Curriculum & Instruction Idaho Falls District # 91.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NYC Teacher Data Initiative: An introduction for Principals ESO Focus on Professional Development October 2008.
Advertisements

All who have meditated on the art of governing mankind have been convinced that the fate of empires depends on the education of youth. - Aristotle.
Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program Gateway and End of Course 2007.
Walking to Improved Reading Outcomes A Flexible Skill Grouping Success Story Sally Helton and Rachell Keys Tigard Tualatin School District, Oregon.
Future Ready Schools ABCs/AYP Background Briefing August 23, 2007 Lou Fabrizio, Ph.D. Director of Accountability Services NC Department of Public.
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Recognized ASCA Model Program Application (the RAMP application)
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) An Overview. Resources Policy Guidance NCLB Brochures
NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 23, 2007.
NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 28, 2008.
Newark Kids Count 2011 A City Profile of Child Well-Being Advocates for Children of New Jersey 35 Halsey Street Newark, NJ
A Principals Guide to Title I Requirements. 2 The Basics Signed into law in 1964 by President Johnson, next reauthorization 2007 Allocations to district.
2008 May 31Standards PD: Day 2 morning: slide 1 Feedback from Yesterday We want to begin today by reviewing some the things you said yesterday afternoon.
Closing the Achievement Gap in Americas Public Schools U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
Instructional Decision Making
1 R-2 Report: Success in algebra by the end of ninth grade A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad Stam, Chief Academic Officer Instructional.
A presentation to the Board of Education
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Enhancing our guiding philosophy of continuous improvement
Continuous Improvement Update The Integration of Continuous Improvement and Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment & Technology October 13 th, 2008.
Building Leadership Team October Agenda Big Picture Formative Overview PLC Overview SMART Goal and Action Plan Plan.
Agenda - January 28, 2009 Professional Learning Community – Jefferson HS Learning by Doing What does the data tell us? ITED results SIP Goals Data Questions.
2007 ITBS/ ITED Results Cedar Rapids Community Schools.
Curriculum & Instruction Idaho Falls District # 91.
Factors Associated with High Achieving Schools findings of Gordon Cawelti – Education Research Service 1.The reliance and persistent focus on standards.
Powerful Professional Development. Its time to end sort-of staff development. Schmoker, 1999.
SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY Title I For additional information contact the school at
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
Shawboro Elementary School Home of the Mustangs School Improvement Plan Results and Next Steps October, 2009.
Chief Research Officer Ohio Department of Education
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
Faster IS Better: Accelerating to Success Kay Teague And Michael Warren.
No Child Left Behind The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), also known as the “No Child Left Behind Act,” will have.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Middle School 8 period day. Rationale Low performing academic scores on Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) - specifically in mathematics.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
School Improvement Advisory Committee October 15, 2008 Welcome!
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK (SPF) Clark County School District.
Co-Teaching Overview Mason City Community School District 2010.
1  Janet Hensley  Pam Lange  Barb Rowenhorst Meade School District.
Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data.
Preparing for Cycle III School and District Accountability Ratings and AYP Determinations Information Sessions August 26 & 27, 2004 Juliane Dow, Associate.
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
No Child Left Behind The New Age: No Child Left Behind.
SUGGESTED TALKING POINTS IN COMMUNICATING WITH THE MEDIA AND PUBLIC ON HIGH SCHOOL PROFICIENCY TEST.
1 Standards, Curriculum, and Research Mathematically Connected Communities (MC 2 ) Adapted from a PowerPoint by Barbara A. Austin, Ph.D.
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training School Improvement.
1 Differentiated Accountability. 2 Florida’s Differentiated Accountability Model On July 28, 2008, Florida was named one of six states to pilot a differentiated.
May 25,  MSP scores are compared against a uniform bar.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are not representative of individual.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
1 Standards, Curriculum, and Research Mathematically Connected Communities (MC 2 ) Adapted from a PowerPoint by Barbara A. Austin, Ph.D.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Testing & Accountability Update TAKS, EOC, & STAAR.
There are only two ways to assess student performance: 1.Norms: We can compare it to other performances we have observed. 2.Standards: We can compare it.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Raising the Bar: Common Core State Standards Idaho State Department of Education
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
Title One Program Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Curriculum & Instruction Idaho Falls District # 91

Spectacular achievement is always preceded by unspectacular preparation. Roger Staubach

Factors Associated with High Achieving Schools 1.Focus on clear standards and goals. 2.Daily presence of visible principal. 3.A faculty of teachers ensuring that all are taught and learn the standards. Gordon Cawelti – Education Research Service

Factors Associated with High Achieving Schools Cont. 4.Teachers working collaboratively to focus on student learning. 5.Concentration over a period of time on the changes needed to improve learning. Gordon Cawelti – Education Research Service

Curricular Chaos Written Reported Tested Taught

District 91 Curriculum Unity Model Taught Written Tested Reported

Traditional Report Card Taught Written Tested Reported

Without guaranteed & viable curriculum, four variables predict student achievement… 1.Type of community 2.Poverty rate 3.The education of their parents 4.Number of parents in home

Idaho Content Standards Webpage…

Talking the Talk Coordination : Geometry is geometry is geometry Articulation : Avoiding gaps or unnecessary overlaps over a students entire school career Alignment : The match between taught curriculum and tested curriculum.

Three Levels of Alignment The test Teaching Test Teaching Test Teaching No Alignment Surface Alignment Deep Alignment

Four Lenses of Learning

The Achievement Lens How are we doing compared to everyone else? Other Districts? Other Buildings? Other Classrooms? Other Students?

The Proficiency Lens How are we doing against the state selected cut score? What percentage of our students is proficient? Ex: If the cut score for mathematics at 10 th grade is 242, what percentage of our students has reached or exceeded that score??

The Growth Lens How much growth did our students make this year from fall to spring? Ex: Whether students have reached a cut score or not, how much growth did they make in our district in one year? Six months worth? Two years worth?

The Instructional Lens Using the data available from state, district, and classroom assessments, what do principals, teachers, etc. need to change or do to make sure that all students are learning the curriculum?

Do Tests Improve Learning? No. Learning only improves if we change what we are doing based on what we learn from the test results. Allan Olson, NWEA

Tests, by themselves, do not improve learning, any more than a thermometer reduces fever. (Hubert, 2000)

The main factor in improving achievement is a knowledgeable, skillful teacher. (Breaux & Wong, 2003)

Percentile Entering Percentile Leaving Highly Ineffective School/50 th 3 rd Highly Ineffective Teacher Average School/50 th 50 th Average Teacher Highly Effective School/50 th 37 th Highly Ineffective Teacher Highly Ineffective School/50 th 63 rd Highly Effective Teacher Highly Effective School/50 th 78 th Average Teacher Highly Effective School/50 th 96 th Highly Effective Teacher

Teacher Effectiveness (Randall, 2001) In a study, researchers determined that students assigned to three effective teachers in a row grew from the 59th to 76th percentile in three years. A different group, assigned to three ineffective teachers for three years dropped from the 60th to the 42nd percentile in the same time period.

A Little History Practically, if not idealistically, poor education for many students was not a social problem when plenty of low-skilled jobs offering good wages were to be had. It is a problem today when most jobs demand much greater competence. Linda Darling-Hammond, Teacher and Professor

A Look at the Future In 1950 there were sixteen workers for every person on social security; by 2010, there will be only three (SSA, 1996). If not all of these potential workers are productive, our nations social compact will crumble. Linda Darling-Hammond

A Look at the Future High school dropouts now have less than one chance in three of finding work, and if they do find a job, they typically earn less than half as much as they would have twenty years ago. William T. Grant Foundation, 1988

Two things U.S. schools have never before been called upon to do: To teach for understanding. That is, to teach all students, not just a few, to understand ideas deeply and perform proficiently To teach for diversity. That is, to teach in ways that help different kinds of learners find productive paths to knowledge as needed.

Critical Questions Process Discuss Critical Questions in small groups List all questions, concerns, and ideas Rank each listing: –1 – Total Agreement/Key Point –2 – Important Point/Save for later –3 – Save for later Report all 1s from each group to large group

Critical Question 1 What interventions can be provided to students in order for the district to improve in the identified areas of AYP?

ISAT Graduation Cut Scores 2007 Graduation Proficient 2008 Graduation Proficient Reading Math Language Usage219222

ISAT AYP Percent Proficient Targets Approved by State Board of Education Aug Read- ing 66%72%78%84%92%100% Math51%60%70%80%90%100% Lang- uage Usage 66%72%78%84%92%100%

What happens when AYP is not met… YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3YEAR 4YEAR 5YEAR 6YEAR 7 Year 1Year 2Year 1 School Improvement Year 2 School Improvement Year 3 School Improvement Corrective Action Year 4 School Improvement Plan Restructure Year 5 School Improvement Restructuring Status AYP not met Notify parents Offer school choice Provide transportation assistance Revise and implement School Improvement Plan (SIP) Provide professional development Notify parents Offer school choice Provide transportation assistance Offer Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Revise and implement School Improvement Plan (SIP) Provide professional development In addition to the school improvement steps, the district must take at least one of the following corrective actions: Replace some school staff Institute new curricula Decrease management authority of school Appoint outside expert Extend school day/year Restructure school Prepare a restructuring plan to implement at least one of the following: Replace all or most of school staff Contract with an outside entity to operate the school as a public school Re-open the school as a public charter school Restructure the school's governance Turn over to state Implement the restructuring plan

Critical Question 1 Discussion and Ranking What interventions can be provided to students in order for the district to improve in the identified areas of AYP?

Critical Question 2 Are we committed to reporting the written curriculum K-12? If so, what are the barriers to implementation?

Traditional Report Card Taught Written Tested Reported

Standards Based Report Card Taught Written Tested Reported

Critical Question 2 Discussion and Ranking Are we committed to reporting the written curriculum K-12? If so, what are the barriers to implementation?

As an educator, it is impossible to go through a school day without impacting someones life….

…for better or for worse.

What a great responsibility.

What an even greater opportunity.