Introduction to Quality Matters ™ Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning © MarylandOnline, Inc., 2008. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Target 2018 Pathway to the Future Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Advertisements

A Quality Matters “Quickie”
Trends in Number of High School Graduates: National
Hwy Ops Div1 THE GREAT KAHUNA AWARD !!! TEA 2004 CONFERENCE, MOBILE, AL OCTOBER 09-11, 2004 OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION HIPA-30.
The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah
Horizon 2023 National Enrollment Projections and the Role of California Dr. Lisa Castellino Institutional Research and Planning Data sourced from NCES.
TOTAL CASES FILED IN MAINE PER 1,000 POPULATION CALENDAR YEARS FILINGS PER 1,000 POPULATION This chart shows bankruptcy filings relative to.
The Role of the QM Institution Representative QM Institution Representative Training © MarylandOnline, Inc., All rights reserved.
Quality Matters for New Subscribers © MarylandOnline, Inc., All rights reserved.
Opportunities and Challenges in Secondary Career and Technical Education.
Distance Education at BGSU COSMOS Presentation December 3, 2009 Dr. Bruce Edwards, Associate Vice President for Academic Technology and E-Learning Connie.
The Quality Matters™ K-12 Program Overview. The Quality Matters Program Quality Assurance through Faculty Development and Course Design © 2014 MarylandOnline,
Quality Matters : Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning Teaching with New Technologies May 2007.
BINARY CODING. Alabama Arizona California Connecticut Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri 0 Nebraska New Hampshire.
Quality Matters Overview Deborah Adair, Ph.D. Director, Quality Matters October 14, 2008.
U.S. Civil War Map On a current map of the U.S. identify and label the Union States, the Confederate States, and U.S. territories. Create a map key and.
Hwy Ops Div1 THE GREAT KAHUNA AWARD !!! TEA 2003 CONFERENCE, BURLINGTON, VT SEPTEMBER 3-5, 2003 OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION HIPA-30.
This chart compares the percentage of cases filed in Maine under chapter 13 with the national average between 1999 and As a percent of total filings,
Fasten your seatbelts we’re off on a cross country road trip!
Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.
Judicial Circuits. If You Live In This State This Is Your Judicial Circuit Alabama11th Circuit Alaska 9th Circuit Arkansas 8th Circuit Arizona 9th Circuit.
1 Overview: The Federation of State Beef Councils.
1. AFL-CIO What percentage of the funds received by Alabama K-12 public schools in school year was provided by the state of Alabama? a)44% b)53%
The United States.
It’s been 18 years… 1996 Purchasing Power compared to cents to the dollar. What $1.00 could buy in 1996 now costs $1.48.
Directions: Label Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia--- then color.
 As a group, we thought it be interesting to see how many of our peers drop out of school.  Since in the United States education is so important, we.
Quality Matters TM Overview ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved Updated
CHAPTER 7 FILINGS IN MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR CHAPTER 7 FILINGS This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
Social Security Administration’s EDR Partnership Update Presented by: Robin Fearce Robin Fearce SSA Project Officer for Electronic Death Registration Initiative.
Study Cards The East (12) Study Cards The East (12) New Hampshire New York Massachusetts Delaware Connecticut New Jersey Rhode Island Rhode Island Maryland.
Sub-regions Project. Project Instructions Each Student will be assigned a sub-region of the United States of America Each Student will find the following.
Hawaii Alaska (not to scale) Alaska GeoCurrents Customizable Base Map text.
US MAP TEST Practice
Education Level. STD RATE Teen Pregnancy Rates Pre-teen Pregnancy Rate.
TOTAL CASE FILINGS - MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR Total Filings This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
50 Nifty United States Fifty nifty United States from thirteen original colonies; Fifty nifty stars in the flag that billows so beautif’ly in the breeze.
The United States is a system that can be broken into 5 major parts or regions.
1st Hour2nd Hour3rd Hour Day #1 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5.
NEADA Winter Meeting February 28, 2017.
The United States Song Wee Sing America.
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
The United States.
Physicians per 1,000 Persons
USAGE OF THE – GHz BAND IN THE USA
Content Objective: Language Objectives:
EVVE Implementation – August 2013 Northern Mariana Islands
Percentage of Fully Electronic* Death Records Filed
Name the State Flags Your group are to identify which state the flag belongs to and sign correctly to earn a point.
GLD Org Chart February 2008.
EVVE Vital Records Implementation Northern Mariana Islands
Membership Update July 13, 2016.
2008 presidential election
Percentage of Partially Electronic* Death Records Filed
State Adoption of Uniform State Test
The States How many states are in the United States?
State Adoption of NMLS ESB
AIDS Education & Training Center Program Regional Centers
Table 2.3: Beds per 1,000 Persons by State, 2013 and 2014
Regions of the United States
DO NOW: TAKE OUT ANY FORMS OR PAPERS YOU NEED TO TURN IN
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Presidential Electoral College Map
2008 presidential election
WASHINGTON MAINE MONTANA VERMONT NORTH DAKOTA MINNESOTA MICHIGAN
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
The estimated number of adults and adolescents living with AIDS in each region of the 50 states and the District of Columbia increased from 1993 through.
CBD Topical Sales Restrictions by State (as of May 23, 2019)
AIDS Education & Training Center Program Regional Centers
USAGE OF THE 4.4 – 4.99 GHz BAND IN THE USA
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Quality Matters ™ Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning © MarylandOnline, Inc., All rights reserved.

What is Quality Matters?

A set of standards (rubric) for the design of online and hybrid courses A peer review process (faculty to faculty) for reviewing and improving online and hybrid courses A faculty development tool used by instructional development staff Quality Matters is …

The Quality Matters Rubric

Factors Affecting Course Quality  Course design QM REVIEWS THIS  Course delivery (i.e. teaching, faculty performance)  Course content  Course management system  Institutional infrastructure  Faculty training and readiness  Student engagement and readiness

 Consisting of:  8 key areas (general standards) of course quality  40 specific review standards  Including 17 essential standards  and detailed annotations and examples of good practice for all 40 standards The Rubric is the Core of QM

 The 8 general standards: 1. Course Overview and Introduction 2. Learning Objectives 3. Assessment and Measurement 4. Resources and Materials 5. Learner Interaction 6. Course Technology 7. Learner Support 8. Accessibility The Rubric is the Core of QM Key components must align. }

 A statement introduces the student to the course and the structure of the student learning  Instructions make the organization of the course easy to understand  Learning activities foster interaction:  instructor-student  content-student  student-student (if appropriate)  Clear standards are set for instructor response and availability Some Essential Standards

 Learning Objectives describe measurable outcomes  Module/unit learning objectives describe outcomes that are measurable and consistent with course learning objectives  Instructional materials contribute to the achievement of the learning objectives  Course assessments measure the achievement of the learning objectives Standards that Relate to Alignment

Quality Matters Principles

 Improves online/hybrid course quality  Stimulates a campus dialog among faculty and instructional development staff on best practices in online instruction  Helps build a campus culture dedicated to the continuous improvement of online learning  Helps persuade internal and external stakeholders that the quality of online and hybrid offerings is a major institutional priority Principal Value of Quality Matters

 The QM toolset and process are: 1. a faculty-driven, peer review process, and 2. a collaborative process among faculty peers 3. committed to continuous quality improvement 4. based in national standards of best practice, the research literature and instructional design principles, and 5. designed to promote student learning  Courses do not have to be “perfect” but QM aims at better than just “good enough.” Underlying Principles

 Not about an individual instructor (it’s about the design of a specific course)  Not about faculty evaluation (it’s about the quality and effectiveness of a course)  Not a win/lose or pass/fail test (it’s a diagnostic process to facilitate continuous improvement of online/hybrid courses) What the QM Process is Not

 Internal course review/improvement processes  Component in online/hybrid quality assurance programs  Guidelines for online course development  Checklist for improvement of existing online courses  Component of faculty development/training programs  Basis for institutional distance learning policies  An element in regional and professional accreditation Expanded Uses of the Quality Matters Rubric

 Overview Sessions for campus leaders and/or faculty and staff  Applying the QM Rubric (APPQMR)  Individual vs. Group Training  Online or on-site  Online Peer Reviewer Certification  Other Workshops  Building Your Online/Hybrid Course (BYOC)  Improving Your Online/Hybrid Course (IYOC)  Specialized workshops Building an Effective Course Introduction Developing Measurable Course Objectives Implementing Accessibility Tools Training Options

Quality Matters Organization

 Statewide non-profit consortium dedicated to support of distance learning in Maryland  Partners: 14 community colleges, 5 senior institutions  Goals 1. Provide statewide leadership in distance education 2. Maintain a Web gateway for online higher education in Maryland 3. Collaborate on Faculty training 4. Facilitate online course and program sharing  Goals 3 and 4 led to the creation of Quality Matters Quality Matters Was Launched by MarylandOnline

 In 2003, MOL sought funding for a project to…  Develop a rubric for online course design, and  A peer review process to apply these standards  In a manner that was replicable and scalable  Grantor: FIPSE (The Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education)  Title: “Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning”  Grant period: 3 Years: 9/03 – 8/06  Award: $509,177 FIPSE Funds the Quality Matters Project

 Collaborate among 19 MarylandOnline schools to develop and test standards  Engage limited involvement of non-MOL institutions  Make presentations on QM progress at regional and national conferences  Develop a sustainable quality assurance process in Maryland  Create a replicable process for institutions and consortia beyond Maryland Original Scope of the Project

 Early presentations generated widespread interest  MarylandOnline began to receive recognition for QM  WCET Outstanding Work (WOW) Award, 2005  USDLA 21 st Century Best Practice Award, 2005  Maryland Distance Learning Association (MDLA) Best Program Award,  The Sloan Consortium online workshops introduced hundreds of faculty members and staff to QM.  Peer reviewer training spread far beyond Maryland:  700+ faculty trained to review online courses using the rubric  individuals from 158 different institutions in 28 states Success of the FIPSE Grant

 Grant ended in August 2006  MOL decided to continue Quality Matters as a self- supporting activity in order to …  Maintain the integrity of the rubric & process  Guarantee QM’s availability to MOL schools  Continue momentum of nationwide adoption  Participate in the further evolution and enhancement of online education standards  Today, Quality Matters is non-profit subscription service with rapidly growing participation Quality Matters as Non-Profit Subsidiary of MOL

 More than 250 colleges and universities subscribe to Quality Matters  Including 12 statewide groups of institutions  More than 4,000 faculty and staff have been trained  QM continues to earn national recognition for…  Outstanding Contributions to Faculty Development (Sloan Consortium, 2007)  Leadership in Distance Learning (U. S. Distance Learning Association, 2008) Results After 2 Years of Self- Support Operation

MONTANA WYOMING IDAHO WASHINGTON OREGON NEVADA UTAH CALIFORNIA ARIZONA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA NEBRASKA COLORADO NEW MEXICO TEXAS OKLAHOMA KANSAS ARKANSAS LOUISIANA MISSOURI IOWA MINNESOTA WISCONSIN ILLINOIS INDIANA KENTUCKY TENNESSEE MISS ALABAMA GEORGIA FLORIDA SOUTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA VIRGINIA WV OHIO MICHIGAN NEW YORK PENN MARYLAND DELAWARE NEW JERSEY CONN RI MASS MAINE VT NH ALASKA HAWAII PUERTO RICO VIRGIN ISLANDS Some Subscribers in State Statewide Subscribers 7/1/2008 Quality Matters: An Emerging National Standard

 Visit the Quality Matters Website:   Or Contact  Ron Legon, Executive Director Tel:  Deb Adair, Director Tel: For More Information