Michigan MSPs June 2007 Wendy Tackett, PhD, iEval

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rigorous Science Content and Instructional Practice Ms. Katrina Slone, Knott County Public Schools Dr. Kent Price, Morehead State University GEAR UP Alliance.
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
LINDSAY CLARE MATSUMURA HELEN GARNIER BRIAN JUNKER LAUREN RESNICK DONNA DIPRIMA BICKEL June 30, 2010 Institute of Educational Sciences Conference Evidence.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Collaborative Evaluation Communities in Urban Schools.
1 Minnesota MSP Grants June 2007 Leader Learning x Teacher Learning for Student Success Highlighting Professional Development Burnsville-Eagan-Savage School.
ESTEEMS (ESTablishing Excellence in Education of Mathematics and Science) Project Overview and Evaluation Dr. Deborah H. Cook, Director, NJ SSI MSP Regional.
Project RACE: Rigorous Academic Curriculum for Everyone.
© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.
Closing the Gap for Mathematics in Middle School and High School Visionary Leadership for the 21st Century: Closing the Gaps That Matter February 22-24,
What should be the basis of
What is program success? Wendy Tackett, Ph.D., Evaluator Valerie L. Mills, Project Director Adele Sobania, STEM Oakland Schools MSP, Michigan.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Literacy Coaching as a Component of Professional Development Joanne F. Carlisle, PhD Coauthors: Kai Cortina, Dan Berebitsky (University of Michigan), and.
This work was supported in part by MSP grant # through the National Science Foundation. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily.
Teacher Professional Development Programs in Grades 3-8: Promoting Teachers’ and Students’ Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering Beth McGrath &
In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure. McPherson
Stone-Robinson Math Information Night Dr. Nicholas King, Principal December 9, 2014.
Studying Lesson Study Results from Michigan’s Round 1 Mathematics/Science Partnership Grant Projects.
1 Developing an Evaluation Plan _____________________ The Mathematically- Connected Communities MSP Developed for the February, MSP Conference Dr.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Outreach to Districts and Schools ?Is there a drop down menu with three items, or does it go to a page on outreach, or both?
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
The Impact of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative on Teachers, Students, and Learning Maine’s Middle School 1-to-1 Laptop Program Dr. David L. Silvernail.
THE DRAGON CONNECTION March Who are we?  Jefferson City Schools  Small, rural school district 60 miles north of Atlanta, 18 miles north of the.
The Impact of the MMP on Student Achievement Cindy M. Walker, PhD Jacqueline Gosz, MS University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Research Indicators for Sustaining and Institutionalizing Change CaMSP Network Meeting April 4 & 5, 2011 Sacramento, CA Mikala L. Rahn, PhD Public Works,
Teacher and Principal Evaluation Pilot (TPEP). Objectives & Agenda What we’re going to learn General Pilot Details …. Who, What, How, What Then Explore.
Teacher Algebra Network: Our Model for Professional Development in Three Rural North Carolina Counties Presented by Katie J. Mawhinney and Tracie McLemore.
Title I Annual Meeting State of School Address
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
The Role of the Institutional Setting in Teachers’ Development of Ambitious Instructional Practices in Middle-Grades Mathematics Paul Cobb Kara Jackson.
Governing Board Meeting September 29, 2011 Annual State of the School Address Mr. R. Hackler, Principal.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.
Making a Difference in Heidi A. Ramírez, PhD Chief Academic Officer Milwaukee Public Schools.
Professional Development in Challenged Environments A Model for Effective PD.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Using SEC Data for Program Evaluation Report on SEC Data Analysis for a State MSP.
RESEARCH BINGO!. Compared to teachers in a flexible block schedule, teachers in a traditional, fixed-period schedule are more likely to implement a variety.
THINKING ABOUT MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTION (TMI) A Study of Elementary and Middle School Principals’ Leadership Content Knowledge Education Development Center.
Professional Development in Challenged Environments Project: Making Mathematics Matter (PM³) A Model for Effective PD Conversations Among Colleagues March.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
1 SEC State Collaborative Meeting San Diego February 10-12, 2008 Idaho’s PRINCIPAL ACADEMY of LEADERSHIP and the SEC Peter Kavouras Curt Rathburn.
Ohio’s Mathematics Science Partnership All New OMSP Programs must use the Survey of Enacted Curriculum.
2011 MEAP Results Board of Education Presentation | 07 May 2012 Romeo Community Schools | Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
 New Professional Standards Media &Technology October 3, 2011 Presenters: Kelly Brannock & Cynthia Sartain The webinar will begin at 10:30 a.m. Backchannel:
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Principal Investigator: Dr. Ann Robinson Project Director: Ms. Kristy Kidd Evaluator: Dr. Jill Adelson In collaboration with: Museum of Science, Boston.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant (DPI)
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
MSP Evaluation in the Far North Evaluator Collaboration Evaluation Design Action Research Studies.
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
Teacher Voice Represented in District Level Decision Making
Report on SEC Data Analysis
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Michigan MSPs June 2007 Wendy Tackett, PhD, iEval

Shared Instrumentation Measures of: Teacher knowledge Michigan Test for Teacher Certification (MTTC) Learning Mathematics for Teaching (LMT) Instructional knowledge & curriculum implementation Survey of Enacted Curriculum (SEC) Science and Mathematics Program Improvement (SAMPI) lesson observations Principal knowledge Lenses on Learning (LOL) Student knowledge MEAP

Shared Comparison Group Designed not to deny services to teachers & students Share the costs among participants Logistics Non-participants from Macomb County ISD (round 1) served as 1st comparison group Separate unfunded district (round 2) served as comparison group Resulted in a rigorous evaluation design at a reduced cost

Collaboration is Essential At the administrative-level Focused efforts Reduction in costs Time savings At the teacher participant-level Create a community of learners Increased knowledge base Utilize technology to save time and increase learning Maximize the benefits for student learning

Common Results Sharing resources to make for more accurate analyses Must consider many variables Teacher participation levels in coaching Teacher participation in math institutes Principal participation in program Baseline data about teacher instruction Baseline data about teacher content & pedagogical content knowledge

Common Results: SAMPI Statistically significant improvements in: Overall rating for classroom instruction Subcategory ratings of lesson implementation, lesson content, & classroom culture Substantive student-student interaction Appropriate pacing for all student levels Adequate reflection time Growing use & comfort with teacher use of technology Differences between teachers using standards- based math curricula vs. traditional curricula

Common Results: SAMPI 2006 Spring MSP conference in Boston Iris Weiss discussed impact of building climate on student learning We developed survey that addressed five elements of building climate Completed one-way ANOVA with climate score and various observational elements from SAMPI observation Found statistically significant differences (p<.05) in behaviors observed in the classroom between teachers in buildings with high climate ratings (3.0 or higher) and the rest of classrooms

Common Results: SAMPI Example from MERC, Oakland Schools

Common Results: LMT & MTTC Significantly greater knowledge of mathematical content and pedagogy Attendance at three or more content- focused or curriculum-based courses had a statistically significant positive impact on the pedagogical content knowledge of teachers Teacher growth in math content knowledge highly related to student motivation in math

Common Results: LMT LMT ALMT B Attend 3 or more courses 56%69% Attend 1-2 courses 36%54% Comparison group 51%48% Example from MERC, Oakland Schools

Common Results: MTTC Example from Washtenaw County

Common Results: MEAP Round 2 projects still too early to determine impact on student academic achievement Round 1 projects confirmed increases on MEAP math in elementary and middle grades

Common Results: Coach Observations & SEC Teachers are exhibiting deeper understandings of math - leading to more math talk & student discourse Teachers strongly support the professional development sessions Teachers report greater instructional focus and alignment to state standards Teacher concerns moved from logistics to student learning

Keys to Success in Evaluation Collaborate with your colleagues Share tools Share comparison groups Share findings & suggestions for improvement Easier cross-program comparisons Maximizes resources in purchasing tools & analyzing results More robust comparisons (higher n)

For More Information Michigan MSP website MTTC Study Guide Survey of Enacted Curriculum (SEC) Learning Mathematics for Teaching (LMT) SAMPI