evaluations of tsunami response in order to optimise sector wide learning. Level 2 Purpose To develop and validate procedures for future establishment of such a coordination mechanism.

12-Oct-15 Who is in it? As with ALNAP the TEC includes: Bilateral Donors UN agencies NGOs and the Red Cross Movement

12-Oct-15 Type of participation? First level: Individual agency evaluations (reports for synthesis). Sharing ToRs and lessons (Online Forum: Evaluation map: who, what, where, when. Second level: Working together on five joint thematic evaluations (cross- cutting for all). Reducing number of agency evaluations (eg, OCHA, WHO, UNDP). Commitment to follow up on findings. Joint evaluations Managing Thematic Evaluations Steering Thematic Evaluations Supporting Thematic Evaluations

12-Oct-15 Five joint thematic evaluations Coordination (incl civil-military issues) Impact on local and national capacities Needs assessments Linking relief, rehabilitation and development (LRRD) Funding study Each thematic evaluation is financed by a series of bilateral donors, UN agencies, and - in some cases - NGOs and the Red Cross.

12-Oct-15 Particpation in Theme Groups Systemic & Cross-cutting ThemesSteering Group Membership Coordination (incl civil-military)OCHA (group lead) UNFPA USAID IFRC UNICEF Needs assessment WHO (co-lead) SDC (co-lead) FAO Funding studyDanida (group lead) Ireland Canada Germany Netherlands Australia Luxemburg Japan World Vision DARA Local / national capacities UNDP (group lead) AIDMI Cordaid ActionAid UNICEF LRRDSida (group lead) ECHO UNICEF OCHA

12-Oct-15

Significant new learning and accountability initiative: New model: multi-partner; decentralised & ‘distributed’. Paradigm shift towards joint evaluations / value added. Responsive to need to reduce evaluative burden.

12-Oct-15 How Jointly is ‘Joint’? Hybrid multi- partner (Distributed evaluation) Participation is open to all stakeholders (classic). Implementation is decentralised & distributed – ie, devolved to different partners in the evaluations. (lead agency; steering committee; working group) Various levels of linkage between separate but parallel and inter-related evaluations. Learning is synthesised at the central level.

12-Oct-15 The TEC timeline February Mar - Jul August Formation of TEC Formation of thematic groups and TOR Recruitment of teams and preparation SeptemberBriefing workshop for the evaluation teams in Geneva Sep - Nov Thematic studies field work TEC meeting in Copenhagen on utilisation & learning. NovemberPost-fieldwork workshop (London) Initial Draft Reports December February Publication of Initial Findings Teams meet to consolidate findings March July 14th Thematic studies finalised Final Synthesis Report Published (at ECOSOC)

12-Oct-15 Find out more at : http: //