WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parents as Partners in Education
Advertisements

California Standards for the Teaching Profession
Student Growth Goals Sorting it out. Over- arching Goal 2.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
ESSB 5895: Language In New Evaluation Bill
Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher:  What would you see?  What would you hear?  What would the students be doing or saying?
New Legislation In March of 2010, the Washington State legislature passed Engrossed Second Senate Bill 6696 (E2SSB 6696), a law requiring the following:
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.
Session Materials  Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
All certified staff need to write professional development learning goals. A minimum of three learning goals are required. Individual Professional Development.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Principal Professional Development September 26, SUSD Common Core PD 2013.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
SMHC Talent Development around Instruction To Increase Student Learning Carl Cohn.
KSU Faculty Retreat Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
Assess the effectiveness of strategies Analyze that evidence/data Identify the most powerful teaching strategies Identify and gather evidence/data of student.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
Enhance Professional Growth Principal Evaluation Superintendents are Key in the Assessment of Principal Performance Renae Tostenson EDAD 608 April 2011.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Supplemental Text Project Kenn Ward EDL 678 Dr. Pfennig June 2013.
1 Principal Orientation. 1.The Ohio Resident Educator Program 2.Orientation Purpose 3.Collaborative Cultures 4.What is Residency? 5.Teaching and Learning.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Effective Supervision Supporting the Art and Science of Teaching An overview by Olivia L. Boucher Robert J. Marzano Tony Frontier David Livingston Robert.
Overview of the Teacher Work Sample (TWS)
Update on UDL Implementation Measurement and GD Comparison Districts
Presentation transcript:

WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6 Administrators, 5 Teachers

WSD’s Committee Goals Develop evaluation tools that reflect current research and promote professional growth. Review the current tools and retain those aspects that are effective and eliminate or revamp those aspects that are not. Build off of previous work and experiences. Effectively use multiple measures of student growth for building/instructional improvement Develop tools that are truly beneficial, not just the fulfillment of a requirement. Develop a teacher evaluation system that reflects the WSD vision of becoming a world class school district.

The Process Review of the Research Identify research-based characteristics of effective teacher evaluation. Instructional Framework Development: Dr. Robert Marzano Marzano’s framework is based on the belief that all teachers can improve. We were able to shift our thinking from an evaluation model that finds a teacher satisfactory or not, to an evaluation model that requires growth of every teacher on a specific scale.

The Process Evaluation Tool Format Review current WSD evaluation tool and gather feedback on its strengths and weaknesses. Look at sample evaluation tools from around the U.S. using our evaluation rubric and identify aspects for implementation into the new WSD tool. Agree upon the format for the new evaluation tool and the 4 tier language.

The Process Rubric Development Discuss and unwrap each criterion. Align Marzano’s Framework to each criterion.

The Process Development of the Evaluation Process. Identification of evidence/measures for evaluating each of the performance criterion. Created a differentiated process for evaluation, including timelines, forms for goal-setting, self-assessment/reflection, and the summative evaluation report. Discussed issues regarding student growth data.

Criterion #2 INSTRUCTION: The teacher uses research-based instructional practices to meet the needs of all students. 2.8 The teacher reflects and evaluates the effectiveness of instructional performance to identify areas of pedagogical strength and weakness.

Criterion #3 DIFFERENTIATION: The teacher acquires and uses specific knowledge about students’ cultural, intellectual, and social development to adjust their practice by employing strategies that advance learning. 3.1 The teacher plans and prepares for effective scaffolding of information within lessons and units that progresses toward a deep understanding and transfer of content. 3.2 The teacher uses data to plan and provide interventions that meet individual student learning needs, including ELL, Special Ed and students who come from home environments that offer little support for schooling.

Criterion #6 ASSESSMENT: The teacher uses multiple data elements (both formative and summative) to plan, inform, and adjust instruction and evaluate student learning. 6.1 The teacher uses multiple data elements to modify instruction. 6.2 The teacher uses multiple data elements to design and modify appropriate student assessments. 6.3 The teacher uses multiple measures to demonstrate student growth.

Criterion #8 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE: The teacher participates collaboratively in the educational community to improve instruction, advance the knowledge and practice of teaching as a profession, and ultimately impact student learning. 8.6 The teacher meets growth targets as identified in annual professional goals.

The Process Implementation Plan Develop pilot plan Selection of participants Create a professional development plan Calibration training (Walk Throughs and Instructional Rounds) Develop a plan for evaluating the new tools

The Process Communication Plan Newsletter District Website Meetings WENEA Rep Council Principals’ Meeting Building meetings Parent Involvement

Lessons Learned A collaborative working relationship is a must. We didn’t know what we didn’t know, so technical support from WEA and OSPI has been extremely beneficial. An instructional framework is critical for creating a teacher evaluation tool The professional development for implementation will change the way we look at PD (aligned to framework vs. content specific, calibration training).

Time and timelines. Changing our culture to a professional growth model for educators. Refining the use of data as a measure of effectiveness and determining impact on student learning. Maintaining professional development in the face of diminishing resources. Challenges- Now and in the Future